:: WAYBEL29 semantic presentation  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph for whole article:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Trees again to close it)

theorem Th1: :: WAYBEL29:1  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being non empty 1-sorted
for f being Function of S,T st f is one-to-one & f is onto holds
( f * (f " ) = id T & (f " ) * f = id S & f " is one-to-one & f " is onto )
proof end;

theorem Th2: :: WAYBEL29:2  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for X, Y being non empty set
for Z being non empty RelStr
for S being non empty SubRelStr of Z |^ [:X,Y:]
for T being non empty SubRelStr of (Z |^ Y) |^ X
for f being Function of S,T st f is currying & f is one-to-one & f is onto holds
f " is uncurrying
proof end;

theorem Th3: :: WAYBEL29:3  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for X, Y being non empty set
for Z being non empty RelStr
for S being non empty SubRelStr of Z |^ [:X,Y:]
for T being non empty SubRelStr of (Z |^ Y) |^ X
for f being Function of T,S st f is uncurrying & f is one-to-one & f is onto holds
f " is currying
proof end;

theorem :: WAYBEL29:4  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for X, Y being non empty set
for Z being non empty Poset
for S being non empty full SubRelStr of Z |^ [:X,Y:]
for T being non empty full SubRelStr of (Z |^ Y) |^ X
for f being Function of S,T st f is currying & f is one-to-one & f is onto holds
f is isomorphic
proof end;

theorem :: WAYBEL29:5  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for X, Y being non empty set
for Z being non empty Poset
for T being non empty full SubRelStr of Z |^ [:X,Y:]
for S being non empty full SubRelStr of (Z |^ Y) |^ X
for f being Function of S,T st f is uncurrying & f is one-to-one & f is onto holds
f is isomorphic
proof end;

theorem Th6: :: WAYBEL29:6  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S1, S2, T1, T2 being RelStr st RelStr(# the carrier of S1,the InternalRel of S1 #) = RelStr(# the carrier of S2,the InternalRel of S2 #) & RelStr(# the carrier of T1,the InternalRel of T1 #) = RelStr(# the carrier of T2,the InternalRel of T2 #) holds
for f being Function of S1,T1 st f is isomorphic holds
for g being Function of S2,T2 st g = f holds
g is isomorphic
proof end;

theorem Th7: :: WAYBEL29:7  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for R, S, T being RelStr
for f being Function of R,S st f is isomorphic holds
for g being Function of S,T st g is isomorphic holds
for h being Function of R,T st h = g * f holds
h is isomorphic
proof end;

theorem :: WAYBEL29:8  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
canceled;

theorem :: WAYBEL29:9  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
canceled;

theorem Th10: :: WAYBEL29:10  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for X, Y, X1, Y1 being TopSpace st TopStruct(# the carrier of X,the topology of X #) = TopStruct(# the carrier of X1,the topology of X1 #) & TopStruct(# the carrier of Y,the topology of Y #) = TopStruct(# the carrier of Y1,the topology of Y1 #) holds
[:X,Y:] = [:X1,Y1:]
proof end;

theorem Th11: :: WAYBEL29:11  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for X being non empty TopSpace
for L being non empty up-complete Scott TopPoset
for F being non empty directed Subset of (ContMaps X,L) holds "\/" F,(L |^ the carrier of X) is continuous Function of X,L
proof end;

theorem Th12: :: WAYBEL29:12  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for X being non empty TopSpace
for L being non empty up-complete Scott TopPoset holds ContMaps X,L is directed-sups-inheriting SubRelStr of L |^ the carrier of X
proof end;

theorem Th13: :: WAYBEL29:13  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S1, S2 being TopStruct st TopStruct(# the carrier of S1,the topology of S1 #) = TopStruct(# the carrier of S2,the topology of S2 #) holds
for T1, T2 being non empty TopRelStr st TopRelStr(# the carrier of T1,the InternalRel of T1,the topology of T1 #) = TopRelStr(# the carrier of T2,the InternalRel of T2,the topology of T2 #) holds
ContMaps S1,T1 = ContMaps S2,T2
proof end;

registration
cluster Scott complete continuous -> complete continuous injective T_0 TopRelStr ;
coherence
for b1 being complete continuous TopLattice st b1 is Scott holds
( b1 is injective & b1 is T_0 )
proof end;
end;

registration
cluster Scott complete continuous injective T_0 TopRelStr ;
existence
ex b1 being TopLattice st
( b1 is Scott & b1 is continuous & b1 is complete )
proof end;
end;

registration
let X be non empty TopSpace;
let L be non empty up-complete Scott TopPoset;
cluster ContMaps X,L -> up-complete ;
coherence
ContMaps X,L is up-complete
proof end;
end;

theorem Th14: :: WAYBEL29:14  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for I being non empty set
for J being non-Empty Poset-yielding ManySortedSet of I st ( for i being Element of I holds J . i is up-complete ) holds
I -POS_prod J is up-complete
proof end;

theorem :: WAYBEL29:15  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for I being non empty set
for J being non-Empty reflexive-yielding Poset-yielding ManySortedSet of I st ( for i being Element of I holds
( J . i is up-complete & J . i is lower-bounded ) ) holds
for x, y being Element of (product J) holds
( x << y iff ( ( for i being Element of I holds x . i << y . i ) & ex K being finite Subset of I st
for i being Element of I st not i in K holds
x . i = Bottom (J . i) ) )
proof end;

registration
let X be set ;
let L be non empty reflexive antisymmetric lower-bounded RelStr ;
cluster L |^ X -> lower-bounded ;
coherence
L |^ X is lower-bounded
proof end;
end;

registration
let X be non empty TopSpace;
let L be non empty lower-bounded TopPoset;
cluster ContMaps X,L -> lower-bounded ;
coherence
ContMaps X,L is lower-bounded
proof end;
end;

registration
let L be non empty up-complete Poset;
cluster -> up-complete TopAugmentation of L;
coherence
for b1 being TopAugmentation of L holds b1 is up-complete
proof end;
cluster Scott -> correct TopAugmentation of L;
coherence
for b1 being TopAugmentation of L st b1 is Scott holds
b1 is TopSpace-like
proof end;
end;

registration
let L be non empty up-complete Poset;
cluster up-complete correct strict Scott TopAugmentation of L;
existence
ex b1 being TopAugmentation of L st
( b1 is strict & b1 is Scott )
proof end;
end;

theorem :: WAYBEL29:16  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
canceled;

theorem Th17: :: WAYBEL29:17  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for L being non empty up-complete Poset
for S1, S2 being Scott TopAugmentation of L holds the topology of S1 = the topology of S2
proof end;

theorem Th18: :: WAYBEL29:18  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S1, S2 being non empty reflexive antisymmetric up-complete TopRelStr st TopRelStr(# the carrier of S1,the InternalRel of S1,the topology of S1 #) = TopRelStr(# the carrier of S2,the InternalRel of S2,the topology of S2 #) & S1 is Scott holds
S2 is Scott
proof end;

definition
let L be non empty up-complete Poset;
func Sigma L -> strict Scott TopAugmentation of L means :Def1: :: WAYBEL29:def 1
verum;
uniqueness
for b1, b2 being strict Scott TopAugmentation of L holds b1 = b2
proof end;
existence
ex b1 being strict Scott TopAugmentation of L st verum
;
end;

:: deftheorem Def1 defines Sigma WAYBEL29:def 1 :
for L being non empty up-complete Poset
for b2 being strict Scott TopAugmentation of L holds
( b2 = Sigma L iff verum );

theorem Th19: :: WAYBEL29:19  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S being non empty up-complete Scott TopPoset holds Sigma S = TopRelStr(# the carrier of S,the InternalRel of S,the topology of S #)
proof end;

theorem Th20: :: WAYBEL29:20  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for L1, L2 being non empty up-complete Poset st RelStr(# the carrier of L1,the InternalRel of L1 #) = RelStr(# the carrier of L2,the InternalRel of L2 #) holds
Sigma L1 = Sigma L2
proof end;

definition
let S, T be non empty up-complete Poset;
let f be Function of S,T;
func Sigma f -> Function of (Sigma S),(Sigma T) equals :: WAYBEL29:def 2
f;
coherence
f is Function of (Sigma S),(Sigma T)
proof end;
end;

:: deftheorem defines Sigma WAYBEL29:def 2 :
for S, T being non empty up-complete Poset
for f being Function of S,T holds Sigma f = f;

registration
let S, T be non empty up-complete Poset;
let f be directed-sups-preserving Function of S,T;
cluster Sigma f -> continuous ;
coherence
Sigma f is continuous
proof end;
end;

theorem :: WAYBEL29:21  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being non empty up-complete Poset
for f being Function of S,T holds
( f is isomorphic iff Sigma f is isomorphic )
proof end;

theorem Th22: :: WAYBEL29:22  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for X being non empty TopSpace
for S being Scott complete TopLattice holds oContMaps X,S = ContMaps X,S
proof end;

definition
let X, Y be non empty TopSpace;
func Theta X,Y -> Function of (InclPoset the topology of [:X,Y:]),(ContMaps X,(Sigma (InclPoset the topology of Y))) means :Def3: :: WAYBEL29:def 3
for W being open Subset of [:X,Y:] holds it . W = W,the carrier of X *graph ;
existence
ex b1 being Function of (InclPoset the topology of [:X,Y:]),(ContMaps X,(Sigma (InclPoset the topology of Y))) st
for W being open Subset of [:X,Y:] holds b1 . W = W,the carrier of X *graph
proof end;
correctness
uniqueness
for b1, b2 being Function of (InclPoset the topology of [:X,Y:]),(ContMaps X,(Sigma (InclPoset the topology of Y))) st ( for W being open Subset of [:X,Y:] holds b1 . W = W,the carrier of X *graph ) & ( for W being open Subset of [:X,Y:] holds b2 . W = W,the carrier of X *graph ) holds
b1 = b2
;
proof end;
end;

:: deftheorem Def3 defines Theta WAYBEL29:def 3 :
for X, Y being non empty TopSpace
for b3 being Function of (InclPoset the topology of [:X,Y:]),(ContMaps X,(Sigma (InclPoset the topology of Y))) holds
( b3 = Theta X,Y iff for W being open Subset of [:X,Y:] holds b3 . W = W,the carrier of X *graph );

defpred S1[ T_0-TopSpace] means for X being non empty TopSpace
for L being Scott complete continuous TopLattice
for T being Scott TopAugmentation of ContMaps $1,L ex f being Function of (ContMaps X,T),(ContMaps [:X,$1:],L) ex g being Function of (ContMaps [:X,$1:],L),(ContMaps X,T) st
( f is uncurrying & f is one-to-one & f is onto & g is currying & g is one-to-one & g is onto );

defpred S2[ T_0-TopSpace] means for X being non empty TopSpace
for L being Scott complete continuous TopLattice
for T being Scott TopAugmentation of ContMaps $1,L ex f being Function of (ContMaps X,T),(ContMaps [:X,$1:],L) ex g being Function of (ContMaps [:X,$1:],L),(ContMaps X,T) st
( f is uncurrying & f is isomorphic & g is currying & g is isomorphic );

defpred S3[ T_0-TopSpace] means for X being non empty TopSpace holds Theta X,$1 is isomorphic;

defpred S4[ T_0-TopSpace] means for X being non empty TopSpace
for T being Scott TopAugmentation of InclPoset the topology of $1
for f being continuous Function of X,T holds *graph f is open Subset of [:X,$1:];

defpred S5[ T_0-TopSpace] means for T being Scott TopAugmentation of InclPoset the topology of $1 holds { [W,y] where W is open Subset of $1, y is Element of $1 : y in W } is open Subset of [:T,$1:];

defpred S6[ T_0-TopSpace] means for S being Scott TopAugmentation of InclPoset the topology of $1
for y being Element of $1
for V being open a_neighborhood of y ex H being open Subset of S st
( V in H & meet H is a_neighborhood of y );

Lm1: for T being T_0-TopSpace holds
( S1[T] iff S2[T] )
proof end;

definition
let X be non empty TopSpace;
func alpha X -> Function of (oContMaps X,Sierpinski_Space ),(InclPoset the topology of X) means :Def4: :: WAYBEL29:def 4
for g being continuous Function of X,Sierpinski_Space holds it . g = g " {1};
existence
ex b1 being Function of (oContMaps X,Sierpinski_Space ),(InclPoset the topology of X) st
for g being continuous Function of X,Sierpinski_Space holds b1 . g = g " {1}
proof end;
uniqueness
for b1, b2 being Function of (oContMaps X,Sierpinski_Space ),(InclPoset the topology of X) st ( for g being continuous Function of X,Sierpinski_Space holds b1 . g = g " {1} ) & ( for g being continuous Function of X,Sierpinski_Space holds b2 . g = g " {1} ) holds
b1 = b2
proof end;
end;

:: deftheorem Def4 defines alpha WAYBEL29:def 4 :
for X being non empty TopSpace
for b2 being Function of (oContMaps X,Sierpinski_Space ),(InclPoset the topology of X) holds
( b2 = alpha X iff for g being continuous Function of X,Sierpinski_Space holds b2 . g = g " {1} );

theorem :: WAYBEL29:23  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for X being non empty TopSpace
for V being open Subset of X holds ((alpha X) " ) . V = chi V,the carrier of X
proof end;

registration
let X be non empty TopSpace;
cluster alpha X -> isomorphic ;
coherence
alpha X is isomorphic
proof end;
end;

registration
let X be non empty TopSpace;
cluster (alpha X) " -> isomorphic ;
coherence
(alpha X) " is isomorphic
by YELLOW14:11;
end;

registration
let S be injective T_0-TopSpace;
cluster Omega S -> Scott injective T_0 ;
coherence
Omega S is Scott
proof end;
end;

registration
let X be non empty TopSpace;
cluster oContMaps X,Sierpinski_Space -> complete ;
coherence
oContMaps X,Sierpinski_Space is complete
proof end;
end;

theorem :: WAYBEL29:24  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
Omega Sierpinski_Space = Sigma (BoolePoset 1)
proof end;

registration
let M be non empty set ;
let S be injective T_0-TopSpace;
cluster product (M => S) -> injective ;
coherence
M -TOP_prod (M => S) is injective
proof end;
end;

theorem :: WAYBEL29:25  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for M being non empty set
for L being complete continuous LATTICE holds Omega (M -TOP_prod (M => (Sigma L))) = Sigma (M -POS_prod (M => L))
proof end;

theorem :: WAYBEL29:26  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for M being non empty set
for T being injective T_0-TopSpace holds Omega (M -TOP_prod (M => T)) = Sigma (M -POS_prod (M => (Omega T)))
proof end;

definition
let M be non empty set ;
let X, Y be non empty TopSpace;
func commute X,M,Y -> Function of (oContMaps X,(M -TOP_prod (M => Y))),((oContMaps X,Y) |^ M) means :Def5: :: WAYBEL29:def 5
for f being continuous Function of X,(M -TOP_prod (M => Y)) holds it . f = commute f;
uniqueness
for b1, b2 being Function of (oContMaps X,(M -TOP_prod (M => Y))),((oContMaps X,Y) |^ M) st ( for f being continuous Function of X,(M -TOP_prod (M => Y)) holds b1 . f = commute f ) & ( for f being continuous Function of X,(M -TOP_prod (M => Y)) holds b2 . f = commute f ) holds
b1 = b2
proof end;
existence
ex b1 being Function of (oContMaps X,(M -TOP_prod (M => Y))),((oContMaps X,Y) |^ M) st
for f being continuous Function of X,(M -TOP_prod (M => Y)) holds b1 . f = commute f
proof end;
end;

:: deftheorem Def5 defines commute WAYBEL29:def 5 :
for M being non empty set
for X, Y being non empty TopSpace
for b4 being Function of (oContMaps X,(M -TOP_prod (M => Y))),((oContMaps X,Y) |^ M) holds
( b4 = commute X,M,Y iff for f being continuous Function of X,(M -TOP_prod (M => Y)) holds b4 . f = commute f );

registration
let M be non empty set ;
let X, Y be non empty TopSpace;
cluster commute X,M,Y -> V5 onto ;
correctness
coherence
( commute X,M,Y is one-to-one & commute X,M,Y is onto )
;
proof end;
end;

registration
let M be non empty set ;
let X be non empty TopSpace;
cluster commute X,M,Sierpinski_Space -> V5 onto isomorphic ;
correctness
coherence
commute X,M,Sierpinski_Space is isomorphic
;
proof end;
end;

Lm2: for T being T_0-TopSpace st S3[T] holds
S4[T]
proof end;

theorem Th27: :: WAYBEL29:27  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for X, Y being non empty TopSpace
for S being Scott TopAugmentation of InclPoset the topology of Y
for f1, f2 being Element of (ContMaps X,S) st f1 <= f2 holds
*graph f1 c= *graph f2
proof end;

Lm3: for T being T_0-TopSpace st S4[T] holds
S3[T]
proof end;

Lm4: for T being T_0-TopSpace st S4[T] holds
S5[T]
proof end;

Lm5: for T being T_0-TopSpace st S5[T] holds
S6[T]
proof end;

Lm6: for T being T_0-TopSpace st S6[T] holds
S4[T]
proof end;

Lm7: for T being T_0-TopSpace st S6[T] holds
InclPoset the topology of T is continuous
proof end;

Lm8: for T being T_0-TopSpace st InclPoset the topology of T is continuous holds
S6[T]
proof end;

theorem :: WAYBEL29:28  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for Y being T_0-TopSpace holds
( ( for X being non empty TopSpace
for L being Scott complete continuous TopLattice
for T being Scott TopAugmentation of ContMaps Y,L ex f being Function of (ContMaps X,T),(ContMaps [:X,Y:],L) ex g being Function of (ContMaps [:X,Y:],L),(ContMaps X,T) st
( f is uncurrying & f is one-to-one & f is onto & g is currying & g is one-to-one & g is onto ) ) iff for X being non empty TopSpace
for L being Scott complete continuous TopLattice
for T being Scott TopAugmentation of ContMaps Y,L ex f being Function of (ContMaps X,T),(ContMaps [:X,Y:],L) ex g being Function of (ContMaps [:X,Y:],L),(ContMaps X,T) st
( f is uncurrying & f is isomorphic & g is currying & g is isomorphic ) ) by Lm1;

theorem :: WAYBEL29:29  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for Y being T_0-TopSpace holds
( InclPoset the topology of Y is continuous iff for X being non empty TopSpace holds Theta X,Y is isomorphic )
proof end;

theorem :: WAYBEL29:30  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for Y being T_0-TopSpace holds
( InclPoset the topology of Y is continuous iff for X being non empty TopSpace
for f being continuous Function of X,(Sigma (InclPoset the topology of Y)) holds *graph f is open Subset of [:X,Y:] )
proof end;

theorem :: WAYBEL29:31  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for Y being T_0-TopSpace holds
( InclPoset the topology of Y is continuous iff { [W,y] where W is open Subset of Y, y is Element of Y : y in W } is open Subset of [:(Sigma (InclPoset the topology of Y)),Y:] )
proof end;

theorem :: WAYBEL29:32  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for Y being T_0-TopSpace holds
( InclPoset the topology of Y is continuous iff for y being Element of Y
for V being open a_neighborhood of y ex H being open Subset of (Sigma (InclPoset the topology of Y)) st
( V in H & meet H is a_neighborhood of y ) )
proof end;

defpred S7[ complete LATTICE] means InclPoset (sigma $1) is continuous;

defpred S8[ complete LATTICE] means for SL being Scott TopAugmentation of $1
for S being complete LATTICE
for SS being Scott TopAugmentation of S holds sigma [:S,$1:] = the topology of [:SS,SL:];

defpred S9[ complete LATTICE] means for SL being Scott TopAugmentation of $1
for S being complete LATTICE
for SS being Scott TopAugmentation of S
for SSL being Scott TopAugmentation of [:S,$1:] holds TopStruct(# the carrier of SSL,the topology of SSL #) = [:SS,SL:];

Lm9: for L being complete LATTICE holds
( S8[L] iff S9[L] )
proof end;

theorem :: WAYBEL29:33  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for R1, R2, R3 being non empty RelStr
for f1 being Function of R1,R3 st f1 is isomorphic holds
for f2 being Function of R2,R3 st f2 = f1 & f2 is isomorphic holds
RelStr(# the carrier of R1,the InternalRel of R1 #) = RelStr(# the carrier of R2,the InternalRel of R2 #)
proof end;

Lm10: for L being complete LATTICE st S7[L] holds
S8[L]
proof end;

Lm11: for L being complete LATTICE st S8[L] holds
S7[L]
proof end;

theorem Th34: :: WAYBEL29:34  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for L being complete LATTICE holds
( InclPoset (sigma L) is continuous iff for S being complete LATTICE holds sigma [:S,L:] = the topology of [:(Sigma S),(Sigma L):] )
proof end;

theorem Th35: :: WAYBEL29:35  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for L being complete LATTICE holds
( ( for S being complete LATTICE holds sigma [:S,L:] = the topology of [:(Sigma S),(Sigma L):] ) iff for S being complete LATTICE holds TopStruct(# the carrier of (Sigma [:S,L:]),the topology of (Sigma [:S,L:]) #) = [:(Sigma S),(Sigma L):] )
proof end;

theorem Th36: :: WAYBEL29:36  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for L being complete LATTICE holds
( ( for S being complete LATTICE holds sigma [:S,L:] = the topology of [:(Sigma S),(Sigma L):] ) iff for S being complete LATTICE holds Sigma [:S,L:] = Omega [:(Sigma S),(Sigma L):] )
proof end;

theorem :: WAYBEL29:37  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for L being complete LATTICE holds
( InclPoset (sigma L) is continuous iff for S being complete LATTICE holds Sigma [:S,L:] = Omega [:(Sigma S),(Sigma L):] )
proof end;