TSTP Solution File: SYO645+1 by Z3---4.8.9.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Z3---4.8.9.0
% Problem  : SYO645+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : z3_tptp -proof -model -t:%d -file:%s

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 30 01:41:09 EDT 2022

% Result   : Satisfiable 0.19s 0.39s
% Output   : Model 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.10  % Problem  : SYO645+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.2.0.
% 0.06/0.11  % Command  : z3_tptp -proof -model -t:%d -file:%s
% 0.12/0.32  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.32  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.32  % DateTime : Mon Sep  5 15:44:28 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.32  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.32  Z3tptp [4.8.9.0] (c) 2006-20**. Microsoft Corp.
% 0.12/0.32  Usage: tptp [options] [-file:]file
% 0.12/0.32    -h, -?       prints this message.
% 0.12/0.32    -smt2        print SMT-LIB2 benchmark.
% 0.12/0.32    -m, -model   generate model.
% 0.12/0.32    -p, -proof   generate proof.
% 0.12/0.32    -c, -core    generate unsat core of named formulas.
% 0.12/0.32    -st, -statistics display statistics.
% 0.12/0.32    -t:timeout   set timeout (in second).
% 0.12/0.32    -smt2status  display status in smt2 format instead of SZS.
% 0.12/0.32    -check_status check the status produced by Z3 against annotation in benchmark.
% 0.12/0.32    -<param>:<value> configuration parameter and value.
% 0.12/0.32    -o:<output-file> file to place output in.
% 0.19/0.39  % SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.19/0.39  % SZS output start Model
% 0.19/0.39  tff(tptp_fun__i_val_0_type, type, (
% 0.19/0.39     tptp_fun__i_val_0: $i)).
% 0.19/0.39  tff(tptp_fun__i_val_1_type, type, (
% 0.19/0.39     tptp_fun__i_val_1: $i)).
% 0.19/0.39  tff(tptp_fun__i_val_2_type, type, (
% 0.19/0.39     tptp_fun__i_val_2: $i)).
% 0.19/0.39  tff(f_type, type, (
% 0.19/0.39     f: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o)).
% 0.19/0.39  tff(formula1, axiom,
% 0.19/0.39      ![X0: $i, X1: $i, X2: $i] : (f(X0, X1, X2) <=> (((ite_t((X2 = $i!val!2), $i!val!2, ite_t((X2 = $i!val!0), $i!val!0, $i!val!1)) = $i!val!1) & (ite_t((X1 = $i!val!2), $i!val!2, ite_t((X1 = $i!val!0), $i!val!0, $i!val!1)) = $i!val!2) & (ite_t((X0 = $i!val!2), $i!val!2, ite_t((X0 = $i!val!0), $i!val!0, $i!val!1)) = $i!val!1)) | ((ite_t((X2 = $i!val!2), $i!val!2, ite_t((X2 = $i!val!0), $i!val!0, $i!val!1)) = $i!val!2) & (ite_t((X1 = $i!val!2), $i!val!2, ite_t((X1 = $i!val!0), $i!val!0, $i!val!1)) = $i!val!0) & (ite_t((X0 = $i!val!2), $i!val!2, ite_t((X0 = $i!val!0), $i!val!0, $i!val!1)) = $i!val!0)) | ((ite_t((X2 = $i!val!2), $i!val!2, ite_t((X2 = $i!val!0), $i!val!0, $i!val!1)) = $i!val!0) & (ite_t((X1 = $i!val!2), $i!val!2, ite_t((X1 = $i!val!0), $i!val!0, $i!val!1)) = $i!val!2) & (ite_t((X0 = $i!val!2), $i!val!2, ite_t((X0 = $i!val!0), $i!val!0, $i!val!1)) = $i!val!0)) | ((ite_t((X2 = $i!val!2), $i!val!2, ite_t((X2 = $i!val!0), $i!val!0, $i!val!1)) = $i!val!0) & (ite_t((X1 = $i!val!2), $i!val!2, ite_t((X1 = $i!val!0), $i!val!0, $i!val!1)) = $i!val!1) & (ite_t((X0 = $i!val!2), $i!val!2, ite_t((X0 = $i!val!0), $i!val!0, $i!val!1)) = $i!val!2)) | ((ite_t((X2 = $i!val!2), $i!val!2, ite_t((X2 = $i!val!0), $i!val!0, $i!val!1)) = $i!val!0) & (ite_t((X1 = $i!val!2), $i!val!2, ite_t((X1 = $i!val!0), $i!val!0, $i!val!1)) = $i!val!0) & (ite_t((X0 = $i!val!2), $i!val!2, ite_t((X0 = $i!val!0), $i!val!0, $i!val!1)) = $i!val!2)) | ((ite_t((X2 = $i!val!2), $i!val!2, ite_t((X2 = $i!val!0), $i!val!0, $i!val!1)) = $i!val!2) & (ite_t((X1 = $i!val!2), $i!val!2, ite_t((X1 = $i!val!0), $i!val!0, $i!val!1)) = $i!val!2) & (ite_t((X0 = $i!val!2), $i!val!2, ite_t((X0 = $i!val!0), $i!val!0, $i!val!1)) = $i!val!0)) | ((ite_t((X2 = $i!val!2), $i!val!2, ite_t((X2 = $i!val!0), $i!val!0, $i!val!1)) = $i!val!0) & (ite_t((X1 = $i!val!2), $i!val!2, ite_t((X1 = $i!val!0), $i!val!0, $i!val!1)) = $i!val!2) & (ite_t((X0 = $i!val!2), $i!val!2, ite_t((X0 = $i!val!0), $i!val!0, $i!val!1)) = $i!val!1)) | ((ite_t((X2 = $i!val!2), $i!val!2, ite_t((X2 = $i!val!0), $i!val!0, $i!val!1)) = $i!val!1) & (ite_t((X1 = $i!val!2), $i!val!2, ite_t((X1 = $i!val!0), $i!val!0, $i!val!1)) = $i!val!2) & (ite_t((X0 = $i!val!2), $i!val!2, ite_t((X0 = $i!val!0), $i!val!0, $i!val!1)) = $i!val!2)) | ((ite_t((X2 = $i!val!2), $i!val!2, ite_t((X2 = $i!val!0), $i!val!0, $i!val!1)) = $i!val!0) & (ite_t((X1 = $i!val!2), $i!val!2, ite_t((X1 = $i!val!0), $i!val!0, $i!val!1)) = $i!val!2) & (ite_t((X0 = $i!val!2), $i!val!2, ite_t((X0 = $i!val!0), $i!val!0, $i!val!1)) = $i!val!2)) | ((ite_t((X2 = $i!val!2), $i!val!2, ite_t((X2 = $i!val!0), $i!val!0, $i!val!1)) = $i!val!1) & (ite_t((X1 = $i!val!2), $i!val!2, ite_t((X1 = $i!val!0), $i!val!0, $i!val!1)) = $i!val!2) & (ite_t((X0 = $i!val!2), $i!val!2, ite_t((X0 = $i!val!0), $i!val!0, $i!val!1)) = $i!val!0)) | ((ite_t((X2 = $i!val!2), $i!val!2, ite_t((X2 = $i!val!0), $i!val!0, $i!val!1)) = $i!val!2) & (ite_t((X1 = $i!val!2), $i!val!2, ite_t((X1 = $i!val!0), $i!val!0, $i!val!1)) = $i!val!1) & (ite_t((X0 = $i!val!2), $i!val!2, ite_t((X0 = $i!val!0), $i!val!0, $i!val!1)) = $i!val!0))))).
% 0.19/0.39  % SZS output end Model
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------