:: WAYBEL21 semantic presentation  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph for whole article:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Trees again to close it)

definition
let S, T be Semilattice;
assume A1: ( S is upper-bounded implies T is upper-bounded ) ;
mode SemilatticeHomomorphism of S,T -> Function of S,T means :Def1: :: WAYBEL21:def 1
for X being finite Subset of S holds it preserves_inf_of X;
existence
ex b1 being Function of S,T st
for X being finite Subset of S holds b1 preserves_inf_of X
proof end;
end;

:: deftheorem Def1 defines SemilatticeHomomorphism WAYBEL21:def 1 :
for S, T being Semilattice st ( S is upper-bounded implies T is upper-bounded ) holds
for b3 being Function of S,T holds
( b3 is SemilatticeHomomorphism of S,T iff for X being finite Subset of S holds b3 preserves_inf_of X );

registration
let S, T be Semilattice;
cluster meet-preserving -> monotone M4(the carrier of S,the carrier of T);
coherence
for b1 being Function of S,T st b1 is meet-preserving holds
b1 is monotone
proof end;
end;

registration
let S be Semilattice;
let T be upper-bounded Semilattice;
cluster -> meet-preserving SemilatticeHomomorphism of S,T;
coherence
for b1 being SemilatticeHomomorphism of S,T holds b1 is meet-preserving
proof end;
end;

theorem :: WAYBEL21:1  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being upper-bounded Semilattice
for f being SemilatticeHomomorphism of S,T holds f . (Top S) = Top T
proof end;

theorem Th2: :: WAYBEL21:2  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being Semilattice
for f being Function of S,T st f is meet-preserving holds
for X being non empty finite Subset of S holds f preserves_inf_of X
proof end;

theorem :: WAYBEL21:3  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being upper-bounded Semilattice
for f being meet-preserving Function of S,T st f . (Top S) = Top T holds
f is SemilatticeHomomorphism of S,T
proof end;

theorem Th4: :: WAYBEL21:4  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being Semilattice
for f being Function of S,T st f is meet-preserving & ( for X being non empty filtered Subset of S holds f preserves_inf_of X ) holds
for X being non empty Subset of S holds f preserves_inf_of X
proof end;

theorem Th5: :: WAYBEL21:5  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being Semilattice
for f being Function of S,T st f is infs-preserving holds
f is SemilatticeHomomorphism of S,T
proof end;

theorem Th6: :: WAYBEL21:6  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S1, T1, S2, T2 being non empty RelStr st RelStr(# the carrier of S1,the InternalRel of S1 #) = RelStr(# the carrier of S2,the InternalRel of S2 #) & RelStr(# the carrier of T1,the InternalRel of T1 #) = RelStr(# the carrier of T2,the InternalRel of T2 #) holds
for f1 being Function of S1,T1
for f2 being Function of S2,T2 st f1 = f2 holds
( ( f1 is infs-preserving implies f2 is infs-preserving ) & ( f1 is directed-sups-preserving implies f2 is directed-sups-preserving ) )
proof end;

theorem :: WAYBEL21:7  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S1, T1, S2, T2 being non empty RelStr st RelStr(# the carrier of S1,the InternalRel of S1 #) = RelStr(# the carrier of S2,the InternalRel of S2 #) & RelStr(# the carrier of T1,the InternalRel of T1 #) = RelStr(# the carrier of T2,the InternalRel of T2 #) holds
for f1 being Function of S1,T1
for f2 being Function of S2,T2 st f1 = f2 holds
( ( f1 is sups-preserving implies f2 is sups-preserving ) & ( f1 is filtered-infs-preserving implies f2 is filtered-infs-preserving ) )
proof end;

theorem Th8: :: WAYBEL21:8  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T being complete LATTICE
for S being non empty full infs-inheriting SubRelStr of T holds incl S,T is infs-preserving
proof end;

theorem :: WAYBEL21:9  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T being complete LATTICE
for S being non empty full sups-inheriting SubRelStr of T holds incl S,T is sups-preserving
proof end;

theorem Th10: :: WAYBEL21:10  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T being non empty up-complete Poset
for S being non empty full directed-sups-inheriting SubRelStr of T holds incl S,T is directed-sups-preserving
proof end;

theorem :: WAYBEL21:11  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T being complete LATTICE
for S being non empty full filtered-infs-inheriting SubRelStr of T holds incl S,T is filtered-infs-preserving
proof end;

theorem Th12: :: WAYBEL21:12  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T1, T2, R being RelStr
for S being SubRelStr of T1 st RelStr(# the carrier of T1,the InternalRel of T1 #) = RelStr(# the carrier of T2,the InternalRel of T2 #) & RelStr(# the carrier of S,the InternalRel of S #) = RelStr(# the carrier of R,the InternalRel of R #) holds
( R is SubRelStr of T2 & ( S is full implies R is full SubRelStr of T2 ) )
proof end;

theorem Th13: :: WAYBEL21:13  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T being non empty RelStr holds T is full infs-inheriting sups-inheriting SubRelStr of T
proof end;

registration
let T be complete LATTICE;
cluster complete SubRelStr of T;
existence
ex b1 being CLSubFrame of T st b1 is complete
proof end;
end;

theorem Th14: :: WAYBEL21:14  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T being Semilattice
for S being non empty full SubRelStr of T holds
( S is meet-inheriting iff for X being non empty finite Subset of S holds "/\" X,T in the carrier of S )
proof end;

theorem Th15: :: WAYBEL21:15  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T being sup-Semilattice
for S being non empty full SubRelStr of T holds
( S is join-inheriting iff for X being non empty finite Subset of S holds "\/" X,T in the carrier of S )
proof end;

theorem Th16: :: WAYBEL21:16  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T being upper-bounded Semilattice
for S being non empty full meet-inheriting SubRelStr of T st Top T in the carrier of S & S is filtered-infs-inheriting holds
S is infs-inheriting
proof end;

theorem :: WAYBEL21:17  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T being lower-bounded sup-Semilattice
for S being non empty full join-inheriting SubRelStr of T st Bottom T in the carrier of S & S is directed-sups-inheriting holds
S is sups-inheriting
proof end;

theorem Th18: :: WAYBEL21:18  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T being complete LATTICE
for S being non empty full SubRelStr of T st S is infs-inheriting holds
S is complete
proof end;

theorem :: WAYBEL21:19  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T being complete LATTICE
for S being non empty full SubRelStr of T st S is sups-inheriting holds
S is complete
proof end;

theorem :: WAYBEL21:20  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T1, T2 being non empty RelStr
for S1 being non empty full SubRelStr of T1
for S2 being non empty full SubRelStr of T2 st RelStr(# the carrier of T1,the InternalRel of T1 #) = RelStr(# the carrier of T2,the InternalRel of T2 #) & the carrier of S1 = the carrier of S2 & S1 is infs-inheriting holds
S2 is infs-inheriting
proof end;

theorem :: WAYBEL21:21  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T1, T2 being non empty RelStr
for S1 being non empty full SubRelStr of T1
for S2 being non empty full SubRelStr of T2 st RelStr(# the carrier of T1,the InternalRel of T1 #) = RelStr(# the carrier of T2,the InternalRel of T2 #) & the carrier of S1 = the carrier of S2 & S1 is sups-inheriting holds
S2 is sups-inheriting
proof end;

theorem :: WAYBEL21:22  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T1, T2 being non empty RelStr
for S1 being non empty full SubRelStr of T1
for S2 being non empty full SubRelStr of T2 st RelStr(# the carrier of T1,the InternalRel of T1 #) = RelStr(# the carrier of T2,the InternalRel of T2 #) & the carrier of S1 = the carrier of S2 & S1 is directed-sups-inheriting holds
S2 is directed-sups-inheriting
proof end;

theorem :: WAYBEL21:23  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T1, T2 being non empty RelStr
for S1 being non empty full SubRelStr of T1
for S2 being non empty full SubRelStr of T2 st RelStr(# the carrier of T1,the InternalRel of T1 #) = RelStr(# the carrier of T2,the InternalRel of T2 #) & the carrier of S1 = the carrier of S2 & S1 is filtered-infs-inheriting holds
S2 is filtered-infs-inheriting
proof end;

theorem Th24: :: WAYBEL21:24  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being non empty TopSpace
for N being net of S
for f being Function of S,T st f is continuous holds
f .: (Lim N) c= Lim (f * N)
proof end;

definition
let T be non empty RelStr ;
let N be non empty NetStr of T;
redefine attr N is antitone means :Def2: :: WAYBEL21:def 2
for i, j being Element of N st i <= j holds
N . i >= N . j;
compatibility
( N is antitone iff for i, j being Element of N st i <= j holds
N . i >= N . j )
proof end;
end;

:: deftheorem Def2 defines antitone WAYBEL21:def 2 :
for T being non empty RelStr
for N being non empty NetStr of T holds
( N is antitone iff for i, j being Element of N st i <= j holds
N . i >= N . j );

registration
let T be non empty reflexive RelStr ;
let x be Element of T;
cluster {x} opp+id -> transitive directed monotone antitone ;
coherence
( {x} opp+id is transitive & {x} opp+id is directed & {x} opp+id is monotone & {x} opp+id is antitone )
proof end;
end;

registration
let T be non empty reflexive RelStr ;
cluster reflexive strict monotone antitone NetStr of T;
existence
ex b1 being net of T st
( b1 is monotone & b1 is antitone & b1 is reflexive & b1 is strict )
proof end;
end;

registration
let T be non empty RelStr ;
let F be non empty Subset of T;
cluster F opp+id -> antitone ;
coherence
F opp+id is antitone
proof end;
end;

registration
let S, T be non empty reflexive RelStr ;
let f be monotone Function of S,T;
let N be non empty antitone NetStr of S;
cluster f * N -> antitone ;
coherence
f * N is antitone
proof end;
end;

theorem Th25: :: WAYBEL21:25  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S being complete LATTICE
for N being net of S holds { ("/\" { (N . i) where i is Element of N : i >= j } ,S) where j is Element of N : verum } is non empty directed Subset of S
proof end;

theorem :: WAYBEL21:26  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S being non empty Poset
for N being reflexive monotone net of S holds { ("/\" { (N . i) where i is Element of N : i >= j } ,S) where j is Element of N : verum } is non empty directed Subset of S
proof end;

theorem Th27: :: WAYBEL21:27  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S being non empty 1-sorted
for N being non empty NetStr of S
for X being set st rng the mapping of N c= X holds
N is_eventually_in X
proof end;

theorem Th28: :: WAYBEL21:28  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for R being non empty /\-complete Poset
for F being non empty filtered Subset of R holds lim_inf (F opp+id ) = inf F
proof end;

theorem Th29: :: WAYBEL21:29  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being non empty /\-complete Poset
for X being non empty filtered Subset of S
for f being monotone Function of S,T holds lim_inf (f * (X opp+id )) = inf (f .: X)
proof end;

theorem Th30: :: WAYBEL21:30  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being non empty TopPoset
for X being non empty filtered Subset of S
for f being monotone Function of S,T
for Y being non empty filtered Subset of T st Y = f .: X holds
f * (X opp+id ) is subnet of Y opp+id
proof end;

theorem :: WAYBEL21:31  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being non empty TopPoset
for X being non empty filtered Subset of S
for f being monotone Function of S,T
for Y being non empty filtered Subset of T st Y = f .: X holds
Lim (Y opp+id ) c= Lim (f * (X opp+id ))
proof end;

theorem Th32: :: WAYBEL21:32  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S being non empty reflexive RelStr
for D being non empty Subset of S holds
( the mapping of (Net-Str D) = id D & the carrier of (Net-Str D) = D & Net-Str D is full SubRelStr of S )
proof end;

theorem Th33: :: WAYBEL21:33  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being non empty up-complete Poset
for f being monotone Function of S,T
for D being non empty directed Subset of S holds lim_inf (f * (Net-Str D)) = sup (f .: D)
proof end;

theorem Th34: :: WAYBEL21:34  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S being non empty reflexive RelStr
for D being non empty directed Subset of S
for i, j being Element of (Net-Str D) holds
( i <= j iff (Net-Str D) . i <= (Net-Str D) . j )
proof end;

theorem Th35: :: WAYBEL21:35  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T being complete Lawson TopLattice
for D being non empty directed Subset of T holds sup D in Lim (Net-Str D)
proof end;

definition
let T be non empty 1-sorted ;
let N be net of T;
let M be non empty NetStr of T;
assume A1: M is subnet of N ;
mode Embedding of M,N -> Function of M,N means :Def3: :: WAYBEL21:def 3
( the mapping of M = the mapping of N * it & ( for m being Element of N ex n being Element of M st
for p being Element of M st n <= p holds
m <= it . p ) );
existence
ex b1 being Function of M,N st
( the mapping of M = the mapping of N * b1 & ( for m being Element of N ex n being Element of M st
for p being Element of M st n <= p holds
m <= b1 . p ) )
by A1, YELLOW_6:def 12;
end;

:: deftheorem Def3 defines Embedding WAYBEL21:def 3 :
for T being non empty 1-sorted
for N being net of T
for M being non empty NetStr of T st M is subnet of N holds
for b4 being Function of M,N holds
( b4 is Embedding of M,N iff ( the mapping of M = the mapping of N * b4 & ( for m being Element of N ex n being Element of M st
for p being Element of M st n <= p holds
m <= b4 . p ) ) );

theorem Th36: :: WAYBEL21:36  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T being non empty 1-sorted
for N being net of T
for M being non empty subnet of N
for e being Embedding of M,N
for i being Element of M holds M . i = N . (e . i)
proof end;

theorem Th37: :: WAYBEL21:37  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T being complete LATTICE
for N being net of T
for M being subnet of N holds lim_inf N <= lim_inf M
proof end;

theorem Th38: :: WAYBEL21:38  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T being complete LATTICE
for N being net of T
for M being subnet of N
for e being Embedding of M,N st ( for i being Element of N
for j being Element of M st e . j <= i holds
ex j' being Element of M st
( j' >= j & N . i >= M . j' ) ) holds
lim_inf N = lim_inf M
proof end;

theorem :: WAYBEL21:39  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T being non empty RelStr
for N being net of T
for M being non empty full SubNetStr of N st ( for i being Element of N ex j being Element of N st
( j >= i & j in the carrier of M ) ) holds
( M is subnet of N & incl M,N is Embedding of M,N )
proof end;

theorem Th40: :: WAYBEL21:40  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T being non empty RelStr
for N being net of T
for i being Element of N holds
( N | i is subnet of N & incl (N | i),N is Embedding of N | i,N )
proof end;

theorem Th41: :: WAYBEL21:41  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T being complete LATTICE
for N being net of T
for i being Element of N holds lim_inf (N | i) = lim_inf N
proof end;

theorem Th42: :: WAYBEL21:42  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T being non empty RelStr
for N being net of T
for X being set st N is_eventually_in X holds
ex i being Element of N st
( N . i in X & rng the mapping of (N | i) c= X )
proof end;

theorem Th43: :: WAYBEL21:43  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T being complete Lawson TopLattice
for N being eventually-filtered net of T holds rng the mapping of N is non empty filtered Subset of T
proof end;

theorem Th44: :: WAYBEL21:44  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T being complete Lawson TopLattice
for N being eventually-filtered net of T holds Lim N = {(inf N)}
proof end;

theorem Th45: :: WAYBEL21:45  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being complete Lawson TopLattice
for f being meet-preserving Function of S,T holds
( f is continuous iff ( f is directed-sups-preserving & ( for X being non empty Subset of S holds f preserves_inf_of X ) ) )
proof end;

theorem Th46: :: WAYBEL21:46  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being complete Lawson TopLattice
for f being SemilatticeHomomorphism of S,T holds
( f is continuous iff ( f is infs-preserving & f is directed-sups-preserving ) )
proof end;

definition
let S, T be non empty RelStr ;
let f be Function of S,T;
attr f is lim_infs-preserving means :: WAYBEL21:def 4
for N being net of S holds f . (lim_inf N) = lim_inf (f * N);
end;

:: deftheorem defines lim_infs-preserving WAYBEL21:def 4 :
for S, T being non empty RelStr
for f being Function of S,T holds
( f is lim_infs-preserving iff for N being net of S holds f . (lim_inf N) = lim_inf (f * N) );

theorem :: WAYBEL21:47  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for S, T being complete Lawson TopLattice
for f being SemilatticeHomomorphism of S,T holds
( f is continuous iff f is lim_infs-preserving )
proof end;

theorem Th48: :: WAYBEL21:48  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T being continuous complete Lawson TopLattice
for S being non empty full meet-inheriting SubRelStr of T st Top T in the carrier of S & ex X being Subset of T st
( X = the carrier of S & X is closed ) holds
S is infs-inheriting
proof end;

theorem Th49: :: WAYBEL21:49  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T being continuous complete Lawson TopLattice
for S being non empty full SubRelStr of T st ex X being Subset of T st
( X = the carrier of S & X is closed ) holds
S is directed-sups-inheriting
proof end;

theorem Th50: :: WAYBEL21:50  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T being continuous complete Lawson TopLattice
for S being non empty full infs-inheriting directed-sups-inheriting SubRelStr of T ex X being Subset of T st
( X = the carrier of S & X is closed )
proof end;

theorem Th51: :: WAYBEL21:51  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T being continuous complete Lawson TopLattice
for S being non empty full infs-inheriting directed-sups-inheriting SubRelStr of T
for N being net of T st N is_eventually_in the carrier of S holds
lim_inf N in the carrier of S
proof end;

theorem Th52: :: WAYBEL21:52  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T being continuous complete Lawson TopLattice
for S being non empty full meet-inheriting SubRelStr of T st Top T in the carrier of S & ( for N being net of T st rng the mapping of N c= the carrier of S holds
lim_inf N in the carrier of S ) holds
S is infs-inheriting
proof end;

theorem Th53: :: WAYBEL21:53  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T being continuous complete Lawson TopLattice
for S being non empty full SubRelStr of T st ( for N being net of T st rng the mapping of N c= the carrier of S holds
lim_inf N in the carrier of S ) holds
S is directed-sups-inheriting
proof end;

theorem :: WAYBEL21:54  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T being continuous complete Lawson TopLattice
for S being non empty full meet-inheriting SubRelStr of T
for X being Subset of T st X = the carrier of S & Top T in X holds
( X is closed iff for N being net of T st N is_eventually_in X holds
lim_inf N in X )
proof end;