TSTP Solution File: SYO580+1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SYO580+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:45:44 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.36s 0.62s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.36s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 14 ( 5 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 67 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 18 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 78 ( 25 ~; 22 |; 21 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 8 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 12 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 5 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 22 ( 0 sgn; 13 !; 6 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(goals_886,conjecture,
( ! [X1056] :
( b48_buttercup10305(X1056)
<=> k04_buttercup10303(X1056) )
| ( ! [X1057] :
( k04_buttercup10303(X1057)
=> b48_buttercup10305(X1057) )
& ? [X1058] :
( b48_buttercup10305(X1058)
& ~ k04_buttercup10303(X1058) ) )
| ( ! [X1059] :
( b48_buttercup10305(X1059)
=> k04_buttercup10303(X1059) )
& ? [X1060] :
( k04_buttercup10303(X1060)
& ~ b48_buttercup10305(X1060) ) )
| ! [X1061] :
( b48_buttercup10305(X1061)
=> ~ k04_buttercup10303(X1061) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.pRy23qu8dc/E---3.1_29897.p',goals_886) ).
fof(sos_320,axiom,
( ! [X320] :
( b48_buttercup10305(X320)
=> k04_buttercup10303(X320) )
& ? [X321] :
( k04_buttercup10303(X321)
& ~ b48_buttercup10305(X321) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.pRy23qu8dc/E---3.1_29897.p',sos_320) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ! [X1056] :
( b48_buttercup10305(X1056)
<=> k04_buttercup10303(X1056) )
| ( ! [X1057] :
( k04_buttercup10303(X1057)
=> b48_buttercup10305(X1057) )
& ? [X1058] :
( b48_buttercup10305(X1058)
& ~ k04_buttercup10303(X1058) ) )
| ( ! [X1059] :
( b48_buttercup10305(X1059)
=> k04_buttercup10303(X1059) )
& ? [X1060] :
( k04_buttercup10303(X1060)
& ~ b48_buttercup10305(X1060) ) )
| ! [X1061] :
( b48_buttercup10305(X1061)
=> ~ k04_buttercup10303(X1061) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals_886])]) ).
fof(c_0_3,plain,
( ! [X320] :
( b48_buttercup10305(X320)
=> k04_buttercup10303(X320) )
& ? [X321] :
( k04_buttercup10303(X321)
& ~ b48_buttercup10305(X321) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[sos_320]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
! [X1064,X1066] :
( ( ~ b48_buttercup10305(esk1_0)
| ~ k04_buttercup10303(esk1_0) )
& ( b48_buttercup10305(esk1_0)
| k04_buttercup10303(esk1_0) )
& ( k04_buttercup10303(esk2_0)
| ~ b48_buttercup10305(X1064)
| k04_buttercup10303(X1064) )
& ( ~ b48_buttercup10305(esk2_0)
| ~ b48_buttercup10305(X1064)
| k04_buttercup10303(X1064) )
& ( b48_buttercup10305(esk3_0)
| ~ k04_buttercup10303(X1066)
| b48_buttercup10305(X1066) )
& ( ~ k04_buttercup10303(esk3_0)
| ~ k04_buttercup10303(X1066)
| b48_buttercup10305(X1066) )
& b48_buttercup10305(esk4_0)
& k04_buttercup10303(esk4_0) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X1072] :
( ( ~ b48_buttercup10305(X1072)
| k04_buttercup10303(X1072) )
& k04_buttercup10303(esk6_0)
& ~ b48_buttercup10305(esk6_0) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( b48_buttercup10305(esk3_0)
| b48_buttercup10305(X1)
| ~ k04_buttercup10303(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
k04_buttercup10303(esk6_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
~ b48_buttercup10305(esk6_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( b48_buttercup10305(X1)
| ~ k04_buttercup10303(esk3_0)
| ~ k04_buttercup10303(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( k04_buttercup10303(X1)
| ~ b48_buttercup10305(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
b48_buttercup10305(esk3_0),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ k04_buttercup10303(esk3_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_7])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.17 % Problem : SYO580+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.5.0.
% 0.17/0.18 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.17/0.39 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.39 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.39 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.39 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.17/0.39 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.17/0.39 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.17/0.39 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.17/0.39 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 16:09:24 EDT 2023
% 0.17/0.40 % CPUTime :
% 0.36/0.58 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.36/0.58 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.pRy23qu8dc/E---3.1_29897.p
% 0.36/0.62 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.36/0.62 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.36/0.62 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.36/0.62 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 900s (3) cores
% 0.36/0.62 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.36/0.62 # Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.36/0.62 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.62 # new_bool_1 with pid 30075 completed with status 0
% 0.36/0.62 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.36/0.62 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.36/0.62 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.36/0.62 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 900s (3) cores
% 0.36/0.62 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.36/0.62 # Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.36/0.62 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.36/0.62 # Search class: FGHNF-FFSM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.36/0.62 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.36/0.62 # Starting G----_406_C05_02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_RG_S04AI with 361s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.62 # Starting G----_404_C05_02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_RG_S04AI with 61s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.62 # G----_406_C05_02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_RG_S04AI with pid 30080 completed with status 0
% 0.36/0.62 # Result found by G----_406_C05_02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_RG_S04AI
% 0.36/0.62 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.36/0.62 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.36/0.62 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 900s (3) cores
% 0.36/0.62 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.36/0.62 # Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.36/0.62 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.36/0.62 # Search class: FGHNF-FFSM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.36/0.62 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.36/0.62 # Starting G----_406_C05_02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_RG_S04AI with 361s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.62 # Preprocessing time : 0.004 s
% 0.36/0.62 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.36/0.62
% 0.36/0.62 # Proof found!
% 0.36/0.62 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.36/0.62 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.36/0.62 # Parsed axioms : 886
% 0.36/0.62 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 874
% 0.36/0.62 # Initial clauses : 24
% 0.36/0.62 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.36/0.62 # Initial clauses in saturation : 24
% 0.36/0.62 # Processed clauses : 59
% 0.36/0.62 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.36/0.62 # ...subsumed : 3
% 0.36/0.62 # ...remaining for further processing : 56
% 0.36/0.62 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.36/0.62 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.36/0.62 # Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.36/0.62 # Backward-rewritten : 3
% 0.36/0.62 # Generated clauses : 23
% 0.36/0.62 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 17
% 0.36/0.62 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.36/0.62 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.36/0.62 # Paramodulations : 23
% 0.36/0.62 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.36/0.62 # NegExts : 0
% 0.36/0.62 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.36/0.62 # Total rewrite steps : 8
% 0.36/0.62 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.36/0.62 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.36/0.62 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.36/0.62 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.36/0.62 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.36/0.62 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.36/0.62 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.36/0.62 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.36/0.62 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.36/0.62 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.36/0.62 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.36/0.62 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.36/0.62 # Current number of processed clauses : 30
% 0.36/0.62 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 19
% 0.36/0.62 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.36/0.62 # Negative unit clauses : 4
% 0.36/0.62 # Non-unit-clauses : 7
% 0.36/0.62 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 3
% 0.36/0.62 # ...number of literals in the above : 5
% 0.36/0.62 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.36/0.62 # Current number of archived clauses : 26
% 0.36/0.62 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 11
% 0.36/0.62 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 11
% 0.36/0.62 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 3
% 0.36/0.62 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7
% 0.36/0.62 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.36/0.62 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.36/0.62 # BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.36/0.62 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.36/0.62 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.36/0.62 # Termbank termtop insertions : 6622
% 0.36/0.62
% 0.36/0.62 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.36/0.62 # User time : 0.008 s
% 0.36/0.62 # System time : 0.008 s
% 0.36/0.62 # Total time : 0.016 s
% 0.36/0.62 # Maximum resident set size: 3860 pages
% 0.36/0.62
% 0.36/0.62 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.36/0.62 # User time : 0.025 s
% 0.36/0.62 # System time : 0.020 s
% 0.36/0.62 # Total time : 0.045 s
% 0.36/0.62 # Maximum resident set size: 3096 pages
% 0.36/0.62 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.36/0.62 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------