TSTP Solution File: SYO641+1 by Bliksem---1.12
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Bliksem---1.12
% Problem : SYO641+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : bliksem %s
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 0s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 14:29:04 EDT 2022
% Result : Satisfiable 0.43s 1.07s
% Output : Saturation 0.43s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.10 % Problem : SYO641+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.1.0.
% 0.03/0.11 % Command : bliksem %s
% 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Sat Jul 9 13:20:55 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.43/1.07 *** allocated 10000 integers for termspace/termends
% 0.43/1.07 *** allocated 10000 integers for clauses
% 0.43/1.07 *** allocated 10000 integers for justifications
% 0.43/1.07 Bliksem 1.12
% 0.43/1.07
% 0.43/1.07
% 0.43/1.07 Automatic Strategy Selection
% 0.43/1.07
% 0.43/1.07
% 0.43/1.07 Clauses:
% 0.43/1.07
% 0.43/1.07 { f( skol1, skol2, X ) }.
% 0.43/1.07 { f( Y, skol3( X ), skol3( X ) ), ! f( X, Y, skol3( X ) ) }.
% 0.43/1.07 { ! f( Y, X, Z ), ! f( T, U, W ), ! f( X, T, V0 ) }.
% 0.43/1.07
% 0.43/1.07 percentage equality = 0.000000, percentage horn = 1.000000
% 0.43/1.07 This is a near-Horn, non-equality problem
% 0.43/1.07
% 0.43/1.07
% 0.43/1.07 Options Used:
% 0.43/1.07
% 0.43/1.07 useres = 1
% 0.43/1.07 useparamod = 0
% 0.43/1.07 useeqrefl = 0
% 0.43/1.07 useeqfact = 0
% 0.43/1.07 usefactor = 1
% 0.43/1.07 usesimpsplitting = 0
% 0.43/1.07 usesimpdemod = 0
% 0.43/1.07 usesimpres = 4
% 0.43/1.07
% 0.43/1.07 resimpinuse = 1000
% 0.43/1.07 resimpclauses = 20000
% 0.43/1.07 substype = standard
% 0.43/1.07 backwardsubs = 1
% 0.43/1.07 selectoldest = 5
% 0.43/1.07
% 0.43/1.07 litorderings [0] = split
% 0.43/1.07 litorderings [1] = liftord
% 0.43/1.07
% 0.43/1.07 termordering = none
% 0.43/1.07
% 0.43/1.07 litapriori = 1
% 0.43/1.07 termapriori = 0
% 0.43/1.07 litaposteriori = 0
% 0.43/1.07 termaposteriori = 0
% 0.43/1.07 demodaposteriori = 0
% 0.43/1.07 ordereqreflfact = 0
% 0.43/1.07
% 0.43/1.07 litselect = negative
% 0.43/1.07
% 0.43/1.07 maxweight = 30000
% 0.43/1.07 maxdepth = 30000
% 0.43/1.07 maxlength = 115
% 0.43/1.07 maxnrvars = 195
% 0.43/1.07 excuselevel = 0
% 0.43/1.07 increasemaxweight = 0
% 0.43/1.07
% 0.43/1.07 maxselected = 10000000
% 0.43/1.07 maxnrclauses = 10000000
% 0.43/1.07
% 0.43/1.07 showgenerated = 0
% 0.43/1.07 showkept = 0
% 0.43/1.07 showselected = 0
% 0.43/1.07 showdeleted = 0
% 0.43/1.07 showresimp = 1
% 0.43/1.07 showstatus = 2000
% 0.43/1.07
% 0.43/1.07 prologoutput = 0
% 0.43/1.07 nrgoals = 5000000
% 0.43/1.07 totalproof = 1
% 0.43/1.07
% 0.43/1.07 Symbols occurring in the translation:
% 0.43/1.07
% 0.43/1.07 {} [0, 0] (w:1, o:2, a:1, s:1, b:0),
% 0.43/1.07 . [1, 2] (w:1, o:27, a:1, s:1, b:0),
% 0.43/1.07 ! [4, 1] (w:1, o:21, a:1, s:1, b:0),
% 0.43/1.07 = [13, 2] (w:1, o:0, a:0, s:1, b:0),
% 0.43/1.07 ==> [14, 2] (w:1, o:0, a:0, s:1, b:0),
% 0.43/1.07 f [38, 3] (w:1, o:51, a:1, s:1, b:0),
% 0.43/1.07 skol1 [49, 0] (w:1, o:19, a:1, s:1, b:0),
% 0.43/1.07 skol2 [50, 0] (w:1, o:20, a:1, s:1, b:0),
% 0.43/1.07 skol3 [51, 1] (w:1, o:26, a:1, s:1, b:0).
% 0.43/1.07
% 0.43/1.07
% 0.43/1.07 Starting Search:
% 0.43/1.07
% 0.43/1.07 Resimplifying inuse:
% 0.43/1.07 Done
% 0.43/1.07
% 0.43/1.07
% 0.43/1.07
% 0.43/1.07 found a saturation!
% 0.43/1.07 % SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.43/1.07 % SZS output start Saturation
% 0.43/1.07
% 0.43/1.07 (11) {G3,W5,D2,L1,V2,M1} R(9,0) { ! f( X, skol1, Y ) }.
% 0.43/1.07 (9) {G2,W10,D2,L2,V4,M1} R(2,7) { ! f( X, Y, Z ), ! f( Y, skol2, T ) }.
% 0.43/1.07 (2) {G0,W15,D2,L3,V7,M1} I { ! f( Y, X, Z ), ! f( X, T, V0 ), ! f( T, U, W
% 0.43/1.07 ) }.
% 0.43/1.07 (8) {G2,W6,D3,L1,V1,M1} R(7,4) { ! f( skol3( skol1 ), skol2, X ) }.
% 0.43/1.07 (7) {G1,W6,D3,L1,V0,M1} R(1,0) { f( skol2, skol3( skol1 ), skol3( skol1 ) )
% 0.43/1.07 }.
% 0.43/1.07 (1) {G0,W12,D3,L2,V2,M1} I { f( Y, skol3( X ), skol3( X ) ), ! f( X, Y,
% 0.43/1.07 skol3( X ) ) }.
% 0.43/1.07 (4) {G1,W10,D2,L2,V4,M1} F(2) { ! f( X, Y, Z ), ! f( Y, X, T ) }.
% 0.43/1.07 (5) {G2,W5,D2,L1,V2,M1} F(4) { ! f( X, X, Y ) }.
% 0.43/1.07 (0) {G0,W4,D2,L1,V1,M1} I { f( skol1, skol2, X ) }.
% 0.43/1.07
% 0.43/1.07
% 0.43/1.07 % SZS output end Saturation
% 0.43/1.07 end of saturation!
% 0.43/1.07
% 0.43/1.07 Memory use:
% 0.43/1.07
% 0.43/1.07 space for terms: 198
% 0.43/1.07 space for clauses: 654
% 0.43/1.07
% 0.43/1.07
% 0.43/1.07 clauses generated: 16
% 0.43/1.07 clauses kept: 12
% 0.43/1.07 clauses selected: 10
% 0.43/1.07 clauses deleted: 3
% 0.43/1.07 clauses inuse deleted: 1
% 0.43/1.07
% 0.43/1.07 subsentry: 82
% 0.43/1.07 literals s-matched: 25
% 0.43/1.07 literals matched: 25
% 0.43/1.07 full subsumption: 17
% 0.43/1.07
% 0.43/1.07 checksum: 37764596
% 0.43/1.07
% 0.43/1.07
% 0.43/1.07 Bliksem ended
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------