TSTP Solution File: SYO580+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SYO580+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 15:30:12 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 9.39s 2.94s
% Output : CNFRefutation 9.39s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 13 ( 7 unt; 2 nHn; 13 RR)
% Number of literals : 23 ( 0 equ; 11 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 6 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( b48_buttercup10305(X1)
| b48_buttercup10305(esk3_0)
| ~ k04_buttercup10303(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-260oqa__/input.p',i_0_4) ).
cnf(i_0_243,plain,
k04_buttercup10303(esk5_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-260oqa__/input.p',i_0_243) ).
cnf(i_0_242,plain,
~ b48_buttercup10305(esk5_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-260oqa__/input.p',i_0_242) ).
cnf(i_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( b48_buttercup10305(X1)
| ~ k04_buttercup10303(X1)
| ~ k04_buttercup10303(esk3_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-260oqa__/input.p',i_0_3) ).
cnf(i_0_244,plain,
( k04_buttercup10303(X1)
| ~ b48_buttercup10305(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-260oqa__/input.p',i_0_244) ).
cnf(c_0_250,negated_conjecture,
( b48_buttercup10305(X1)
| b48_buttercup10305(esk3_0)
| ~ k04_buttercup10303(X1) ),
i_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_251,plain,
k04_buttercup10303(esk5_0),
i_0_243 ).
cnf(c_0_252,plain,
~ b48_buttercup10305(esk5_0),
i_0_242 ).
cnf(c_0_253,negated_conjecture,
( b48_buttercup10305(X1)
| ~ k04_buttercup10303(X1)
| ~ k04_buttercup10303(esk3_0) ),
i_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_254,plain,
( k04_buttercup10303(X1)
| ~ b48_buttercup10305(X1) ),
i_0_244 ).
cnf(c_0_255,plain,
b48_buttercup10305(esk3_0),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_250,c_0_251]),c_0_252]) ).
cnf(c_0_256,plain,
~ k04_buttercup10303(esk3_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_252,c_0_253]),c_0_251])]) ).
cnf(c_0_257,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_254,c_0_255]),c_0_256]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12 % Problem : SYO580+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.5.0.
% 0.10/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jul 9 12:38:41 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.19/0.47 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.47 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.19/0.47 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.19/0.47 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 9.39/2.94 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN:
% 9.39/2.94 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 9.39/2.94 # Preprocessing time : 0.060 s
% 9.39/2.94
% 9.39/2.94 # Proof found!
% 9.39/2.94 # SZS status Theorem
% 9.39/2.94 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 9.39/2.94 # Proof object total steps : 13
% 9.39/2.94 # Proof object clause steps : 8
% 9.39/2.94 # Proof object formula steps : 5
% 9.39/2.94 # Proof object conjectures : 4
% 9.39/2.94 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 9.39/2.94 # Proof object formula conjectures : 2
% 9.39/2.94 # Proof object initial clauses used : 5
% 9.39/2.94 # Proof object initial formulas used : 5
% 9.39/2.94 # Proof object generating inferences : 3
% 9.39/2.94 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 4
% 9.39/2.94 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 9.39/2.94 # Parsed axioms : 1737
% 9.39/2.94 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 9.39/2.94 # Initial clauses : 1737
% 9.39/2.94 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 9.39/2.94 # Initial clauses in saturation : 1737
% 9.39/2.94 # Processed clauses : 1749
% 9.39/2.94 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 9.39/2.94 # ...subsumed : 3
% 9.39/2.94 # ...remaining for further processing : 1745
% 9.39/2.94 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 9.39/2.94 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 9.39/2.94 # Backward-subsumed : 1
% 9.39/2.94 # Backward-rewritten : 2
% 9.39/2.94 # Generated clauses : 865
% 9.39/2.94 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 719
% 9.39/2.94 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 2
% 9.39/2.94 # Paramodulations : 863
% 9.39/2.94 # Factorizations : 2
% 9.39/2.94 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 9.39/2.94 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 9.39/2.94 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 9.39/2.94 # Current number of processed clauses : 1742
% 9.39/2.94 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 413
% 9.39/2.94 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 9.39/2.94 # Negative unit clauses : 88
% 9.39/2.94 # Non-unit-clauses : 1241
% 9.39/2.94 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 701
% 9.39/2.94 # ...number of literals in the above : 953
% 9.39/2.94 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 9.39/2.94 # Current number of archived clauses : 3
% 9.39/2.94 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 766141
% 9.39/2.94 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 162202
% 9.39/2.94 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 5
% 9.39/2.94 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 19144
% 9.39/2.94 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 9.39/2.94 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 9.39/2.94 # BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 9.39/2.94 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 9.39/2.94 # Condensation successes : 0
% 9.39/2.94 # Termbank termtop insertions : 42454
% 9.39/2.94
% 9.39/2.94 # -------------------------------------------------
% 9.39/2.94 # User time : 0.178 s
% 9.39/2.94 # System time : 0.008 s
% 9.39/2.94 # Total time : 0.186 s
% 9.39/2.94 # ...preprocessing : 0.060 s
% 9.39/2.94 # ...main loop : 0.126 s
% 9.39/2.94 # Maximum resident set size: 12332 pages
% 9.39/2.94
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------