:: YELLOW16 semantic presentation  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph for whole article:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Trees again to close it)

theorem :: YELLOW16:1  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for a, b being Relation holds a * b = a (#) b
proof end;

theorem :: YELLOW16:2  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for X being set
for L being non empty RelStr
for S being non empty SubRelStr of L
for f, g being Function of X,the carrier of S
for f', g' being Function of X,the carrier of L st f' = f & g' = g & f <= g holds
f' <= g'
proof end;

theorem :: YELLOW16:3  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for X being set
for L being non empty RelStr
for S being non empty full SubRelStr of L
for f, g being Function of X,the carrier of S
for f', g' being Function of X,the carrier of L st f' = f & g' = g & f' <= g' holds
f <= g
proof end;

registration
let S be non empty RelStr ;
let T be non empty reflexive antisymmetric RelStr ;
cluster monotone directed-sups-preserving M5(the carrier of S,the carrier of T);
existence
ex b1 being Function of S,T st
( b1 is directed-sups-preserving & b1 is monotone )
proof end;
end;

theorem :: YELLOW16:4  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for f, g being Function st f is idempotent & rng g c= rng f & rng g c= dom f holds
f * g = g
proof end;

registration
let S be 1-sorted ;
cluster idempotent M5(the carrier of S,the carrier of S);
existence
ex b1 being Function of S,S st b1 is idempotent
proof end;
end;

theorem Th5: :: YELLOW16:5  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for L being non empty up-complete Poset
for S being non empty full directed-sups-inheriting SubRelStr of L holds S is up-complete
proof end;

theorem Th6: :: YELLOW16:6  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for L being non empty up-complete Poset
for f being Function of L,L st f is idempotent & f is directed-sups-preserving holds
Image f is directed-sups-inheriting
proof end;

theorem :: YELLOW16:7  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
canceled;

theorem Th8: :: YELLOW16:8  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being non empty 1-sorted
for f being Function of T,S
for g being Function of S,T st f * g = id S holds
rng f = the carrier of S
proof end;

theorem Th9: :: YELLOW16:9  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T being non empty RelStr
for S being non empty SubRelStr of T
for f being Function of T,S st f * (incl S,T) = id S holds
f is idempotent Function of T,T
proof end;

definition
let S, T be non empty Poset;
let f be Function;
pred f is_a_retraction_of T,S means :Def1: :: YELLOW16:def 1
( f is directed-sups-preserving Function of T,S & f | the carrier of S = id S & S is full directed-sups-inheriting SubRelStr of T );
pred f is_an_UPS_retraction_of T,S means :Def2: :: YELLOW16:def 2
( f is directed-sups-preserving Function of T,S & ex g being directed-sups-preserving Function of S,T st f * g = id S );
end;

:: deftheorem Def1 defines is_a_retraction_of YELLOW16:def 1 :
for S, T being non empty Poset
for f being Function holds
( f is_a_retraction_of T,S iff ( f is directed-sups-preserving Function of T,S & f | the carrier of S = id S & S is full directed-sups-inheriting SubRelStr of T ) );

:: deftheorem Def2 defines is_an_UPS_retraction_of YELLOW16:def 2 :
for S, T being non empty Poset
for f being Function holds
( f is_an_UPS_retraction_of T,S iff ( f is directed-sups-preserving Function of T,S & ex g being directed-sups-preserving Function of S,T st f * g = id S ) );

definition
let S, T be non empty Poset;
pred S is_a_retract_of T means :Def3: :: YELLOW16:def 3
ex f being Function of T,S st f is_a_retraction_of T,S;
pred S is_an_UPS_retract_of T means :Def4: :: YELLOW16:def 4
ex f being Function of T,S st f is_an_UPS_retraction_of T,S;
end;

:: deftheorem Def3 defines is_a_retract_of YELLOW16:def 3 :
for S, T being non empty Poset holds
( S is_a_retract_of T iff ex f being Function of T,S st f is_a_retraction_of T,S );

:: deftheorem Def4 defines is_an_UPS_retract_of YELLOW16:def 4 :
for S, T being non empty Poset holds
( S is_an_UPS_retract_of T iff ex f being Function of T,S st f is_an_UPS_retraction_of T,S );

theorem Th10: :: YELLOW16:10  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being non empty Poset
for f being Function st f is_a_retraction_of T,S holds
f * (incl S,T) = id S
proof end;

theorem Th11: :: YELLOW16:11  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S being non empty Poset
for T being non empty up-complete Poset
for f being Function st f is_a_retraction_of T,S holds
f is_an_UPS_retraction_of T,S
proof end;

theorem Th12: :: YELLOW16:12  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being non empty Poset
for f being Function st f is_a_retraction_of T,S holds
rng f = the carrier of S
proof end;

theorem Th13: :: YELLOW16:13  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being non empty Poset
for f being Function st f is_an_UPS_retraction_of T,S holds
rng f = the carrier of S
proof end;

theorem Th14: :: YELLOW16:14  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being non empty Poset
for f being Function st f is_a_retraction_of T,S holds
f is idempotent Function of T,T
proof end;

theorem Th15: :: YELLOW16:15  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T, S being non empty Poset
for f being Function of T,T st f is_a_retraction_of T,S holds
Image f = RelStr(# the carrier of S,the InternalRel of S #)
proof end;

theorem Th16: :: YELLOW16:16  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T being non empty up-complete Poset
for S being non empty Poset
for f being Function of T,T st f is_a_retraction_of T,S holds
( f is directed-sups-preserving & f is projection )
proof end;

theorem Th17: :: YELLOW16:17  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being non empty reflexive transitive RelStr
for f being Function of S,T holds
( f is isomorphic iff ( f is monotone & ex g being monotone Function of T,S st
( f * g = id T & g * f = id S ) ) )
proof end;

theorem Th18: :: YELLOW16:18  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being non empty Poset holds
( S,T are_isomorphic iff ex f being monotone Function of S,T ex g being monotone Function of T,S st
( f * g = id T & g * f = id S ) )
proof end;

theorem :: YELLOW16:19  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being non empty up-complete Poset st S,T are_isomorphic holds
( S is_an_UPS_retract_of T & T is_an_UPS_retract_of S )
proof end;

theorem Th20: :: YELLOW16:20  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T, S being non empty Poset
for f being monotone Function of T,S
for g being monotone Function of S,T st f * g = id S holds
ex h being projection Function of T,T st
( h = g * f & h | the carrier of (Image h) = id (Image h) & S, Image h are_isomorphic )
proof end;

theorem Th21: :: YELLOW16:21  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T being non empty up-complete Poset
for S being non empty Poset
for f being Function st f is_an_UPS_retraction_of T,S holds
ex h being directed-sups-preserving projection Function of T,T st
( h is_a_retraction_of T, Image h & S, Image h are_isomorphic )
proof end;

theorem Th22: :: YELLOW16:22  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for L being non empty up-complete Poset
for S being non empty Poset st S is_a_retract_of L holds
S is up-complete
proof end;

theorem Th23: :: YELLOW16:23  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for L being non empty complete Poset
for S being non empty Poset st S is_a_retract_of L holds
S is complete
proof end;

theorem Th24: :: YELLOW16:24  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for L being complete continuous LATTICE
for S being non empty Poset st S is_a_retract_of L holds
S is continuous
proof end;

theorem :: YELLOW16:25  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for L being non empty up-complete Poset
for S being non empty Poset st S is_an_UPS_retract_of L holds
S is up-complete
proof end;

theorem :: YELLOW16:26  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for L being non empty complete Poset
for S being non empty Poset st S is_an_UPS_retract_of L holds
S is complete
proof end;

theorem :: YELLOW16:27  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for L being complete continuous LATTICE
for S being non empty Poset st S is_an_UPS_retract_of L holds
S is continuous
proof end;

theorem Th28: :: YELLOW16:28  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for L being RelStr
for S being full SubRelStr of L
for R being SubRelStr of S holds
( R is full iff R is full SubRelStr of L )
proof end;

theorem :: YELLOW16:29  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for L being non empty transitive RelStr
for S being non empty full directed-sups-inheriting SubRelStr of L
for R being non empty directed-sups-inheriting SubRelStr of S holds R is directed-sups-inheriting SubRelStr of L
proof end;

theorem :: YELLOW16:30  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for L being non empty up-complete Poset
for S1, S2 being non empty full directed-sups-inheriting SubRelStr of L st S1 is SubRelStr of S2 holds
S1 is full directed-sups-inheriting SubRelStr of S2
proof end;

definition
let R be Relation;
attr R is Poset-yielding means :Def5: :: YELLOW16:def 5
for x being set st x in rng R holds
x is Poset;
end;

:: deftheorem Def5 defines Poset-yielding YELLOW16:def 5 :
for R being Relation holds
( R is Poset-yielding iff for x being set st x in rng R holds
x is Poset );

registration
cluster Poset-yielding -> RelStr-yielding reflexive-yielding set ;
coherence
for b1 being Relation st b1 is Poset-yielding holds
( b1 is RelStr-yielding & b1 is reflexive-yielding )
proof end;
end;

definition
let X be non empty set ;
let L be non empty RelStr ;
let i be Element of X;
let Y be Subset of (L |^ X);
:: original: pi
redefine func pi Y,i -> Subset of L;
coherence
pi Y,i is Subset of L
proof end;
end;

registration
let X be set ;
let S be Poset;
cluster K104(X,S) -> Poset-yielding ;
coherence
X --> S is Poset-yielding
proof end;
end;

registration
let I be set ;
cluster RelStr-yielding non-Empty reflexive-yielding Poset-yielding ManySortedSet of I;
existence
ex b1 being ManySortedSet of I st
( b1 is Poset-yielding & b1 is non-Empty )
proof end;
end;

registration
let I be non empty set ;
let J be non-Empty Poset-yielding ManySortedSet of I;
cluster product J -> transitive antisymmetric ;
coherence
( product J is transitive & product J is antisymmetric )
proof end;
end;

definition
let I be non empty set ;
let J be non-Empty Poset-yielding ManySortedSet of I;
let i be Element of I;
:: original: .
redefine func J . i -> non empty Poset;
coherence
J . i is non empty Poset
proof end;
end;

Lm1: now
let I be non empty set ; :: thesis: for J being non-Empty Poset-yielding ManySortedSet of I
for X being Subset of (product J) st ( for i being Element of I holds ex_sup_of pi X,i,J . i ) holds
ex f being Element of (product J) st
( ( for i being Element of I holds f . i = sup (pi X,i) ) & f is_>=_than X & ( for g being Element of (product J) st X is_<=_than g holds
f <= g ) )

let J be non-Empty Poset-yielding ManySortedSet of I; :: thesis: for X being Subset of (product J) st ( for i being Element of I holds ex_sup_of pi X,i,J . i ) holds
ex f being Element of (product J) st
( ( for i being Element of I holds f . i = sup (pi X,i) ) & f is_>=_than X & ( for g being Element of (product J) st X is_<=_than g holds
f <= g ) )

let X be Subset of (product J); :: thesis: ( ( for i being Element of I holds ex_sup_of pi X,i,J . i ) implies ex f being Element of (product J) st
( ( for i being Element of I holds f . i = sup (pi X,i) ) & f is_>=_than X & ( for g being Element of (product J) st X is_<=_than g holds
f <= g ) ) )

deffunc H1( Element of I) -> Element of the carrier of (J . $1) = sup (pi X,$1);
consider f being ManySortedSet of I such that
A1: for i being Element of I holds f . i = H1(i) from PBOOLE:sch 5( R );
A2: dom f = I by PBOOLE:def 3;
now
let i be Element of I; :: thesis: f . i is Element of (J . i)
f . i = sup (pi X,i) by A1;
hence f . i is Element of (J . i) ; :: thesis: verum
end;
then reconsider f = f as Element of (product J) by A2, WAYBEL_3:27;
assume A3: for i being Element of I holds ex_sup_of pi X,i,J . i ; :: thesis: ex f being Element of (product J) st
( ( for i being Element of I holds f . i = sup (pi X,i) ) & f is_>=_than X & ( for g being Element of (product J) st X is_<=_than g holds
f <= g ) )

take f = f; :: thesis: ( ( for i being Element of I holds f . i = sup (pi X,i) ) & f is_>=_than X & ( for g being Element of (product J) st X is_<=_than g holds
f <= g ) )

thus for i being Element of I holds f . i = sup (pi X,i) by A1; :: thesis: ( f is_>=_than X & ( for g being Element of (product J) st X is_<=_than g holds
f <= g ) )

thus f is_>=_than X :: thesis: for g being Element of (product J) st X is_<=_than g holds
f <= g
proof
let x be Element of (product J); :: according to LATTICE3:def 9 :: thesis: ( not x in X or x <= f )
assume A4: x in X ; :: thesis: x <= f
now
let i be Element of I; :: thesis: x . i <= f . i
( ex_sup_of pi X,i,J . i & f . i = sup (pi X,i) ) by A1, A3;
then ( f . i is_>=_than pi X,i & x . i in pi X,i ) by A4, CARD_3:def 6, YELLOW_0:30;
hence x . i <= f . i by LATTICE3:def 9; :: thesis: verum
end;
hence x <= f by WAYBEL_3:28; :: thesis: verum
end;
let g be Element of (product J); :: thesis: ( X is_<=_than g implies f <= g )
assume A5: X is_<=_than g ; :: thesis: f <= g
now
let i be Element of I; :: thesis: f . i <= g . i
A6: ( f . i = sup (pi X,i) & ex_sup_of pi X,i,J . i ) by A1, A3;
g . i is_>=_than pi X,i
proof
let a be Element of (J . i); :: according to LATTICE3:def 9 :: thesis: ( not a in pi X,i or a <= g . i )
assume a in pi X,i ; :: thesis: a <= g . i
then consider h being Function such that
A7: ( h in X & a = h . i ) by CARD_3:def 6;
reconsider h = h as Element of (product J) by A7;
h <= g by A5, A7, LATTICE3:def 9;
hence a <= g . i by A7, WAYBEL_3:28; :: thesis: verum
end;
hence f . i <= g . i by A6, YELLOW_0:30; :: thesis: verum
end;
hence f <= g by WAYBEL_3:28; :: thesis: verum
end;

Lm2: now
let I be non empty set ; :: thesis: for J being non-Empty Poset-yielding ManySortedSet of I
for X being Subset of (product J) st ( for i being Element of I holds ex_inf_of pi X,i,J . i ) holds
ex f being Element of (product J) st
( ( for i being Element of I holds f . i = inf (pi X,i) ) & f is_<=_than X & ( for g being Element of (product J) st X is_>=_than g holds
f >= g ) )

let J be non-Empty Poset-yielding ManySortedSet of I; :: thesis: for X being Subset of (product J) st ( for i being Element of I holds ex_inf_of pi X,i,J . i ) holds
ex f being Element of (product J) st
( ( for i being Element of I holds f . i = inf (pi X,i) ) & f is_<=_than X & ( for g being Element of (product J) st X is_>=_than g holds
f >= g ) )

let X be Subset of (product J); :: thesis: ( ( for i being Element of I holds ex_inf_of pi X,i,J . i ) implies ex f being Element of (product J) st
( ( for i being Element of I holds f . i = inf (pi X,i) ) & f is_<=_than X & ( for g being Element of (product J) st X is_>=_than g holds
f >= g ) ) )

deffunc H1( Element of I) -> Element of the carrier of (J . $1) = inf (pi X,$1);
consider f being ManySortedSet of I such that
A1: for i being Element of I holds f . i = H1(i) from PBOOLE:sch 5( R );
A2: dom f = I by PBOOLE:def 3;
now
let i be Element of I; :: thesis: f . i is Element of (J . i)
f . i = inf (pi X,i) by A1;
hence f . i is Element of (J . i) ; :: thesis: verum
end;
then reconsider f = f as Element of (product J) by A2, WAYBEL_3:27;
assume A3: for i being Element of I holds ex_inf_of pi X,i,J . i ; :: thesis: ex f being Element of (product J) st
( ( for i being Element of I holds f . i = inf (pi X,i) ) & f is_<=_than X & ( for g being Element of (product J) st X is_>=_than g holds
f >= g ) )

take f = f; :: thesis: ( ( for i being Element of I holds f . i = inf (pi X,i) ) & f is_<=_than X & ( for g being Element of (product J) st X is_>=_than g holds
f >= g ) )

thus for i being Element of I holds f . i = inf (pi X,i) by A1; :: thesis: ( f is_<=_than X & ( for g being Element of (product J) st X is_>=_than g holds
f >= g ) )

thus f is_<=_than X :: thesis: for g being Element of (product J) st X is_>=_than g holds
f >= g
proof
let x be Element of (product J); :: according to LATTICE3:def 8 :: thesis: ( not x in X or f <= x )
assume A4: x in X ; :: thesis: f <= x
now
let i be Element of I; :: thesis: x . i >= f . i
( ex_inf_of pi X,i,J . i & f . i = inf (pi X,i) ) by A1, A3;
then ( f . i is_<=_than pi X,i & x . i in pi X,i ) by A4, CARD_3:def 6, YELLOW_0:31;
hence x . i >= f . i by LATTICE3:def 8; :: thesis: verum
end;
hence f <= x by WAYBEL_3:28; :: thesis: verum
end;
let g be Element of (product J); :: thesis: ( X is_>=_than g implies f >= g )
assume A5: X is_>=_than g ; :: thesis: f >= g
now
let i be Element of I; :: thesis: f . i >= g . i
A6: ( f . i = inf (pi X,i) & ex_inf_of pi X,i,J . i ) by A1, A3;
g . i is_<=_than pi X,i
proof
let a be Element of (J . i); :: according to LATTICE3:def 8 :: thesis: ( not a in pi X,i or g . i <= a )
assume a in pi X,i ; :: thesis: g . i <= a
then consider h being Function such that
A7: ( h in X & a = h . i ) by CARD_3:def 6;
reconsider h = h as Element of (product J) by A7;
h >= g by A5, A7, LATTICE3:def 8;
hence a >= g . i by A7, WAYBEL_3:28; :: thesis: verum
end;
hence f . i >= g . i by A6, YELLOW_0:31; :: thesis: verum
end;
hence f >= g by WAYBEL_3:28; :: thesis: verum
end;

theorem Th31: :: YELLOW16:31  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for I being non empty set
for J being non-Empty Poset-yielding ManySortedSet of I
for f being Element of (product J)
for X being Subset of (product J) holds
( f is_>=_than X iff for i being Element of I holds f . i is_>=_than pi X,i )
proof end;

theorem Th32: :: YELLOW16:32  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for I being non empty set
for J being non-Empty Poset-yielding ManySortedSet of I
for f being Element of (product J)
for X being Subset of (product J) holds
( f is_<=_than X iff for i being Element of I holds f . i is_<=_than pi X,i )
proof end;

theorem Th33: :: YELLOW16:33  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for I being non empty set
for J being non-Empty Poset-yielding ManySortedSet of I
for X being Subset of (product J) holds
( ex_sup_of X, product J iff for i being Element of I holds ex_sup_of pi X,i,J . i )
proof end;

theorem Th34: :: YELLOW16:34  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for I being non empty set
for J being non-Empty Poset-yielding ManySortedSet of I
for X being Subset of (product J) holds
( ex_inf_of X, product J iff for i being Element of I holds ex_inf_of pi X,i,J . i )
proof end;

theorem Th35: :: YELLOW16:35  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for I being non empty set
for J being non-Empty Poset-yielding ManySortedSet of I
for X being Subset of (product J) st ex_sup_of X, product J holds
for i being Element of I holds (sup X) . i = sup (pi X,i)
proof end;

theorem Th36: :: YELLOW16:36  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for I being non empty set
for J being non-Empty Poset-yielding ManySortedSet of I
for X being Subset of (product J) st ex_inf_of X, product J holds
for i being Element of I holds (inf X) . i = inf (pi X,i)
proof end;

theorem Th37: :: YELLOW16:37  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for I being non empty set
for J being RelStr-yielding non-Empty reflexive-yielding ManySortedSet of I
for X being directed Subset of (product J)
for i being Element of I holds pi X,i is directed
proof end;

theorem Th38: :: YELLOW16:38  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for I being non empty set
for J, K being RelStr-yielding non-Empty ManySortedSet of I st ( for i being Element of I holds K . i is SubRelStr of J . i ) holds
product K is SubRelStr of product J
proof end;

theorem Th39: :: YELLOW16:39  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for I being non empty set
for J, K being RelStr-yielding non-Empty ManySortedSet of I st ( for i being Element of I holds K . i is full SubRelStr of J . i ) holds
product K is full SubRelStr of product J
proof end;

theorem :: YELLOW16:40  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for L being non empty RelStr
for S being non empty SubRelStr of L
for X being set holds S |^ X is SubRelStr of L |^ X
proof end;

theorem Th41: :: YELLOW16:41  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for L being non empty RelStr
for S being non empty full SubRelStr of L
for X being set holds S |^ X is full SubRelStr of L |^ X
proof end;

definition
let S, T be non empty RelStr ;
let X be set ;
pred S inherits_sup_of X,T means :Def6: :: YELLOW16:def 6
( ex_sup_of X,T implies "\/" X,T in the carrier of S );
pred S inherits_inf_of X,T means :Def7: :: YELLOW16:def 7
( ex_inf_of X,T implies "/\" X,T in the carrier of S );
end;

:: deftheorem Def6 defines inherits_sup_of YELLOW16:def 6 :
for S, T being non empty RelStr
for X being set holds
( S inherits_sup_of X,T iff ( ex_sup_of X,T implies "\/" X,T in the carrier of S ) );

:: deftheorem Def7 defines inherits_inf_of YELLOW16:def 7 :
for S, T being non empty RelStr
for X being set holds
( S inherits_inf_of X,T iff ( ex_inf_of X,T implies "/\" X,T in the carrier of S ) );

theorem Th42: :: YELLOW16:42  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T being non empty transitive RelStr
for S being non empty full SubRelStr of T
for X being Subset of S holds
( S inherits_sup_of X,T iff ( ex_sup_of X,T implies ( ex_sup_of X,S & sup X = "\/" X,T ) ) )
proof end;

theorem :: YELLOW16:43  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T being non empty transitive RelStr
for S being non empty full SubRelStr of T
for X being Subset of S holds
( S inherits_inf_of X,T iff ( ex_inf_of X,T implies ( ex_inf_of X,S & inf X = "/\" X,T ) ) )
proof end;

scheme :: YELLOW16:sch 1
ProductSupsInheriting{ F1() -> non empty set , F2() -> non-Empty Poset-yielding ManySortedSet of F1(), F3() -> non-Empty Poset-yielding ManySortedSet of F1(), P1[ set , set ] } :
for X being Subset of (product F3()) st P1[X, product F3()] holds
product F3() inherits_sup_of X, product F2()
provided
A1: for X being Subset of (product F3()) st P1[X, product F3()] holds
for i being Element of F1() holds P1[ pi X,i,F3() . i] and
A2: for i being Element of F1() holds F3() . i is full SubRelStr of F2() . i and
A3: for i being Element of F1()
for X being Subset of (F3() . i) st P1[X,F3() . i] holds
F3() . i inherits_sup_of X,F2() . i
proof end;

scheme :: YELLOW16:sch 2
PowerSupsInheriting{ F1() -> non empty set , F2() -> non empty Poset, F3() -> non empty full SubRelStr of F2(), P1[ set , set ] } :
for X being Subset of (F3() |^ F1()) st P1[X,F3() |^ F1()] holds
F3() |^ F1() inherits_sup_of X,F2() |^ F1()
provided
A1: for X being Subset of (F3() |^ F1()) st P1[X,F3() |^ F1()] holds
for i being Element of F1() holds P1[ pi X,i,F3()] and
A2: for X being Subset of F3() st P1[X,F3()] holds
F3() inherits_sup_of X,F2()
proof end;

scheme :: YELLOW16:sch 3
ProductInfsInheriting{ F1() -> non empty set , F2() -> non-Empty Poset-yielding ManySortedSet of F1(), F3() -> non-Empty Poset-yielding ManySortedSet of F1(), P1[ set , set ] } :
for X being Subset of (product F3()) st P1[X, product F3()] holds
product F3() inherits_inf_of X, product F2()
provided
A1: for X being Subset of (product F3()) st P1[X, product F3()] holds
for i being Element of F1() holds P1[ pi X,i,F3() . i] and
A2: for i being Element of F1() holds F3() . i is full SubRelStr of F2() . i and
A3: for i being Element of F1()
for X being Subset of (F3() . i) st P1[X,F3() . i] holds
F3() . i inherits_inf_of X,F2() . i
proof end;

scheme :: YELLOW16:sch 4
PowerInfsInheriting{ F1() -> non empty set , F2() -> non empty Poset, F3() -> non empty full SubRelStr of F2(), P1[ set , set ] } :
for X being Subset of (F3() |^ F1()) st P1[X,F3() |^ F1()] holds
F3() |^ F1() inherits_inf_of X,F2() |^ F1()
provided
A1: for X being Subset of (F3() |^ F1()) st P1[X,F3() |^ F1()] holds
for i being Element of F1() holds P1[ pi X,i,F3()] and
A2: for X being Subset of F3() st P1[X,F3()] holds
F3() inherits_inf_of X,F2()
proof end;

registration
let I be set ;
let L be non empty RelStr ;
let X be non empty Subset of (L |^ I);
let i be set ;
cluster pi X,i -> non empty ;
coherence
not pi X,i is empty
proof end;
end;

theorem :: YELLOW16:44  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for L being non empty Poset
for S being non empty full directed-sups-inheriting SubRelStr of L
for X being non empty set holds S |^ X is directed-sups-inheriting SubRelStr of L |^ X
proof end;

registration
let I be non empty set ;
let J be RelStr-yielding non-Empty ManySortedSet of I;
let X be non empty Subset of (product J);
let i be set ;
cluster pi X,i -> non empty ;
coherence
not pi X,i is empty
proof end;
end;

theorem Th45: :: YELLOW16:45  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for X being non empty set
for L being non empty up-complete Poset holds L |^ X is up-complete
proof end;

registration
let L be non empty up-complete Poset;
let X be non empty set ;
cluster L |^ X -> up-complete ;
coherence
L |^ X is up-complete
by Th45;
end;

registration
let T be TopSpace;
cluster the topology of T -> non empty ;
coherence
not the topology of T is empty
by PRE_TOPC:def 1;
end;

theorem Th46: :: YELLOW16:46  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T being non empty TopSpace
for S being non empty SubSpace of T
for f being Function of T,S st f is_a_retraction holds
rng f = the carrier of S
proof end;

theorem :: YELLOW16:47  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T being non empty TopSpace
for S being non empty SubSpace of T
for f being continuous Function of T,S st f is_a_retraction holds
f is idempotent
proof end;

theorem Th48: :: YELLOW16:48  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T being non empty TopSpace
for V being open Subset of T holds chi V,the carrier of T is continuous Function of T,Sierpinski_Space
proof end;

theorem :: YELLOW16:49  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T being non empty TopSpace
for x, y being Element of T st ( for W being open Subset of T st y in W holds
x in W ) holds
0,1 --> y,x is continuous Function of Sierpinski_Space ,T
proof end;

theorem :: YELLOW16:50  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T being non empty TopSpace
for x, y being Element of T
for V being open Subset of T st x in V & not y in V holds
(chi V,the carrier of T) * (0,1 --> y,x) = id Sierpinski_Space
proof end;

theorem :: YELLOW16:51  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T being non empty 1-sorted
for V, W being Subset of T
for S being TopAugmentation of BoolePoset 1
for f, g being Function of T,S st f = chi V,the carrier of T & g = chi W,the carrier of T holds
( V c= W iff f <= g )
proof end;

theorem :: YELLOW16:52  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for L being non empty RelStr
for X being non empty set
for R being non empty full SubRelStr of L |^ X st ( for a being set holds
( a is Element of R iff ex x being Element of L st a = X --> x ) ) holds
L,R are_isomorphic
proof end;

theorem :: YELLOW16:53  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being non empty TopSpace holds
( S,T are_homeomorphic iff ex f being continuous Function of S,T ex g being continuous Function of T,S st
( f * g = id T & g * f = id S ) )
proof end;

theorem Th54: :: YELLOW16:54  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T, S, R being non empty TopSpace
for f being Function of T,S
for g being Function of S,T
for h being Function of S,R st f * g = id S & h is_homeomorphism holds
(h * f) * (g * (h " )) = id R
proof end;

theorem Th55: :: YELLOW16:55  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T, S, R being non empty TopSpace st S is_Retract_of T & S,R are_homeomorphic holds
R is_Retract_of T
proof end;

theorem Th56: :: YELLOW16:56  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T being non empty TopSpace
for S being non empty SubSpace of T holds incl S,T is continuous
proof end;

theorem Th57: :: YELLOW16:57  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T being non empty TopSpace
for S being non empty SubSpace of T
for f being continuous Function of T,S st f is_a_retraction holds
f * (incl S,T) = id S
proof end;

theorem Th58: :: YELLOW16:58  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T being non empty TopSpace
for S being non empty SubSpace of T st S is_a_retract_of T holds
S is_Retract_of T
proof end;

theorem :: YELLOW16:59  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for R, T being non empty TopSpace holds
( R is_Retract_of T iff ex S being non empty SubSpace of T st
( S is_a_retract_of T & S,R are_homeomorphic ) )
proof end;