TSTP Solution File: TOP044+4 by nanoCoP---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : nanoCoP---2.0
% Problem : TOP044+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : nanocop.sh %s %d
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 19 12:39:09 EDT 2023
% Result : Unknown 172.66s 160.30s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : TOP044+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : nanocop.sh %s %d
% 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Thu May 18 20:16:41 EDT 2023
% 0.11/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 12.97/12.76 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 12.97/12.76 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 12.97/12.76 Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 26.42/26.68 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 26.42/26.68 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 26.42/26.68 Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 38.90/39.23 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 38.90/39.23 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 38.90/39.23 Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 50.20/50.69 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 50.20/50.69 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 50.20/50.69 Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 67.33/57.21 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 67.33/57.21 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 67.33/57.21 Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 78.69/68.30 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 78.69/68.30 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 78.69/68.30 Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 90.59/80.25 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 90.59/80.25 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 90.59/80.25 Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 102.16/91.33 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 102.16/91.33 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 102.16/91.33 Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 118.78/107.60 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 118.78/107.60 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 118.78/107.60 Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 172.62/159.95 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 172.62/159.95 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 172.62/159.95 Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 172.66/160.30 Timeout
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------