TSTP Solution File: SYO620-1 by Etableau---0.67
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Etableau---0.67
% Problem : SYO620-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 16:05:47 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 4.67s 1.01s
% Output : CNFRefutation 4.67s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12 % Problem : SYO620-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.1.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jul 9 05:46:29 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.37 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.13/0.37 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S032N
% 0.13/0.37 # and selection function SelectUnlessUniqMax.
% 0.13/0.37 #
% 0.13/0.37 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.13/0.37 # Number of axioms: 8 Number of unprocessed: 8
% 0.13/0.37 # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.13/0.37 # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.13/0.37 # Hello from C++
% 0.13/0.37 # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.13/0.37 # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.13/0.37 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.13/0.37 # 8 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.13/0.37 # No conjectures after preprocessing. Attempting to resurrect them from ax_archive.
% 0.13/0.37 # No conjectures.
% 0.13/0.37 # There are 8 start rule candidates:
% 0.13/0.37 # Found 1 unit axioms.
% 0.13/0.37 # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on.
% 0.13/0.37 # 8 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.13/0.37 # 7 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.13/0.37 # 1 unit axiom clauses
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 4.67/1.01 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 4.67/1.01 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 4.67/1.01 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 4.67/1.01 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 4.67/1.01 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 4.67/1.01 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 4.67/1.01 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 4.67/1.01 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 4.67/1.01 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 4.67/1.01 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 4.67/1.01 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 4.67/1.01 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 4.67/1.01 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 4.67/1.01 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 4.67/1.01 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 4.67/1.01 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 4.67/1.01 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.67/1.01 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.67/1.01 # Begin clausification derivation
% 4.67/1.01
% 4.67/1.01 # End clausification derivation
% 4.67/1.01 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 4.67/1.01 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (le(X1,X1))).
% 4.67/1.01 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (le(X1,X2)|~le(max(X3,X1),X2))).
% 4.67/1.01 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (le(X1,X2)|~le(max(X1,X3),X2))).
% 4.67/1.01 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (~eq(f(X1),a0)|~eq(f(X2),a0)|~le(s(X2),X1))).
% 4.67/1.01 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (~eq(f(X1),a1)|~eq(f(X2),a1)|~le(s(X2),X1))).
% 4.67/1.01 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (eq(f(X1),a3)|eq(f(X1),a2)|eq(f(X1),a1)|eq(f(X1),a0))).
% 4.67/1.01 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (~eq(f(X1),a2)|~eq(f(X2),a2)|~le(s(X2),X1))).
% 4.67/1.01 cnf(i_0_16, plain, (~eq(f(X1),a3)|~eq(f(X2),a3)|~le(s(X2),X1))).
% 4.67/1.01 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 4.67/1.01 # Begin printing tableau
% 4.67/1.01 # Found 5 steps
% 4.67/1.01 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (le(max(X11,max(X5,X9)),max(X10,max(X11,max(X5,X9))))|~le(max(X10,max(X11,max(X5,X9))),max(X10,max(X11,max(X5,X9))))), inference(start_rule)).
% 4.67/1.01 cnf(i_0_19, plain, (~le(max(X10,max(X11,max(X5,X9))),max(X10,max(X11,max(X5,X9))))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_9])).
% 4.67/1.01 cnf(i_0_18, plain, (le(max(X11,max(X5,X9)),max(X10,max(X11,max(X5,X9))))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_11])).
% 4.67/1.01 cnf(i_0_38, plain, (le(max(X5,X9),max(X10,max(X11,max(X5,X9))))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_10])).
% 4.67/1.01 cnf(i_0_40, plain, (le(X5,max(X10,max(X11,max(X5,X9))))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_40, ...])).
% 4.67/1.01 # End printing tableau
% 4.67/1.01 # SZS output end
% 4.67/1.01 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 4.67/1.01 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.67/1.01 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.67/1.01 # Begin clausification derivation
% 4.67/1.01
% 4.67/1.01 # End clausification derivation
% 4.67/1.01 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 4.67/1.01 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (le(X1,X1))).
% 4.67/1.01 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (le(X1,X2)|~le(max(X3,X1),X2))).
% 4.67/1.01 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (le(X1,X2)|~le(max(X1,X3),X2))).
% 4.67/1.01 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (~eq(f(X1),a0)|~eq(f(X2),a0)|~le(s(X2),X1))).
% 4.67/1.01 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (~eq(f(X1),a1)|~eq(f(X2),a1)|~le(s(X2),X1))).
% 4.67/1.01 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (eq(f(X1),a3)|eq(f(X1),a2)|eq(f(X1),a1)|eq(f(X1),a0))).
% 4.67/1.01 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (~eq(f(X1),a2)|~eq(f(X2),a2)|~le(s(X2),X1))).
% 4.67/1.01 cnf(i_0_16, plain, (~eq(f(X1),a3)|~eq(f(X2),a3)|~le(s(X2),X1))).
% 4.67/1.01 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 4.67/1.01 # Begin printing tableau
% 4.67/1.01 # Found 4 steps
% 4.67/1.01 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (le(max(X9,max(X5,X8)),max(X9,max(X5,X8)))), inference(start_rule)).
% 4.67/1.01 cnf(i_0_17, plain, (le(max(X9,max(X5,X8)),max(X9,max(X5,X8)))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_11])).
% 4.67/1.01 cnf(i_0_38, plain, (le(max(X5,X8),max(X9,max(X5,X8)))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_10])).
% 4.67/1.01 cnf(i_0_40, plain, (le(X5,max(X9,max(X5,X8)))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_40, ...])).
% 4.67/1.01 # End printing tableau
% 4.67/1.01 # SZS output end
% 4.67/1.01 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 5.21/1.01 # Child (21056) has found a proof.
% 5.21/1.01
% 5.21/1.01 # Proof search is over...
% 5.21/1.01 # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------