TSTP Solution File: SYO691-1.000 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : SYO691-1.000 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 1 04:08:47 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 60.54s 60.81s
% Output : CNFRefutation 60.54s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SYO691-1.000 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 00:50:41 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.55 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 60.54/60.79 %-------------------------------------------
% 60.54/60.79 % File :CSE---1.6
% 60.54/60.79 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 60.54/60.79 % Transform :cnf
% 60.54/60.79 % Format :tptp:raw
% 60.54/60.79 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 60.54/60.79
% 60.54/60.79 % Result :Theorem 60.000000s
% 60.54/60.79 % Output :CNFRefutation 60.000000s
% 60.54/60.79 %-------------------------------------------
% 60.54/60.81 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 60.54/60.81 % File : SYO691-1.000 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.3.0.
% 60.54/60.81 % Domain : Syntactic
% 60.54/60.81 % Problem : Loop 0 Yes
% 60.54/60.81 % Version : Especial.
% 60.54/60.81 % English :
% 60.54/60.81
% 60.54/60.81 % Refs : [Wal17] Waldman (2017), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 60.54/60.81 % Source : [TPTP]
% 60.54/60.81 % Names : loop-0-yes.tptp [Wal17]
% 60.54/60.81
% 60.54/60.81 % Status : Unsatisfiable
% 60.54/60.81 % Rating : 0.00 v7.3.0
% 60.54/60.81 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 7 ( 3 unt; 0 nHn; 3 RR)
% 60.54/60.81 % Number of literals : 12 ( 0 equ; 6 neg)
% 60.54/60.81 % Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% 60.54/60.81 % Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% 60.54/60.81 % Number of predicates : 3 ( 3 usr; 0 prp; 2-3 aty)
% 60.54/60.81 % Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% 60.54/60.81 % Number of variables : 17 ( 0 sgn)
% 60.54/60.81 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_HRN
% 60.54/60.81
% 60.54/60.81 % Comments :
% 60.54/60.81 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 60.54/60.81 cnf(rule_1,axiom,
% 60.54/60.81 top(f(f(Z,Y),f(X,a)),f(f(X,f(Y,a)),Z)) ).
% 60.54/60.81
% 60.54/60.81 cnf(prove,negated_conjecture,
% 60.54/60.81 ~ seq(succ(succ(succ(zero))),X,X) ).
% 60.54/60.81
% 60.54/60.81 cnf(rewrite_top,axiom,
% 60.54/60.81 ( ~ top(X,Y)
% 60.54/60.81 | step(X,Y) ) ).
% 60.54/60.81
% 60.54/60.81 cnf(rewrite_left,axiom,
% 60.54/60.81 ( ~ step(X,Y)
% 60.54/60.81 | step(f(X,Z),f(Y,Z)) ) ).
% 60.54/60.81
% 60.54/60.81 cnf(rewrite_right,axiom,
% 60.54/60.81 ( ~ step(Y,Z)
% 60.54/60.81 | step(f(X,Y),f(X,Z)) ) ).
% 60.54/60.81
% 60.54/60.81 cnf(rewrite_sequence_zero,axiom,
% 60.54/60.81 seq(zero,X,X) ).
% 60.54/60.81
% 60.54/60.81 cnf(rewrite_sequence_succ,axiom,
% 60.54/60.81 ( ~ seq(N,X,Y)
% 60.54/60.81 | ~ step(Y,Z)
% 60.54/60.81 | seq(succ(N),X,Z) ) ).
% 60.54/60.81
% 60.54/60.81 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 60.54/60.81 %-------------------------------------------
% 60.54/60.81 % Proof found
% 60.54/60.81 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 60.54/60.81 % SZS output start Proof
% 60.54/60.83 %ClaNum:7(EqnAxiom:0)
% 60.54/60.83 %VarNum:34(SingletonVarNum:17)
% 60.54/60.83 %MaxLitNum:3
% 60.54/60.83 %MaxfuncDepth:3
% 60.54/60.83 %SharedTerms:5
% 60.54/60.83 %goalClause: 3
% 60.54/60.83 %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 60.54/60.83 [1]P1(a1,x11,x11)
% 60.54/60.83 [3]~P1(f4(f4(f4(a1))),x31,x31)
% 60.54/60.83 [2]P2(f2(f2(x21,x22),f2(x23,a3)),f2(f2(x23,f2(x22,a3)),x21))
% 60.54/60.83 [4]~P2(x41,x42)+P3(x41,x42)
% 60.54/60.83 [5]~P3(x52,x53)+P3(f2(x51,x52),f2(x51,x53))
% 60.54/60.83 [6]~P3(x61,x63)+P3(f2(x61,x62),f2(x63,x62))
% 60.54/60.83 [7]~P1(x71,x72,x74)+~P3(x74,x73)+P1(f4(x71),x72,x73)
% 60.54/60.83 %EqnAxiom
% 60.54/60.83
% 60.54/60.83 %-------------------------------------------
% 60.54/60.86 cnf(8,plain,
% 60.54/60.86 (P3(f2(f2(x81,x82),f2(x83,a3)),f2(f2(x83,f2(x82,a3)),x81))),
% 60.54/60.86 inference(scs_inference,[],[2,4])).
% 60.54/60.86 cnf(10,plain,
% 60.54/60.86 (~P1(f4(f4(a1)),f2(f2(x101,f2(x102,a3)),x103),f2(f2(x103,x102),f2(x101,a3)))),
% 60.54/60.86 inference(scs_inference,[],[3,8,7])).
% 60.54/60.86 cnf(23,plain,
% 60.54/60.86 (~P1(f4(a1),f2(f2(x231,f2(x232,a3)),f2(x233,f2(x234,a3))),f2(f2(f2(x232,x234),f2(x233,a3)),f2(x231,a3)))),
% 60.54/60.86 inference(scs_inference,[],[8,10,6,7])).
% 60.54/60.86 cnf(24289,plain,
% 60.54/60.86 (~P3(f2(f2(x242891,f2(x242892,a3)),f2(x242893,f2(x242894,a3))),f2(f2(f2(x242892,x242894),f2(x242893,a3)),f2(x242891,a3)))),
% 60.54/60.86 inference(scs_inference,[],[23,1,7])).
% 60.54/60.86 cnf(24293,plain,
% 60.54/60.86 ($false),
% 60.54/60.86 inference(scs_inference,[],[8,24289,5]),
% 60.54/60.86 ['proof']).
% 60.54/60.90 % SZS output end Proof
% 60.54/60.90 % Total time :60.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------