TSTP Solution File: SYO691-1.000 by CSE_E---1.5

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem  : SYO691-1.000 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep  1 04:13:09 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.55s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :   17
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   34 (   9 unt;  10 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   47 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   50 (  27   ~;  23   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   10 (   5   >;   5   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   6 usr;   4 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   65 (   0 sgn;   0   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
    f: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_23,type,
    a: $i ).

tff(decl_24,type,
    top: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_25,type,
    zero: $i ).

tff(decl_26,type,
    succ: $i > $i ).

tff(decl_27,type,
    seq: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_28,type,
    step: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_29,type,
    epred1_0: $o ).

tff(decl_30,type,
    epred2_0: $o ).

tff(decl_31,type,
    epred3_0: $o ).

cnf(rewrite_sequence_succ,axiom,
    ( seq(succ(X1),X2,X4)
    | ~ seq(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ step(X3,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rewrite_sequence_succ) ).

cnf(rewrite_sequence_zero,axiom,
    seq(zero,X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rewrite_sequence_zero) ).

cnf(rewrite_right,axiom,
    ( step(f(X3,X1),f(X3,X2))
    | ~ step(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rewrite_right) ).

cnf(rewrite_left,axiom,
    ( step(f(X1,X3),f(X2,X3))
    | ~ step(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rewrite_left) ).

cnf(rewrite_top,axiom,
    ( step(X1,X2)
    | ~ top(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rewrite_top) ).

cnf(rule_1,axiom,
    top(f(f(X1,X2),f(X3,a)),f(f(X3,f(X2,a)),X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rule_1) ).

cnf(prove,negated_conjecture,
    ~ seq(succ(succ(succ(zero))),X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove) ).

cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
    ( seq(succ(X1),X2,X4)
    | ~ seq(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ step(X3,X4) ),
    rewrite_sequence_succ ).

cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
    seq(zero,X1,X1),
    rewrite_sequence_zero ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( seq(succ(zero),X1,X2)
    | ~ step(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( seq(succ(succ(zero)),X1,X2)
    | ~ step(X3,X2)
    | ~ step(X1,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
    ( step(f(X3,X1),f(X3,X2))
    | ~ step(X1,X2) ),
    rewrite_right ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( seq(succ(succ(zero)),X1,f(X2,X3))
    | ~ step(X1,f(X2,X4))
    | ~ step(X4,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
    ( step(f(X1,X3),f(X2,X3))
    | ~ step(X1,X2) ),
    rewrite_left ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( seq(succ(succ(zero)),f(X1,X2),f(X3,X4))
    | ~ step(X2,X4)
    | ~ step(X1,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
    ( step(X1,X2)
    | ~ top(X1,X2) ),
    rewrite_top ).

cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
    top(f(f(X1,X2),f(X3,a)),f(f(X3,f(X2,a)),X1)),
    rule_1 ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( seq(succ(succ(succ(zero))),f(X1,X2),X3)
    | ~ step(f(X4,X5),X3)
    | ~ step(X2,X5)
    | ~ step(X1,X4) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    step(f(f(X1,X2),f(X3,a)),f(f(X3,f(X2,a)),X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ~ seq(succ(succ(succ(zero))),X1,X1),
    prove ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( seq(succ(succ(succ(zero))),f(X1,X2),f(f(X3,f(X4,a)),X5))
    | ~ step(X2,f(X3,a))
    | ~ step(X1,f(X5,X4)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ step(f(X1,f(X2,a)),f(X3,X2))
    | ~ step(X3,f(X1,a)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ~ step(f(X1,f(X2,a)),f(f(X1,X2),a)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_18]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : SYO691-1.000 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime   : Sat Aug 26 00:52:20 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.53  start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.55  % Version  : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.19/0.55  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.55  % Proof found
% 0.19/0.55  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.55  % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.55  % Total time : 0.005000 s
% 0.19/0.55  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.19/0.55  % Total time : 0.008000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------