TSTP Solution File: TOP025+3 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : TOP025+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 21:24:31 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 7.89s 4.91s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.89s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :   13
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   33 (  19 unt;   9 nHn;  30 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   73 (  11 equ;  37 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   11 (   9 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   25 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_5003,plain,
    ( k3_tex_4(X1,X2) = X2
    | v3_struct_0(X1)
    | ~ l1_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ v2_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ v3_pre_topc(X2,X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rt89gowt/lgb.p',i_0_5003) ).

cnf(i_0_4338,negated_conjecture,
    ( v3_pre_topc(esk614_0,esk613_0)
    | v4_pre_topc(esk614_0,esk613_0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rt89gowt/lgb.p',i_0_4338) ).

cnf(i_0_4341,negated_conjecture,
    v2_pre_topc(esk613_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rt89gowt/lgb.p',i_0_4341) ).

cnf(i_0_4340,negated_conjecture,
    l1_pre_topc(esk613_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rt89gowt/lgb.p',i_0_4340) ).

cnf(i_0_4339,negated_conjecture,
    m1_subset_1(esk614_0,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk613_0))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rt89gowt/lgb.p',i_0_4339) ).

cnf(i_0_4342,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v3_struct_0(esk613_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rt89gowt/lgb.p',i_0_4342) ).

cnf(i_0_5259,plain,
    ( k3_tex_4(X1,X2) = X2
    | v3_struct_0(X1)
    | ~ l1_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ v2_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ v4_pre_topc(X2,X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rt89gowt/lgb.p',i_0_5259) ).

cnf(i_0_5099,plain,
    ( X1 != X2
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X2))
    | ~ v1_tex_2(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rt89gowt/lgb.p',i_0_5099) ).

cnf(i_0_4329,plain,
    ( m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X2))
    | ~ r1_tarski(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rt89gowt/lgb.p',i_0_4329) ).

cnf(i_0_2785,plain,
    r1_tarski(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rt89gowt/lgb.p',i_0_2785) ).

cnf(i_0_1271,plain,
    ( k3_tex_4(X1,X2) = u1_struct_0(X1)
    | v3_struct_0(X1)
    | ~ l1_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ v2_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ v1_tsp_2(X2,X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rt89gowt/lgb.p',i_0_1271) ).

cnf(i_0_4337,negated_conjecture,
    v1_tsp_2(esk614_0,esk613_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rt89gowt/lgb.p',i_0_4337) ).

cnf(i_0_4336,negated_conjecture,
    v1_tex_2(esk614_0,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk613_0))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rt89gowt/lgb.p',i_0_4336) ).

cnf(c_0_5273,plain,
    ( k3_tex_4(X1,X2) = X2
    | v3_struct_0(X1)
    | ~ l1_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ v2_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ v3_pre_topc(X2,X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ),
    i_0_5003 ).

cnf(c_0_5274,negated_conjecture,
    ( v3_pre_topc(esk614_0,esk613_0)
    | v4_pre_topc(esk614_0,esk613_0) ),
    i_0_4338 ).

cnf(c_0_5275,negated_conjecture,
    v2_pre_topc(esk613_0),
    i_0_4341 ).

cnf(c_0_5276,negated_conjecture,
    l1_pre_topc(esk613_0),
    i_0_4340 ).

cnf(c_0_5277,negated_conjecture,
    m1_subset_1(esk614_0,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk613_0))),
    i_0_4339 ).

cnf(c_0_5278,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v3_struct_0(esk613_0),
    i_0_4342 ).

cnf(c_0_5279,plain,
    ( k3_tex_4(X1,X2) = X2
    | v3_struct_0(X1)
    | ~ l1_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ v2_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ v4_pre_topc(X2,X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ),
    i_0_5259 ).

cnf(c_0_5280,negated_conjecture,
    ( k3_tex_4(esk613_0,esk614_0) = esk614_0
    | v4_pre_topc(esk614_0,esk613_0) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5273,c_0_5274]),c_0_5275]),c_0_5276]),c_0_5277])]),c_0_5278]) ).

cnf(c_0_5281,plain,
    ( X1 != X2
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X2))
    | ~ v1_tex_2(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X2)) ),
    i_0_5099 ).

cnf(c_0_5282,plain,
    ( m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X2))
    | ~ r1_tarski(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_4329 ).

cnf(c_0_5283,plain,
    r1_tarski(X1,X1),
    i_0_2785 ).

cnf(c_0_5284,plain,
    ( k3_tex_4(X1,X2) = u1_struct_0(X1)
    | v3_struct_0(X1)
    | ~ l1_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ v2_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ v1_tsp_2(X2,X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ),
    i_0_1271 ).

cnf(c_0_5285,negated_conjecture,
    v1_tsp_2(esk614_0,esk613_0),
    i_0_4337 ).

cnf(c_0_5286,negated_conjecture,
    k3_tex_4(esk613_0,esk614_0) = esk614_0,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5279,c_0_5280]),c_0_5275]),c_0_5276]),c_0_5277])]),c_0_5278]) ).

cnf(c_0_5287,plain,
    ( ~ v1_tex_2(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X1))
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X1)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_5281]) ).

cnf(c_0_5288,plain,
    m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5282,c_0_5283]) ).

cnf(c_0_5289,negated_conjecture,
    v1_tex_2(esk614_0,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk613_0))),
    i_0_4336 ).

cnf(c_0_5290,negated_conjecture,
    u1_struct_0(esk613_0) = esk614_0,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5284,c_0_5285]),c_0_5286]),c_0_5275]),c_0_5276]),c_0_5277])]),c_0_5278]) ).

cnf(c_0_5291,plain,
    ~ v1_tex_2(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X1)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5287,c_0_5288])]) ).

cnf(c_0_5292,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5289,c_0_5290]),c_0_5291]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : TOP025+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sun May 29 14:00:16 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.44  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.71/0.88  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.71/0.88  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.71/0.88  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.71/0.88  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 7.89/4.91  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.89/4.91  # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.89/4.91  # Trying AutoSched0 for 149 seconds
% 7.89/4.91  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d
% 7.89/4.91  # and selection function SelectCQIPrecWNTNp.
% 7.89/4.91  #
% 7.89/4.91  # Preprocessing time       : 0.016 s
% 7.89/4.91  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.89/4.91  
% 7.89/4.91  # Proof found!
% 7.89/4.91  # SZS status Theorem
% 7.89/4.91  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.89/4.91  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.89/4.91  
% 7.89/4.91  # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.89/4.91  # User time                : 0.031 s
% 7.89/4.91  # System time              : 0.008 s
% 7.89/4.91  # Total time               : 0.039 s
% 7.89/4.91  # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.89/4.91  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------