TSTP Solution File: SYO632-1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SYO632-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:46:43 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.49s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 8 ( 6 unt; 0 nHn; 4 RR)
% Number of literals : 10 ( 0 equ; 5 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 1 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 9 ( 9 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(clause_1_04,axiom,
( ~ 'E'(f(X1),'0')
| ~ 'E'(f(X2),s('0')) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.vFUN6oJ6Gd/E---3.1_29987.p',clause_1_04) ).
cnf(clause_0_03,axiom,
'E'(f(X1),s('0')),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.vFUN6oJ6Gd/E---3.1_29987.p',clause_0_03) ).
cnf(clause_2_02,axiom,
'E'(f('AP'(s(s('0')),X1)),'0'),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.vFUN6oJ6Gd/E---3.1_29987.p',clause_2_02) ).
cnf(c_0_3,axiom,
( ~ 'E'(f(X1),'0')
| ~ 'E'(f(X2),s('0')) ),
clause_1_04 ).
cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
'E'(f(X1),s('0')),
clause_0_03 ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
'E'(f('AP'(s(s('0')),X1)),'0'),
clause_2_02 ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
~ 'E'(f(X1),'0'),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4])]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SYO632-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.1.0.
% 0.12/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 15:57:20 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.48 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.vFUN6oJ6Gd/E---3.1_29987.p
% 0.21/0.49 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.21/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 30065 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.21/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.21/0.49 # Search class: FUHNM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.49 # partial match(1): FUHPM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.49 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting H----_047_B31_F1_PI_AE_R4_CS_SP_S2S with 811s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting H----_047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_CS_SP_S2S with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 30072 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.21/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.21/0.49 # Search class: FUHNM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.49 # partial match(1): FUHPM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.49 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting H----_047_B31_F1_PI_AE_R4_CS_SP_S2S with 811s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.49
% 0.21/0.49 # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.49 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.21/0.49 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.49 # Parsed axioms : 5
% 0.21/0.49 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Initial clauses : 5
% 0.21/0.49 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Initial clauses in saturation : 5
% 0.21/0.49 # Processed clauses : 6
% 0.21/0.49 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # ...remaining for further processing : 6
% 0.21/0.49 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.21/0.49 # Generated clauses : 1
% 0.21/0.49 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1
% 0.21/0.49 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # NegExts : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.21/0.49 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.49 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.49 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.49 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.49 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.49 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.49 # Current number of processed clauses : 4
% 0.21/0.49 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 3
% 0.21/0.49 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.21/0.49 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.49 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Current number of archived clauses : 2
% 0.21/0.49 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.21/0.49 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.21/0.49 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Termbank termtop insertions : 129
% 0.21/0.49
% 0.21/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.49 # User time : 0.000 s
% 0.21/0.49 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.49 # Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1592 pages
% 0.21/0.49
% 0.21/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.49 # User time : 0.005 s
% 0.21/0.49 # System time : 0.009 s
% 0.21/0.49 # Total time : 0.014 s
% 0.21/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1672 pages
% 0.21/0.49 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.21/0.49 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------