TSTP Solution File: TOP035+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : TOP035+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 21:34:53 EDT 2022
% Result : Timeout 300.07s 300.25s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : TOP035+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun May 29 14:52:09 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.36 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.19/0.36 The process was started by sandbox on n026.cluster.edu,
% 0.19/0.36 Sun May 29 14:52:09 2022
% 0.19/0.36 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 5370.
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.19/0.36 set(auto).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.19/0.36 clear(print_given).
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 formula_list(usable).
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=15.
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.19/0.36 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.19/0.36 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.19/0.36 clauses in usable.
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 ------------> process usable:
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 19 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v2_pre_topc(A)|v2_t_0topsp(A)| -l1_pre_topc(A)| -m1_pre_topc(B,A)|v3_struct_0(B)| -v2_t_0topsp(B)|v2_tex_2(B,A).
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 49 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -l1_pre_topc(A)|v3_struct_0(A)|v2_t_0topsp(A)| -v3_realset2(A).
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 50 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -l1_pre_topc(A)| -m1_pre_topc(B,A)|v3_struct_0(B)|v2_t_0topsp(B)| -v2_tsp_2(B,A).
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 45 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v2_pre_topc(A)| -l1_pre_topc(A)| -m1_pre_topc(B,A)| -v2_tsp_2(B,A)|v2_pre_topc(B).
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 49 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -l1_pre_topc(A)|v3_struct_0(A)| -v2_pre_topc(A)|v2_t_0topsp(A)| -v3_realset2(A).
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 60 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -l1_pre_topc(A)|v3_struct_0(A)| -v2_pre_topc(A)|v2_t_0topsp(A)| -v1_tdlat_3(A).
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 45 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v2_pre_topc(A)| -l1_pre_topc(A)| -m1_pre_topc(B,A)|v1_tex_3(B,A)|v2_pre_topc(B).
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 61 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v2_pre_topc(A)| -l1_pre_topc(A)| -m1_pre_topc(B,A)|v1_tex_3(B,A)| -v2_tsp_2(B,A).
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 45 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v2_pre_topc(A)| -l1_pre_topc(A)| -m1_pre_topc(B,A)| -v1_tsep_1(B,A)| -v2_tsp_2(B,A)|v2_pre_topc(B).
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 63 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -v2_pre_topc(A)| -l1_pre_topc(A)| -m1_subset_1(B,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(A)))| -v3_pre_topc(B,A)| -v3_tops_1(B,A)|v2_tops_1(B,A).
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 65 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -l1_pre_topc(A)|v3_struct_0(A)| -v2_pre_topc(A)| -v2_tdlat_3(A)| -v2_t_0topsp(A)|v3_realset2(A).
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 8 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -l1_pre_topc(A)|v3_struct_0(A)| -v2_pre_topc(A)| -v2_tdlat_3(A)| -v2_t_0topsp(A)|v1_tdlat_3(A).
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 45 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v2_pre_topc(A)| -l1_pre_topc(A)| -m1_pre_topc(B,A)| -v1_tsep_1(B,A)| -v2_tex_2(B,A)|v2_pre_topc(B).
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 66 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v2_pre_topc(A)| -l1_pre_topc(A)| -m1_pre_topc(B,A)| -v1_tsep_1(B,A)| -v2_tex_2(B,A)| -v2_tsp_2(B,A).
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 65 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -l1_pre_topc(A)|v3_struct_0(A)|v3_realset2(A)| -v2_pre_topc(A)| -v2_t_0topsp(A)| -v2_tdlat_3(A).
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 10 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v2_pre_topc(A)| -l1_pre_topc(A)| -m1_pre_topc(B,A)| -v2_tex_2(B,A)| -v2_tsp_2(B,A)|v2_pre_topc(B).
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 66 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v2_pre_topc(A)| -l1_pre_topc(A)| -m1_pre_topc(B,A)| -v2_tex_2(B,A)| -v2_tsp_2(B,A)| -v1_tsep_1(B,A).
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 9 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -l1_pre_topc(A)|v3_struct_0(A)| -v2_pre_topc(A)| -v3_tdlat_3(A)| -v2_t_0topsp(A)|v1_tdlat_3(A).
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 45 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v2_pre_topc(A)| -l1_pre_topc(A)| -m1_pre_topc(B,A)| -v1_borsuk_1(B,A)| -v2_tsp_2(B,A)|v2_pre_topc(B).
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 11 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v2_pre_topc(A)| -l1_pre_topc(A)| -m1_pre_topc(B,A)| -v1_borsuk_1(B,A)| -v2_tsp_2(B,A)| -v2_tex_2(B,A).
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 9 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -l1_pre_topc(A)|v3_struct_0(A)| -v2_pre_topc(A)|v1_tdlat_3(A)| -v3_tdlat_3(A)| -v2_t_0topsp(A).
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 45 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v2_pre_topc(A)| -l1_pre_topc(A)| -m1_pre_topc(B,A)| -v2_tex_2(B,A)| -v1_borsuk_1(B,A)|v2_pre_topc(B).
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 11 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v2_pre_topc(A)| -l1_pre_topc(A)| -m1_pre_topc(B,A)| -v2_tex_2(B,A)| -v1_borsuk_1(B,A)| -v2_tsp_2(B,A).
% 0.19/0.36 45 back subsumes 10.
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 ------------> process sos:
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 212 during input processing: 0 [copy,212,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.19/0.36 212 back subsumes 182.
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.19/0.41
% 0.19/0.41 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.41
% 0.19/0.41 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.41
% 0.19/0.41
% 0.19/0.41 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.19/0.41
% 0.19/0.41 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.19/0.41 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.19/0.41 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.19/0.41 number of clauses in intial UL: 178
% 0.19/0.41 number of clauses initially in problem: 209
% 0.19/0.41 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 85
% 0.19/0.41 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 89
% 0.19/0.41 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 99
% 0.19/0.41 absolute distinct symbol count: 77
% 0.19/0.41 distinct predicate count: 44
% 0.19/0.41 distinct function count: 24
% 0.19/0.41 distinct constant count: 9
% 0.19/0.41
% 0.19/0.41 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.19/0.41
% 0.19/0.41
% 0.19/0.41
% 0.19/0.41 =========== start of search ===========
% 300.07/300.25 Wow, sos-wrapper got a signal XCPU
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------