TSTP Solution File: TOP005-2 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : TOP005-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 21:34:49 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.45s
% Output   : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : TOP005-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime : Sun May 29 12:27:54 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.36  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.14/0.36  The process was started by sandbox2 on n020.cluster.edu,
% 0.14/0.36  Sun May 29 12:27:54 2022
% 0.14/0.36  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 2538.
% 0.14/0.36  
% 0.14/0.36  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.14/0.36  set(auto).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.14/0.36  clear(print_given).
% 0.14/0.36  
% 0.14/0.36  list(usable).
% 0.14/0.36  
% 0.14/0.36  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=4.
% 0.14/0.36  
% 0.14/0.36  This is a non-Horn set without equality.  The strategy
% 0.14/0.36  will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.14/0.36  factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.14/0.36  
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.14/0.36  
% 0.14/0.36  ------------> process usable:
% 0.14/0.36  
% 0.14/0.36  ------------> process sos:
% 0.14/0.36  
% 0.14/0.36  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.20/0.38  
% 0.20/0.38  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.38  
% 0.20/0.38  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.20/0.38  
% 0.20/0.38  
% 0.20/0.38  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.20/0.38  
% 0.20/0.38  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.20/0.38  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.20/0.38  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.20/0.38  number of clauses in intial UL: 10
% 0.20/0.38  number of clauses initially in problem: 12
% 0.20/0.38  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 83
% 0.20/0.38  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.20/0.38  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.20/0.38  absolute distinct symbol count: 11
% 0.20/0.38     distinct predicate count: 4
% 0.20/0.38     distinct function count: 5
% 0.20/0.38     distinct constant count: 2
% 0.20/0.38  
% 0.20/0.38  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.20/0.38  
% 0.20/0.38  
% 0.20/0.38  
% 0.20/0.38  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.20/0.45  
% 0.20/0.45  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 0.20/0.45  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.45  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.20/0.45  
% 0.20/0.45  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.45  
% 0.20/0.45  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.20/0.45  
% 0.20/0.45  -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at   0.07 sec ----> 265 [hyper,260,6,51,49,unit_del,10,10,10] {-} $F.
% 0.20/0.45  
% 0.20/0.45  Length of proof is 9.  Level of proof is 5.
% 0.20/0.45  
% 0.20/0.45  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.20/0.45  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.45  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.20/0.45  
% 0.20/0.45  1 [] {+} -element_of_set(A,union_of_members(B))|element_of_set(A,f1(B,A)).
% 0.20/0.45  2 [] {+} -element_of_set(A,union_of_members(B))|element_of_collection(f1(B,A),B).
% 0.20/0.45  3 [] {+} -element_of_collection(A,top_of_basis(B))| -element_of_set(C,A)|element_of_set(C,f10(B,A,C)).
% 0.20/0.45  4 [] {+} -element_of_collection(A,top_of_basis(B))| -element_of_set(C,A)|element_of_collection(f10(B,A,C),B).
% 0.20/0.45  5 [] {+} -element_of_collection(A,top_of_basis(B))| -element_of_set(C,A)|subset_sets(f10(B,A,C),A).
% 0.20/0.45  6 [] {+} element_of_collection(A,top_of_basis(B))| -element_of_set(f11(B,A),C)| -element_of_collection(C,B)| -subset_sets(C,A).
% 0.20/0.45  8 [] {+} -subset_sets(A,B)| -element_of_collection(B,C)|subset_sets(A,union_of_members(C)).
% 0.20/0.45  9 [] {+} -subset_collections(A,B)| -element_of_collection(C,A)|element_of_collection(C,B).
% 0.20/0.45  10 [] {+} -element_of_collection(union_of_members(g),top_of_basis(f)).
% 0.20/0.45  11 [] {+} element_of_collection(A,top_of_basis(B))|element_of_set(f11(B,A),A).
% 0.20/0.45  12 [] {+} subset_collections(g,top_of_basis(f)).
% 0.20/0.45  14 [hyper,11,2] {-} element_of_collection(union_of_members(A),top_of_basis(B))|element_of_collection(f1(A,f11(B,union_of_members(A))),A).
% 0.20/0.45  15 [hyper,11,1] {-} element_of_collection(union_of_members(A),top_of_basis(B))|element_of_set(f11(B,union_of_members(A)),f1(A,f11(B,union_of_members(A)))).
% 0.20/0.45  16 [hyper,14,10] {-} element_of_collection(f1(g,f11(f,union_of_members(g))),g).
% 0.20/0.45  21 [hyper,14,9,12] {-} element_of_collection(union_of_members(g),top_of_basis(A))|element_of_collection(f1(g,f11(A,union_of_members(g))),top_of_basis(f)).
% 0.20/0.45  27 [hyper,16,9,12] {-} element_of_collection(f1(g,f11(f,union_of_members(g))),top_of_basis(f)).
% 0.20/0.45  35 [hyper,27,5,15,unit_del,10] {+} subset_sets(f10(f,f1(g,f11(f,union_of_members(g))),f11(f,union_of_members(g))),f1(g,f11(f,union_of_members(g)))).
% 0.20/0.45  49 [hyper,21,4,15,factor_simp] {-} element_of_collection(union_of_members(g),top_of_basis(A))|element_of_collection(f10(f,f1(g,f11(A,union_of_members(g))),f11(A,union_of_members(g))),f).
% 0.20/0.45  51 [hyper,21,3,15,factor_simp] {-} element_of_collection(union_of_members(g),top_of_basis(A))|element_of_set(f11(A,union_of_members(g)),f10(f,f1(g,f11(A,union_of_members(g))),f11(A,union_of_members(g)))).
% 0.20/0.45  260 [hyper,35,8,16] {-} subset_sets(f10(f,f1(g,f11(f,union_of_members(g))),f11(f,union_of_members(g))),union_of_members(g)).
% 0.20/0.45  265 [hyper,260,6,51,49,unit_del,10,10,10] {-} $F.
% 0.20/0.45  
% 0.20/0.45  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.20/0.45  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.20/0.45  
% 0.20/0.45  
% 0.20/0.45  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.20/0.45  
% 0.20/0.45  
% 0.20/0.45  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.20/0.45  
% 0.20/0.45  ============ end of search ============
% 0.20/0.45  
% 0.20/0.45  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.20/0.45  
% 0.20/0.45  true clauses given           6      (15.8%)
% 0.20/0.45  false clauses given         32
% 0.20/0.45  
% 0.20/0.45        FALSE     TRUE
% 0.20/0.45    16  1         0
% 0.20/0.45    19  0         2
% 0.20/0.45    23  1         0
% 0.20/0.45    24  6         2
% 0.20/0.45    25  7         2
% 0.20/0.45    26  5         1
% 0.20/0.45    27  8         0
% 0.20/0.45    28  6         0
% 0.20/0.45    29  9         0
% 0.20/0.45    30  8         4
% 0.20/0.45    31  16        3
% 0.20/0.45    32  11        1
% 0.20/0.45    33  8         0
% 0.20/0.45    34  8         1
% 0.20/0.45    35  4         6
% 0.20/0.45    36  9         2
% 0.20/0.45    37  5         3
% 0.20/0.45    38  1         1
% 0.20/0.45    39  4         2
% 0.20/0.45    40  7         1
% 0.20/0.45    41  9         0
% 0.20/0.45    42  1         1
% 0.20/0.45    43  2         2
% 0.20/0.45    44  1         2
% 0.20/0.45    45  1         2
% 0.20/0.45    46  1         0
% 0.20/0.45    47  1         0
% 0.20/0.45    48  3         3
% 0.20/0.45    49  0         2
% 0.20/0.45    50  1         0
% 0.20/0.45    51  1         0
% 0.20/0.45    52  1         2
% 0.20/0.45    53  0         1
% 0.20/0.45    55  0         1
% 0.20/0.45    56  0         1
% 0.20/0.45    57  1         0
% 0.20/0.45    58  1         1
% 0.20/0.45    60  2         2
% 0.20/0.45  tot:  150       51      (25.4% true)
% 0.20/0.45  
% 0.20/0.45  
% 0.20/0.45  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.45  
% 0.20/0.45  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.20/0.45  
% 0.20/0.45  Process 2538 finished Sun May 29 12:27:54 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------