:: WAYBEL19 semantic presentation  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph for whole article:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Trees again to close it)

definition
let T be non empty TopRelStr ;
attr T is lower means :Def1: :: WAYBEL19:def 1
{ ((uparrow x) ` ) where x is Element of T : verum } is prebasis of T;
end;

:: deftheorem Def1 defines lower WAYBEL19:def 1 :
for T being non empty TopRelStr holds
( T is lower iff { ((uparrow x) ` ) where x is Element of T : verum } is prebasis of T );

Lm1: now
let LL, T be non empty RelStr ; :: thesis: ( RelStr(# the carrier of LL,the InternalRel of LL #) = RelStr(# the carrier of T,the InternalRel of T #) implies { ((uparrow x) ` ) where x is Element of LL : verum } = { ((uparrow x) ` ) where x is Element of T : verum } )
assume A1: RelStr(# the carrier of LL,the InternalRel of LL #) = RelStr(# the carrier of T,the InternalRel of T #) ; :: thesis: { ((uparrow x) ` ) where x is Element of LL : verum } = { ((uparrow x) ` ) where x is Element of T : verum }
set A = { ((uparrow x) ` ) where x is Element of LL : verum } ;
set BB = { ((uparrow x) ` ) where x is Element of T : verum } ;
thus { ((uparrow x) ` ) where x is Element of LL : verum } = { ((uparrow x) ` ) where x is Element of T : verum } :: thesis: verum
proof
hereby :: according to TARSKI:def 3,XBOOLE_0:def 10 :: thesis: { ((uparrow x) ` ) where x is Element of T : verum } c= { ((uparrow x) ` ) where x is Element of LL : verum }
let a be set ; :: thesis: ( a in { ((uparrow x) ` ) where x is Element of LL : verum } implies a in { ((uparrow x) ` ) where x is Element of T : verum } )
assume a in { ((uparrow x) ` ) where x is Element of LL : verum } ; :: thesis: a in { ((uparrow x) ` ) where x is Element of T : verum }
then consider x being Element of LL such that
A2: a = (uparrow x) ` ;
reconsider y = x as Element of T by A1;
a = ([#] LL) \ (uparrow x) by A2, PRE_TOPC:17
.= ([#] LL) \ (uparrow {x})
.= ([#] LL) \ (uparrow {y}) by A1, WAYBEL_0:13
.= the carrier of LL \ (uparrow {y})
.= ([#] T) \ (uparrow {y}) by A1
.= (uparrow {y}) ` by PRE_TOPC:17
.= (uparrow y) ` ;
hence a in { ((uparrow x) ` ) where x is Element of T : verum } ; :: thesis: verum
end;
let a be set ; :: according to TARSKI:def 3 :: thesis: ( not a in { ((uparrow x) ` ) where x is Element of T : verum } or a in { ((uparrow x) ` ) where x is Element of LL : verum } )
assume a in { ((uparrow x) ` ) where x is Element of T : verum } ; :: thesis: a in { ((uparrow x) ` ) where x is Element of LL : verum }
then consider x being Element of T such that
A3: a = (uparrow x) ` ;
reconsider y = x as Element of LL by A1;
a = ([#] T) \ (uparrow x) by A3, PRE_TOPC:17
.= ([#] T) \ (uparrow {x})
.= ([#] T) \ (uparrow {y}) by A1, WAYBEL_0:13
.= the carrier of LL \ (uparrow {y}) by A1
.= ([#] LL) \ (uparrow {y})
.= (uparrow {y}) ` by PRE_TOPC:17
.= (uparrow y) ` ;
hence a in { ((uparrow x) ` ) where x is Element of LL : verum } ; :: thesis: verum
end;
end;

registration
cluster non empty reflexive TopSpace-like trivial -> non empty reflexive TopSpace-like lower TopRelStr ;
coherence
for b1 being non empty reflexive TopSpace-like TopRelStr st b1 is trivial holds
b1 is lower
proof end;
end;

registration
cluster strict complete trivial lower TopRelStr ;
existence
ex b1 being TopLattice st
( b1 is lower & b1 is trivial & b1 is complete & b1 is strict )
proof end;
end;

theorem Th1: :: WAYBEL19:1  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for LL being non empty RelStr ex T being correct strict TopAugmentation of LL st T is lower
proof end;

registration
let R be non empty RelStr ;
cluster correct strict lower TopAugmentation of R;
existence
ex b1 being correct strict TopAugmentation of R st b1 is lower
by Th1;
end;

theorem Th2: :: WAYBEL19:2  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for L1, L2 being non empty TopSpace-like lower TopRelStr st RelStr(# the carrier of L1,the InternalRel of L1 #) = RelStr(# the carrier of L2,the InternalRel of L2 #) holds
the topology of L1 = the topology of L2
proof end;

definition
let R be non empty RelStr ;
func omega R -> Subset-Family of R means :Def2: :: WAYBEL19:def 2
for T being correct lower TopAugmentation of R holds it = the topology of T;
uniqueness
for b1, b2 being Subset-Family of R st ( for T being correct lower TopAugmentation of R holds b1 = the topology of T ) & ( for T being correct lower TopAugmentation of R holds b2 = the topology of T ) holds
b1 = b2
proof end;
existence
ex b1 being Subset-Family of R st
for T being correct lower TopAugmentation of R holds b1 = the topology of T
proof end;
end;

:: deftheorem Def2 defines omega WAYBEL19:def 2 :
for R being non empty RelStr
for b2 being Subset-Family of R holds
( b2 = omega R iff for T being correct lower TopAugmentation of R holds b2 = the topology of T );

theorem Th3: :: WAYBEL19:3  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for R1, R2 being non empty RelStr st RelStr(# the carrier of R1,the InternalRel of R1 #) = RelStr(# the carrier of R2,the InternalRel of R2 #) holds
omega R1 = omega R2
proof end;

theorem Th4: :: WAYBEL19:4  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T being non empty lower TopRelStr
for x being Point of T holds
( (uparrow x) ` is open & uparrow x is closed )
proof end;

theorem Th5: :: WAYBEL19:5  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T being non empty transitive lower TopRelStr
for A being Subset of T st A is open holds
A is lower
proof end;

theorem Th6: :: WAYBEL19:6  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T being non empty transitive lower TopRelStr
for A being Subset of T st A is closed holds
A is upper
proof end;

theorem Th7: :: WAYBEL19:7  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T being non empty TopSpace-like TopRelStr holds
( T is lower iff { ((uparrow F) ` ) where F is Subset of T : F is finite } is Basis of T )
proof end;

theorem Th8: :: WAYBEL19:8  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being complete lower TopLattice
for f being Function of S,T st ( for X being non empty Subset of S holds f preserves_inf_of X ) holds
f is continuous
proof end;

theorem Th9: :: WAYBEL19:9  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being complete lower TopLattice
for f being Function of S,T st f is infs-preserving holds
f is continuous
proof end;

theorem Th10: :: WAYBEL19:10  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T being complete lower TopLattice
for BB being prebasis of T
for F being non empty filtered Subset of T st ( for A being Subset of T st A in BB & inf F in A holds
F meets A ) holds
inf F in Cl F
proof end;

theorem Th11: :: WAYBEL19:11  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being complete lower TopLattice
for f being Function of S,T st f is continuous holds
f is filtered-infs-preserving
proof end;

theorem :: WAYBEL19:12  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being complete lower TopLattice
for f being Function of S,T st f is continuous & ( for X being finite Subset of S holds f preserves_inf_of X ) holds
f is infs-preserving
proof end;

theorem :: WAYBEL19:13  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T being non empty reflexive transitive TopSpace-like lower TopRelStr
for x being Point of T holds Cl {x} = uparrow x
proof end;

definition
mode TopPoset is reflexive transitive antisymmetric TopSpace-like TopRelStr ;
end;

registration
cluster non empty lower -> non empty T_0 TopRelStr ;
coherence
for b1 being non empty TopPoset st b1 is lower holds
b1 is T_0
proof end;
end;

registration
let R be non empty lower-bounded RelStr ;
cluster -> lower-bounded TopAugmentation of R;
coherence
for b1 being TopAugmentation of R holds b1 is lower-bounded
proof end;
end;

theorem Th14: :: WAYBEL19:14  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being non empty RelStr
for s being Element of S
for t being Element of T holds (uparrow [s,t]) ` = [:((uparrow s) ` ),the carrier of T:] \/ [:the carrier of S,((uparrow t) ` ):]
proof end;

Lm2: for L1, L2 being non empty RelStr st RelStr(# the carrier of L1,the InternalRel of L1 #) = RelStr(# the carrier of L2,the InternalRel of L2 #) holds
for x1 being Element of L1
for x2 being Element of L2 st x1 = x2 holds
( uparrow x1 = uparrow x2 & downarrow x1 = downarrow x2 )
by WAYBEL_0:13;

theorem Th15: :: WAYBEL19:15  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being non empty lower-bounded Poset
for S' being correct lower TopAugmentation of S
for T' being correct lower TopAugmentation of T holds omega [:S,T:] = the topology of [:S',T':]
proof end;

theorem :: WAYBEL19:16  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being non empty lower-bounded lower TopPoset holds omega [:S,T:] = the topology of [:S,T:]
proof end;

theorem :: WAYBEL19:17  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T, T2 being complete lower TopLattice st T2 is TopAugmentation of [:T,T:] holds
for f being Function of T2,T st f = inf_op T holds
f is continuous
proof end;

scheme :: WAYBEL19:sch 1
TopInd{ F1() -> TopLattice, P1[ set ] } :
for A being Subset of F1() st A is open holds
P1[A]
provided
A1: ex K being prebasis of F1() st
for A being Subset of F1() st A in K holds
P1[A] and
A2: for F being Subset-Family of F1() st ( for A being Subset of F1() st A in F holds
P1[A] ) holds
P1[ union F] and
A3: for A1, A2 being Subset of F1() st P1[A1] & P1[A2] holds
P1[A1 /\ A2] and
A4: P1[ [#] F1()]
proof end;

theorem :: WAYBEL19:18  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for L1, L2 being non empty reflexive antisymmetric up-complete RelStr st RelStr(# the carrier of L1,the InternalRel of L1 #) = RelStr(# the carrier of L2,the InternalRel of L2 #) & ( for x being Element of L1 holds
( waybelow x is directed & not waybelow x is empty ) ) & L1 is satisfying_axiom_of_approximation holds
L2 is satisfying_axiom_of_approximation
proof end;

registration
let T be non empty continuous Poset;
cluster -> continuous TopAugmentation of T;
coherence
for b1 being TopAugmentation of T holds b1 is continuous
proof end;
end;

theorem Th19: :: WAYBEL19:19  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T, S being TopSpace
for R being Refinement of T,S
for W being Subset of R st ( W in the topology of T or W in the topology of S ) holds
W is open
proof end;

theorem Th20: :: WAYBEL19:20  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T, S being TopSpace
for R being Refinement of T,S
for V being Subset of T
for W being Subset of R st W = V & V is open holds
W is open
proof end;

theorem Th21: :: WAYBEL19:21  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T, S being TopSpace st the carrier of T = the carrier of S holds
for R being Refinement of T,S
for V being Subset of T
for W being Subset of R st W = V & V is closed holds
W is closed
proof end;

theorem Th22: :: WAYBEL19:22  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T being non empty TopSpace
for K, O being set st K c= O & O c= the topology of T holds
( ( K is Basis of T implies O is Basis of T ) & ( K is prebasis of T implies O is prebasis of T ) )
proof end;

theorem Th23: :: WAYBEL19:23  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T1, T2 being non empty TopSpace st the carrier of T1 = the carrier of T2 holds
for T being Refinement of T1,T2
for B1 being prebasis of T1
for B2 being prebasis of T2 holds B1 \/ B2 is prebasis of T
proof end;

theorem :: WAYBEL19:24  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T1, S1, T2, S2 being non empty TopSpace
for R1 being Refinement of T1,S1
for R2 being Refinement of T2,S2
for f being Function of T1,T2
for g being Function of S1,S2
for h being Function of R1,R2 st h = f & h = g & f is continuous & g is continuous holds
h is continuous
proof end;

theorem Th25: :: WAYBEL19:25  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T being non empty TopSpace
for K being prebasis of T
for N being net of T
for p being Point of T st ( for A being Subset of T st p in A & A in K holds
N is_eventually_in A ) holds
p in Lim N
proof end;

theorem Th26: :: WAYBEL19:26  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T being non empty TopSpace
for N being net of T
for S being Subset of T st N is_eventually_in S holds
Lim N c= Cl S
proof end;

theorem Th27: :: WAYBEL19:27  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for R being non empty RelStr
for X being non empty Subset of R holds
( the mapping of (X +id ) = id X & the mapping of (X opp+id ) = id X )
proof end;

theorem Th28: :: WAYBEL19:28  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for R being non empty reflexive antisymmetric RelStr
for x being Element of R holds (uparrow x) /\ (downarrow x) = {x}
proof end;

definition
let T be non empty reflexive TopRelStr ;
attr T is Lawson means :Def3: :: WAYBEL19:def 3
(omega T) \/ (sigma T) is prebasis of T;
end;

:: deftheorem Def3 defines Lawson WAYBEL19:def 3 :
for T being non empty reflexive TopRelStr holds
( T is Lawson iff (omega T) \/ (sigma T) is prebasis of T );

theorem Th29: :: WAYBEL19:29  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for R being complete LATTICE
for LL being correct lower TopAugmentation of R
for S being Scott TopAugmentation of R
for T being correct TopAugmentation of R holds
( T is Lawson iff T is Refinement of S,LL )
proof end;

registration
let R be complete LATTICE;
cluster lower-bounded correct strict Lawson TopAugmentation of R;
existence
ex b1 being TopAugmentation of R st
( b1 is Lawson & b1 is strict & b1 is TopSpace-like )
proof end;
end;

registration
cluster strict Scott complete TopRelStr ;
existence
ex b1 being TopLattice st
( b1 is Scott & b1 is complete & b1 is strict )
proof end;
cluster continuous strict complete Lawson TopRelStr ;
existence
ex b1 being strict complete TopLattice st
( b1 is Lawson & b1 is continuous )
proof end;
end;

theorem Th30: :: WAYBEL19:30  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T being complete Lawson TopLattice holds (sigma T) \/ { ((uparrow x) ` ) where x is Element of T : verum } is prebasis of T
proof end;

theorem :: WAYBEL19:31  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T being complete Lawson TopLattice holds (sigma T) \/ { (W \ (uparrow x)) where W is Subset of T, x is Element of T : W in sigma T } is prebasis of T
proof end;

theorem :: WAYBEL19:32  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T being complete Lawson TopLattice holds { (W \ (uparrow F)) where W, F is Subset of T : ( W in sigma T & F is finite ) } is Basis of T
proof end;

definition
let T be complete LATTICE;
func lambda T -> Subset-Family of T means :Def4: :: WAYBEL19:def 4
for S being correct Lawson TopAugmentation of T holds it = the topology of S;
uniqueness
for b1, b2 being Subset-Family of T st ( for S being correct Lawson TopAugmentation of T holds b1 = the topology of S ) & ( for S being correct Lawson TopAugmentation of T holds b2 = the topology of S ) holds
b1 = b2
proof end;
existence
ex b1 being Subset-Family of T st
for S being correct Lawson TopAugmentation of T holds b1 = the topology of S
proof end;
end;

:: deftheorem Def4 defines lambda WAYBEL19:def 4 :
for T being complete LATTICE
for b2 being Subset-Family of T holds
( b2 = lambda T iff for S being correct Lawson TopAugmentation of T holds b2 = the topology of S );

theorem Th33: :: WAYBEL19:33  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for R being complete LATTICE holds lambda R = UniCl (FinMeetCl ((sigma R) \/ (omega R)))
proof end;

theorem :: WAYBEL19:34  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for R being complete LATTICE
for T being correct lower TopAugmentation of R
for S being correct Scott TopAugmentation of R
for M being Refinement of S,T holds lambda R = the topology of M
proof end;

Lm3: for T being LATTICE
for F being Subset-Family of T st ( for A being Subset of T st A in F holds
A has_the_property_(S) ) holds
union F has_the_property_(S)
proof end;

Lm4: for T being LATTICE
for A1, A2 being Subset of T st A1 has_the_property_(S) & A2 has_the_property_(S) holds
A1 /\ A2 has_the_property_(S)
proof end;

Lm5: for T being LATTICE holds [#] T has_the_property_(S)
proof end;

theorem Th35: :: WAYBEL19:35  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T being up-complete lower TopLattice
for A being Subset of T st A is open holds
A has_the_property_(S)
proof end;

theorem Th36: :: WAYBEL19:36  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T being complete Lawson TopLattice
for A being Subset of T st A is open holds
A has_the_property_(S)
proof end;

theorem Th37: :: WAYBEL19:37  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S being Scott complete TopLattice
for T being correct Lawson TopAugmentation of S
for A being Subset of S st A is open holds
for C being Subset of T st C = A holds
C is open
proof end;

theorem Th38: :: WAYBEL19:38  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T being complete Lawson TopLattice
for x being Element of T holds
( uparrow x is closed & downarrow x is closed & {x} is closed )
proof end;

theorem Th39: :: WAYBEL19:39  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T being complete Lawson TopLattice
for x being Element of T holds
( (uparrow x) ` is open & (downarrow x) ` is open & {x} ` is open )
proof end;

theorem Th40: :: WAYBEL19:40  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T being continuous complete Lawson TopLattice
for x being Element of T holds
( wayabove x is open & (wayabove x) ` is closed )
proof end;

theorem :: WAYBEL19:41  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S being Scott complete TopLattice
for T being correct Lawson TopAugmentation of S
for A being upper Subset of T st A is open holds
for C being Subset of S st C = A holds
C is open
proof end;

theorem :: WAYBEL19:42  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T being complete Lawson TopLattice
for A being lower Subset of T holds
( A is closed iff A is closed_under_directed_sups )
proof end;

theorem :: WAYBEL19:43  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T being complete Lawson TopLattice
for F being non empty filtered Subset of T holds Lim (F opp+id ) = {(inf F)}
proof end;

registration
cluster complete Lawson -> compact being_T1 complete TopRelStr ;
coherence
for b1 being complete TopLattice st b1 is Lawson holds
( b1 is being_T1 & b1 is compact )
proof end;
end;

registration
cluster continuous complete Lawson -> continuous Hausdorff complete TopRelStr ;
coherence
for b1 being continuous complete TopLattice st b1 is Lawson holds
b1 is being_T2
proof end;
end;