TSTP Solution File: SYO639+1 by Bliksem---1.12
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Bliksem---1.12
% Problem : SYO639+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : bliksem %s
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 0s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 14:29:02 EDT 2022
% Result : Satisfiable 0.40s 0.81s
% Output : Saturation 0.40s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.06 % Problem : SYO639+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.1.0.
% 0.03/0.07 % Command : bliksem %s
% 0.06/0.25 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.06/0.25 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.06/0.25 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.06/0.25 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.06/0.25 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.06/0.25 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.06/0.25 % DateTime : Sat Jul 9 02:50:43 EDT 2022
% 0.06/0.25 % CPUTime :
% 0.40/0.81 *** allocated 10000 integers for termspace/termends
% 0.40/0.81 *** allocated 10000 integers for clauses
% 0.40/0.81 *** allocated 10000 integers for justifications
% 0.40/0.81 Bliksem 1.12
% 0.40/0.81
% 0.40/0.81
% 0.40/0.81 Automatic Strategy Selection
% 0.40/0.81
% 0.40/0.81
% 0.40/0.81 Clauses:
% 0.40/0.81
% 0.40/0.81 { f( skol2, skol1 ) }.
% 0.40/0.81 { f( skol2, skol2 ) }.
% 0.40/0.81 { g( X, skol1 ), g( X, skol2 ) }.
% 0.40/0.81 { g( skol1, skol1 ) }.
% 0.40/0.81 { ! f( skol1, skol2 ) }.
% 0.40/0.81 { f( X, Y ), ! f( Z, X ), ! g( Z, X ) }.
% 0.40/0.81
% 0.40/0.81 percentage equality = 0.000000, percentage horn = 0.833333
% 0.40/0.81 This a non-horn, non-equality problem
% 0.40/0.81
% 0.40/0.81
% 0.40/0.81 Options Used:
% 0.40/0.81
% 0.40/0.81 useres = 1
% 0.40/0.81 useparamod = 0
% 0.40/0.81 useeqrefl = 0
% 0.40/0.81 useeqfact = 0
% 0.40/0.81 usefactor = 1
% 0.40/0.81 usesimpsplitting = 0
% 0.40/0.81 usesimpdemod = 0
% 0.40/0.81 usesimpres = 3
% 0.40/0.81
% 0.40/0.81 resimpinuse = 1000
% 0.40/0.81 resimpclauses = 20000
% 0.40/0.81 substype = standard
% 0.40/0.81 backwardsubs = 1
% 0.40/0.81 selectoldest = 5
% 0.40/0.81
% 0.40/0.81 litorderings [0] = split
% 0.40/0.81 litorderings [1] = liftord
% 0.40/0.81
% 0.40/0.81 termordering = none
% 0.40/0.81
% 0.40/0.81 litapriori = 1
% 0.40/0.81 termapriori = 0
% 0.40/0.81 litaposteriori = 0
% 0.40/0.81 termaposteriori = 0
% 0.40/0.81 demodaposteriori = 0
% 0.40/0.81 ordereqreflfact = 0
% 0.40/0.81
% 0.40/0.81 litselect = none
% 0.40/0.81
% 0.40/0.81 maxweight = 15
% 0.40/0.81 maxdepth = 30000
% 0.40/0.81 maxlength = 115
% 0.40/0.81 maxnrvars = 195
% 0.40/0.81 excuselevel = 1
% 0.40/0.81 increasemaxweight = 1
% 0.40/0.81
% 0.40/0.81 maxselected = 10000000
% 0.40/0.81 maxnrclauses = 10000000
% 0.40/0.81
% 0.40/0.81 showgenerated = 0
% 0.40/0.81 showkept = 0
% 0.40/0.81 showselected = 0
% 0.40/0.81 showdeleted = 0
% 0.40/0.81 showresimp = 1
% 0.40/0.81 showstatus = 2000
% 0.40/0.81
% 0.40/0.81 prologoutput = 0
% 0.40/0.81 nrgoals = 5000000
% 0.40/0.81 totalproof = 1
% 0.40/0.81
% 0.40/0.81 Symbols occurring in the translation:
% 0.40/0.81
% 0.40/0.81 {} [0, 0] (w:1, o:2, a:1, s:1, b:0),
% 0.40/0.81 . [1, 2] (w:1, o:19, a:1, s:1, b:0),
% 0.40/0.81 ! [4, 1] (w:0, o:14, a:1, s:1, b:0),
% 0.40/0.81 = [13, 2] (w:1, o:0, a:0, s:1, b:0),
% 0.40/0.81 ==> [14, 2] (w:1, o:0, a:0, s:1, b:0),
% 0.40/0.81 f [37, 2] (w:1, o:43, a:1, s:1, b:0),
% 0.40/0.81 g [39, 2] (w:1, o:44, a:1, s:1, b:0),
% 0.40/0.81 skol1 [43, 0] (w:1, o:12, a:1, s:1, b:0),
% 0.40/0.81 skol2 [44, 0] (w:1, o:13, a:1, s:1, b:0).
% 0.40/0.81
% 0.40/0.81
% 0.40/0.81 Starting Search:
% 0.40/0.81
% 0.40/0.81 Resimplifying inuse:
% 0.40/0.81 Done
% 0.40/0.81
% 0.40/0.81 Failed to find proof!
% 0.40/0.81 maxweight = 15
% 0.40/0.81 maxnrclauses = 10000000
% 0.40/0.81 Generated: 31
% 0.40/0.81 Kept: 13
% 0.40/0.81
% 0.40/0.81
% 0.40/0.81 The strategy used was not complete!
% 0.40/0.81
% 0.40/0.81 Increased maxweight to 16
% 0.40/0.81
% 0.40/0.81 Starting Search:
% 0.40/0.81
% 0.40/0.81 Resimplifying inuse:
% 0.40/0.81 Done
% 0.40/0.81
% 0.40/0.81 Failed to find proof!
% 0.40/0.81 maxweight = 16
% 0.40/0.81 maxnrclauses = 10000000
% 0.40/0.81 Generated: 31
% 0.40/0.81 Kept: 13
% 0.40/0.81
% 0.40/0.81
% 0.40/0.81 The strategy used was not complete!
% 0.40/0.81
% 0.40/0.81 Increased maxweight to 17
% 0.40/0.81
% 0.40/0.81 Starting Search:
% 0.40/0.81
% 0.40/0.81 Resimplifying inuse:
% 0.40/0.81 Done
% 0.40/0.81
% 0.40/0.81 Failed to find proof!
% 0.40/0.81 maxweight = 17
% 0.40/0.81 maxnrclauses = 10000000
% 0.40/0.81 Generated: 31
% 0.40/0.81 Kept: 13
% 0.40/0.81
% 0.40/0.81
% 0.40/0.81 The strategy used was not complete!
% 0.40/0.81
% 0.40/0.81 Increased maxweight to 18
% 0.40/0.81
% 0.40/0.81 Starting Search:
% 0.40/0.81
% 0.40/0.81 Resimplifying inuse:
% 0.40/0.81 Done
% 0.40/0.81
% 0.40/0.81
% 0.40/0.81
% 0.40/0.81 found a saturation!
% 0.40/0.81 % SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.40/0.81 % SZS output start Saturation
% 0.40/0.81
% 0.40/0.81 (12) {G4,W3,D2,L1,V1,M1} R(10,1);r(0) { f( skol2, X ) }.
% 0.40/0.81 (8) {G2,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} R(7,4) { ! f( skol1, skol1 ) }.
% 0.40/0.81 (5) {G0,W9,D2,L3,V3,M1} I { f( X, Y ), ! f( Z, X ), ! g( Z, X ) }.
% 0.40/0.81 (2) {G0,W6,D2,L2,V1,M1} I { g( X, skol1 ), g( X, skol2 ) }.
% 0.40/0.81 (3) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} I { g( skol1, skol1 ) }.
% 0.40/0.81 (4) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} I { ! f( skol1, skol2 ) }.
% 0.40/0.81
% 0.40/0.81
% 0.40/0.81 % SZS output end Saturation
% 0.40/0.81 end of saturation!
% 0.40/0.81
% 0.40/0.81 Memory use:
% 0.40/0.81
% 0.40/0.81 space for terms: 181
% 0.40/0.81 space for clauses: 569
% 0.40/0.81
% 0.40/0.81
% 0.40/0.81 clauses generated: 31
% 0.40/0.81 clauses kept: 13
% 0.40/0.81 clauses selected: 12
% 0.40/0.81 clauses deleted: 7
% 0.40/0.81 clauses inuse deleted: 6
% 0.40/0.81
% 0.40/0.81 subsentry: 25
% 0.40/0.81 literals s-matched: 25
% 0.40/0.81 literals matched: 25
% 0.40/0.81 full subsumption: 0
% 0.40/0.81
% 0.40/0.81 checksum: 33561048
% 0.40/0.81
% 0.40/0.81
% 0.40/0.81 Bliksem ended
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------