TSTP Solution File: TOP044+4 by nanoCoP---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : nanoCoP---2.0
% Problem  : TOP044+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : nanocop.sh %s %d

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 19 12:39:09 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unknown 172.66s 160.30s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : TOP044+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : nanocop.sh %s %d
% 0.11/0.32  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % DateTime : Thu May 18 20:16:41 EDT 2023
% 0.11/0.32  % CPUTime  : 
% 12.97/12.76  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 12.97/12.76  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 12.97/12.76  Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 26.42/26.68  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 26.42/26.68  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 26.42/26.68  Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 38.90/39.23  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 38.90/39.23  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 38.90/39.23  Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 50.20/50.69  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 50.20/50.69  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 50.20/50.69  Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 67.33/57.21  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 67.33/57.21  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 67.33/57.21  Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 78.69/68.30  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 78.69/68.30  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 78.69/68.30  Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 90.59/80.25  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 90.59/80.25  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 90.59/80.25  Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 102.16/91.33  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 102.16/91.33  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 102.16/91.33  Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 118.78/107.60  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 118.78/107.60  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 118.78/107.60  Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 172.62/159.95  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 172.62/159.95  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 172.62/159.95  Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 172.66/160.30  Timeout
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------