TSTP Solution File: TOP026+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : TOP026+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 21:24:31 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.89s 2.31s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.89s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 23 ( 15 unt; 3 nHn; 23 RR)
% Number of literals : 54 ( 6 equ; 32 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 8 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 6 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 3 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 18 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_180,plain,
( k3_tex_4(X1,k5_subset_1(u1_struct_0(X1),X2,X3)) = X3
| v3_struct_0(X1)
| ~ v2_pre_topc(X1)
| ~ l1_pre_topc(X1)
| ~ v1_tsp_2(X2,X1)
| ~ v4_pre_topc(X3,X1)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
| ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-px3i4x6t/lgb.p',i_0_180) ).
cnf(i_0_170,plain,
( m1_subset_1(k6_pre_topc(X1,X2),k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
| ~ l1_pre_topc(X1)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-px3i4x6t/lgb.p',i_0_170) ).
cnf(i_0_175,plain,
( v4_pre_topc(k6_pre_topc(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ v2_pre_topc(X1)
| ~ l1_pre_topc(X1)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-px3i4x6t/lgb.p',i_0_175) ).
cnf(i_0_4,negated_conjecture,
m1_subset_1(esk2_0,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk1_0))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-px3i4x6t/lgb.p',i_0_4) ).
cnf(i_0_5,negated_conjecture,
l1_pre_topc(esk1_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-px3i4x6t/lgb.p',i_0_5) ).
cnf(i_0_6,negated_conjecture,
v2_pre_topc(esk1_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-px3i4x6t/lgb.p',i_0_6) ).
cnf(i_0_3,negated_conjecture,
v1_tsp_2(esk2_0,esk1_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-px3i4x6t/lgb.p',i_0_3) ).
cnf(i_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ v3_struct_0(esk1_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-px3i4x6t/lgb.p',i_0_7) ).
cnf(i_0_1,negated_conjecture,
k3_tex_4(esk1_0,k5_subset_1(u1_struct_0(esk1_0),esk2_0,k6_pre_topc(esk1_0,esk3_0))) != k6_pre_topc(esk1_0,esk3_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-px3i4x6t/lgb.p',i_0_1) ).
cnf(i_0_2,negated_conjecture,
m1_subset_1(esk3_0,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk1_0))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-px3i4x6t/lgb.p',i_0_2) ).
cnf(c_0_191,plain,
( k3_tex_4(X1,k5_subset_1(u1_struct_0(X1),X2,X3)) = X3
| v3_struct_0(X1)
| ~ v2_pre_topc(X1)
| ~ l1_pre_topc(X1)
| ~ v1_tsp_2(X2,X1)
| ~ v4_pre_topc(X3,X1)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
| ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ),
i_0_180 ).
cnf(c_0_192,plain,
( m1_subset_1(k6_pre_topc(X1,X2),k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
| ~ l1_pre_topc(X1)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ),
i_0_170 ).
cnf(c_0_193,plain,
( v4_pre_topc(k6_pre_topc(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ v2_pre_topc(X1)
| ~ l1_pre_topc(X1)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ),
i_0_175 ).
cnf(c_0_194,plain,
( k3_tex_4(X1,k5_subset_1(u1_struct_0(X1),X2,k6_pre_topc(X1,X3))) = k6_pre_topc(X1,X3)
| v3_struct_0(X1)
| ~ l1_pre_topc(X1)
| ~ v2_pre_topc(X1)
| ~ v1_tsp_2(X2,X1)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
| ~ m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_191,c_0_192]),c_0_193]) ).
cnf(c_0_195,negated_conjecture,
m1_subset_1(esk2_0,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk1_0))),
i_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_196,negated_conjecture,
l1_pre_topc(esk1_0),
i_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_197,negated_conjecture,
v2_pre_topc(esk1_0),
i_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_198,negated_conjecture,
v1_tsp_2(esk2_0,esk1_0),
i_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_199,negated_conjecture,
~ v3_struct_0(esk1_0),
i_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_200,negated_conjecture,
k3_tex_4(esk1_0,k5_subset_1(u1_struct_0(esk1_0),esk2_0,k6_pre_topc(esk1_0,esk3_0))) != k6_pre_topc(esk1_0,esk3_0),
i_0_1 ).
cnf(c_0_201,negated_conjecture,
( k3_tex_4(esk1_0,k5_subset_1(u1_struct_0(esk1_0),esk2_0,k6_pre_topc(esk1_0,X1))) = k6_pre_topc(esk1_0,X1)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk1_0))) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_194,c_0_195]),c_0_196]),c_0_197]),c_0_198])]),c_0_199]) ).
cnf(c_0_202,negated_conjecture,
m1_subset_1(esk3_0,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk1_0))),
i_0_2 ).
cnf(c_0_203,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_200,c_0_201]),c_0_202])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : TOP026+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sun May 29 09:03:44 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.39 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.89/2.31 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.89/2.31 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.89/2.31 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.89/2.31 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 7.89/2.31 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 7.89/2.31 #
% 7.89/2.31 # Preprocessing time : 0.024 s
% 7.89/2.31 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.89/2.31
% 7.89/2.31 # Proof found!
% 7.89/2.31 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.89/2.31 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.89/2.31 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.89/2.31
% 7.89/2.31 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.89/2.31 # User time : 0.068 s
% 7.89/2.31 # System time : 0.007 s
% 7.89/2.31 # Total time : 0.074 s
% 7.89/2.31 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.89/2.31
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------