:: WAYBEL27 semantic presentation  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph for whole article:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Trees again to close it)

definition
let F be Function;
attr F is uncurrying means :Def1: :: WAYBEL27:def 1
( ( for x being set st x in dom F holds
x is Function-yielding Function ) & ( for f being Function st f in dom F holds
F . f = uncurry f ) );
attr F is currying means :Def2: :: WAYBEL27:def 2
( ( for x being set st x in dom F holds
( x is Function & proj1 x is Relation ) ) & ( for f being Function st f in dom F holds
F . f = curry f ) );
attr F is commuting means :Def3: :: WAYBEL27:def 3
( ( for x being set st x in dom F holds
x is Function-yielding Function ) & ( for f being Function st f in dom F holds
F . f = commute f ) );
end;

:: deftheorem Def1 defines uncurrying WAYBEL27:def 1 :
for F being Function holds
( F is uncurrying iff ( ( for x being set st x in dom F holds
x is Function-yielding Function ) & ( for f being Function st f in dom F holds
F . f = uncurry f ) ) );

:: deftheorem Def2 defines currying WAYBEL27:def 2 :
for F being Function holds
( F is currying iff ( ( for x being set st x in dom F holds
( x is Function & proj1 x is Relation ) ) & ( for f being Function st f in dom F holds
F . f = curry f ) ) );

:: deftheorem Def3 defines commuting WAYBEL27:def 3 :
for F being Function holds
( F is commuting iff ( ( for x being set st x in dom F holds
x is Function-yielding Function ) & ( for f being Function st f in dom F holds
F . f = commute f ) ) );

registration
cluster empty -> uncurrying currying commuting set ;
coherence
for b1 being Function st b1 is empty holds
( b1 is uncurrying & b1 is currying & b1 is commuting )
proof end;
end;

registration
cluster uncurrying currying commuting set ;
existence
ex b1 being Function st
( b1 is uncurrying & b1 is currying & b1 is commuting )
proof end;
end;

registration
let F be uncurrying Function;
let X be set ;
cluster F | X -> uncurrying ;
coherence
F | X is uncurrying
proof end;
end;

registration
let F be currying Function;
let X be set ;
cluster F | X -> currying ;
coherence
F | X is currying
proof end;
end;

theorem Th1: :: WAYBEL27:1  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for X, Y, Z, D being set st D c= Funcs X,(Funcs Y,Z) holds
ex F being ManySortedSet of D st
( F is uncurrying & rng F c= Funcs [:X,Y:],Z )
proof end;

theorem Th2: :: WAYBEL27:2  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for X, Y, Z, D being set st D c= Funcs [:X,Y:],Z holds
ex F being ManySortedSet of D st
( F is currying & ( ( Y = {} implies X = {} ) implies rng F c= Funcs X,(Funcs Y,Z) ) )
proof end;

registration
let X, Y, Z be set ;
cluster uncurrying ManySortedSet of Funcs X,(Funcs Y,Z);
existence
ex b1 being ManySortedSet of Funcs X,(Funcs Y,Z) st b1 is uncurrying
proof end;
cluster currying ManySortedSet of Funcs [:X,Y:],Z;
existence
ex b1 being ManySortedSet of Funcs [:X,Y:],Z st b1 is currying
proof end;
end;

theorem Th3: :: WAYBEL27:3  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for A, B being non empty set
for C being set
for f, g being commuting Function st dom f c= Funcs A,(Funcs B,C) & rng f c= dom g holds
g * f = id (dom f)
proof end;

theorem Th4: :: WAYBEL27:4  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for B being non empty set
for A, C being set
for f being uncurrying Function
for g being currying Function st dom f c= Funcs A,(Funcs B,C) & rng f c= dom g holds
g * f = id (dom f)
proof end;

theorem Th5: :: WAYBEL27:5  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for A, B, C being set
for f being currying Function
for g being uncurrying Function st dom f c= Funcs [:A,B:],C & rng f c= dom g holds
g * f = id (dom f)
proof end;

theorem Th6: :: WAYBEL27:6  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for f being Function-yielding Function
for i, A being set st i in dom (commute f) holds
((commute f) . i) .: A c= pi (f .: A),i
proof end;

theorem Th7: :: WAYBEL27:7  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for f being Function-yielding Function
for i, A being set st ( for g being Function st g in f .: A holds
i in dom g ) holds
pi (f .: A),i c= ((commute f) . i) .: A
proof end;

theorem Th8: :: WAYBEL27:8  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for X, Y being set
for f being Function st rng f c= Funcs X,Y holds
for i, A being set st i in X holds
((commute f) . i) .: A = pi (f .: A),i
proof end;

theorem Th9: :: WAYBEL27:9  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for f being Function
for i, A being set st [:A,{i}:] c= dom f holds
pi ((curry f) .: A),i = f .: [:A,{i}:]
proof end;

registration
let X be set ;
let Y be non empty functional set ;
cluster -> Function-yielding M5(X,Y);
coherence
for b1 being Function of X,Y holds b1 is Function-yielding
proof end;
end;

registration
let T be constituted-Functions 1-sorted ;
cluster the carrier of T -> functional ;
coherence
the carrier of T is functional
proof end;
end;

registration
let X be set ;
let L be non empty RelStr ;
cluster L |^ X -> constituted-Functions ;
coherence
L |^ X is constituted-Functions
;
end;

registration
cluster strict complete constituted-Functions RelStr ;
existence
ex b1 being LATTICE st
( b1 is constituted-Functions & b1 is complete & b1 is strict )
proof end;
cluster non empty constituted-Functions 1-sorted ;
existence
ex b1 being 1-sorted st
( b1 is constituted-Functions & not b1 is empty )
proof end;
end;

registration
let T be non empty constituted-Functions RelStr ;
cluster non empty -> non empty constituted-Functions SubRelStr of T;
coherence
for b1 being non empty SubRelStr of T holds b1 is constituted-Functions
proof end;
end;

theorem Th10: :: WAYBEL27:10  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being complete LATTICE
for f being idempotent Function of T,T
for h being Function of S,(Image f) holds f * h = h
proof end;

theorem :: WAYBEL27:11  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T, T1 being non empty RelStr st T is SubRelStr of T1 holds
for f being Function of S,T
for f1 being Function of S,T1 st f is monotone & f = f1 holds
f1 is monotone
proof end;

theorem Th12: :: WAYBEL27:12  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T, T1 being non empty RelStr st T is full SubRelStr of T1 holds
for f being Function of S,T
for f1 being Function of S,T1 st f1 is monotone & f = f1 holds
f is monotone
proof end;

theorem Th13: :: WAYBEL27:13  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for X being set
for V being Subset of X holds
( (chi V,X) " {1} = V & (chi V,X) " {0} = X \ V )
proof end;

definition
let X be non empty set ;
let T be non empty RelStr ;
let f be Element of (T |^ X);
let x be Element of X;
:: original: .
redefine func f . x -> Element of T;
coherence
f . x is Element of T
proof end;
end;

theorem Th14: :: WAYBEL27:14  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for X being non empty set
for T being non empty RelStr
for f, g being Element of (T |^ X) holds
( f <= g iff for x being Element of X holds f . x <= g . x )
proof end;

theorem Th15: :: WAYBEL27:15  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for X being set
for L, S being non empty RelStr st RelStr(# the carrier of L,the InternalRel of L #) = RelStr(# the carrier of S,the InternalRel of S #) holds
L |^ X = S |^ X
proof end;

theorem :: WAYBEL27:16  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S1, S2, T1, T2 being non empty TopSpace st TopStruct(# the carrier of S1,the topology of S1 #) = TopStruct(# the carrier of S2,the topology of S2 #) & TopStruct(# the carrier of T1,the topology of T1 #) = TopStruct(# the carrier of T2,the topology of T2 #) holds
oContMaps S1,T1 = oContMaps S2,T2
proof end;

theorem Th17: :: WAYBEL27:17  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for X being set ex f being Function of (BoolePoset X),((BoolePoset 1) |^ X) st
( f is isomorphic & ( for Y being Subset of X holds f . Y = chi Y,X ) )
proof end;

theorem Th18: :: WAYBEL27:18  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for X being set holds BoolePoset X,(BoolePoset 1) |^ X are_isomorphic
proof end;

theorem Th19: :: WAYBEL27:19  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for X, Y being non empty set
for T being non empty Poset
for S1 being non empty full SubRelStr of (T |^ X) |^ Y
for S2 being non empty full SubRelStr of (T |^ Y) |^ X
for F being Function of S1,S2 st F is commuting holds
F is monotone
proof end;

theorem Th20: :: WAYBEL27:20  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for X, Y being non empty set
for T being non empty Poset
for S1 being non empty full SubRelStr of (T |^ Y) |^ X
for S2 being non empty full SubRelStr of T |^ [:X,Y:]
for F being Function of S1,S2 st F is uncurrying holds
F is monotone
proof end;

theorem Th21: :: WAYBEL27:21  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for X, Y being non empty set
for T being non empty Poset
for S1 being non empty full SubRelStr of (T |^ Y) |^ X
for S2 being non empty full SubRelStr of T |^ [:X,Y:]
for F being Function of S2,S1 st F is currying holds
F is monotone
proof end;

definition
let S be non empty RelStr ;
let T be non empty reflexive antisymmetric RelStr ;
func UPS S,T -> strict RelStr means :Def4: :: WAYBEL27:def 4
( it is full SubRelStr of T |^ the carrier of S & ( for x being set holds
( x in the carrier of it iff x is directed-sups-preserving Function of S,T ) ) );
existence
ex b1 being strict RelStr st
( b1 is full SubRelStr of T |^ the carrier of S & ( for x being set holds
( x in the carrier of b1 iff x is directed-sups-preserving Function of S,T ) ) )
proof end;
uniqueness
for b1, b2 being strict RelStr st b1 is full SubRelStr of T |^ the carrier of S & ( for x being set holds
( x in the carrier of b1 iff x is directed-sups-preserving Function of S,T ) ) & b2 is full SubRelStr of T |^ the carrier of S & ( for x being set holds
( x in the carrier of b2 iff x is directed-sups-preserving Function of S,T ) ) holds
b1 = b2
proof end;
end;

:: deftheorem Def4 defines UPS WAYBEL27:def 4 :
for S being non empty RelStr
for T being non empty reflexive antisymmetric RelStr
for b3 being strict RelStr holds
( b3 = UPS S,T iff ( b3 is full SubRelStr of T |^ the carrier of S & ( for x being set holds
( x in the carrier of b3 iff x is directed-sups-preserving Function of S,T ) ) ) );

registration
let S be non empty RelStr ;
let T be non empty reflexive antisymmetric RelStr ;
cluster UPS S,T -> non empty strict reflexive antisymmetric constituted-Functions ;
coherence
( not UPS S,T is empty & UPS S,T is reflexive & UPS S,T is antisymmetric & UPS S,T is constituted-Functions )
proof end;
end;

registration
let S be non empty RelStr ;
let T be non empty Poset;
cluster UPS S,T -> non empty strict reflexive transitive antisymmetric constituted-Functions ;
coherence
UPS S,T is transitive
proof end;
end;

theorem Th22: :: WAYBEL27:22  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S being non empty RelStr
for T being non empty reflexive antisymmetric RelStr holds the carrier of (UPS S,T) c= Funcs the carrier of S,the carrier of T
proof end;

definition
let S be non empty RelStr ;
let T be non empty reflexive antisymmetric RelStr ;
let f be Element of (UPS S,T);
let s be Element of S;
:: original: .
redefine func f . s -> Element of T;
coherence
f . s is Element of T
proof end;
end;

theorem Th23: :: WAYBEL27:23  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S being non empty RelStr
for T being non empty reflexive antisymmetric RelStr
for f, g being Element of (UPS S,T) holds
( f <= g iff for s being Element of S holds f . s <= g . s )
proof end;

theorem Th24: :: WAYBEL27:24  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being Scott complete TopLattice holds UPS S,T = SCMaps S,T
proof end;

theorem Th25: :: WAYBEL27:25  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, S' being non empty RelStr
for T, T' being non empty reflexive antisymmetric RelStr st RelStr(# the carrier of S,the InternalRel of S #) = RelStr(# the carrier of S',the InternalRel of S' #) & RelStr(# the carrier of T,the InternalRel of T #) = RelStr(# the carrier of T',the InternalRel of T' #) holds
UPS S,T = UPS S',T'
proof end;

registration
let S, T be complete LATTICE;
cluster UPS S,T -> non empty strict reflexive transitive antisymmetric complete constituted-Functions ;
coherence
UPS S,T is complete
proof end;
end;

theorem Th26: :: WAYBEL27:26  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being complete LATTICE holds UPS S,T is sups-inheriting SubRelStr of T |^ the carrier of S
proof end;

theorem Th27: :: WAYBEL27:27  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being complete LATTICE
for A being Subset of (UPS S,T) holds sup A = "\/" A,(T |^ the carrier of S)
proof end;

definition
let S1, S2, T1, T2 be non empty reflexive antisymmetric RelStr ;
let f be Function of S1,S2;
assume A1: f is directed-sups-preserving ;
let g be Function of T1,T2;
assume A2: g is directed-sups-preserving ;
func UPS f,g -> Function of (UPS S2,T1),(UPS S1,T2) means :Def5: :: WAYBEL27:def 5
for h being directed-sups-preserving Function of S2,T1 holds it . h = (g * h) * f;
existence
ex b1 being Function of (UPS S2,T1),(UPS S1,T2) st
for h being directed-sups-preserving Function of S2,T1 holds b1 . h = (g * h) * f
proof end;
uniqueness
for b1, b2 being Function of (UPS S2,T1),(UPS S1,T2) st ( for h being directed-sups-preserving Function of S2,T1 holds b1 . h = (g * h) * f ) & ( for h being directed-sups-preserving Function of S2,T1 holds b2 . h = (g * h) * f ) holds
b1 = b2
proof end;
end;

:: deftheorem Def5 defines UPS WAYBEL27:def 5 :
for S1, S2, T1, T2 being non empty reflexive antisymmetric RelStr
for f being Function of S1,S2 st f is directed-sups-preserving holds
for g being Function of T1,T2 st g is directed-sups-preserving holds
for b7 being Function of (UPS S2,T1),(UPS S1,T2) holds
( b7 = UPS f,g iff for h being directed-sups-preserving Function of S2,T1 holds b7 . h = (g * h) * f );

theorem Th28: :: WAYBEL27:28  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S1, S2, S3, T1, T2, T3 being non empty Poset
for f1 being directed-sups-preserving Function of S2,S3
for f2 being directed-sups-preserving Function of S1,S2
for g1 being directed-sups-preserving Function of T1,T2
for g2 being directed-sups-preserving Function of T2,T3 holds (UPS f2,g2) * (UPS f1,g1) = UPS (f1 * f2),(g2 * g1)
proof end;

theorem Th29: :: WAYBEL27:29  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being non empty reflexive antisymmetric RelStr holds UPS (id S),(id T) = id (UPS S,T)
proof end;

theorem Th30: :: WAYBEL27:30  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S1, S2, T1, T2 being complete LATTICE
for f being directed-sups-preserving Function of S1,S2
for g being directed-sups-preserving Function of T1,T2 holds UPS f,g is directed-sups-preserving
proof end;

theorem Th31: :: WAYBEL27:31  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
Omega Sierpinski_Space is Scott
proof end;

theorem :: WAYBEL27:32  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S being Scott complete TopLattice holds oContMaps S,Sierpinski_Space = UPS S,(BoolePoset 1)
proof end;

theorem Th33: :: WAYBEL27:33  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S being complete LATTICE ex F being Function of (UPS S,(BoolePoset 1)),(InclPoset (sigma S)) st
( F is isomorphic & ( for f being directed-sups-preserving Function of S,(BoolePoset 1) holds F . f = f " {1} ) )
proof end;

theorem Th34: :: WAYBEL27:34  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S being complete LATTICE holds UPS S,(BoolePoset 1), InclPoset (sigma S) are_isomorphic
proof end;

theorem Th35: :: WAYBEL27:35  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S1, S2, T1, T2 being complete LATTICE
for f being Function of S1,S2
for g being Function of T1,T2 st f is isomorphic & g is isomorphic holds
UPS f,g is isomorphic
proof end;

theorem Th36: :: WAYBEL27:36  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S1, S2, T1, T2 being complete LATTICE st S1,S2 are_isomorphic & T1,T2 are_isomorphic holds
UPS S2,T1, UPS S1,T2 are_isomorphic
proof end;

theorem Th37: :: WAYBEL27:37  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being complete LATTICE
for f being directed-sups-preserving projection Function of T,T holds Image (UPS (id S),f) = UPS S,(Image f)
proof end;

Lm1: now
let M be non empty set ; :: thesis: for X, Y being non empty Poset
for f being directed-sups-preserving Function of X,(Y |^ M) holds
( f in Funcs the carrier of X,(Funcs M,the carrier of Y) & rng (commute f) c= Funcs the carrier of X,the carrier of Y & dom (commute f) = M )

let X, Y be non empty Poset; :: thesis: for f being directed-sups-preserving Function of X,(Y |^ M) holds
( f in Funcs the carrier of X,(Funcs M,the carrier of Y) & rng (commute f) c= Funcs the carrier of X,the carrier of Y & dom (commute f) = M )

let f be directed-sups-preserving Function of X,(Y |^ M); :: thesis: ( f in Funcs the carrier of X,(Funcs M,the carrier of Y) & rng (commute f) c= Funcs the carrier of X,the carrier of Y & dom (commute f) = M )
the carrier of (Y |^ M) = Funcs M,the carrier of Y by YELLOW_1:28;
then ( dom f = the carrier of X & rng f c= Funcs M,the carrier of Y ) by FUNCT_2:def 1;
hence f in Funcs the carrier of X,(Funcs M,the carrier of Y) by FUNCT_2:def 2; :: thesis: ( rng (commute f) c= Funcs the carrier of X,the carrier of Y & dom (commute f) = M )
then commute f in Funcs M,(Funcs the carrier of X,the carrier of Y) by FUNCT_6:85;
then ex g being Function st
( commute f = g & dom g = M & rng g c= Funcs the carrier of X,the carrier of Y ) by FUNCT_2:def 2;
hence ( rng (commute f) c= Funcs the carrier of X,the carrier of Y & dom (commute f) = M ) ; :: thesis: verum
end;

theorem Th38: :: WAYBEL27:38  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for X being non empty set
for S, T being non empty Poset
for f being directed-sups-preserving Function of S,(T |^ X)
for i being Element of X holds (commute f) . i is directed-sups-preserving Function of S,T
proof end;

theorem Th39: :: WAYBEL27:39  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for X being non empty set
for S, T being non empty Poset
for f being directed-sups-preserving Function of S,(T |^ X) holds commute f is Function of X,the carrier of (UPS S,T)
proof end;

theorem Th40: :: WAYBEL27:40  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for X being non empty set
for S, T being non empty Poset
for f being Function of X,the carrier of (UPS S,T) holds commute f is directed-sups-preserving Function of S,(T |^ X)
proof end;

theorem Th41: :: WAYBEL27:41  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for X being non empty set
for S, T being non empty Poset ex F being Function of (UPS S,(T |^ X)),((UPS S,T) |^ X) st
( F is commuting & F is isomorphic )
proof end;

theorem Th42: :: WAYBEL27:42  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for X being non empty set
for S, T being non empty Poset holds UPS S,(T |^ X),(UPS S,T) |^ X are_isomorphic
proof end;

theorem :: WAYBEL27:43  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being complete continuous LATTICE holds UPS S,T is continuous
proof end;

theorem :: WAYBEL27:44  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being algebraic complete LATTICE holds UPS S,T is algebraic
proof end;

theorem Th45: :: WAYBEL27:45  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for R, S, T being complete LATTICE
for f being directed-sups-preserving Function of R,(UPS S,T) holds uncurry f is directed-sups-preserving Function of [:R,S:],T
proof end;

theorem Th46: :: WAYBEL27:46  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for R, S, T being complete LATTICE
for f being directed-sups-preserving Function of [:R,S:],T holds curry f is directed-sups-preserving Function of R,(UPS S,T)
proof end;

theorem :: WAYBEL27:47  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for R, S, T being complete LATTICE ex f being Function of (UPS R,(UPS S,T)),(UPS [:R,S:],T) st
( f is uncurrying & f is isomorphic )
proof end;