TSTP Solution File: TOP024+2 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : TOP024+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 21:24:30 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 11.64s 4.10s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 11.64s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   31 (  18 unt;   4 nHn;  31 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   66 (   9 equ;  35 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    9 (   7 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   24 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_1272,plain,
    ( m1_subset_1(k6_pre_topc(X1,X2),k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
    | ~ l1_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-z59q24w7/lgb.p',i_0_1272) ).

cnf(i_0_3022,negated_conjecture,
    m1_subset_1(esk388_0,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk387_0))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-z59q24w7/lgb.p',i_0_3022) ).

cnf(i_0_3023,negated_conjecture,
    l1_pre_topc(esk387_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-z59q24w7/lgb.p',i_0_3023) ).

cnf(i_0_3288,plain,
    ( r1_tarski(X1,X2)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-z59q24w7/lgb.p',i_0_3288) ).

cnf(i_0_1063,plain,
    ( k3_tex_4(X1,X2) = u1_struct_0(X1)
    | v3_struct_0(X1)
    | ~ l1_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ v2_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ v1_tsp_2(X2,X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-z59q24w7/lgb.p',i_0_1063) ).

cnf(i_0_3021,negated_conjecture,
    v1_tsp_2(esk388_0,esk387_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-z59q24w7/lgb.p',i_0_3021) ).

cnf(i_0_3024,negated_conjecture,
    v2_pre_topc(esk387_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-z59q24w7/lgb.p',i_0_3024) ).

cnf(i_0_3025,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v3_struct_0(esk387_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-z59q24w7/lgb.p',i_0_3025) ).

cnf(i_0_543,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ r1_tarski(X2,X1)
    | ~ r1_tarski(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-z59q24w7/lgb.p',i_0_543) ).

cnf(i_0_3961,plain,
    ( v3_struct_0(X1)
    | r1_tarski(k3_tex_4(X1,X2),k6_pre_topc(X1,X2))
    | ~ l1_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ v2_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-z59q24w7/lgb.p',i_0_3961) ).

cnf(i_0_833,plain,
    ( v1_tops_1(X1,X2)
    | k6_pre_topc(X2,X1) != u1_struct_0(X2)
    | ~ l1_pre_topc(X2)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X2))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-z59q24w7/lgb.p',i_0_833) ).

cnf(i_0_3020,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v1_tops_1(esk388_0,esk387_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-z59q24w7/lgb.p',i_0_3020) ).

cnf(c_0_3974,plain,
    ( m1_subset_1(k6_pre_topc(X1,X2),k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
    | ~ l1_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ),
    i_0_1272 ).

cnf(c_0_3975,negated_conjecture,
    m1_subset_1(esk388_0,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk387_0))),
    i_0_3022 ).

cnf(c_0_3976,negated_conjecture,
    l1_pre_topc(esk387_0),
    i_0_3023 ).

cnf(c_0_3977,plain,
    ( r1_tarski(X1,X2)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X2)) ),
    i_0_3288 ).

cnf(c_0_3978,negated_conjecture,
    m1_subset_1(k6_pre_topc(esk387_0,esk388_0),k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk387_0))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3974,c_0_3975]),c_0_3976])]) ).

cnf(c_0_3979,plain,
    ( k3_tex_4(X1,X2) = u1_struct_0(X1)
    | v3_struct_0(X1)
    | ~ l1_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ v2_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ v1_tsp_2(X2,X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ),
    i_0_1063 ).

cnf(c_0_3980,negated_conjecture,
    v1_tsp_2(esk388_0,esk387_0),
    i_0_3021 ).

cnf(c_0_3981,negated_conjecture,
    v2_pre_topc(esk387_0),
    i_0_3024 ).

cnf(c_0_3982,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v3_struct_0(esk387_0),
    i_0_3025 ).

cnf(c_0_3983,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ r1_tarski(X2,X1)
    | ~ r1_tarski(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_543 ).

cnf(c_0_3984,plain,
    r1_tarski(k6_pre_topc(esk387_0,esk388_0),u1_struct_0(esk387_0)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3977,c_0_3978]) ).

cnf(c_0_3985,plain,
    ( v3_struct_0(X1)
    | r1_tarski(k3_tex_4(X1,X2),k6_pre_topc(X1,X2))
    | ~ l1_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ v2_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ),
    i_0_3961 ).

cnf(c_0_3986,negated_conjecture,
    k3_tex_4(esk387_0,esk388_0) = u1_struct_0(esk387_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3979,c_0_3980]),c_0_3981]),c_0_3976]),c_0_3975])]),c_0_3982]) ).

cnf(c_0_3987,plain,
    ( k6_pre_topc(esk387_0,esk388_0) = u1_struct_0(esk387_0)
    | ~ r1_tarski(u1_struct_0(esk387_0),k6_pre_topc(esk387_0,esk388_0)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3983,c_0_3984]) ).

cnf(c_0_3988,negated_conjecture,
    r1_tarski(u1_struct_0(esk387_0),k6_pre_topc(esk387_0,esk388_0)),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3985,c_0_3975]),c_0_3986]),c_0_3981]),c_0_3976])]),c_0_3982]) ).

cnf(c_0_3989,plain,
    ( v1_tops_1(X1,X2)
    | k6_pre_topc(X2,X1) != u1_struct_0(X2)
    | ~ l1_pre_topc(X2)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X2))) ),
    i_0_833 ).

cnf(c_0_3990,plain,
    k6_pre_topc(esk387_0,esk388_0) = u1_struct_0(esk387_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_3987,c_0_3988])]) ).

cnf(c_0_3991,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v1_tops_1(esk388_0,esk387_0),
    i_0_3020 ).

cnf(c_0_3992,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3989,c_0_3990]),c_0_3976]),c_0_3975])]),c_0_3991]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13  % Problem  : TOP024+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.08/0.13  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sun May 29 05:50:27 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.46  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.43/0.62  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.43/0.62  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.43/0.62  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.43/0.62  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 11.64/4.10  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 11.64/4.10  # No SInE strategy applied
% 11.64/4.10  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 11.64/4.10  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d
% 11.64/4.10  # and selection function SelectCQIPrecWNTNp.
% 11.64/4.10  #
% 11.64/4.10  # Preprocessing time       : 0.028 s
% 11.64/4.10  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 11.64/4.10  
% 11.64/4.10  # Proof found!
% 11.64/4.10  # SZS status Theorem
% 11.64/4.10  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 11.64/4.10  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 11.64/4.10  
% 11.64/4.10  # -------------------------------------------------
% 11.64/4.10  # User time                : 0.202 s
% 11.64/4.10  # System time              : 0.015 s
% 11.64/4.10  # Total time               : 0.217 s
% 11.64/4.10  # Maximum resident set size: 7120 pages
% 11.64/4.10  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------