TSTP Solution File: TOP025+4 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : TOP025+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 21:25:28 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 2.08s 20.26s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.08s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   30 (  14 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  120 (  19 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   19 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  144 (  54   ~;  51   |;  24   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;  13  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   11 (   9 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   31 (   0 sgn  22   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t3_tsp_2,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
        & v2_pre_topc(X1)
        & l1_pre_topc(X1) )
     => ! [X2] :
          ( m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
         => ~ ( ( v3_pre_topc(X2,X1)
                | v4_pre_topc(X2,X1) )
              & v1_tsp_2(X2,X1)
              & v1_tex_2(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',t3_tsp_2) ).

fof(d5_tsp_2,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
        & v2_pre_topc(X1)
        & l1_pre_topc(X1) )
     => ! [X2] :
          ( m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
         => ( v1_tsp_2(X2,X1)
          <=> ( v1_tsp_1(X2,X1)
              & k3_tex_4(X1,X2) = u1_struct_0(X1) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',d5_tsp_2) ).

fof(d2_tex_2,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( m1_subset_1(X2,X1)
     => ( v1_tex_2(X2,X1)
      <=> X2 != k3_tarski(X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+387.ax',d2_tex_2) ).

fof(t99_zfmisc_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] : k3_tarski(k1_zfmisc_1(X1)) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+6.ax',t99_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(t62_tex_4,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
        & v2_pre_topc(X1)
        & l1_pre_topc(X1) )
     => ! [X2] :
          ( m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
         => ( v4_pre_topc(X2,X1)
           => k3_tex_4(X1,X2) = X2 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+405.ax',t62_tex_4) ).

fof(t58_tex_4,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
        & v2_pre_topc(X1)
        & l1_pre_topc(X1) )
     => ! [X2] :
          ( m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
         => ( v3_pre_topc(X2,X1)
           => k3_tex_4(X1,X2) = X2 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+405.ax',t58_tex_4) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
          & v2_pre_topc(X1)
          & l1_pre_topc(X1) )
       => ! [X2] :
            ( m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
           => ~ ( ( v3_pre_topc(X2,X1)
                  | v4_pre_topc(X2,X1) )
                & v1_tsp_2(X2,X1)
                & v1_tex_2(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t3_tsp_2]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ( v1_tsp_1(X4,X3)
        | ~ v1_tsp_2(X4,X3)
        | ~ m1_subset_1(X4,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X3)))
        | v3_struct_0(X3)
        | ~ v2_pre_topc(X3)
        | ~ l1_pre_topc(X3) )
      & ( k3_tex_4(X3,X4) = u1_struct_0(X3)
        | ~ v1_tsp_2(X4,X3)
        | ~ m1_subset_1(X4,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X3)))
        | v3_struct_0(X3)
        | ~ v2_pre_topc(X3)
        | ~ l1_pre_topc(X3) )
      & ( ~ v1_tsp_1(X4,X3)
        | k3_tex_4(X3,X4) != u1_struct_0(X3)
        | v1_tsp_2(X4,X3)
        | ~ m1_subset_1(X4,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X3)))
        | v3_struct_0(X3)
        | ~ v2_pre_topc(X3)
        | ~ l1_pre_topc(X3) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[d5_tsp_2])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ v3_struct_0(esk1_0)
    & v2_pre_topc(esk1_0)
    & l1_pre_topc(esk1_0)
    & m1_subset_1(esk2_0,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk1_0)))
    & ( v3_pre_topc(esk2_0,esk1_0)
      | v4_pre_topc(esk2_0,esk1_0) )
    & v1_tsp_2(esk2_0,esk1_0)
    & v1_tex_2(esk2_0,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk1_0))) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ( ~ v1_tex_2(X4,X3)
        | X4 != k3_tarski(X3)
        | ~ m1_subset_1(X4,X3) )
      & ( X4 = k3_tarski(X3)
        | v1_tex_2(X4,X3)
        | ~ m1_subset_1(X4,X3) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d2_tex_2])])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X2] : k3_tarski(k1_zfmisc_1(X2)) = X2,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t99_zfmisc_1]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( v3_struct_0(X3)
      | ~ v2_pre_topc(X3)
      | ~ l1_pre_topc(X3)
      | ~ m1_subset_1(X4,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X3)))
      | ~ v4_pre_topc(X4,X3)
      | k3_tex_4(X3,X4) = X4 ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[t62_tex_4])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( v3_struct_0(X1)
    | k3_tex_4(X1,X2) = u1_struct_0(X1)
    | ~ l1_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ v2_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
    | ~ v1_tsp_2(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    v1_tsp_2(esk2_0,esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    v2_pre_topc(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    l1_pre_topc(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    m1_subset_1(esk2_0,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk1_0))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v3_struct_0(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ m1_subset_1(X1,X2)
    | X1 != k3_tarski(X2)
    | ~ v1_tex_2(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    v1_tex_2(esk2_0,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk1_0))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    k3_tarski(k1_zfmisc_1(X1)) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

fof(c_0_21,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( v3_struct_0(X3)
      | ~ v2_pre_topc(X3)
      | ~ l1_pre_topc(X3)
      | ~ m1_subset_1(X4,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X3)))
      | ~ v3_pre_topc(X4,X3)
      | k3_tex_4(X3,X4) = X4 ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[t58_tex_4])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( k3_tex_4(X1,X2) = X2
    | v3_struct_0(X1)
    | ~ v4_pre_topc(X2,X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
    | ~ l1_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ v2_pre_topc(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    k3_tex_4(esk1_0,esk2_0) = u1_struct_0(esk1_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14]),c_0_15]),c_0_16])]),c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    u1_struct_0(esk1_0) != esk2_0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20]),c_0_16])]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( k3_tex_4(X1,X2) = X2
    | v3_struct_0(X1)
    | ~ v3_pre_topc(X2,X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
    | ~ l1_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ v2_pre_topc(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ( v4_pre_topc(esk2_0,esk1_0)
    | v3_pre_topc(esk2_0,esk1_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v4_pre_topc(esk2_0,esk1_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_14]),c_0_15]),c_0_16])]),c_0_24]),c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v3_pre_topc(esk2_0,esk1_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_23]),c_0_14]),c_0_15]),c_0_16])]),c_0_24]),c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_28]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : TOP025+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.11/0.33  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.11/0.33  % DateTime : Sun May 29 06:27:14 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 2.08/20.26  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_63dc1b1eb7d762c2f3686774d32795976f981b97 for 23 seconds:
% 2.08/20.26  # Preprocessing time       : 9.174 s
% 2.08/20.26  
% 2.08/20.26  # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 2.08/20.26  # OLD status GaveUp
% 2.08/20.26  # Parsed axioms                        : 34383
% 2.08/20.26  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 2.08/20.26  # Initial clauses                      : 103144
% 2.08/20.26  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 9071
% 2.08/20.26  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 94073
% 2.08/20.26  # Processed clauses                    : 16
% 2.08/20.26  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 2.08/20.26  # ...subsumed                          : 2
% 2.08/20.26  # ...remaining for further processing  : 14
% 2.08/20.26  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 2.08/20.26  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 94057
% 2.08/20.26  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 2.08/20.26  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 2.08/20.26  # Generated clauses                    : 0
% 2.08/20.26  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 0
% 2.08/20.26  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 2.08/20.26  # Paramodulations                      : 0
% 2.08/20.26  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 2.08/20.26  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 2.08/20.26  # Current number of processed clauses  : 14
% 2.08/20.26  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 6
% 2.08/20.26  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 2.08/20.26  #    Negative unit clauses             : 8
% 2.08/20.26  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 2.08/20.26  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 2.08/20.26  # ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 2.08/20.26  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 2.08/20.26  # Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 2.08/20.26  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 2.08/20.26  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 2.08/20.26  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 2.08/20.26  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4
% 2.08/20.26  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 2.08/20.26  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 2.08/20.26  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 2.08/20.26  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 2.08/20.26  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 2.08/20.26  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 10322691
% 2.08/20.26  
% 2.08/20.26  # -------------------------------------------------
% 2.08/20.26  # User time                : 13.928 s
% 2.08/20.26  # System time              : 0.307 s
% 2.08/20.26  # Total time               : 14.235 s
% 2.08/20.26  # Maximum resident set size: 413268 pages
% 2.08/20.26  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f6eb5f7f05126ea361481ae651a4823314e3d740 for 23 seconds:
% 2.08/20.26  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,02,20000,1.0)
% 2.08/20.26  # Preprocessing time       : 1.397 s
% 2.08/20.26  
% 2.08/20.26  # Proof found!
% 2.08/20.26  # SZS status Theorem
% 2.08/20.26  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 2.08/20.26  # Proof object total steps             : 30
% 2.08/20.26  # Proof object clause steps            : 17
% 2.08/20.26  # Proof object formula steps           : 13
% 2.08/20.26  # Proof object conjectures             : 15
% 2.08/20.26  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 12
% 2.08/20.26  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 2.08/20.26  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 12
% 2.08/20.26  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 6
% 2.08/20.26  # Proof object generating inferences   : 4
% 2.08/20.26  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 22
% 2.08/20.26  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 2.08/20.26  # Parsed axioms                        : 34383
% 2.08/20.26  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 33409
% 2.08/20.26  # Initial clauses                      : 2598
% 2.08/20.26  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 89
% 2.08/20.26  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 2509
% 2.08/20.26  # Processed clauses                    : 2594
% 2.08/20.26  # ...of these trivial                  : 23
% 2.08/20.26  # ...subsumed                          : 214
% 2.08/20.26  # ...remaining for further processing  : 2356
% 2.08/20.26  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 67
% 2.08/20.26  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 2.08/20.26  # Backward-subsumed                    : 2
% 2.08/20.26  # Backward-rewritten                   : 20
% 2.08/20.26  # Generated clauses                    : 35476
% 2.08/20.26  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 34496
% 2.08/20.26  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 594
% 2.08/20.26  # Paramodulations                      : 35377
% 2.08/20.26  # Factorizations                       : 2
% 2.08/20.26  # Equation resolutions                 : 97
% 2.08/20.26  # Current number of processed clauses  : 2286
% 2.08/20.26  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 194
% 2.08/20.26  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 2.08/20.26  #    Negative unit clauses             : 47
% 2.08/20.26  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 2045
% 2.08/20.26  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 34119
% 2.08/20.26  # ...number of literals in the above   : 268761
% 2.08/20.26  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 2.08/20.26  # Current number of archived clauses   : 24
% 2.08/20.26  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3890274
% 2.08/20.26  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 252771
% 2.08/20.26  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 801
% 2.08/20.26  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 57193
% 2.08/20.26  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 2.08/20.26  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 172
% 2.08/20.26  # BW rewrite match successes           : 5
% 2.08/20.26  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 2.08/20.26  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 2.08/20.26  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 2007680
% 2.08/20.26  
% 2.08/20.26  # -------------------------------------------------
% 2.08/20.26  # User time                : 2.871 s
% 2.08/20.26  # System time              : 0.105 s
% 2.08/20.26  # Total time               : 2.976 s
% 2.08/20.26  # Maximum resident set size: 122628 pages
% 2.08/25.17  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 2.08/25.18  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 2.08/25.19  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.08/25.19  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.08/25.19  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.08/25.19  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.08/25.20  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.08/25.20  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.08/25.20  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 2.08/25.20  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.08/25.20  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.08/25.20  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.08/25.20  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 2.08/25.20  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.08/25.20  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.08/25.20  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.08/25.21  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 2.08/25.21  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.08/25.21  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.08/25.21  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.08/25.21  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 2.08/25.21  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.08/25.21  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.08/25.21  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.08/25.22  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 2.08/25.22  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.08/25.22  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.08/25.22  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.08/25.22  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 2.08/25.22  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.08/25.23  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.08/25.23  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.08/25.23  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 2.08/25.23  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.08/25.23  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.08/25.23  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.08/25.23  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 2.08/25.23  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.08/25.24  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 2.08/25.24  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.08/25.24  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.08/25.24  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.08/25.24  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 2.08/25.24  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.08/25.25  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 2.08/25.25  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.08/39.18  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 2.08/39.21  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.08/39.21  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.08/39.21  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.08/39.21  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.08/39.22  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.08/39.22  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.08/39.23  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.08/39.23  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.08/39.23  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.08/39.23  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.08/39.24  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.08/39.24  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.08/39.24  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.08/39.24  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.08/39.25  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.08/39.25  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.08/39.26  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.08/39.26  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.08/39.26  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.08/39.26  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------