TSTP Solution File: TOP027+3 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : TOP027+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 21:25:29 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.88s 2.08s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.88s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   23 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   81 (   9 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   93 (  35   ~;  28   |;  15   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  15  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   6 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   3 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   29 (   0 sgn  20   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t8_tsp_2,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
        & v2_pre_topc(X1)
        & l1_pre_topc(X1) )
     => ! [X2] :
          ( m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
         => ( v1_tsp_2(X2,X1)
           => ! [X3] :
                ( m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
               => k1_tops_1(X1,X3) = k3_tex_4(X1,k5_subset_1(u1_struct_0(X1),X2,k1_tops_1(X1,X3))) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t8_tsp_2) ).

fof(t6_tsp_2,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
        & v2_pre_topc(X1)
        & l1_pre_topc(X1) )
     => ! [X2] :
          ( m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
         => ( v1_tsp_2(X2,X1)
           => ! [X3] :
                ( m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
               => ( v3_pre_topc(X3,X1)
                 => X3 = k3_tex_4(X1,k5_subset_1(u1_struct_0(X1),X2,X3)) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t6_tsp_2) ).

fof(fc6_tops_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( v2_pre_topc(X1)
        & l1_pre_topc(X1)
        & m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) )
     => v3_pre_topc(k1_tops_1(X1,X2),X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+207.ax',fc6_tops_1) ).

fof(dt_k1_tops_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( l1_pre_topc(X1)
        & m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) )
     => m1_subset_1(k1_tops_1(X1,X2),k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+207.ax',dt_k1_tops_1) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
          & v2_pre_topc(X1)
          & l1_pre_topc(X1) )
       => ! [X2] :
            ( m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
           => ( v1_tsp_2(X2,X1)
             => ! [X3] :
                  ( m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
                 => k1_tops_1(X1,X3) = k3_tex_4(X1,k5_subset_1(u1_struct_0(X1),X2,k1_tops_1(X1,X3))) ) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t8_tsp_2]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] :
      ( v3_struct_0(X4)
      | ~ v2_pre_topc(X4)
      | ~ l1_pre_topc(X4)
      | ~ m1_subset_1(X5,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X4)))
      | ~ v1_tsp_2(X5,X4)
      | ~ m1_subset_1(X6,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X4)))
      | ~ v3_pre_topc(X6,X4)
      | X6 = k3_tex_4(X4,k5_subset_1(u1_struct_0(X4),X5,X6)) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[t6_tsp_2])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ v3_struct_0(esk1_0)
    & v2_pre_topc(esk1_0)
    & l1_pre_topc(esk1_0)
    & m1_subset_1(esk2_0,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk1_0)))
    & v1_tsp_2(esk2_0,esk1_0)
    & m1_subset_1(esk3_0,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk1_0)))
    & k1_tops_1(esk1_0,esk3_0) != k3_tex_4(esk1_0,k5_subset_1(u1_struct_0(esk1_0),esk2_0,k1_tops_1(esk1_0,esk3_0))) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( X1 = k3_tex_4(X2,k5_subset_1(u1_struct_0(X2),X3,X1))
    | v3_struct_0(X2)
    | ~ v3_pre_topc(X1,X2)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X2)))
    | ~ v1_tsp_2(X3,X2)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X2)))
    | ~ l1_pre_topc(X2)
    | ~ v2_pre_topc(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    v1_tsp_2(esk2_0,esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    v2_pre_topc(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    l1_pre_topc(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    m1_subset_1(esk2_0,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk1_0))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v3_struct_0(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ v2_pre_topc(X3)
      | ~ l1_pre_topc(X3)
      | ~ m1_subset_1(X4,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X3)))
      | v3_pre_topc(k1_tops_1(X3,X4),X3) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fc6_tops_1])]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( k3_tex_4(esk1_0,k5_subset_1(u1_struct_0(esk1_0),esk2_0,X1)) = X1
    | ~ v3_pre_topc(X1,esk1_0)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk1_0))) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9]),c_0_10]),c_0_11])]),c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( v3_pre_topc(k1_tops_1(X1,X2),X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
    | ~ l1_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ v2_pre_topc(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    k1_tops_1(esk1_0,esk3_0) != k3_tex_4(esk1_0,k5_subset_1(u1_struct_0(esk1_0),esk2_0,k1_tops_1(esk1_0,esk3_0))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( k3_tex_4(esk1_0,k5_subset_1(u1_struct_0(esk1_0),esk2_0,k1_tops_1(esk1_0,X1))) = k1_tops_1(esk1_0,X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(k1_tops_1(esk1_0,X1),k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk1_0)))
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk1_0))) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_9]),c_0_10])]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    m1_subset_1(esk3_0,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk1_0))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

fof(c_0_19,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ l1_pre_topc(X3)
      | ~ m1_subset_1(X4,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X3)))
      | m1_subset_1(k1_tops_1(X3,X4),k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X3))) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[dt_k1_tops_1])]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ~ m1_subset_1(k1_tops_1(esk1_0,esk3_0),k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk1_0))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18])]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( m1_subset_1(k1_tops_1(X1,X2),k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
    | ~ l1_pre_topc(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_10]),c_0_18])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : TOP027+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sun May 29 12:04:39 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.88/2.08  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.88/2.08  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.88/2.08  # Preprocessing time       : 0.468 s
% 0.88/2.08  
% 0.88/2.08  # Proof found!
% 0.88/2.08  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.88/2.08  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.88/2.08  # Proof object total steps             : 23
% 0.88/2.08  # Proof object clause steps            : 14
% 0.88/2.08  # Proof object formula steps           : 9
% 0.88/2.08  # Proof object conjectures             : 14
% 0.88/2.08  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 11
% 0.88/2.08  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.88/2.08  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 10
% 0.88/2.08  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 4
% 0.88/2.08  # Proof object generating inferences   : 4
% 0.88/2.08  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 13
% 0.88/2.08  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.88/2.08  # Parsed axioms                        : 13483
% 0.88/2.08  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 13382
% 0.88/2.08  # Initial clauses                      : 172
% 0.88/2.08  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.88/2.08  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 172
% 0.88/2.08  # Processed clauses                    : 495
% 0.88/2.08  # ...of these trivial                  : 3
% 0.88/2.08  # ...subsumed                          : 131
% 0.88/2.08  # ...remaining for further processing  : 361
% 0.88/2.08  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 3
% 0.88/2.08  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.88/2.08  # Backward-subsumed                    : 4
% 0.88/2.08  # Backward-rewritten                   : 11
% 0.88/2.08  # Generated clauses                    : 1932
% 0.88/2.08  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 1776
% 0.88/2.08  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 40
% 0.88/2.08  # Paramodulations                      : 1928
% 0.88/2.08  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.88/2.08  # Equation resolutions                 : 4
% 0.88/2.08  # Current number of processed clauses  : 343
% 0.88/2.08  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 43
% 0.88/2.08  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.88/2.08  #    Negative unit clauses             : 7
% 0.88/2.08  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 293
% 0.88/2.08  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1368
% 0.88/2.08  # ...number of literals in the above   : 7478
% 0.88/2.08  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.88/2.08  # Current number of archived clauses   : 15
% 0.88/2.08  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 22679
% 0.88/2.08  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5527
% 0.88/2.08  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 131
% 0.88/2.08  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 984
% 0.88/2.08  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.88/2.08  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 18
% 0.88/2.08  # BW rewrite match successes           : 9
% 0.88/2.08  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.88/2.08  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.88/2.08  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 398166
% 0.88/2.08  
% 0.88/2.08  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.88/2.08  # User time                : 0.506 s
% 0.88/2.08  # System time              : 0.025 s
% 0.88/2.08  # Total time               : 0.531 s
% 0.88/2.08  # Maximum resident set size: 33088 pages
% 0.91/24.07  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.91/24.08  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.91/24.09  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.91/24.09  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.91/24.10  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.91/24.10  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.91/24.10  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.91/24.10  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.91/24.10  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.91/24.10  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.91/24.10  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.91/24.10  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.91/24.11  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.91/24.11  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.91/24.11  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.91/24.11  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.91/24.11  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.91/24.11  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.91/24.11  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.91/24.11  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.91/24.12  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.91/24.12  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.91/24.12  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.91/24.12  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.91/24.13  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.91/24.13  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.91/24.13  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.91/24.13  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.91/24.13  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.91/24.13  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.91/24.13  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.91/24.13  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.91/24.13  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.91/24.13  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.91/24.14  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.91/24.14  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.91/24.14  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.91/24.14  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.91/24.14  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.91/24.14  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.91/24.14  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.91/24.14  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.91/24.15  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.91/24.15  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.91/24.16  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.91/24.16  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------