TSTP Solution File: TOP028+2 by SATCoP---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SATCoP---0.1
% Problem : TOP028+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : satcop --statistics %s
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 21:34:17 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 82.47s 10.94s
% Output : Proof 82.47s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(g0,plain,
~ v3_struct_0(sK1146),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t10_tsp_2)]) ).
cnf(g1,plain,
v2_pre_topc(sK1146),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t10_tsp_2)]) ).
cnf(g2,plain,
l1_pre_topc(sK1146),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t10_tsp_2)]) ).
cnf(g3,plain,
( ~ l1_pre_topc(sK1146)
| ~ l1_pre_topc(sK1146)
| ~ v2_pre_topc(sK1146)
| ~ v2_pre_topc(sK1146)
| sPE(k1_funct_1(k12_borsuk_1(sK1146,sK1146),k1_xboole_0),k1_xboole_0)
| v3_struct_0(sK1146)
| v3_struct_0(sK1146) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('Axioms/SET007/SET007+309.ax',t66_borsuk_1)]) ).
cnf(g4,plain,
m1_subset_1(k1_xboole_0,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(sK1146))),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('Axioms/SET007/SET007+7.ax',t4_subset_1)]) ).
cnf(g5,plain,
( ~ sPE(k1_funct_1(k12_borsuk_1(sK1146,sK1146),k1_xboole_0),k1_xboole_0)
| v1_xboole_0(k1_funct_1(k12_borsuk_1(sK1146,sK1146),k1_xboole_0)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('Axioms/SET007/SET007+2.ax',d5_xboole_0)]) ).
cnf(g6,plain,
( ~ sPE(k1_funct_1(k12_borsuk_1(sK1146,sK1146),k1_xboole_0),k1_xboole_0)
| ~ v1_xboole_0(k1_funct_1(k12_borsuk_1(sK1146,sK1146),k1_xboole_0))
| v1_xboole_0(k1_xboole_0) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(g7,plain,
( ~ v1_xboole_0(k1_xboole_0)
| ~ m1_subset_1(k1_xboole_0,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(sK1146)))
| ~ l1_pre_topc(sK1146)
| ~ v2_pre_topc(sK1146)
| v3_struct_0(sK1146)
| v1_tsp_1(k1_xboole_0,sK1146) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('Axioms/SET007/SET007+406.ax',t13_tsp_1)]) ).
cnf(g8,plain,
( ~ m1_subset_1(k1_xboole_0,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(sK1146)))
| ~ l1_pre_topc(sK1146)
| ~ v2_pre_topc(sK1146)
| ~ v1_tsp_1(k1_xboole_0,sK1146)
| v3_struct_0(sK1146)
| v1_tsp_2(sK1145(sK1146,k1_xboole_0),sK1146) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t9_tsp_2)]) ).
cnf(g9,plain,
( ~ m1_subset_1(k1_xboole_0,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(sK1146)))
| ~ l1_pre_topc(sK1146)
| ~ v2_pre_topc(sK1146)
| ~ v1_tsp_1(k1_xboole_0,sK1146)
| m1_subset_1(sK1145(sK1146,k1_xboole_0),k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(sK1146)))
| v3_struct_0(sK1146) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t9_tsp_2)]) ).
cnf(g10,plain,
( ~ m1_subset_1(sK1145(sK1146,k1_xboole_0),k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(sK1146)))
| ~ v1_tsp_2(sK1145(sK1146,k1_xboole_0),sK1146) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t10_tsp_2)]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.11 % Problem : TOP028+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : satcop --statistics %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sun May 29 10:34:53 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 82.47/10.94 % symbols: 1955
% 82.47/10.94 % clauses: 9317
% 82.47/10.94 % start clauses: 4
% 82.47/10.94 % iterative deepening steps: 342
% 82.47/10.94 % maximum path limit: 2
% 82.47/10.94 % literal attempts: 5155170
% 82.47/10.94 % depth failures: 4269207
% 82.47/10.94 % regularity failures: 1146
% 82.47/10.94 % tautology failures: 18638
% 82.47/10.94 % reductions: 863711
% 82.47/10.94 % extensions: 4291207
% 82.47/10.94 % SAT variables: 3001421
% 82.47/10.94 % SAT clauses: 3005932
% 82.47/10.94 % WalkSAT solutions: 3005786
% 82.47/10.94 % CDCL solutions: 139
% 82.47/10.94 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 82.47/10.94 % SZS output start ListOfCNF for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------