TSTP Solution File: SYO796+1 by iProver---3.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.8
% Problem  : SYO796+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep  1 04:41:25 EDT 2023

% Result   : Satisfiable 174.72s 23.84s
% Output   : Saturation 174.72s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ! [X4] : ~ f(X0,X4)
      & ? [X1] :
          ( ! [X3] : ~ f(X1,X3)
          & ? [X2] :
              ( ~ f(X2,X1)
              & f(X2,X0) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_1) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ? [X0] : f(X0,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_2) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ? [X0] :
    ! [X3] : ~ f(X0,X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_3) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X3] :
    ? [X0] : f(X0,X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_4) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ! [X6] :
          ( f(X4,X6)
          | ~ f(X3,X6) )
      | ! [X5] :
          ( ~ f(X5,X4)
          | ~ f(X5,X3) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_5) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ! [X6] :
          ( f(X6,X4)
          | ~ f(X6,X3) )
      | ! [X5] :
          ( ~ f(X4,X5)
          | ~ f(X3,X5) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_6) ).

fof(f7,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ! [X1] : ~ f(X0,X1)
      & ? [X2] :
          ( ! [X3] : ~ f(X2,X3)
          & ? [X4] :
              ( ~ f(X4,X2)
              & f(X4,X0) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f8,plain,
    ? [X0] :
    ! [X1] : ~ f(X0,X1),
    inference(rectify,[],[f3]) ).

fof(f9,plain,
    ! [X0] :
    ? [X1] : f(X1,X0),
    inference(rectify,[],[f4]) ).

fof(f10,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ! [X2] :
          ( f(X1,X2)
          | ~ f(X0,X2) )
      | ! [X3] :
          ( ~ f(X3,X1)
          | ~ f(X3,X0) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f11,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ! [X2] :
          ( f(X2,X1)
          | ~ f(X2,X0) )
      | ! [X3] :
          ( ~ f(X1,X3)
          | ~ f(X0,X3) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f6]) ).

fof(f12,plain,
    ( ? [X0] :
        ( ! [X1] : ~ f(X0,X1)
        & ? [X2] :
            ( ! [X3] : ~ f(X2,X3)
            & ? [X4] :
                ( ~ f(X4,X2)
                & f(X4,X0) ) ) )
   => ( ! [X1] : ~ f(sK0,X1)
      & ? [X2] :
          ( ! [X3] : ~ f(X2,X3)
          & ? [X4] :
              ( ~ f(X4,X2)
              & f(X4,sK0) ) ) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f13,plain,
    ( ? [X2] :
        ( ! [X3] : ~ f(X2,X3)
        & ? [X4] :
            ( ~ f(X4,X2)
            & f(X4,sK0) ) )
   => ( ! [X3] : ~ f(sK1,X3)
      & ? [X4] :
          ( ~ f(X4,sK1)
          & f(X4,sK0) ) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f14,plain,
    ( ? [X4] :
        ( ~ f(X4,sK1)
        & f(X4,sK0) )
   => ( ~ f(sK2,sK1)
      & f(sK2,sK0) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f15,plain,
    ( ! [X1] : ~ f(sK0,X1)
    & ! [X3] : ~ f(sK1,X3)
    & ~ f(sK2,sK1)
    & f(sK2,sK0) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2])],[f7,f14,f13,f12]) ).

fof(f16,plain,
    ( ? [X0] : f(X0,X0)
   => f(sK3,sK3) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f17,plain,
    f(sK3,sK3),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK3])],[f2,f16]) ).

fof(f18,plain,
    ( ? [X0] :
      ! [X1] : ~ f(X0,X1)
   => ! [X1] : ~ f(sK4,X1) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f19,plain,
    ! [X1] : ~ f(sK4,X1),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK4])],[f8,f18]) ).

fof(f20,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ? [X1] : f(X1,X0)
     => f(sK5(X0),X0) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f21,plain,
    ! [X0] : f(sK5(X0),X0),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK5])],[f9,f20]) ).

fof(f22,plain,
    f(sK2,sK0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

fof(f23,plain,
    ~ f(sK2,sK1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

fof(f24,plain,
    ! [X3] : ~ f(sK1,X3),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

fof(f25,plain,
    ! [X1] : ~ f(sK0,X1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

fof(f26,plain,
    f(sK3,sK3),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).

fof(f27,plain,
    ! [X1] : ~ f(sK4,X1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f19]) ).

fof(f28,plain,
    ! [X0] : f(sK5(X0),X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f21]) ).

fof(f29,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( f(X1,X2)
      | ~ f(X0,X2)
      | ~ f(X3,X1)
      | ~ f(X3,X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

fof(f30,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( f(X2,X1)
      | ~ f(X2,X0)
      | ~ f(X1,X3)
      | ~ f(X0,X3) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

cnf(c_49,plain,
    ~ f(sK0,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f25]) ).

cnf(c_50,plain,
    ~ f(sK1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f24]) ).

cnf(c_51,plain,
    ~ f(sK2,sK1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f23]) ).

cnf(c_52,plain,
    f(sK2,sK0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f22]) ).

cnf(c_53,plain,
    f(sK3,sK3),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f26]) ).

cnf(c_54,plain,
    ~ f(sK4,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f27]) ).

cnf(c_55,plain,
    f(sK5(X0),X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f28]) ).

cnf(c_56,plain,
    ( ~ f(X0,X1)
    | ~ f(X0,X2)
    | ~ f(X2,X3)
    | f(X1,X3) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f29]) ).

cnf(c_57,plain,
    ( ~ f(X0,X1)
    | ~ f(X2,X1)
    | ~ f(X3,X2)
    | f(X3,X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f30]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : SYO796+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.4.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 04:32:38 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.46  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.46  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 174.72/23.84  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 174.72/23.84  % SZS status Satisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 174.72/23.84  
% 174.72/23.84  %---------------- iProver v3.8 (pre SMT-COMP 2023/CASC 2023) ----------------%
% 174.72/23.84  
% 174.72/23.84  ------  iProver source info
% 174.72/23.84  
% 174.72/23.84  git: date: 2023-05-31 18:12:56 +0000
% 174.72/23.84  git: sha1: 8abddc1f627fd3ce0bcb8b4cbf113b3cc443d7b6
% 174.72/23.84  git: non_committed_changes: false
% 174.72/23.84  git: last_make_outside_of_git: false
% 174.72/23.84  
% 174.72/23.84  ------ Parsing...
% 174.72/23.84  ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...
% 174.72/23.84  
% 174.72/23.84  ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e 
% 174.72/23.84  
% 174.72/23.84  ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e 
% 174.72/23.84  ------ Proving...
% 174.72/23.84  ------ Problem Properties 
% 174.72/23.84  
% 174.72/23.84  
% 174.72/23.84  clauses                                 9
% 174.72/23.84  conjectures                             0
% 174.72/23.84  EPR                                     8
% 174.72/23.84  Horn                                    9
% 174.72/23.84  unary                                   7
% 174.72/23.84  binary                                  0
% 174.72/23.84  lits                                    15
% 174.72/23.84  lits eq                                 0
% 174.72/23.84  fd_pure                                 0
% 174.72/23.84  fd_pseudo                               0
% 174.72/23.84  fd_cond                                 0
% 174.72/23.84  fd_pseudo_cond                          0
% 174.72/23.84  AC symbols                              0
% 174.72/23.84  
% 174.72/23.84  ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 174.72/23.84  
% 174.72/23.84  
% 174.72/23.84  ------ 
% 174.72/23.84  Current options:
% 174.72/23.84  ------ 
% 174.72/23.84  
% 174.72/23.84  
% 174.72/23.84  
% 174.72/23.84  
% 174.72/23.84  ------ Proving...
% 174.72/23.84  
% 174.72/23.84  
% 174.72/23.84  % SZS status Satisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 174.72/23.84  
% 174.72/23.84  % SZS output start Saturation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 174.72/23.84  
% 174.72/23.84  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------