TSTP Solution File: SYO761+1 by iProver---3.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.8
% Problem  : SYO761+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep  1 04:41:17 EDT 2023

% Result   : Satisfiable 219.61s 29.86s
% Output   : Saturation 219.61s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
    ? [X0] :
      ( ? [X2] : ~ f(X0,X2)
      & f(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_2) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
    ? [X0] :
      ( ! [X3] :
          ( f(X3,X0)
          | ! [X4] :
              ( f(X0,X4)
              | ~ f(X3,X4) ) )
      & f(X1,X0)
      & ? [X2] : ~ f(X2,X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_3) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X1] : f(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_4) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X1,X3,X4] :
      ( f(X1,X4)
      | ~ f(X3,X4)
      | ~ f(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_5) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X1,X3] :
      ( f(X1,X3)
      | ! [X4] :
          ( f(X3,X4)
          | ~ f(X1,X4) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_6) ).

fof(f10,plain,
    ! [X0] :
    ? [X1] :
      ( ? [X2] : ~ f(X1,X2)
      & f(X1,X0) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f11,plain,
    ! [X0] :
    ? [X1] :
      ( ! [X2] :
          ( f(X2,X1)
          | ! [X3] :
              ( f(X1,X3)
              | ~ f(X2,X3) ) )
      & f(X0,X1)
      & ? [X4] : ~ f(X4,X1) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f3]) ).

fof(f12,plain,
    ! [X0] : f(X0,X0),
    inference(rectify,[],[f4]) ).

fof(f13,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( f(X0,X2)
      | ~ f(X1,X2)
      | ~ f(X0,X1) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f14,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( f(X0,X1)
      | ! [X2] :
          ( f(X1,X2)
          | ~ f(X0,X2) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f6]) ).

fof(f20,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ? [X1] :
          ( ? [X2] : ~ f(X1,X2)
          & f(X1,X0) )
     => ( ? [X2] : ~ f(sK1(X0),X2)
        & f(sK1(X0),X0) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f21,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ? [X2] : ~ f(sK1(X0),X2)
     => ~ f(sK1(X0),sK2(X0)) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f22,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ f(sK1(X0),sK2(X0))
      & f(sK1(X0),X0) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1,sK2])],[f10,f21,f20]) ).

fof(f23,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ? [X1] :
          ( ! [X2] :
              ( f(X2,X1)
              | ! [X3] :
                  ( f(X1,X3)
                  | ~ f(X2,X3) ) )
          & f(X0,X1)
          & ? [X4] : ~ f(X4,X1) )
     => ( ! [X2] :
            ( f(X2,sK3(X0))
            | ! [X3] :
                ( f(sK3(X0),X3)
                | ~ f(X2,X3) ) )
        & f(X0,sK3(X0))
        & ? [X4] : ~ f(X4,sK3(X0)) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f24,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ? [X4] : ~ f(X4,sK3(X0))
     => ~ f(sK4(X0),sK3(X0)) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f25,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ! [X2] :
          ( f(X2,sK3(X0))
          | ! [X3] :
              ( f(sK3(X0),X3)
              | ~ f(X2,X3) ) )
      & f(X0,sK3(X0))
      & ~ f(sK4(X0),sK3(X0)) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK3,sK4])],[f11,f24,f23]) ).

fof(f27,plain,
    ! [X0] : f(sK1(X0),X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f22]) ).

fof(f28,plain,
    ! [X0] : ~ f(sK1(X0),sK2(X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f22]) ).

fof(f29,plain,
    ! [X0] : ~ f(sK4(X0),sK3(X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f25]) ).

fof(f30,plain,
    ! [X0] : f(X0,sK3(X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f25]) ).

fof(f32,plain,
    ! [X0] : f(X0,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).

fof(f33,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( f(X0,X2)
      | ~ f(X1,X2)
      | ~ f(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).

fof(f34,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( f(X0,X1)
      | f(X1,X2)
      | ~ f(X0,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).

cnf(c_50,plain,
    ~ f(sK1(X0),sK2(X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f28]) ).

cnf(c_51,plain,
    f(sK1(X0),X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f27]) ).

cnf(c_53,plain,
    f(X0,sK3(X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f30]) ).

cnf(c_54,plain,
    ~ f(sK4(X0),sK3(X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f29]) ).

cnf(c_55,plain,
    f(X0,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f32]) ).

cnf(c_56,plain,
    ( ~ f(X0,X1)
    | ~ f(X2,X0)
    | f(X2,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f33]) ).

cnf(c_57,plain,
    ( ~ f(X0,X1)
    | f(X0,X2)
    | f(X2,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f34]) ).

cnf(c_70188,plain,
    ( f(X0,X1)
    | f(X1,X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_55,c_57]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SYO761+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.4.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 02:17:51 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.48  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.48  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 219.61/29.86  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 219.61/29.86  % SZS status Satisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 219.61/29.86  
% 219.61/29.86  %---------------- iProver v3.8 (pre SMT-COMP 2023/CASC 2023) ----------------%
% 219.61/29.86  
% 219.61/29.86  ------  iProver source info
% 219.61/29.86  
% 219.61/29.86  git: date: 2023-05-31 18:12:56 +0000
% 219.61/29.86  git: sha1: 8abddc1f627fd3ce0bcb8b4cbf113b3cc443d7b6
% 219.61/29.86  git: non_committed_changes: false
% 219.61/29.86  git: last_make_outside_of_git: false
% 219.61/29.86  
% 219.61/29.86  ------ Parsing...
% 219.61/29.86  ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...
% 219.61/29.86  
% 219.61/29.86  ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e 
% 219.61/29.86  
% 219.61/29.86  ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e 
% 219.61/29.86  ------ Proving...
% 219.61/29.86  ------ Problem Properties 
% 219.61/29.86  
% 219.61/29.86  
% 219.61/29.86  clauses                                 7
% 219.61/29.86  conjectures                             0
% 219.61/29.86  EPR                                     3
% 219.61/29.86  Horn                                    6
% 219.61/29.86  unary                                   5
% 219.61/29.86  binary                                  0
% 219.61/29.86  lits                                    11
% 219.61/29.86  lits eq                                 0
% 219.61/29.86  fd_pure                                 0
% 219.61/29.86  fd_pseudo                               0
% 219.61/29.86  fd_cond                                 0
% 219.61/29.86  fd_pseudo_cond                          0
% 219.61/29.86  AC symbols                              0
% 219.61/29.86  
% 219.61/29.86  ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 219.61/29.86  
% 219.61/29.86  
% 219.61/29.86  ------ 
% 219.61/29.86  Current options:
% 219.61/29.86  ------ 
% 219.61/29.86  
% 219.61/29.86  
% 219.61/29.86  
% 219.61/29.86  
% 219.61/29.86  ------ Proving...
% 219.61/29.86  
% 219.61/29.86  
% 219.61/29.86  % SZS status Satisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 219.61/29.86  
% 219.61/29.86  % SZS output start Saturation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 219.61/29.87  
% 219.61/29.87  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------