:: NECKLA_3 semantic presentation
:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Trees again to close it)
theorem Th1: :: NECKLA_3:1
:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) 
theorem :: NECKLA_3:2
:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) 
for
a,
b,
c,
d being
set holds
id {a,b,c,d} = {[a,a],[b,b],[c,c],[d,d]}
theorem Th3: :: NECKLA_3:3
:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) 
for
a,
b,
c,
d,
e,
f,
g,
h being
set holds
[:{a,b,c,d},{e,f,g,h}:] = {[a,e],[a,f],[b,e],[b,f],[a,g],[a,h],[b,g],[b,h]} \/ {[c,e],[c,f],[d,e],[d,f],[c,g],[c,h],[d,g],[d,h]}
theorem Th4: :: NECKLA_3:4
:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) 
theorem Th5: :: NECKLA_3:5
:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) 
theorem Th6: :: NECKLA_3:6
:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) 
theorem :: NECKLA_3:7
:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) 
theorem Th8: :: NECKLA_3:8
:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) 
theorem Th9: :: NECKLA_3:9
:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) 
theorem Th10: :: NECKLA_3:10
:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) 
theorem Th11: :: NECKLA_3:11
:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) 
the
InternalRel of
(ComplRelStr (Necklace 4)) = {[0,2],[2,0],[0,3],[3,0],[1,3],[3,1]}
theorem Th12: :: NECKLA_3:12
:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) 
theorem Th13: :: NECKLA_3:13
:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) 
theorem Th14: :: NECKLA_3:14
:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) 
theorem Th15: :: NECKLA_3:15
:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) 
theorem Th16: :: NECKLA_3:16
:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) 
theorem Th17: :: NECKLA_3:17
:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) 
theorem Th18: :: NECKLA_3:18
:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) 
theorem :: NECKLA_3:19
:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) 
theorem Th20: :: NECKLA_3:20
:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) 
theorem :: NECKLA_3:21
:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) 
theorem Th22: :: NECKLA_3:22
:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) 
theorem Th23: :: NECKLA_3:23
:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) 
theorem Th24: :: NECKLA_3:24
:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) 
theorem Th25: :: NECKLA_3:25
:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) 
:: deftheorem Def1 defines path-connected NECKLA_3:def 1 :
theorem Th26: :: NECKLA_3:26
:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) 
theorem Th27: :: NECKLA_3:27
:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) 
:: deftheorem Def2 defines path-connected NECKLA_3:def 2 :
:: deftheorem defines component NECKLA_3:def 3 :
theorem Th28: :: NECKLA_3:28
:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) 
theorem Th29: :: NECKLA_3:29
:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) 
theorem Th30: :: NECKLA_3:30
:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) 
theorem Th31: :: NECKLA_3:31
:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) 
theorem Th32: :: NECKLA_3:32
:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) 
Lm1:
for X being non empty finite set
for A, B being non empty set st X = A \/ B & A misses B holds
( Card A <` Card X & Card B <` Card X )
theorem :: NECKLA_3:33
:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) 
theorem Th34: :: NECKLA_3:34
:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) 
theorem :: NECKLA_3:35
:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) 
theorem Th36: :: NECKLA_3:36
:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) 
theorem :: NECKLA_3:37
:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) 
theorem Th38: :: NECKLA_3:38
:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) 
theorem Th39: :: NECKLA_3:39
:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) 
for
G being non
empty symmetric irreflexive RelStr for
a,
b,
c,
d being
Element of
G for
Z being
Subset of
G st
Z = {a,b,c,d} &
a,
b,
c,
d are_mutually_different &
[a,b] in the
InternalRel of
G &
[b,c] in the
InternalRel of
G &
[c,d] in the
InternalRel of
G & not
[a,c] in the
InternalRel of
G & not
[a,d] in the
InternalRel of
G & not
[b,d] in the
InternalRel of
G holds
subrelstr Z embeds Necklace 4
theorem Th40: :: NECKLA_3:40
:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) 
theorem :: NECKLA_3:41
:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) 