TSTP Solution File: SYO641-10 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SYO641-10 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:46:44 EDT 2023
% Result : Satisfiable 0.18s 0.47s
% Output : Saturation 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named notref3_2)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
ifeq(f(X1,X2,sK1_notref3_Y1(X1)),true,f(X2,sK1_notref3_Y1(X1),sK1_notref3_Y1(X1)),true) = true,
notref3_1,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
f(sK3_notref3_Y2,sK2_notref3_Y3,X1) = true,
notref3,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
ifeq(X1,X1,X2,X3) = X2,
ifeq_axiom,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
tuple(f(X1,X2,X3),f(X4,X1,X5),f(X2,X6,X7)) != tuple(true,true,true),
notref3_2,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
f(sK2_notref3_Y3,sK1_notref3_Y1(sK3_notref3_Y2),sK1_notref3_Y1(sK3_notref3_Y2)) = true,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]),c_0_6]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
tuple(f(X1,sK2_notref3_Y3,X2),f(X3,X1,X4),true) != tuple(true,true,true),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
tuple(true,f(X1,sK3_notref3_Y2,X2),f(sK2_notref3_Y3,X3,X4)) != tuple(true,true,true),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_5]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
tuple(f(sK2_notref3_Y3,X1,X2),true,f(X1,X3,X4)) != tuple(true,true,true),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_5]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
tuple(f(X1,sK3_notref3_Y2,X2),f(X3,X1,X4),true) != tuple(true,true,true),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_5]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
tuple(f(sK1_notref3_Y1(sK3_notref3_Y2),X1,X2),true,f(X1,X3,X4)) != tuple(true,true,true),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
tuple(true,f(X1,sK2_notref3_Y3,X2),f(sK1_notref3_Y1(sK3_notref3_Y2),X3,X4)) != tuple(true,true,true),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
tuple(f(sK1_notref3_Y1(sK3_notref3_Y2),sK2_notref3_Y3,X1),true,true) != tuple(true,true,true),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_8]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
tuple(true,f(X1,sK3_notref3_Y2,X2),true) != tuple(true,true,true),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_8]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
tuple(true,true,f(sK1_notref3_Y1(sK3_notref3_Y2),X1,X2)) != tuple(true,true,true),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_8]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
tuple(f(sK1_notref3_Y1(sK3_notref3_Y2),sK3_notref3_Y2,X1),true,true) != tuple(true,true,true),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_8]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
tuple(f(sK2_notref3_Y3,sK2_notref3_Y3,X1),true,true) != tuple(true,true,true),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_8]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
tuple(f(sK2_notref3_Y3,sK3_notref3_Y2,X1),true,true) != tuple(true,true,true),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_5]),
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : SYO641-10 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.06/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 16:02:07 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.46 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.18/0.46 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.bFFaphY6dK/E---3.1_4244.p
% 0.18/0.47 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.18/0.47 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.47 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.47 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.47 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.47 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.47 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.47 # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 4342 completed with status 1
% 0.18/0.47 # Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.18/0.47 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.47 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.47 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.47 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.18/0.47 # Search class: FUUPS-FFSF32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.47 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.18/0.47 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 811s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.47 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.47 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.47 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.47 # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.47 # G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 4349 completed with status 1
% 0.18/0.47 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.18/0.47 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.47 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.47 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.47 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.18/0.47 # Search class: FUUPS-FFSF32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.47 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.18/0.47 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 811s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.47 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.18/0.47 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.18/0.47
% 0.18/0.47 # No proof found!
% 0.18/0.47 # SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.18/0.47 # SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.47 # Parsed axioms : 4
% 0.18/0.47 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Initial clauses : 4
% 0.18/0.47 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Initial clauses in saturation : 4
% 0.18/0.47 # Processed clauses : 27
% 0.18/0.47 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # ...subsumed : 6
% 0.18/0.47 # ...remaining for further processing : 21
% 0.18/0.47 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Generated clauses : 20
% 0.18/0.47 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 19
% 0.18/0.47 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Paramodulations : 20
% 0.18/0.47 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # NegExts : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Total rewrite steps : 3
% 0.18/0.47 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.47 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.47 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.47 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.47 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.47 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.47 # Current number of processed clauses : 17
% 0.18/0.47 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 4
% 0.18/0.47 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Negative unit clauses : 13
% 0.18/0.47 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.18/0.47 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Current number of archived clauses : 4
% 0.18/0.47 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 30
% 0.18/0.47 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Termbank termtop insertions : 475
% 0.18/0.47
% 0.18/0.47 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.47 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.18/0.47 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.18/0.47 # Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.18/0.47 # Maximum resident set size: 1520 pages
% 0.18/0.47
% 0.18/0.47 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.47 # User time : 0.011 s
% 0.18/0.47 # System time : 0.009 s
% 0.18/0.47 # Total time : 0.020 s
% 0.18/0.47 # Maximum resident set size: 1668 pages
% 0.18/0.47 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.18/0.48 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------