:: YELLOW10 semantic presentation  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph for whole article:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Trees again to close it)

registration
let S, T be non empty upper-bounded RelStr ;
cluster [:S,T:] -> upper-bounded ;
coherence
[:S,T:] is upper-bounded
proof end;
end;

registration
let S, T be non empty lower-bounded RelStr ;
cluster [:S,T:] -> lower-bounded ;
coherence
[:S,T:] is lower-bounded
proof end;
end;

theorem :: YELLOW10:1  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being non empty RelStr st [:S,T:] is upper-bounded holds
( S is upper-bounded & T is upper-bounded )
proof end;

theorem :: YELLOW10:2  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being non empty RelStr st [:S,T:] is lower-bounded holds
( S is lower-bounded & T is lower-bounded )
proof end;

theorem Th3: :: YELLOW10:3  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being non empty antisymmetric upper-bounded RelStr holds Top [:S,T:] = [(Top S),(Top T)]
proof end;

theorem Th4: :: YELLOW10:4  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being non empty antisymmetric lower-bounded RelStr holds Bottom [:S,T:] = [(Bottom S),(Bottom T)]
proof end;

theorem Th5: :: YELLOW10:5  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being non empty antisymmetric lower-bounded RelStr
for D being Subset of [:S,T:] st ( [:S,T:] is complete or ex_sup_of D,[:S,T:] ) holds
sup D = [(sup (proj1 D)),(sup (proj2 D))]
proof end;

theorem :: YELLOW10:6  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being non empty antisymmetric upper-bounded RelStr
for D being Subset of [:S,T:] st ( [:S,T:] is complete or ex_inf_of D,[:S,T:] ) holds
inf D = [(inf (proj1 D)),(inf (proj2 D))]
proof end;

theorem :: YELLOW10:7  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being non empty RelStr
for x, y being Element of [:S,T:] holds
( x is_<=_than {y} iff ( x `1 is_<=_than {(y `1 )} & x `2 is_<=_than {(y `2 )} ) )
proof end;

theorem :: YELLOW10:8  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being non empty RelStr
for x, y, z being Element of [:S,T:] holds
( x is_<=_than {y,z} iff ( x `1 is_<=_than {(y `1 ),(z `1 )} & x `2 is_<=_than {(y `2 ),(z `2 )} ) )
proof end;

theorem :: YELLOW10:9  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being non empty RelStr
for x, y being Element of [:S,T:] holds
( x is_>=_than {y} iff ( x `1 is_>=_than {(y `1 )} & x `2 is_>=_than {(y `2 )} ) )
proof end;

theorem :: YELLOW10:10  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being non empty RelStr
for x, y, z being Element of [:S,T:] holds
( x is_>=_than {y,z} iff ( x `1 is_>=_than {(y `1 ),(z `1 )} & x `2 is_>=_than {(y `2 ),(z `2 )} ) )
proof end;

theorem :: YELLOW10:11  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being non empty antisymmetric RelStr
for x, y being Element of [:S,T:] holds
( ex_inf_of {x,y},[:S,T:] iff ( ex_inf_of {(x `1 ),(y `1 )},S & ex_inf_of {(x `2 ),(y `2 )},T ) )
proof end;

theorem :: YELLOW10:12  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being non empty antisymmetric RelStr
for x, y being Element of [:S,T:] holds
( ex_sup_of {x,y},[:S,T:] iff ( ex_sup_of {(x `1 ),(y `1 )},S & ex_sup_of {(x `2 ),(y `2 )},T ) )
proof end;

theorem Th13: :: YELLOW10:13  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being antisymmetric with_infima RelStr
for x, y being Element of [:S,T:] holds
( (x "/\" y) `1 = (x `1 ) "/\" (y `1 ) & (x "/\" y) `2 = (x `2 ) "/\" (y `2 ) )
proof end;

theorem Th14: :: YELLOW10:14  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being antisymmetric with_suprema RelStr
for x, y being Element of [:S,T:] holds
( (x "\/" y) `1 = (x `1 ) "\/" (y `1 ) & (x "\/" y) `2 = (x `2 ) "\/" (y `2 ) )
proof end;

theorem Th15: :: YELLOW10:15  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being antisymmetric with_infima RelStr
for x1, y1 being Element of S
for x2, y2 being Element of T holds [(x1 "/\" y1),(x2 "/\" y2)] = [x1,x2] "/\" [y1,y2]
proof end;

theorem Th16: :: YELLOW10:16  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being antisymmetric with_suprema RelStr
for x1, y1 being Element of S
for x2, y2 being Element of T holds [(x1 "\/" y1),(x2 "\/" y2)] = [x1,x2] "\/" [y1,y2]
proof end;

definition
let S be antisymmetric with_suprema with_infima RelStr ;
let x, y be Element of S;
:: original: is_a_complement_of
redefine pred y is_a_complement_of x;
symmetry
for y, x being Element of S st y is_a_complement_of x holds
x is_a_complement_of y
proof end;
end;

theorem Th17: :: YELLOW10:17  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being antisymmetric with_suprema with_infima bounded RelStr
for x, y being Element of [:S,T:] holds
( x is_a_complement_of y iff ( x `1 is_a_complement_of y `1 & x `2 is_a_complement_of y `2 ) )
proof end;

theorem Th18: :: YELLOW10:18  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being non empty reflexive antisymmetric up-complete RelStr
for a, c being Element of S
for b, d being Element of T st [a,b] << [c,d] holds
( a << c & b << d )
proof end;

theorem Th19: :: YELLOW10:19  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being non empty up-complete Poset
for a, c being Element of S
for b, d being Element of T holds
( [a,b] << [c,d] iff ( a << c & b << d ) )
proof end;

theorem Th20: :: YELLOW10:20  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being non empty reflexive antisymmetric up-complete RelStr
for x, y being Element of [:S,T:] st x << y holds
( x `1 << y `1 & x `2 << y `2 )
proof end;

theorem Th21: :: YELLOW10:21  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being non empty up-complete Poset
for x, y being Element of [:S,T:] holds
( x << y iff ( x `1 << y `1 & x `2 << y `2 ) )
proof end;

theorem Th22: :: YELLOW10:22  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being non empty reflexive antisymmetric up-complete RelStr
for x being Element of [:S,T:] st x is compact holds
( x `1 is compact & x `2 is compact )
proof end;

theorem Th23: :: YELLOW10:23  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being non empty up-complete Poset
for x being Element of [:S,T:] st x `1 is compact & x `2 is compact holds
x is compact
proof end;

theorem Th24: :: YELLOW10:24  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being antisymmetric with_infima RelStr
for X, Y being Subset of [:S,T:] holds
( proj1 (X "/\" Y) = (proj1 X) "/\" (proj1 Y) & proj2 (X "/\" Y) = (proj2 X) "/\" (proj2 Y) )
proof end;

theorem :: YELLOW10:25  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being antisymmetric with_suprema RelStr
for X, Y being Subset of [:S,T:] holds
( proj1 (X "\/" Y) = (proj1 X) "\/" (proj1 Y) & proj2 (X "\/" Y) = (proj2 X) "\/" (proj2 Y) )
proof end;

theorem :: YELLOW10:26  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being RelStr
for X being Subset of [:S,T:] holds downarrow X c= [:(downarrow (proj1 X)),(downarrow (proj2 X)):]
proof end;

theorem :: YELLOW10:27  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being RelStr
for X being Subset of S
for Y being Subset of T holds [:(downarrow X),(downarrow Y):] = downarrow [:X,Y:]
proof end;

theorem Th28: :: YELLOW10:28  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being RelStr
for X being Subset of [:S,T:] holds
( proj1 (downarrow X) c= downarrow (proj1 X) & proj2 (downarrow X) c= downarrow (proj2 X) )
proof end;

theorem :: YELLOW10:29  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S being RelStr
for T being reflexive RelStr
for X being Subset of [:S,T:] holds proj1 (downarrow X) = downarrow (proj1 X)
proof end;

theorem :: YELLOW10:30  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S being reflexive RelStr
for T being RelStr
for X being Subset of [:S,T:] holds proj2 (downarrow X) = downarrow (proj2 X)
proof end;

theorem :: YELLOW10:31  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being RelStr
for X being Subset of [:S,T:] holds uparrow X c= [:(uparrow (proj1 X)),(uparrow (proj2 X)):]
proof end;

theorem :: YELLOW10:32  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being RelStr
for X being Subset of S
for Y being Subset of T holds [:(uparrow X),(uparrow Y):] = uparrow [:X,Y:]
proof end;

theorem Th33: :: YELLOW10:33  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being RelStr
for X being Subset of [:S,T:] holds
( proj1 (uparrow X) c= uparrow (proj1 X) & proj2 (uparrow X) c= uparrow (proj2 X) )
proof end;

theorem :: YELLOW10:34  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S being RelStr
for T being reflexive RelStr
for X being Subset of [:S,T:] holds proj1 (uparrow X) = uparrow (proj1 X)
proof end;

theorem :: YELLOW10:35  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S being reflexive RelStr
for T being RelStr
for X being Subset of [:S,T:] holds proj2 (uparrow X) = uparrow (proj2 X)
proof end;

theorem :: YELLOW10:36  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being non empty RelStr
for s being Element of S
for t being Element of T holds [:(downarrow s),(downarrow t):] = downarrow [s,t]
proof end;

theorem Th37: :: YELLOW10:37  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being non empty RelStr
for x being Element of [:S,T:] holds
( proj1 (downarrow x) c= downarrow (x `1 ) & proj2 (downarrow x) c= downarrow (x `2 ) )
proof end;

theorem :: YELLOW10:38  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S being non empty RelStr
for T being non empty reflexive RelStr
for x being Element of [:S,T:] holds proj1 (downarrow x) = downarrow (x `1 )
proof end;

theorem :: YELLOW10:39  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S being non empty reflexive RelStr
for T being non empty RelStr
for x being Element of [:S,T:] holds proj2 (downarrow x) = downarrow (x `2 )
proof end;

theorem :: YELLOW10:40  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being non empty RelStr
for s being Element of S
for t being Element of T holds [:(uparrow s),(uparrow t):] = uparrow [s,t]
proof end;

theorem Th41: :: YELLOW10:41  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being non empty RelStr
for x being Element of [:S,T:] holds
( proj1 (uparrow x) c= uparrow (x `1 ) & proj2 (uparrow x) c= uparrow (x `2 ) )
proof end;

theorem :: YELLOW10:42  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S being non empty RelStr
for T being non empty reflexive RelStr
for x being Element of [:S,T:] holds proj1 (uparrow x) = uparrow (x `1 )
proof end;

theorem :: YELLOW10:43  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S being non empty reflexive RelStr
for T being non empty RelStr
for x being Element of [:S,T:] holds proj2 (uparrow x) = uparrow (x `2 )
proof end;

theorem Th44: :: YELLOW10:44  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being non empty up-complete Poset
for s being Element of S
for t being Element of T holds [:(waybelow s),(waybelow t):] = waybelow [s,t]
proof end;

theorem Th45: :: YELLOW10:45  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being non empty reflexive antisymmetric up-complete RelStr
for x being Element of [:S,T:] holds
( proj1 (waybelow x) c= waybelow (x `1 ) & proj2 (waybelow x) c= waybelow (x `2 ) )
proof end;

theorem Th46: :: YELLOW10:46  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S being non empty up-complete Poset
for T being non empty lower-bounded up-complete Poset
for x being Element of [:S,T:] holds proj1 (waybelow x) = waybelow (x `1 )
proof end;

theorem Th47: :: YELLOW10:47  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S being non empty lower-bounded up-complete Poset
for T being non empty up-complete Poset
for x being Element of [:S,T:] holds proj2 (waybelow x) = waybelow (x `2 )
proof end;

theorem :: YELLOW10:48  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being non empty up-complete Poset
for s being Element of S
for t being Element of T holds [:(wayabove s),(wayabove t):] = wayabove [s,t]
proof end;

theorem :: YELLOW10:49  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being non empty reflexive antisymmetric up-complete RelStr
for x being Element of [:S,T:] holds
( proj1 (wayabove x) c= wayabove (x `1 ) & proj2 (wayabove x) c= wayabove (x `2 ) )
proof end;

theorem Th50: :: YELLOW10:50  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being non empty up-complete Poset
for s being Element of S
for t being Element of T holds [:(compactbelow s),(compactbelow t):] = compactbelow [s,t]
proof end;

theorem Th51: :: YELLOW10:51  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being non empty reflexive antisymmetric up-complete RelStr
for x being Element of [:S,T:] holds
( proj1 (compactbelow x) c= compactbelow (x `1 ) & proj2 (compactbelow x) c= compactbelow (x `2 ) )
proof end;

theorem Th52: :: YELLOW10:52  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S being non empty up-complete Poset
for T being non empty lower-bounded up-complete Poset
for x being Element of [:S,T:] holds proj1 (compactbelow x) = compactbelow (x `1 )
proof end;

theorem Th53: :: YELLOW10:53  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S being non empty lower-bounded up-complete Poset
for T being non empty up-complete Poset
for x being Element of [:S,T:] holds proj2 (compactbelow x) = compactbelow (x `2 )
proof end;

registration
let S be non empty reflexive RelStr ;
cluster empty -> Open M2( bool the carrier of S);
coherence
for b1 being Subset of S st b1 is empty holds
b1 is Open
proof end;
end;

theorem :: YELLOW10:54  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being non empty reflexive antisymmetric up-complete RelStr
for X being Subset of [:S,T:] st X is Open holds
( proj1 X is Open & proj2 X is Open )
proof end;

theorem :: YELLOW10:55  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being non empty up-complete Poset
for X being Subset of S
for Y being Subset of T st X is Open & Y is Open holds
[:X,Y:] is Open
proof end;

theorem :: YELLOW10:56  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being non empty reflexive antisymmetric up-complete RelStr
for X being Subset of [:S,T:] st X is inaccessible_by_directed_joins holds
( proj1 X is inaccessible_by_directed_joins & proj2 X is inaccessible_by_directed_joins )
proof end;

theorem :: YELLOW10:57  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being non empty reflexive antisymmetric up-complete RelStr
for X being upper Subset of S
for Y being upper Subset of T st X is inaccessible_by_directed_joins & Y is inaccessible_by_directed_joins holds
[:X,Y:] is inaccessible_by_directed_joins
proof end;

theorem :: YELLOW10:58  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being non empty reflexive antisymmetric up-complete RelStr
for X being Subset of S
for Y being Subset of T st [:X,Y:] is closed_under_directed_sups holds
( ( Y <> {} implies X is closed_under_directed_sups ) & ( X <> {} implies Y is closed_under_directed_sups ) )
proof end;

theorem :: YELLOW10:59  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being non empty reflexive antisymmetric up-complete RelStr
for X being Subset of S
for Y being Subset of T st X is closed_under_directed_sups & Y is closed_under_directed_sups holds
[:X,Y:] is closed_under_directed_sups
proof end;

theorem :: YELLOW10:60  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being non empty reflexive antisymmetric up-complete RelStr
for X being Subset of [:S,T:] st X has_the_property_(S) holds
( proj1 X has_the_property_(S) & proj2 X has_the_property_(S) )
proof end;

theorem :: YELLOW10:61  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being non empty up-complete Poset
for X being Subset of S
for Y being Subset of T st X has_the_property_(S) & Y has_the_property_(S) holds
[:X,Y:] has_the_property_(S)
proof end;

theorem Th62: :: YELLOW10:62  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being non empty reflexive RelStr st RelStr(# the carrier of S,the InternalRel of S #) = RelStr(# the carrier of T,the InternalRel of T #) & S is /\-complete holds
T is /\-complete
proof end;

registration
let S be non empty reflexive /\-complete RelStr ;
cluster RelStr(# the carrier of S,the InternalRel of S #) -> /\-complete ;
coherence
RelStr(# the carrier of S,the InternalRel of S #) is /\-complete
by Th62;
end;

registration
let S, T be non empty reflexive /\-complete RelStr ;
cluster [:S,T:] -> lower-bounded /\-complete ;
coherence
[:S,T:] is /\-complete
proof end;
end;

theorem :: YELLOW10:63  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being non empty reflexive RelStr st [:S,T:] is /\-complete holds
( S is /\-complete & T is /\-complete )
proof end;

registration
let S, T be non empty antisymmetric with_suprema with_infima bounded complemented RelStr ;
cluster [:S,T:] -> lower-bounded upper-bounded complemented ;
coherence
[:S,T:] is complemented
proof end;
end;

theorem :: YELLOW10:64  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being antisymmetric with_suprema with_infima bounded RelStr st [:S,T:] is complemented holds
( S is complemented & T is complemented )
proof end;

registration
let S, T be non empty antisymmetric with_suprema with_infima distributive RelStr ;
cluster [:S,T:] -> distributive ;
coherence
[:S,T:] is distributive
proof end;
end;

theorem :: YELLOW10:65  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S being antisymmetric with_suprema with_infima RelStr
for T being reflexive antisymmetric with_suprema with_infima RelStr st [:S,T:] is distributive holds
S is distributive
proof end;

theorem :: YELLOW10:66  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S being reflexive antisymmetric with_suprema with_infima RelStr
for T being antisymmetric with_suprema with_infima RelStr st [:S,T:] is distributive holds
T is distributive
proof end;

registration
let S, T be meet-continuous Semilattice;
cluster [:S,T:] -> satisfying_MC ;
coherence
[:S,T:] is satisfying_MC
proof end;
end;

theorem :: YELLOW10:67  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being Semilattice st [:S,T:] is meet-continuous holds
( S is meet-continuous & T is meet-continuous )
proof end;

registration
let S, T be non empty up-complete /\-complete satisfying_axiom_of_approximation Poset;
cluster [:S,T:] -> lower-bounded /\-complete satisfying_axiom_of_approximation ;
coherence
[:S,T:] is satisfying_axiom_of_approximation
proof end;
end;

registration
let S, T be non empty /\-complete continuous Poset;
cluster [:S,T:] -> lower-bounded /\-complete satisfying_axiom_of_approximation continuous ;
coherence
[:S,T:] is continuous
proof end;
end;

theorem :: YELLOW10:68  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being non empty lower-bounded up-complete Poset st [:S,T:] is continuous holds
( S is continuous & T is continuous )
proof end;

registration
let S, T be lower-bounded up-complete satisfying_axiom_K sup-Semilattice;
cluster [:S,T:] -> /\-complete satisfying_axiom_K ;
coherence
[:S,T:] is satisfying_axiom_K
proof end;
end;

registration
let S, T be complete lower-bounded algebraic sup-Semilattice;
cluster [:S,T:] -> /\-complete satisfying_axiom_of_approximation continuous satisfying_axiom_K algebraic ;
coherence
[:S,T:] is algebraic
proof end;
end;

theorem Th69: :: YELLOW10:69  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being non empty lower-bounded Poset st [:S,T:] is algebraic holds
( S is algebraic & T is algebraic )
proof end;

registration
let S, T be lower-bounded arithmetic LATTICE;
cluster [:S,T:] -> /\-complete satisfying_axiom_of_approximation continuous satisfying_axiom_K algebraic arithmetic ;
coherence
[:S,T:] is arithmetic
proof end;
end;

theorem :: YELLOW10:70  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being lower-bounded LATTICE st [:S,T:] is arithmetic holds
( S is arithmetic & T is arithmetic )
proof end;