:: NECKLA_3 semantic presentation  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph for whole article:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Trees again to close it)

theorem Th1: :: NECKLA_3:1  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for A, B being set holds (id A) | B = (id A) /\ [:B,B:]
proof end;

theorem :: NECKLA_3:2  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for a, b, c, d being set holds id {a,b,c,d} = {[a,a],[b,b],[c,c],[d,d]}
proof end;

theorem Th3: :: NECKLA_3:3  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h being set holds [:{a,b,c,d},{e,f,g,h}:] = {[a,e],[a,f],[b,e],[b,f],[a,g],[a,h],[b,g],[b,h]} \/ {[c,e],[c,f],[d,e],[d,f],[c,g],[c,h],[d,g],[d,h]}
proof end;

registration
let X, Y be trivial set ;
cluster -> trivial Relation of X,Y;
correctness
coherence
for b1 being Relation of X,Y holds b1 is trivial
;
proof end;
end;

theorem Th4: :: NECKLA_3:4  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for X being trivial set
for R being Relation of X st not R is empty holds
ex x being set st R = {[x,x]}
proof end;

registration
let X be trivial set ;
cluster -> reflexive symmetric strongly_connected transitive trivial Relation of X,X;
correctness
coherence
for b1 being Relation of X holds
( b1 is trivial & b1 is reflexive & b1 is symmetric & b1 is transitive & b1 is strongly_connected )
;
proof end;
end;

theorem Th5: :: NECKLA_3:5  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for X being non empty trivial set
for R being Relation of X holds R is_symmetric_in X
proof end;

registration
cluster non empty strict symmetric irreflexive finite RelStr ;
correctness
existence
ex b1 being RelStr st
( not b1 is empty & b1 is strict & b1 is finite & b1 is irreflexive & b1 is symmetric )
;
proof end;
end;

registration
let L be irreflexive RelStr ;
cluster full -> irreflexive full SubRelStr of L;
correctness
coherence
for b1 being full SubRelStr of L holds b1 is irreflexive
;
proof end;
end;

registration
let L be symmetric RelStr ;
cluster full -> symmetric full SubRelStr of L;
correctness
coherence
for b1 being full SubRelStr of L holds b1 is symmetric
;
proof end;
end;

theorem Th6: :: NECKLA_3:6  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for R being symmetric irreflexive RelStr st Card the carrier of R = 2 holds
ex a, b being set st
( the carrier of R = {a,b} & ( the InternalRel of R = {[a,b],[b,a]} or the InternalRel of R = {} ) )
proof end;

registration
let R be non empty RelStr ;
let S be RelStr ;
cluster union_of R,S -> non empty ;
correctness
coherence
not union_of R,S is empty
;
proof end;
cluster sum_of R,S -> non empty ;
correctness
coherence
not sum_of R,S is empty
;
proof end;
end;

registration
let R be RelStr ;
let S be non empty RelStr ;
cluster union_of R,S -> non empty ;
correctness
coherence
not union_of R,S is empty
;
proof end;
cluster sum_of R,S -> non empty ;
correctness
coherence
not sum_of R,S is empty
;
proof end;
end;

registration
let R, S be finite RelStr ;
cluster union_of R,S -> finite ;
correctness
coherence
union_of R,S is finite
;
proof end;
cluster sum_of R,S -> finite ;
correctness
coherence
sum_of R,S is finite
;
proof end;
end;

registration
let R, S be symmetric RelStr ;
cluster union_of R,S -> symmetric ;
correctness
coherence
union_of R,S is symmetric
;
proof end;
cluster sum_of R,S -> symmetric ;
correctness
coherence
sum_of R,S is symmetric
;
proof end;
end;

registration
let R, S be irreflexive RelStr ;
cluster union_of R,S -> irreflexive ;
correctness
coherence
union_of R,S is irreflexive
;
proof end;
end;

theorem :: NECKLA_3:7  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for R, S being irreflexive RelStr st the carrier of R misses the carrier of S holds
sum_of R,S is irreflexive
proof end;

theorem Th8: :: NECKLA_3:8  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for R1, R2 being RelStr holds
( union_of R1,R2 = union_of R2,R1 & sum_of R1,R2 = sum_of R2,R1 )
proof end;

theorem Th9: :: NECKLA_3:9  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for G being irreflexive RelStr
for G1, G2 being RelStr st ( G = union_of G1,G2 or G = sum_of G1,G2 ) holds
( G1 is irreflexive & G2 is irreflexive )
proof end;

theorem Th10: :: NECKLA_3:10  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for G being non empty RelStr
for H1, H2 being RelStr st the carrier of H1 misses the carrier of H2 & ( RelStr(# the carrier of G,the InternalRel of G #) = union_of H1,H2 or RelStr(# the carrier of G,the InternalRel of G #) = sum_of H1,H2 ) holds
( H1 is full SubRelStr of G & H2 is full SubRelStr of G )
proof end;

theorem Th11: :: NECKLA_3:11  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
the InternalRel of (ComplRelStr (Necklace 4)) = {[0,2],[2,0],[0,3],[3,0],[1,3],[3,1]}
proof end;

registration
let R be RelStr ;
cluster ComplRelStr R -> irreflexive ;
correctness
coherence
ComplRelStr R is irreflexive
;
proof end;
end;

registration
let R be symmetric RelStr ;
cluster ComplRelStr R -> symmetric irreflexive ;
correctness
coherence
ComplRelStr R is symmetric
;
proof end;
end;

theorem Th12: :: NECKLA_3:12  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for R being RelStr holds the InternalRel of R misses the InternalRel of (ComplRelStr R)
proof end;

theorem Th13: :: NECKLA_3:13  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for R being RelStr holds id the carrier of R misses the InternalRel of (ComplRelStr R)
proof end;

theorem Th14: :: NECKLA_3:14  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for G being RelStr holds [:the carrier of G,the carrier of G:] = ((id the carrier of G) \/ the InternalRel of G) \/ the InternalRel of (ComplRelStr G)
proof end;

theorem Th15: :: NECKLA_3:15  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for G being strict irreflexive RelStr st G is trivial holds
ComplRelStr G = G
proof end;

theorem Th16: :: NECKLA_3:16  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for G being strict irreflexive RelStr holds ComplRelStr (ComplRelStr G) = G
proof end;

theorem Th17: :: NECKLA_3:17  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for G1, G2 being RelStr st the carrier of G1 misses the carrier of G2 holds
ComplRelStr (union_of G1,G2) = sum_of (ComplRelStr G1),(ComplRelStr G2)
proof end;

theorem Th18: :: NECKLA_3:18  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for G1, G2 being RelStr st the carrier of G1 misses the carrier of G2 holds
ComplRelStr (sum_of G1,G2) = union_of (ComplRelStr G1),(ComplRelStr G2)
proof end;

theorem :: NECKLA_3:19  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for G being RelStr
for H being full SubRelStr of G holds the InternalRel of (ComplRelStr H) = the InternalRel of (ComplRelStr G) |_2 the carrier of (ComplRelStr H)
proof end;

theorem Th20: :: NECKLA_3:20  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for G being non empty irreflexive RelStr
for x being Element of G
for x' being Element of (ComplRelStr G) st x = x' holds
ComplRelStr (subrelstr (([#] G) \ {x})) = subrelstr (([#] (ComplRelStr G)) \ {x'})
proof end;

registration
cluster non empty strict trivial -> non empty N-free RelStr ;
correctness
coherence
for b1 being non empty RelStr st b1 is trivial & b1 is strict holds
b1 is N-free
;
proof end;
end;

theorem :: NECKLA_3:21  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for R being reflexive antisymmetric RelStr
for S being RelStr holds
( ex f being Function of R,S st
for x, y being Element of R holds
( [x,y] in the InternalRel of R iff [(f . x),(f . y)] in the InternalRel of S ) iff S embeds R )
proof end;

theorem Th22: :: NECKLA_3:22  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for G being non empty RelStr
for H being non empty full SubRelStr of G holds G embeds H
proof end;

theorem Th23: :: NECKLA_3:23  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for G being non empty RelStr
for H being non empty full SubRelStr of G st G is N-free holds
H is N-free
proof end;

theorem Th24: :: NECKLA_3:24  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for G being non empty irreflexive RelStr holds
( G embeds Necklace 4 iff ComplRelStr G embeds Necklace 4 )
proof end;

theorem Th25: :: NECKLA_3:25  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for G being non empty irreflexive RelStr holds
( G is N-free iff ComplRelStr G is N-free )
proof end;

definition
let R be RelStr ;
mode path of R is RedSequence of the InternalRel of R;
end;

definition
let R be RelStr ;
attr R is path-connected means :Def1: :: NECKLA_3:def 1
for x, y being set st x in the carrier of R & y in the carrier of R & x <> y & not the InternalRel of R reduces x,y holds
the InternalRel of R reduces y,x;
end;

:: deftheorem Def1 defines path-connected NECKLA_3:def 1 :
for R being RelStr holds
( R is path-connected iff for x, y being set st x in the carrier of R & y in the carrier of R & x <> y & not the InternalRel of R reduces x,y holds
the InternalRel of R reduces y,x );

registration
cluster empty -> path-connected RelStr ;
correctness
coherence
for b1 being RelStr st b1 is empty holds
b1 is path-connected
;
proof end;
end;

registration
cluster non empty connected -> non empty path-connected RelStr ;
correctness
coherence
for b1 being non empty RelStr st b1 is connected holds
b1 is path-connected
;
proof end;
end;

theorem Th26: :: NECKLA_3:26  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for R being non empty reflexive transitive RelStr
for x, y being Element of R st the InternalRel of R reduces x,y holds
[x,y] in the InternalRel of R
proof end;

registration
cluster non empty reflexive transitive path-connected -> non empty reflexive transitive connected path-connected RelStr ;
correctness
coherence
for b1 being non empty reflexive transitive RelStr st b1 is path-connected holds
b1 is connected
;
proof end;
end;

theorem Th27: :: NECKLA_3:27  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for R being symmetric RelStr
for x, y being set st x in the carrier of R & y in the carrier of R & the InternalRel of R reduces x,y holds
the InternalRel of R reduces y,x
proof end;

definition
let R be symmetric RelStr ;
redefine attr R is path-connected means :Def2: :: NECKLA_3:def 2
for x, y being set st x in the carrier of R & y in the carrier of R & x <> y holds
the InternalRel of R reduces x,y;
compatibility
( R is path-connected iff for x, y being set st x in the carrier of R & y in the carrier of R & x <> y holds
the InternalRel of R reduces x,y )
proof end;
end;

:: deftheorem Def2 defines path-connected NECKLA_3:def 2 :
for R being symmetric RelStr holds
( R is path-connected iff for x, y being set st x in the carrier of R & y in the carrier of R & x <> y holds
the InternalRel of R reduces x,y );

definition
let R be RelStr ;
let x be Element of R;
func component x -> Subset of R equals :: NECKLA_3:def 3
Class (EqCl the InternalRel of R),x;
coherence
Class (EqCl the InternalRel of R),x is Subset of R
;
end;

:: deftheorem defines component NECKLA_3:def 3 :
for R being RelStr
for x being Element of R holds component x = Class (EqCl the InternalRel of R),x;

theorem Th28: :: NECKLA_3:28  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for R being non empty RelStr
for x being Element of R holds x in component x by EQREL_1:28;

registration
let R be non empty RelStr ;
let x be Element of R;
cluster component x -> non empty ;
correctness
coherence
not component x is empty
;
by Th28;
end;

theorem Th29: :: NECKLA_3:29  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for R being RelStr
for x being Element of R
for y being set st y in component x holds
[x,y] in EqCl the InternalRel of R
proof end;

theorem Th30: :: NECKLA_3:30  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for R being RelStr
for x being Element of R
for A being set holds
( A = component x iff for y being set holds
( y in A iff [x,y] in EqCl the InternalRel of R ) )
proof end;

theorem Th31: :: NECKLA_3:31  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for R being non empty symmetric irreflexive RelStr st not R is path-connected holds
ex G1, G2 being non empty strict symmetric irreflexive RelStr st
( the carrier of G1 misses the carrier of G2 & RelStr(# the carrier of R,the InternalRel of R #) = union_of G1,G2 )
proof end;

theorem Th32: :: NECKLA_3:32  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for R being non empty symmetric irreflexive RelStr st not ComplRelStr R is path-connected holds
ex G1, G2 being non empty strict symmetric irreflexive RelStr st
( the carrier of G1 misses the carrier of G2 & RelStr(# the carrier of R,the InternalRel of R #) = sum_of G1,G2 )
proof end;

Lm1: for X being non empty finite set
for A, B being non empty set st X = A \/ B & A misses B holds
( Card A <` Card X & Card B <` Card X )
proof end;

theorem :: NECKLA_3:33  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for G being irreflexive RelStr st G in fin_RelStr_sp holds
ComplRelStr G in fin_RelStr_sp
proof end;

theorem Th34: :: NECKLA_3:34  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for R being symmetric irreflexive RelStr st Card the carrier of R = 2 & the carrier of R in FinSETS holds
RelStr(# the carrier of R,the InternalRel of R #) in fin_RelStr_sp
proof end;

theorem :: NECKLA_3:35  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for R being RelStr st R in fin_RelStr_sp holds
R is symmetric
proof end;

theorem Th36: :: NECKLA_3:36  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for G being RelStr
for H1, H2 being non empty RelStr
for x being Element of H1
for y being Element of H2 st G = union_of H1,H2 & the carrier of H1 misses the carrier of H2 holds
not [x,y] in the InternalRel of G
proof end;

theorem :: NECKLA_3:37  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for G being RelStr
for H1, H2 being non empty RelStr
for x being Element of H1
for y being Element of H2 st G = sum_of H1,H2 holds
not [x,y] in the InternalRel of (ComplRelStr G)
proof end;

theorem Th38: :: NECKLA_3:38  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for G being non empty symmetric RelStr
for x being Element of G
for R1, R2 being non empty RelStr st the carrier of R1 misses the carrier of R2 & subrelstr (([#] G) \ {x}) = union_of R1,R2 & G is path-connected holds
ex b being Element of R1 st [b,x] in the InternalRel of G
proof end;

theorem Th39: :: NECKLA_3:39  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for G being non empty symmetric irreflexive RelStr
for a, b, c, d being Element of G
for Z being Subset of G st Z = {a,b,c,d} & a,b,c,d are_mutually_different & [a,b] in the InternalRel of G & [b,c] in the InternalRel of G & [c,d] in the InternalRel of G & not [a,c] in the InternalRel of G & not [a,d] in the InternalRel of G & not [b,d] in the InternalRel of G holds
subrelstr Z embeds Necklace 4
proof end;

theorem Th40: :: NECKLA_3:40  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for G being non empty symmetric irreflexive RelStr
for x being Element of G
for R1, R2 being non empty RelStr st the carrier of R1 misses the carrier of R2 & subrelstr (([#] G) \ {x}) = union_of R1,R2 & not G is trivial & G is path-connected & ComplRelStr G is path-connected holds
G embeds Necklace 4
proof end;

theorem :: NECKLA_3:41  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for G being non empty strict symmetric irreflexive finite RelStr st G is N-free & the carrier of G in FinSETS holds
RelStr(# the carrier of G,the InternalRel of G #) in fin_RelStr_sp
proof end;