TSTP Solution File: SYO633-1 by SPASS---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS---3.9
% Problem : SYO633-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : run_spass %d %s
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 19:55:11 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.12s 0.41s
% Output : Refutation 0.12s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12 % Problem : SYO633-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.1.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Fri Jul 8 16:01:05 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.41
% 0.12/0.41 SPASS V 3.9
% 0.12/0.41 SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.12/0.41 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.12/0.41 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.41 SPASS derived 1 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 13 clauses.
% 0.12/0.41 SPASS allocated 63120 KBytes.
% 0.12/0.41 SPASS spent 0:00:00.06 on the problem.
% 0.12/0.41 0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.12/0.41 0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.12/0.41 0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.12/0.41 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.12/0.41 0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.12/0.41
% 0.12/0.41
% 0.12/0.41 Here is a proof with depth 0, length 14 :
% 0.12/0.41 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.12/0.41 3[0:Inp] || E(f(u),s(s(0)))* E(f(v),s(s(s(s(0)))))* E(f(w),s(s(s(0))))* E(f(x),s(0))* E(f(y),0)* E(f(z),s(s(s(s(s(0))))))* -> .
% 0.12/0.41 4[0:Inp] || -> E(f(u),s(s(s(s(0)))))*.
% 0.12/0.41 5[0:Inp] || -> E(f(u),s(s(s(s(s(0))))))*.
% 0.12/0.41 7[0:Inp] || E(f(u),s(s(0)))* E(f(v),s(s(s(s(0)))))* E(f(w),s(s(s(0))))* E(f(x),s(0))* E(f(y),s(s(s(s(s(0))))))* -> E(f(AP(s(s(s(s(s(s(0)))))),z)),0)*.
% 0.12/0.41 9[0:Inp] || E(f(u),s(s(s(s(0)))))* E(f(v),s(s(s(s(s(0))))))* E(f(w),s(s(s(0))))* E(f(x),s(s(0)))* -> E(f(AP(s(s(s(s(s(s(0)))))),y)),s(0))*.
% 0.12/0.41 10[0:Inp] || E(f(u),s(s(s(s(0)))))* E(f(v),s(s(s(s(s(0))))))* -> E(f(v),s(s(s(0)))).
% 0.12/0.41 12[0:Inp] || E(f(u),s(s(s(s(0)))))* E(f(v),s(s(s(s(s(0))))))* E(f(w),s(s(s(0))))* -> E(f(AP(s(s(s(s(s(s(0)))))),x)),s(s(0)))*.
% 0.12/0.41 14[0:MRR:10.0,10.1,4.0,5.0] || -> E(f(u),s(s(s(0))))*.
% 0.12/0.41 16[0:MRR:12.0,12.1,12.2,4.0,5.0,14.0] || -> E(f(AP(s(s(s(s(s(s(0)))))),u)),s(s(0)))*.
% 0.12/0.41 18[0:MRR:3.1,3.2,3.5,4.0,14.0,5.0] || E(f(u),s(s(0)))* E(f(v),s(0))* E(f(w),0)* -> .
% 0.12/0.41 19[0:MRR:9.0,9.1,9.2,4.0,5.0,14.0] || E(f(u),s(s(0)))* -> E(f(AP(s(s(s(s(s(s(0)))))),v)),s(0))*.
% 0.12/0.41 21[0:MRR:7.1,7.2,7.4,7.5,4.0,14.0,5.0,18.2] || E(f(u),s(0))* E(f(v),s(s(0)))* -> .
% 0.12/0.41 22[0:MRR:19.1,21.1] || E(f(u),s(s(0)))* -> .
% 0.12/0.41 23[0:UnC:22.0,16.0] || -> .
% 0.12/0.41 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.12/0.41 Formulae used in the proof : clause_5_03 clause_6_04 clause_8_05 clause_2_07 clause_12_09 clause_1_10 clause_4_12
% 0.12/0.41
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------