TSTP Solution File: SYO580+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SYO580+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 16:00:25 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.28s 1.46s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.28s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 13 ( 5 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 63 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 18 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 74 ( 24 ~; 22 |; 19 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 7 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 12 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 5 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 20 ( 0 sgn 12 !; 5 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(goals_886,conjecture,
( ! [X1056] :
( b48_buttercup10305(X1056)
<=> k04_buttercup10303(X1056) )
| ( ! [X1057] :
( k04_buttercup10303(X1057)
=> b48_buttercup10305(X1057) )
& ? [X1058] :
( b48_buttercup10305(X1058)
& ~ k04_buttercup10303(X1058) ) )
| ( ! [X1059] :
( b48_buttercup10305(X1059)
=> k04_buttercup10303(X1059) )
& ? [X1060] :
( k04_buttercup10303(X1060)
& ~ b48_buttercup10305(X1060) ) )
| ! [X1061] :
( b48_buttercup10305(X1061)
=> ~ k04_buttercup10303(X1061) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',goals_886) ).
fof(sos_320,axiom,
( ! [X320] :
( b48_buttercup10305(X320)
=> k04_buttercup10303(X320) )
& ? [X321] :
( k04_buttercup10303(X321)
& ~ b48_buttercup10305(X321) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',sos_320) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ! [X1056] :
( b48_buttercup10305(X1056)
<=> k04_buttercup10303(X1056) )
| ( ! [X1057] :
( k04_buttercup10303(X1057)
=> b48_buttercup10305(X1057) )
& ? [X1058] :
( b48_buttercup10305(X1058)
& ~ k04_buttercup10303(X1058) ) )
| ( ! [X1059] :
( b48_buttercup10305(X1059)
=> k04_buttercup10303(X1059) )
& ? [X1060] :
( k04_buttercup10303(X1060)
& ~ b48_buttercup10305(X1060) ) )
| ! [X1061] :
( b48_buttercup10305(X1061)
=> ~ k04_buttercup10303(X1061) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals_886]) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
! [X1064,X1066] :
( ( ~ b48_buttercup10305(esk1_0)
| ~ k04_buttercup10303(esk1_0) )
& ( b48_buttercup10305(esk1_0)
| k04_buttercup10303(esk1_0) )
& ( k04_buttercup10303(esk2_0)
| ~ b48_buttercup10305(X1064)
| k04_buttercup10303(X1064) )
& ( ~ b48_buttercup10305(esk2_0)
| ~ b48_buttercup10305(X1064)
| k04_buttercup10303(X1064) )
& ( b48_buttercup10305(esk3_0)
| ~ k04_buttercup10303(X1066)
| b48_buttercup10305(X1066) )
& ( ~ k04_buttercup10303(esk3_0)
| ~ k04_buttercup10303(X1066)
| b48_buttercup10305(X1066) )
& b48_buttercup10305(esk4_0)
& k04_buttercup10303(esk4_0) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X322] :
( ( ~ b48_buttercup10305(X322)
| k04_buttercup10303(X322) )
& k04_buttercup10303(esk6_0)
& ~ b48_buttercup10305(esk6_0) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[sos_320])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( b48_buttercup10305(X1)
| b48_buttercup10305(esk3_0)
| ~ k04_buttercup10303(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
k04_buttercup10303(esk6_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
~ b48_buttercup10305(esk6_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( b48_buttercup10305(X1)
| ~ k04_buttercup10303(X1)
| ~ k04_buttercup10303(esk3_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( k04_buttercup10303(X1)
| ~ b48_buttercup10305(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
b48_buttercup10305(esk3_0),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ k04_buttercup10303(esk3_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_6])]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : SYO580+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.5.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Sat Jul 9 12:16:59 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.28/1.46 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.28/1.46 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.28/1.46 # Preprocessing time : 0.028 s
% 0.28/1.46
% 0.28/1.46 # Proof found!
% 0.28/1.46 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.28/1.46 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.28/1.46 # Proof object total steps : 13
% 0.28/1.46 # Proof object clause steps : 8
% 0.28/1.46 # Proof object formula steps : 5
% 0.28/1.46 # Proof object conjectures : 8
% 0.28/1.46 # Proof object clause conjectures : 5
% 0.28/1.46 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.28/1.46 # Proof object initial clauses used : 5
% 0.28/1.46 # Proof object initial formulas used : 2
% 0.28/1.46 # Proof object generating inferences : 3
% 0.28/1.46 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 4
% 0.28/1.46 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.28/1.46 # Parsed axioms : 886
% 0.28/1.46 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 874
% 0.28/1.46 # Initial clauses : 24
% 0.28/1.46 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.28/1.46 # Initial clauses in saturation : 24
% 0.28/1.46 # Processed clauses : 28
% 0.28/1.46 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.28/1.46 # ...subsumed : 2
% 0.28/1.46 # ...remaining for further processing : 26
% 0.28/1.46 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.28/1.46 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.28/1.46 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.28/1.46 # Backward-rewritten : 3
% 0.28/1.46 # Generated clauses : 16
% 0.28/1.46 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 11
% 0.28/1.46 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 2
% 0.28/1.46 # Paramodulations : 16
% 0.28/1.46 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.28/1.46 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.28/1.46 # Current number of processed clauses : 23
% 0.28/1.46 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 11
% 0.28/1.46 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.28/1.46 # Negative unit clauses : 4
% 0.28/1.46 # Non-unit-clauses : 8
% 0.28/1.46 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 4
% 0.28/1.46 # ...number of literals in the above : 5
% 0.28/1.46 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.28/1.46 # Current number of archived clauses : 3
% 0.28/1.46 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 8
% 0.28/1.46 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8
% 0.28/1.46 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 4
% 0.28/1.46 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 11
% 0.28/1.46 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.28/1.46 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.28/1.46 # BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.28/1.46 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.28/1.46 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.28/1.46 # Termbank termtop insertions : 6599
% 0.28/1.46
% 0.28/1.46 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.28/1.46 # User time : 0.024 s
% 0.28/1.46 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.28/1.46 # Total time : 0.030 s
% 0.28/1.46 # Maximum resident set size: 4876 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------