:: WAYBEL_3 semantic presentation  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph for whole article:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Trees again to close it)

definition
let L be non empty reflexive RelStr ;
let x, y be Element of L;
pred x is_way_below y means :Def1: :: WAYBEL_3:def 1
for D being non empty directed Subset of L st y <= sup D holds
ex d being Element of L st
( d in D & x <= d );
end;

:: deftheorem Def1 defines is_way_below WAYBEL_3:def 1 :
for L being non empty reflexive RelStr
for x, y being Element of L holds
( x is_way_below y iff for D being non empty directed Subset of L st y <= sup D holds
ex d being Element of L st
( d in D & x <= d ) );

notation
let L be non empty reflexive RelStr ;
let x, y be Element of L;
synonym x << y for x is_way_below y;
synonym y >> x for x is_way_below y;
end;

definition
let L be non empty reflexive RelStr ;
let x be Element of L;
attr x is compact means :Def2: :: WAYBEL_3:def 2
x is_way_below x;
end;

:: deftheorem Def2 defines compact WAYBEL_3:def 2 :
for L being non empty reflexive RelStr
for x being Element of L holds
( x is compact iff x is_way_below x );

notation
let L be non empty reflexive RelStr ;
let x be Element of L;
synonym isolated_from_below x for compact x;
end;

theorem Th1: :: WAYBEL_3:1  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for L being non empty reflexive antisymmetric RelStr
for x, y being Element of L st x << y holds
x <= y
proof end;

theorem Th2: :: WAYBEL_3:2  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for L being non empty reflexive transitive RelStr
for u, x, y, z being Element of L st u <= x & x << y & y <= z holds
u << z
proof end;

theorem Th3: :: WAYBEL_3:3  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for L being non empty Poset st ( L is with_suprema or L is /\-complete ) holds
for x, y, z being Element of L st x << z & y << z holds
( ex_sup_of {x,y},L & x "\/" y << z )
proof end;

theorem Th4: :: WAYBEL_3:4  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for L being non empty reflexive antisymmetric lower-bounded RelStr
for x being Element of L holds Bottom L << x
proof end;

theorem :: WAYBEL_3:5  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for L being non empty Poset
for x, y, z being Element of L st x << y & y << z holds
x << z
proof end;

theorem :: WAYBEL_3:6  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for L being non empty reflexive antisymmetric RelStr
for x, y being Element of L st x << y & x >> y holds
x = y
proof end;

definition
let L be non empty reflexive RelStr ;
let x be Element of L;
A1: { y where y is Element of L : y << x } c= the carrier of L
proof end;
func waybelow x -> Subset of L equals :: WAYBEL_3:def 3
{ y where y is Element of L : y << x } ;
correctness
coherence
{ y where y is Element of L : y << x } is Subset of L
;
by A1;
A2: { y where y is Element of L : y >> x } c= the carrier of L
proof end;
func wayabove x -> Subset of L equals :: WAYBEL_3:def 4
{ y where y is Element of L : y >> x } ;
correctness
coherence
{ y where y is Element of L : y >> x } is Subset of L
;
by A2;
end;

:: deftheorem defines waybelow WAYBEL_3:def 3 :
for L being non empty reflexive RelStr
for x being Element of L holds waybelow x = { y where y is Element of L : y << x } ;

:: deftheorem defines wayabove WAYBEL_3:def 4 :
for L being non empty reflexive RelStr
for x being Element of L holds wayabove x = { y where y is Element of L : y >> x } ;

theorem Th7: :: WAYBEL_3:7  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for L being non empty reflexive RelStr
for x, y being Element of L holds
( x in waybelow y iff x << y )
proof end;

theorem Th8: :: WAYBEL_3:8  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for L being non empty reflexive RelStr
for x, y being Element of L holds
( x in wayabove y iff x >> y )
proof end;

theorem Th9: :: WAYBEL_3:9  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for L being non empty reflexive antisymmetric RelStr
for x being Element of L holds x is_>=_than waybelow x
proof end;

theorem :: WAYBEL_3:10  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for L being non empty reflexive antisymmetric RelStr
for x being Element of L holds x is_<=_than wayabove x
proof end;

theorem Th11: :: WAYBEL_3:11  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for L being non empty reflexive antisymmetric RelStr
for x being Element of L holds
( waybelow x c= downarrow x & wayabove x c= uparrow x )
proof end;

theorem Th12: :: WAYBEL_3:12  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for L being non empty reflexive transitive RelStr
for x, y being Element of L st x <= y holds
( waybelow x c= waybelow y & wayabove y c= wayabove x )
proof end;

registration
let L be non empty reflexive antisymmetric lower-bounded RelStr ;
let x be Element of L;
cluster waybelow x -> non empty ;
coherence
not waybelow x is empty
proof end;
end;

registration
let L be non empty reflexive transitive RelStr ;
let x be Element of L;
cluster waybelow x -> lower ;
coherence
waybelow x is lower
proof end;
cluster wayabove x -> upper ;
coherence
wayabove x is upper
proof end;
end;

registration
let L be sup-Semilattice;
let x be Element of L;
cluster waybelow x -> directed lower ;
coherence
waybelow x is directed
proof end;
end;

registration
let L be non empty /\-complete Poset;
let x be Element of L;
cluster waybelow x -> non empty directed lower ;
coherence
waybelow x is directed
proof end;
end;

registration
let L be non empty connected RelStr ;
cluster -> directed filtered Element of K40(the carrier of L);
coherence
for b1 being Subset of L holds
( b1 is directed & b1 is filtered )
proof end;
end;

registration
cluster non empty lower-bounded up-complete -> non empty complete RelStr ;
coherence
for b1 being non empty Chain st b1 is up-complete & b1 is lower-bounded holds
b1 is complete
proof end;
end;

registration
cluster non empty complete RelStr ;
existence
ex b1 being non empty Chain st b1 is complete
proof end;
end;

theorem Th13: :: WAYBEL_3:13  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for L being non empty up-complete Chain
for x, y being Element of L st x < y holds
x << y
proof end;

theorem :: WAYBEL_3:14  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for L being non empty reflexive antisymmetric RelStr
for x, y being Element of L st not x is compact & x << y holds
x < y
proof end;

theorem :: WAYBEL_3:15  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for L being non empty reflexive antisymmetric lower-bounded RelStr holds Bottom L is compact
proof end;

theorem Th16: :: WAYBEL_3:16  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for L being non empty up-complete Poset
for D being non empty finite directed Subset of L holds sup D in D
proof end;

theorem :: WAYBEL_3:17  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for L being non empty up-complete Poset st L is finite holds
for x being Element of L holds x is compact
proof end;

theorem Th18: :: WAYBEL_3:18  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for L being complete LATTICE
for x, y being Element of L st x << y holds
for X being Subset of L st y <= sup X holds
ex A being finite Subset of L st
( A c= X & x <= sup A )
proof end;

theorem :: WAYBEL_3:19  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for L being complete LATTICE
for x, y being Element of L st ( for X being Subset of L st y <= sup X holds
ex A being finite Subset of L st
( A c= X & x <= sup A ) ) holds
x << y
proof end;

theorem :: WAYBEL_3:20  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for L being non empty reflexive transitive RelStr
for x, y being Element of L st x << y holds
for I being Ideal of L st y <= sup I holds
x in I
proof end;

theorem Th21: :: WAYBEL_3:21  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for L being non empty up-complete Poset
for x, y being Element of L st ( for I being Ideal of L st y <= sup I holds
x in I ) holds
x << y
proof end;

theorem :: WAYBEL_3:22  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for L being lower-bounded LATTICE st L is meet-continuous holds
for x, y being Element of L holds
( x << y iff for I being Ideal of L st y = sup I holds
x in I )
proof end;

theorem :: WAYBEL_3:23  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for L being complete LATTICE holds
( ( for x being Element of L holds x is compact ) iff for X being non empty Subset of L ex x being Element of L st
( x in X & ( for y being Element of L st y in X holds
not x < y ) ) )
proof end;

definition
let L be non empty reflexive RelStr ;
attr L is satisfying_axiom_of_approximation means :Def5: :: WAYBEL_3:def 5
for x being Element of L holds x = sup (waybelow x);
end;

:: deftheorem Def5 defines satisfying_axiom_of_approximation WAYBEL_3:def 5 :
for L being non empty reflexive RelStr holds
( L is satisfying_axiom_of_approximation iff for x being Element of L holds x = sup (waybelow x) );

registration
cluster non empty trivial reflexive -> non empty reflexive satisfying_axiom_of_approximation RelStr ;
coherence
for b1 being non empty reflexive RelStr st b1 is trivial holds
b1 is satisfying_axiom_of_approximation
proof end;
end;

definition
let L be non empty reflexive RelStr ;
attr L is continuous means :Def6: :: WAYBEL_3:def 6
( ( for x being Element of L holds
( not waybelow x is empty & waybelow x is directed ) ) & L is up-complete & L is satisfying_axiom_of_approximation );
end;

:: deftheorem Def6 defines continuous WAYBEL_3:def 6 :
for L being non empty reflexive RelStr holds
( L is continuous iff ( ( for x being Element of L holds
( not waybelow x is empty & waybelow x is directed ) ) & L is up-complete & L is satisfying_axiom_of_approximation ) );

registration
cluster non empty reflexive continuous -> non empty reflexive up-complete satisfying_axiom_of_approximation RelStr ;
coherence
for b1 being non empty reflexive RelStr st b1 is continuous holds
( b1 is up-complete & b1 is satisfying_axiom_of_approximation )
by Def6;
cluster lower-bounded up-complete satisfying_axiom_of_approximation -> lower-bounded continuous RelStr ;
coherence
for b1 being lower-bounded sup-Semilattice st b1 is up-complete & b1 is satisfying_axiom_of_approximation holds
b1 is continuous
proof end;
end;

registration
cluster strict complete up-complete satisfying_axiom_of_approximation continuous RelStr ;
existence
ex b1 being LATTICE st
( b1 is continuous & b1 is complete & b1 is strict )
proof end;
end;

registration
let L be non empty reflexive continuous RelStr ;
let x be Element of L;
cluster waybelow x -> non empty directed ;
coherence
( not waybelow x is empty & waybelow x is directed )
by Def6;
end;

theorem :: WAYBEL_3:24  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for L being up-complete Semilattice st ( for x being Element of L holds
( not waybelow x is empty & waybelow x is directed ) ) holds
( L is satisfying_axiom_of_approximation iff for x, y being Element of L st not x <= y holds
ex u being Element of L st
( u << x & not u <= y ) )
proof end;

theorem :: WAYBEL_3:25  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for L being continuous LATTICE
for x, y being Element of L holds
( x <= y iff waybelow x c= waybelow y )
proof end;

registration
cluster non empty complete -> non empty satisfying_axiom_of_approximation RelStr ;
coherence
for b1 being non empty Chain st b1 is complete holds
b1 is satisfying_axiom_of_approximation
proof end;
end;

theorem :: WAYBEL_3:26  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for L being complete LATTICE st ( for x being Element of L holds x is compact ) holds
L is satisfying_axiom_of_approximation
proof end;

definition
let f be Relation;
attr f is non-Empty means :Def7: :: WAYBEL_3:def 7
for S being 1-sorted st S in rng f holds
not S is empty;
attr f is reflexive-yielding means :Def8: :: WAYBEL_3:def 8
for S being RelStr st S in rng f holds
S is reflexive;
end;

:: deftheorem Def7 defines non-Empty WAYBEL_3:def 7 :
for f being Relation holds
( f is non-Empty iff for S being 1-sorted st S in rng f holds
not S is empty );

:: deftheorem Def8 defines reflexive-yielding WAYBEL_3:def 8 :
for f being Relation holds
( f is reflexive-yielding iff for S being RelStr st S in rng f holds
S is reflexive );

registration
let I be set ;
cluster RelStr-yielding non-Empty reflexive-yielding ManySortedSet of I;
existence
ex b1 being ManySortedSet of I st
( b1 is RelStr-yielding & b1 is non-Empty & b1 is reflexive-yielding )
proof end;
end;

registration
let I be set ;
let J be RelStr-yielding non-Empty ManySortedSet of I;
cluster product J -> non empty ;
coherence
not product J is empty
proof end;
end;

definition
let I be non empty set ;
let J be RelStr-yielding non-Empty ManySortedSet of I;
let i be Element of I;
:: original: .
redefine func J . i -> non empty RelStr ;
coherence
J . i is non empty RelStr
proof end;
end;

registration
let I be set ;
let J be RelStr-yielding non-Empty ManySortedSet of I;
cluster product J -> non empty constituted-Functions ;
coherence
product J is constituted-Functions
proof end;
end;

definition
let I be non empty set ;
let J be RelStr-yielding non-Empty ManySortedSet of I;
let x be Element of (product J);
let i be Element of I;
:: original: .
redefine func x . i -> Element of (J . i);
coherence
x . i is Element of (J . i)
proof end;
end;

definition
let I be non empty set ;
let J be RelStr-yielding non-Empty ManySortedSet of I;
let i be Element of I;
let X be Subset of (product J);
:: original: pi
redefine func pi X,i -> Subset of (J . i);
coherence
pi X,i is Subset of (J . i)
proof end;
end;

theorem Th27: :: WAYBEL_3:27  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for I being non empty set
for J being RelStr-yielding non-Empty ManySortedSet of I
for x being Function holds
( x is Element of (product J) iff ( dom x = I & ( for i being Element of I holds x . i is Element of (J . i) ) ) )
proof end;

theorem Th28: :: WAYBEL_3:28  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for I being non empty set
for J being RelStr-yielding non-Empty ManySortedSet of I
for x, y being Element of (product J) holds
( x <= y iff for i being Element of I holds x . i <= y . i )
proof end;

definition
let I be non empty set ;
let J be RelStr-yielding non-Empty reflexive-yielding ManySortedSet of I;
let i be Element of I;
:: original: .
redefine func J . i -> non empty reflexive RelStr ;
coherence
J . i is non empty reflexive RelStr
proof end;
end;

registration
let I be non empty set ;
let J be RelStr-yielding non-Empty reflexive-yielding ManySortedSet of I;
cluster product J -> non empty reflexive constituted-Functions ;
coherence
product J is reflexive
proof end;
end;

definition
let I be non empty set ;
let J be RelStr-yielding non-Empty reflexive-yielding ManySortedSet of I;
let x be Element of (product J);
let i be Element of I;
:: original: .
redefine func x . i -> Element of (J . i);
coherence
x . i is Element of (J . i)
proof end;
end;

theorem Th29: :: WAYBEL_3:29  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for I being non empty set
for J being RelStr-yielding non-Empty ManySortedSet of I st ( for i being Element of I holds J . i is transitive ) holds
product J is transitive
proof end;

theorem Th30: :: WAYBEL_3:30  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for I being non empty set
for J being RelStr-yielding non-Empty ManySortedSet of I st ( for i being Element of I holds J . i is antisymmetric ) holds
product J is antisymmetric
proof end;

theorem Th31: :: WAYBEL_3:31  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for I being non empty set
for J being RelStr-yielding non-Empty reflexive-yielding ManySortedSet of I st ( for i being Element of I holds J . i is complete LATTICE ) holds
product J is complete LATTICE
proof end;

theorem Th32: :: WAYBEL_3:32  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for I being non empty set
for J being RelStr-yielding non-Empty reflexive-yielding ManySortedSet of I st ( for i being Element of I holds J . i is complete LATTICE ) holds
for X being Subset of (product J)
for i being Element of I holds (sup X) . i = sup (pi X,i)
proof end;

theorem :: WAYBEL_3:33  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for I being non empty set
for J being RelStr-yielding non-Empty reflexive-yielding ManySortedSet of I st ( for i being Element of I holds J . i is complete LATTICE ) holds
for x, y being Element of (product J) holds
( x << y iff ( ( for i being Element of I holds x . i << y . i ) & ex K being finite Subset of I st
for i being Element of I st not i in K holds
x . i = Bottom (J . i) ) )
proof end;

theorem Th34: :: WAYBEL_3:34  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T being non empty TopSpace
for x, y being Element of (InclPoset the topology of T) st x is_way_below y holds
for F being Subset-Family of T st F is open & y c= union F holds
ex G being finite Subset of F st x c= union G
proof end;

theorem Th35: :: WAYBEL_3:35  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T being non empty TopSpace
for x, y being Element of (InclPoset the topology of T) st ( for F being Subset-Family of T st F is open & y c= union F holds
ex G being finite Subset of F st x c= union G ) holds
x is_way_below y
proof end;

theorem Th36: :: WAYBEL_3:36  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T being non empty TopSpace
for x being Element of (InclPoset the topology of T)
for X being Subset of T st x = X holds
( x is compact iff X is compact )
proof end;

theorem :: WAYBEL_3:37  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T being non empty TopSpace
for x being Element of (InclPoset the topology of T) st x = the carrier of T holds
( x is compact iff T is compact )
proof end;

definition
let T be non empty TopSpace;
attr T is locally-compact means :Def9: :: WAYBEL_3:def 9
for x being Point of T
for X being Subset of T st x in X & X is open holds
ex Y being Subset of T st
( x in Int Y & Y c= X & Y is compact );
end;

:: deftheorem Def9 defines locally-compact WAYBEL_3:def 9 :
for T being non empty TopSpace holds
( T is locally-compact iff for x being Point of T
for X being Subset of T st x in X & X is open holds
ex Y being Subset of T st
( x in Int Y & Y c= X & Y is compact ) );

registration
cluster non empty compact being_T2 -> non empty being_T3 being_T4 locally-compact TopStruct ;
coherence
for b1 being non empty TopSpace st b1 is compact & b1 is being_T2 holds
( b1 is being_T3 & b1 is being_T4 & b1 is locally-compact )
proof end;
end;

theorem Th38: :: WAYBEL_3:38  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for x being set holds 1TopSp {x} is being_T2
proof end;

registration
cluster non empty compact being_T2 being_T3 being_T4 locally-compact TopStruct ;
existence
ex b1 being non empty TopSpace st
( b1 is compact & b1 is being_T2 )
proof end;
end;

theorem Th39: :: WAYBEL_3:39  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T being non empty TopSpace
for x, y being Element of (InclPoset the topology of T) st ex Z being Subset of T st
( x c= Z & Z c= y & Z is compact ) holds
x << y
proof end;

theorem Th40: :: WAYBEL_3:40  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T being non empty TopSpace st T is locally-compact holds
for x, y being Element of (InclPoset the topology of T) st x << y holds
ex Z being Subset of T st
( x c= Z & Z c= y & Z is compact )
proof end;

theorem :: WAYBEL_3:41  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T being non empty TopSpace st T is locally-compact & T is_T2 holds
for x, y being Element of (InclPoset the topology of T) st x << y holds
ex Z being Subset of T st
( Z = x & Cl Z c= y & Cl Z is compact )
proof end;

theorem :: WAYBEL_3:42  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for X being non empty TopSpace st X is_T3 & InclPoset the topology of X is continuous holds
X is locally-compact
proof end;

theorem :: WAYBEL_3:43  Show TPTP formulae Show IDV graph:: Showing IDV graph ... (Click the Palm Tree again to close it) Show TPTP problem
for T being non empty TopSpace st T is locally-compact holds
InclPoset the topology of T is continuous
proof end;