TSTP Solution File: SYO632-1 by Beagle---0.9.51
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem : SYO632-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 11:18:16 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 2.14s 1.52s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.42s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : SYO632-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.1.0.
% 0.00/0.14 % Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Thu Aug 3 15:57:37 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 2.14/1.52 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.14/1.52
% 2.14/1.52 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.42/1.55 %$ LEQ > E > AP > #nlpp > s > f > 0
% 2.42/1.55
% 2.42/1.55 %Foreground sorts:
% 2.42/1.55
% 2.42/1.55
% 2.42/1.55 %Background operators:
% 2.42/1.55
% 2.42/1.55
% 2.42/1.55 %Foreground operators:
% 2.42/1.55 tff(s, type, s: $i > $i).
% 2.42/1.55 tff(AP, type, AP: ($i * $i) > $i).
% 2.42/1.55 tff(f, type, f: $i > $i).
% 2.42/1.55 tff(0, type, 0: $i).
% 2.42/1.55 tff(LEQ, type, LEQ: ($i * $i) > $o).
% 2.42/1.55 tff(E, type, E: ($i * $i) > $o).
% 2.42/1.55
% 2.42/1.56 tff(f_29, axiom, (![B]: E(f(B), s(0))), file('unknown', unknown)).
% 2.42/1.56 tff(f_35, axiom, (![A_0, B_0]: (~E(f(A_0), 0) | ~E(f(B_0), s(0)))), file('unknown', unknown)).
% 2.42/1.56 tff(f_27, axiom, (![K]: E(f(AP(s(s(0)), K)), 0)), file('unknown', unknown)).
% 2.42/1.56 tff(c_6, plain, (![B_3]: (E(f(B_3), s(0)))), inference(cnfTransformation, [status(thm)], [f_29])).
% 2.42/1.56 tff(c_8, plain, (![B_0_5, A_0_4]: (~E(f(B_0_5), s(0)) | ~E(f(A_0_4), 0))), inference(cnfTransformation, [status(thm)], [f_35])).
% 2.42/1.56 tff(c_12, plain, (![A_0_4]: (~E(f(A_0_4), 0))), inference(demodulation, [status(thm), theory('equality')], [c_6, c_8])).
% 2.42/1.56 tff(c_4, plain, (![K_2]: (E(f(AP(s(s(0)), K_2)), 0))), inference(cnfTransformation, [status(thm)], [f_27])).
% 2.42/1.56 tff(c_13, plain, $false, inference(negUnitSimplification, [status(thm)], [c_12, c_4])).
% 2.42/1.56 % SZS output end CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.42/1.56
% 2.42/1.56 Inference rules
% 2.42/1.56 ----------------------
% 2.42/1.56 #Ref : 0
% 2.42/1.56 #Sup : 0
% 2.42/1.56 #Fact : 0
% 2.42/1.56 #Define : 0
% 2.42/1.56 #Split : 0
% 2.42/1.56 #Chain : 0
% 2.42/1.56 #Close : 0
% 2.42/1.56
% 2.42/1.56 Ordering : KBO
% 2.42/1.56
% 2.42/1.56 Simplification rules
% 2.42/1.56 ----------------------
% 2.42/1.56 #Subsume : 4
% 2.42/1.56 #Demod : 1
% 2.42/1.56 #Tautology : 0
% 2.42/1.56 #SimpNegUnit : 1
% 2.42/1.56 #BackRed : 0
% 2.42/1.56
% 2.42/1.56 #Partial instantiations: 0
% 2.42/1.56 #Strategies tried : 1
% 2.42/1.56
% 2.42/1.56 Timing (in seconds)
% 2.42/1.56 ----------------------
% 2.42/1.57 Preprocessing : 0.38
% 2.42/1.57 Parsing : 0.20
% 2.42/1.57 CNF conversion : 0.02
% 2.42/1.57 Main loop : 0.05
% 2.42/1.57 Inferencing : 0.00
% 2.42/1.57 Reduction : 0.03
% 2.42/1.57 Demodulation : 0.02
% 2.42/1.57 BG Simplification : 0.01
% 2.42/1.57 Subsumption : 0.02
% 2.42/1.57 Abstraction : 0.00
% 2.42/1.57 MUC search : 0.00
% 2.42/1.57 Cooper : 0.00
% 2.42/1.57 Total : 0.49
% 2.42/1.57 Index Insertion : 0.00
% 2.42/1.57 Index Deletion : 0.00
% 2.42/1.57 Index Matching : 0.00
% 2.42/1.57 BG Taut test : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------