TSTP Solution File: SYO607+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SYO607+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 19:49:57 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 2.73s 2.95s
% Output : Refutation 2.73s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11 % Problem : SYO607+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.0.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Fri Jul 8 19:59:28 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.34 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.34 The process was started by sandbox2 on n020.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.34 Fri Jul 8 19:59:28 2022
% 0.12/0.34 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 31260.
% 0.12/0.34
% 0.12/0.34 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.34 set(auto).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.34 clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.34
% 0.12/0.34 formula_list(usable).
% 0.12/0.34
% 0.12/0.34 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=8.
% 0.12/0.34
% 0.12/0.34 This is a non-Horn set without equality. The strategy
% 0.12/0.34 will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.12/0.34 factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.12/0.34
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.34
% 0.12/0.34 ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.34
% 0.12/0.34 ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.34
% 0.12/0.34 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.46/0.65 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.46/0.65 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.46/0.65 number of clauses in intial UL: 36
% 0.46/0.65 number of clauses initially in problem: 37
% 0.46/0.65 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 97
% 0.46/0.65 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.46/0.65 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.46/0.65 absolute distinct symbol count: 12
% 0.46/0.65 distinct predicate count: 5
% 0.46/0.65 distinct function count: 3
% 0.46/0.65 distinct constant count: 4
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65 =========== start of search ===========
% 2.73/2.95
% 2.73/2.95 -------- PROOF --------
% 2.73/2.95 % SZS status Theorem
% 2.73/2.95 % SZS output start Refutation
% 2.73/2.95
% 2.73/2.95 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.73/2.95
% 2.73/2.95 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.73/2.95
% 2.73/2.95 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.73/2.95
% 2.73/2.95 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.73/2.95
% 2.73/2.95 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.73/2.95
% 2.73/2.95 Model 2 [ 6 16 142220 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.73/2.95
% 2.73/2.95 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.73/2.95
% 2.73/2.95 Model 3 [ 6 52 118937 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.73/2.95
% 2.73/2.95 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.73/2.95
% 2.73/2.95 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.73/2.95
% 2.73/2.95 Model 4 [ 7 2 38430 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.73/2.95
% 2.73/2.95 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.73/2.95
% 2.73/2.95 -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at 2.58 sec ----> 284 [hyper,282,1,247] {-} $F.
% 2.73/2.95
% 2.73/2.95 Length of proof is 48. Level of proof is 22.
% 2.73/2.95
% 2.73/2.95 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 2.73/2.95 % SZS status Theorem
% 2.73/2.95 % SZS output start Refutation
% 2.73/2.95
% 2.73/2.95 1 [] {+} -g_false_only(a,A)| -g_false_only(A,B).
% 2.73/2.95 2 [] {+} -g_true_only(A,$f1(A)).
% 2.73/2.95 3 [] {+} -g_both(a,A)|g_true_only(a,A)|g_true_only(A,B)|g_false_only(a,$c2)| -g_both(C,D)|g_false_only(C,$f3(C))|g_true_only($c3,E).
% 2.73/2.95 4 [] {+} -g_both(a,A)|g_true_only(a,A)|g_true_only(A,B)|g_false_only($c2,$c1)| -g_both(C,D)|g_false_only(C,$f3(C))|g_true_only($c3,E).
% 2.73/2.95 5 [] {+} -g_both(A,B)|g_false_only(A,$f2(A))|g_true_only(a,A)|g_true_only(A,C)|g_false_only(a,$c2)| -g_both(D,E)|g_false_only(D,$f3(D))|g_true_only($c3,F).
% 2.73/2.95 6 [] {+} -g_both(A,B)|g_false_only(A,$f2(A))|g_true_only(a,A)|g_true_only(A,C)|g_false_only($c2,$c1)| -g_both(D,E)|g_false_only(D,$f3(D))|g_true_only($c3,F).
% 2.73/2.95 8 [] {+} -g_true_only(A,B)| -g_false(A,B).
% 2.73/2.95 11 [] {+} -g_both(A,B)|g_false(A,B).
% 2.73/2.95 13 [] {+} -g_false_only(A,B)|g_false(A,B).
% 2.73/2.95 17 [factor,3.1.5] {+} -g_both(a,A)|g_true_only(a,A)|g_true_only(A,B)|g_false_only(a,$c2)|g_false_only(a,$f3(a))|g_true_only($c3,C).
% 2.73/2.95 20 [factor,4.1.5] {+} -g_both(a,A)|g_true_only(a,A)|g_true_only(A,B)|g_false_only($c2,$c1)|g_false_only(a,$f3(a))|g_true_only($c3,C).
% 2.73/2.95 23 [factor,5.1.6] {+} -g_both(A,B)|g_false_only(A,$f2(A))|g_true_only(a,A)|g_true_only(A,C)|g_false_only(a,$c2)|g_false_only(A,$f3(A))|g_true_only($c3,D).
% 2.73/2.95 26 [factor,6.1.6] {+} -g_both(A,B)|g_false_only(A,$f2(A))|g_true_only(a,A)|g_true_only(A,C)|g_false_only($c2,$c1)|g_false_only(A,$f3(A))|g_true_only($c3,D).
% 2.73/2.95 37 [] {-} g_true_only(A,B)|g_both(A,B)|g_false_only(A,B).
% 2.73/2.95 39 [hyper,37,2] {-} g_both(A,$f1(A))|g_false_only(A,$f1(A)).
% 2.73/2.95 40 [hyper,39,13] {-} g_both(A,$f1(A))|g_false(A,$f1(A)).
% 2.73/2.95 41 [hyper,39,1,39] {-} g_both($f1(a),$f1($f1(a)))|g_both(a,$f1(a)).
% 2.73/2.95 42 [hyper,41,26,unit_del,2] {+} g_both(a,$f1(a))|g_false_only($f1(a),$f2($f1(a)))|g_true_only($f1(a),A)|g_false_only($c2,$c1)|g_false_only($f1(a),$f3($f1(a)))|g_true_only($c3,B).
% 2.73/2.95 43 [hyper,41,23,unit_del,2] {+} g_both(a,$f1(a))|g_false_only($f1(a),$f2($f1(a)))|g_true_only($f1(a),A)|g_false_only(a,$c2)|g_false_only($f1(a),$f3($f1(a)))|g_true_only($c3,B).
% 2.73/2.95 48 [hyper,41,20,unit_del,2] {+} g_both($f1(a),$f1($f1(a)))|g_true_only($f1(a),A)|g_false_only($c2,$c1)|g_false_only(a,$f3(a))|g_true_only($c3,B).
% 2.73/2.95 49 [hyper,41,17,unit_del,2] {-} g_both($f1(a),$f1($f1(a)))|g_true_only($f1(a),A)|g_false_only(a,$c2)|g_false_only(a,$f3(a))|g_true_only($c3,B).
% 2.73/2.95 53 [hyper,42,2] {+} g_both(a,$f1(a))|g_false_only($f1(a),$f2($f1(a)))|g_false_only($c2,$c1)|g_false_only($f1(a),$f3($f1(a)))|g_true_only($c3,A).
% 2.73/2.95 57 [hyper,49,8,40,factor_simp] {-} g_both($f1(a),$f1($f1(a)))|g_false_only(a,$c2)|g_false_only(a,$f3(a))|g_true_only($c3,A).
% 2.73/2.95 62 [hyper,43,2] {+} g_both(a,$f1(a))|g_false_only($f1(a),$f2($f1(a)))|g_false_only(a,$c2)|g_false_only($f1(a),$f3($f1(a)))|g_true_only($c3,A).
% 2.73/2.95 68 [hyper,57,2] {-} g_both($f1(a),$f1($f1(a)))|g_false_only(a,$c2)|g_false_only(a,$f3(a)).
% 2.73/2.95 81 [hyper,48,8,40,factor_simp] {+} g_both($f1(a),$f1($f1(a)))|g_false_only($c2,$c1)|g_false_only(a,$f3(a))|g_true_only($c3,A).
% 2.73/2.95 104 [hyper,53,2] {+} g_both(a,$f1(a))|g_false_only($f1(a),$f2($f1(a)))|g_false_only($c2,$c1)|g_false_only($f1(a),$f3($f1(a))).
% 2.73/2.95 107 [hyper,81,2] {+} g_both($f1(a),$f1($f1(a)))|g_false_only($c2,$c1)|g_false_only(a,$f3(a)).
% 2.73/2.95 111 [hyper,107,1,68,factor_simp,factor_simp] {-} g_both($f1(a),$f1($f1(a)))|g_false_only(a,$f3(a)).
% 2.73/2.95 116 [hyper,62,2] {+} g_both(a,$f1(a))|g_false_only($f1(a),$f2($f1(a)))|g_false_only(a,$c2)|g_false_only($f1(a),$f3($f1(a))).
% 2.73/2.95 118 [hyper,111,1,39] {-} g_both($f1(a),$f1($f1(a)))|g_both($f3(a),$f1($f3(a))).
% 2.73/2.95 130 [hyper,118,3,41,unit_del,2,factor_simp] {+} g_both($f1(a),$f1($f1(a)))|g_true_only($f1(a),A)|g_false_only(a,$c2)|g_false_only($f3(a),$f3($f3(a)))|g_true_only($c3,B).
% 2.73/2.95 132 [hyper,104,1,39,factor_simp] {+} g_both(a,$f1(a))|g_false_only($c2,$c1)|g_false_only($f1(a),$f3($f1(a))).
% 2.73/2.95 138 [hyper,132,1,39,factor_simp] {+} g_both(a,$f1(a))|g_false_only($c2,$c1).
% 2.73/2.95 140 [hyper,116,1,39,factor_simp] {+} g_both(a,$f1(a))|g_false_only(a,$c2)|g_false_only($f1(a),$f3($f1(a))).
% 2.73/2.95 149 [hyper,140,1,39,factor_simp] {-} g_both(a,$f1(a))|g_false_only(a,$c2).
% 2.73/2.95 151 [hyper,149,1,138,factor_simp] {-} g_both(a,$f1(a)).
% 2.73/2.95 160 [hyper,151,20,unit_del,2] {+} g_true_only($f1(a),A)|g_false_only($c2,$c1)|g_false_only(a,$f3(a))|g_true_only($c3,B).
% 2.73/2.95 161 [hyper,151,17,unit_del,2] {+} g_true_only($f1(a),A)|g_false_only(a,$c2)|g_false_only(a,$f3(a))|g_true_only($c3,B).
% 2.73/2.95 179 [hyper,160,2] {+} g_false_only($c2,$c1)|g_false_only(a,$f3(a))|g_true_only($c3,A).
% 2.73/2.95 194 [hyper,179,2] {+} g_false_only($c2,$c1)|g_false_only(a,$f3(a)).
% 2.73/2.95 199 [hyper,130,8,40,factor_simp] {+} g_both($f1(a),$f1($f1(a)))|g_false_only(a,$c2)|g_false_only($f3(a),$f3($f3(a)))|g_true_only($c3,A).
% 2.73/2.95 210 [hyper,161,2] {+} g_false_only(a,$c2)|g_false_only(a,$f3(a))|g_true_only($c3,A).
% 2.73/2.95 216 [hyper,210,2] {+} g_false_only(a,$c2)|g_false_only(a,$f3(a)).
% 2.73/2.95 220 [hyper,216,1,194,factor_simp] {+} g_false_only(a,$f3(a)).
% 2.73/2.95 224 [hyper,220,1,39] {+} g_both($f3(a),$f1($f3(a))).
% 2.73/2.95 232 [hyper,224,4,151,unit_del,2] {-} g_true_only($f1(a),A)|g_false_only($c2,$c1)|g_false_only($f3(a),$f3($f3(a)))|g_true_only($c3,B).
% 2.73/2.95 233 [hyper,224,3,151,unit_del,2] {+} g_true_only($f1(a),A)|g_false_only(a,$c2)|g_false_only($f3(a),$f3($f3(a)))|g_true_only($c3,B).
% 2.73/2.95 235 [hyper,232,2] {-} g_false_only($c2,$c1)|g_false_only($f3(a),$f3($f3(a)))|g_true_only($c3,A).
% 2.73/2.95 241 [hyper,235,2] {-} g_false_only($c2,$c1)|g_false_only($f3(a),$f3($f3(a))).
% 2.73/2.95 247 [hyper,241,1,220] {+} g_false_only($c2,$c1).
% 2.73/2.95 251 [hyper,199,2] {+} g_both($f1(a),$f1($f1(a)))|g_false_only(a,$c2)|g_false_only($f3(a),$f3($f3(a))).
% 2.73/2.95 255 [hyper,251,1,220] {+} g_both($f1(a),$f1($f1(a)))|g_false_only(a,$c2).
% 2.73/2.95 257 [hyper,255,1,247] {+} g_both($f1(a),$f1($f1(a))).
% 2.73/2.95 260 [hyper,257,11] {+} g_false($f1(a),$f1($f1(a))).
% 2.73/2.95 268 [hyper,233,8,260] {+} g_false_only(a,$c2)|g_false_only($f3(a),$f3($f3(a)))|g_true_only($c3,A).
% 2.73/2.95 274 [hyper,268,2] {+} g_false_only(a,$c2)|g_false_only($f3(a),$f3($f3(a))).
% 2.73/2.95 282 [hyper,274,1,220] {-} g_false_only(a,$c2).
% 2.73/2.95 284 [hyper,282,1,247] {-} $F.
% 2.73/2.95
% 2.73/2.95 % SZS output end Refutation
% 2.73/2.95 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 2.73/2.95
% 2.73/2.95
% 2.73/2.95 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 2.73/2.95
% 2.73/2.95
% 2.73/2.95 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 2.73/2.95
% 2.73/2.95 ============ end of search ============
% 2.73/2.95
% 2.73/2.95 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 2.73/2.95
% 2.73/2.95 true clauses given 49 (52.7%)
% 2.73/2.95 false clauses given 44
% 2.73/2.95
% 2.73/2.95 FALSE TRUE
% 2.73/2.95 6 0 1
% 2.73/2.95 tot: 0 1 (100.0% true)
% 2.73/2.95
% 2.73/2.95
% 2.73/2.95 Model 4 [ 7 -8 38430 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.73/2.95
% 2.73/2.95 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 2.73/2.95
% 2.73/2.95 Process 31260 finished Fri Jul 8 19:59:31 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------