TSTP Solution File: SYO691-1.000 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : SYO691-1.000 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 11:18:22 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.71s 1.62s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.87s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   14
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   33 (  11 unt;   7 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   47 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   47 (  26   ~;  21   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   10 (   5   >;   5   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   74 (;  74   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ seq > top > step > f > #nlpp > succ > zero > a

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(top,type,
    top: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(a,type,
    a: $i ).

tff(step,type,
    step: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(succ,type,
    succ: $i > $i ).

tff(f,type,
    f: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(zero,type,
    zero: $i ).

tff(seq,type,
    seq: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(f_23,axiom,
    ! [Z,Y,X] : top(f(f(Z,Y),f(X,a)),f(f(X,f(Y,a)),Z)),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_31,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( ~ top(X,Y)
      | step(X,Y) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_43,axiom,
    ! [X] : seq(zero,X,X),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_41,axiom,
    ! [Y,Z,X] :
      ( ~ step(Y,Z)
      | step(f(X,Y),f(X,Z)) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_51,axiom,
    ! [N,X,Y,Z] :
      ( ~ seq(N,X,Y)
      | ~ step(Y,Z)
      | seq(succ(N),X,Z) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_36,axiom,
    ! [X,Y,Z] :
      ( ~ step(X,Y)
      | step(f(X,Z),f(Y,Z)) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_26,axiom,
    ! [X] : ~ seq(succ(succ(succ(zero))),X,X),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(c_27,plain,
    ! [Z_32,Y_33,X_34] : top(f(f(Z_32,Y_33),f(X_34,a)),f(f(X_34,f(Y_33,a)),Z_32)),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_23]) ).

tff(c_6,plain,
    ! [X_5,Y_6] :
      ( step(X_5,Y_6)
      | ~ top(X_5,Y_6) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_31]) ).

tff(c_31,plain,
    ! [Z_32,Y_33,X_34] : step(f(f(Z_32,Y_33),f(X_34,a)),f(f(X_34,f(Y_33,a)),Z_32)),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_27,c_6]) ).

tff(c_12,plain,
    ! [X_13] : seq(zero,X_13,X_13),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_43]) ).

tff(c_10,plain,
    ! [X_12,Y_10,Z_11] :
      ( step(f(X_12,Y_10),f(X_12,Z_11))
      | ~ step(Y_10,Z_11) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_41]) ).

tff(c_20,plain,
    ! [N_28,X_29,Z_30,Y_31] :
      ( seq(succ(N_28),X_29,Z_30)
      | ~ step(Y_31,Z_30)
      | ~ seq(N_28,X_29,Y_31) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_51]) ).

tff(c_45,plain,
    ! [Y_47,N_49,X_48,Z_50,X_46] :
      ( seq(succ(N_49),X_46,f(X_48,Z_50))
      | ~ seq(N_49,X_46,f(X_48,Y_47))
      | ~ step(Y_47,Z_50) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_10,c_20]) ).

tff(c_53,plain,
    ! [X_51,Y_52,Z_53] :
      ( seq(succ(zero),f(X_51,Y_52),f(X_51,Z_53))
      | ~ step(Y_52,Z_53) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_12,c_45]) ).

tff(c_8,plain,
    ! [X_7,Z_9,Y_8] :
      ( step(f(X_7,Z_9),f(Y_8,Z_9))
      | ~ step(X_7,Y_8) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_36]) ).

tff(c_26,plain,
    ! [Y_8,Z_9,X_29,X_7,N_28] :
      ( seq(succ(N_28),X_29,f(Y_8,Z_9))
      | ~ seq(N_28,X_29,f(X_7,Z_9))
      | ~ step(X_7,Y_8) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_8,c_20]) ).

tff(c_59,plain,
    ! [X_51,Y_52,Y_8,Z_53] :
      ( seq(succ(succ(zero)),f(X_51,Y_52),f(Y_8,Z_53))
      | ~ step(X_51,Y_8)
      | ~ step(Y_52,Z_53) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_53,c_26]) ).

tff(c_32,plain,
    ! [Z_35,Y_36,X_37] : step(f(f(Z_35,Y_36),f(X_37,a)),f(f(X_37,f(Y_36,a)),Z_35)),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_27,c_6]) ).

tff(c_14,plain,
    ! [N_14,X_15,Z_17,Y_16] :
      ( seq(succ(N_14),X_15,Z_17)
      | ~ step(Y_16,Z_17)
      | ~ seq(N_14,X_15,Y_16) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_51]) ).

tff(c_87,plain,
    ! [N_67,Z_70,X_66,Y_68,X_69] :
      ( seq(succ(N_67),X_69,f(f(X_66,f(Y_68,a)),Z_70))
      | ~ seq(N_67,X_69,f(f(Z_70,Y_68),f(X_66,a))) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_32,c_14]) ).

tff(c_4,plain,
    ! [X_4] : ~ seq(succ(succ(succ(zero))),X_4,X_4),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_26]) ).

tff(c_99,plain,
    ! [X_71,Y_72,Z_73] : ~ seq(succ(succ(zero)),f(f(X_71,f(Y_72,a)),Z_73),f(f(Z_73,Y_72),f(X_71,a))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_87,c_4]) ).

tff(c_110,plain,
    ! [X_74,Y_75,Y_76] :
      ( ~ step(f(X_74,f(Y_75,a)),f(Y_76,Y_75))
      | ~ step(Y_76,f(X_74,a)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_59,c_99]) ).

tff(c_128,plain,
    ! [Z_78,Y_79] : ~ step(f(Z_78,f(Y_79,a)),f(f(Z_78,Y_79),a)),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_31,c_110]) ).

tff(c_133,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_31,c_128]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SYO691-1.000 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 15:14:06 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 2.71/1.62  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.71/1.63  
% 2.71/1.63  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.87/1.66  
% 2.87/1.66  Inference rules
% 2.87/1.66  ----------------------
% 2.87/1.66  #Ref     : 0
% 2.87/1.66  #Sup     : 27
% 2.87/1.66  #Fact    : 0
% 2.87/1.66  #Define  : 0
% 2.87/1.66  #Split   : 1
% 2.87/1.66  #Chain   : 0
% 2.87/1.66  #Close   : 0
% 2.87/1.66  
% 2.87/1.66  Ordering : KBO
% 2.87/1.66  
% 2.87/1.66  Simplification rules
% 2.87/1.66  ----------------------
% 2.87/1.66  #Subsume      : 2
% 2.87/1.66  #Demod        : 0
% 2.87/1.66  #Tautology    : 0
% 2.87/1.66  #SimpNegUnit  : 0
% 2.87/1.66  #BackRed      : 0
% 2.87/1.66  
% 2.87/1.66  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 2.87/1.66  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 2.87/1.66  
% 2.87/1.66  Timing (in seconds)
% 2.87/1.66  ----------------------
% 2.87/1.66  Preprocessing        : 0.37
% 2.87/1.66  Parsing              : 0.21
% 2.87/1.66  CNF conversion       : 0.02
% 2.87/1.66  Main loop            : 0.27
% 2.87/1.66  Inferencing          : 0.12
% 2.87/1.66  Reduction            : 0.06
% 2.87/1.66  Demodulation         : 0.04
% 2.87/1.66  BG Simplification    : 0.01
% 2.87/1.66  Subsumption          : 0.06
% 2.87/1.66  Abstraction          : 0.01
% 2.87/1.66  MUC search           : 0.00
% 2.87/1.66  Cooper               : 0.00
% 2.87/1.66  Total                : 0.69
% 2.87/1.66  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 2.87/1.66  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 2.87/1.66  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 2.87/1.66  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------