TSTP Solution File: SYO639+1 by PyRes---1.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : PyRes---1.3
% Problem  : SYO639+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 19:23:00 EDT 2022

% Result   : Satisfiable 0.19s 0.51s
% Output   : Saturation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SYO639+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.1.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Jul  9 02:45:29 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.51  # Version:  1.3
% 0.19/0.51  # SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.19/0.51  # SZS output start Saturation
% 0.19/0.51  fof(addkpairs34,axiom,((?[Y1]:(?[Y2]:((((f(Y2,Y1)&f(Y2,Y2))&(![X4]:(g(X4,Y1)|g(X4,Y2))))&g(Y1,Y1))&(~f(Y1,Y2)))))&(![X1]:((![X2]:f(X1,X2))|(![X3]:((~f(X3,X1))|(~g(X3,X1))))))),input).
% 0.19/0.51  fof(c0,axiom,((?[Y1]:(?[Y2]:((((f(Y2,Y1)&f(Y2,Y2))&(![X4]:(g(X4,Y1)|g(X4,Y2))))&g(Y1,Y1))&~f(Y1,Y2))))&(![X1]:((![X2]:f(X1,X2))|(![X3]:(~f(X3,X1)|~g(X3,X1)))))),inference(fof_simplification,status(thm),[addkpairs34])).
% 0.19/0.51  fof(c1,axiom,((?[X2]:(?[X3]:((((f(X3,X2)&f(X3,X3))&(![X4]:(g(X4,X2)|g(X4,X3))))&g(X2,X2))&~f(X2,X3))))&(![X5]:((![X6]:f(X5,X6))|(![X7]:(~f(X7,X5)|~g(X7,X5)))))),inference(variable_rename,status(thm),[c0])).
% 0.19/0.51  fof(c3,axiom,(![X4]:(![X5]:(![X6]:(![X7]:(((((f(skolem0002,skolem0001)&f(skolem0002,skolem0002))&(g(X4,skolem0001)|g(X4,skolem0002)))&g(skolem0001,skolem0001))&~f(skolem0001,skolem0002))&(f(X5,X6)|(~f(X7,X5)|~g(X7,X5)))))))),inference(shift_quantors,status(thm),[fof(c2,axiom,(((((f(skolem0002,skolem0001)&f(skolem0002,skolem0002))&(![X4]:(g(X4,skolem0001)|g(X4,skolem0002))))&g(skolem0001,skolem0001))&~f(skolem0001,skolem0002))&(![X5]:((![X6]:f(X5,X6))|(![X7]:(~f(X7,X5)|~g(X7,X5)))))),inference(skolemize,status(esa),[c1])).])).
% 0.19/0.51  cnf(c5,axiom,f(skolem0002,skolem0002),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c3])).
% 0.19/0.51  cnf(c9,axiom,f(X9,X10)|~f(X11,X9)|~g(X11,X9),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c3])).
% 0.19/0.51  cnf(c8,axiom,~f(skolem0001,skolem0002),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c3])).
% 0.19/0.51  cnf(c4,axiom,f(skolem0002,skolem0001),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c3])).
% 0.19/0.51  cnf(c6,axiom,g(X8,skolem0001)|g(X8,skolem0002),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c3])).
% 0.19/0.51  cnf(c10,plain,f(skolem0001,X14)|~f(X13,skolem0001)|g(X13,skolem0002),inference(resolution,status(thm),[c9, c6])).
% 0.19/0.51  cnf(c13,plain,f(skolem0001,X15)|g(skolem0002,skolem0002),inference(resolution,status(thm),[c10, c4])).
% 0.19/0.51  cnf(c15,plain,g(skolem0002,skolem0002),inference(resolution,status(thm),[c13, c8])).
% 0.19/0.51  cnf(c18,plain,f(skolem0002,X19)|~f(skolem0002,skolem0002),inference(resolution,status(thm),[c15, c9])).
% 0.19/0.51  cnf(c20,plain,f(skolem0002,X20),inference(resolution,status(thm),[c18, c5])).
% 0.19/0.51  cnf(c7,axiom,g(skolem0001,skolem0001),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c3])).
% 0.19/0.51  cnf(c11,plain,f(skolem0001,X12)|~f(skolem0001,skolem0001),inference(resolution,status(thm),[c9, c7])).
% 0.19/0.51  # SZS output end Saturation
% 0.19/0.51  
% 0.19/0.51  # Initial clauses    : 6
% 0.19/0.51  # Processed clauses  : 13
% 0.19/0.51  # Factors computed   : 0
% 0.19/0.51  # Resolvents computed: 12
% 0.19/0.51  # Tautologies deleted: 0
% 0.19/0.51  # Forward subsumed   : 5
% 0.19/0.51  # Backward subsumed  : 5
% 0.19/0.51  # -------- CPU Time ---------
% 0.19/0.51  # User time          : 0.156 s
% 0.19/0.51  # System time        : 0.018 s
% 0.19/0.51  # Total time         : 0.174 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------