TSTP Solution File: SYO652-1 by SATCoP---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SATCoP---0.1
% Problem : SYO652-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : satcop --statistics %s
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 19:39:15 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.36s
% Output : Proof 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(g0,plain,
'LE'(f(suc(suc(z))),s('0')),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_199)]) ).
cnf(g1,plain,
( ~ 'LE'(f(suc(suc(z))),s('0'))
| 'E'('0',f(suc(suc(z))))
| 'LE'(f(z),'0') ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_3)]) ).
cnf(g2,plain,
~ 'LE'(f(z),'0'),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_99)]) ).
cnf(g3,plain,
( ~ 'E'('0',f(z))
| ~ 'E'('0',f(suc(z)))
| ~ 'E'('0',f(suc(suc(z))))
| ~ 'E'(f(z),f(suc(z)))
| iLEQ(suc(z),suc(z)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_149)]) ).
cnf(g4,plain,
'LE'(f(z),s('0')),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_199)]) ).
cnf(g5,plain,
( ~ 'LE'(f(z),s('0'))
| 'E'('0',f(z))
| 'LE'(f(z),'0') ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_17)]) ).
cnf(g6,plain,
( ~ 'E'('0',f(z))
| ~ 'E'('0',f(suc(z)))
| 'E'(f(z),f(suc(z)))
| iLEQ(suc(z),suc(z)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_44)]) ).
cnf(g7,plain,
'LE'(f(suc(z)),s('0')),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_199)]) ).
cnf(g8,plain,
( ~ 'LE'(f(suc(z)),s('0'))
| 'E'('0',f(suc(z)))
| 'LE'(f(z),'0') ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_191)]) ).
cnf(g9,plain,
( ~ 'E'('0',f(z))
| ~ 'E'('0',f(z))
| ~ 'E'('0',f(z))
| ~ 'E'('0',f(z))
| ~ 'E'('0',f(suc(z)))
| ~ 'E'('0',f(suc(z)))
| ~ 'E'('0',f(suc(z)))
| ~ 'E'('0',f(suc(z)))
| ~ iLEQ(suc(z),suc(z))
| ~ iLEQ(suc(z),suc(z))
| ~ iLEQ(suc(z),suc(z))
| 'E'(f(z),f(suc(z)))
| 'E'(f(z),f(suc(z)))
| 'E'(f(z),f(suc(z)))
| 'E'(f(z),f(suc(z))) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_16)]) ).
cnf(g10,plain,
( ~ 'E'('0',f(z))
| ~ 'E'('0',f(z))
| ~ 'E'('0',f(z))
| ~ 'E'('0',f(z))
| ~ 'E'('0',f(suc(z)))
| ~ 'E'('0',f(suc(z)))
| ~ 'E'('0',f(suc(z)))
| ~ 'E'('0',f(suc(z)))
| ~ 'E'('0',f(suc(suc(z))))
| ~ 'E'('0',f(suc(suc(z))))
| ~ 'E'('0',f(suc(suc(z))))
| ~ 'E'('0',f(suc(suc(z))))
| ~ 'E'(f(z),f(suc(z)))
| ~ 'E'(f(z),f(suc(z)))
| ~ 'E'(f(z),f(suc(z)))
| ~ 'E'(f(z),f(suc(z)))
| ~ iLEQ(suc(z),suc(z))
| ~ iLEQ(suc(z),suc(z))
| ~ iLEQ(suc(z),suc(z)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_96)]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12 % Problem : SYO652-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.04/0.13 % Command : satcop --statistics %s
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jul 9 08:33:01 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.36 % symbols: 10
% 0.19/0.36 % clauses: 23
% 0.19/0.36 % start clauses: 1
% 0.19/0.36 % iterative deepening steps: 52
% 0.19/0.36 % maximum path limit: 2
% 0.19/0.36 % literal attempts: 16053
% 0.19/0.36 % depth failures: 11171
% 0.19/0.36 % regularity failures: 0
% 0.19/0.36 % tautology failures: 1576
% 0.19/0.36 % reductions: 4647
% 0.19/0.36 % extensions: 11408
% 0.19/0.36 % SAT variables: 311
% 0.19/0.36 % SAT clauses: 4511
% 0.19/0.36 % WalkSAT solutions: 4509
% 0.19/0.36 % CDCL solutions: 0
% 0.19/0.36 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.36 % SZS output start ListOfCNF for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------