TSTP Solution File: SYO578+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SYO578+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 16:00:24 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.22s 1.40s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 12 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 73 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 20 ( 6 avg)
% Number of connectives : 91 ( 30 ~; 26 |; 28 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 7 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 17 ( 6 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 28 ( 0 sgn 13 !; 11 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(goals_86,conjecture,
( ( ! [X143] :
( b48_buttercup10098(X143)
=> k04_buttercup10100(X143) )
& ? [X144] :
( k04_buttercup10100(X144)
& ~ b48_buttercup10098(X144) ) )
| ( ! [X145] :
( k04_buttercup10100(X145)
=> b48_buttercup10098(X145) )
& ? [X146] :
( b48_buttercup10098(X146)
& ~ k04_buttercup10100(X146) ) )
| ? [X147,X148,X149] :
( k04_buttercup10100(X147)
& b48_buttercup10098(X147)
& k04_buttercup10100(X148)
& ~ b48_buttercup10098(X148)
& ~ k04_buttercup10100(X149)
& b48_buttercup10098(X149) )
| ! [X150] :
( k04_buttercup10100(X150)
=> ~ b48_buttercup10098(X150) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',goals_86) ).
fof(sos_21,axiom,
( ! [X62] :
( k04_buttercup10100(X62)
=> b48_buttercup10098(X62) )
& ? [X63] :
( b48_buttercup10098(X63)
& ~ k04_buttercup10100(X63) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',sos_21) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ( ! [X143] :
( b48_buttercup10098(X143)
=> k04_buttercup10100(X143) )
& ? [X144] :
( k04_buttercup10100(X144)
& ~ b48_buttercup10098(X144) ) )
| ( ! [X145] :
( k04_buttercup10100(X145)
=> b48_buttercup10098(X145) )
& ? [X146] :
( b48_buttercup10098(X146)
& ~ k04_buttercup10100(X146) ) )
| ? [X147,X148,X149] :
( k04_buttercup10100(X147)
& b48_buttercup10098(X147)
& k04_buttercup10100(X148)
& ~ b48_buttercup10098(X148)
& ~ k04_buttercup10100(X149)
& b48_buttercup10098(X149) )
| ! [X150] :
( k04_buttercup10100(X150)
=> ~ b48_buttercup10098(X150) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals_86]) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
! [X152,X154,X155,X156,X157] :
( ( b48_buttercup10098(esk1_0)
| ~ k04_buttercup10100(X152)
| b48_buttercup10098(X152) )
& ( ~ k04_buttercup10100(esk1_0)
| ~ k04_buttercup10100(X152)
| b48_buttercup10098(X152) )
& ( k04_buttercup10100(esk2_0)
| ~ b48_buttercup10098(X154)
| k04_buttercup10100(X154) )
& ( ~ b48_buttercup10098(esk2_0)
| ~ b48_buttercup10098(X154)
| k04_buttercup10100(X154) )
& ( ~ k04_buttercup10100(X155)
| ~ b48_buttercup10098(X155)
| ~ k04_buttercup10100(X156)
| b48_buttercup10098(X156)
| k04_buttercup10100(X157)
| ~ b48_buttercup10098(X157) )
& k04_buttercup10100(esk3_0)
& b48_buttercup10098(esk3_0) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X64] :
( ( ~ k04_buttercup10100(X64)
| b48_buttercup10098(X64) )
& b48_buttercup10098(esk5_0)
& ~ k04_buttercup10100(esk5_0) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[sos_21])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( k04_buttercup10100(X1)
| ~ b48_buttercup10098(X1)
| ~ b48_buttercup10098(esk2_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( b48_buttercup10098(X1)
| ~ k04_buttercup10100(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( k04_buttercup10100(X1)
| k04_buttercup10100(esk2_0)
| ~ b48_buttercup10098(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( k04_buttercup10100(X1)
| ~ b48_buttercup10098(X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
b48_buttercup10098(esk5_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
~ k04_buttercup10100(esk5_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_10]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.11 % Problem : SYO578+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.5.0.
% 0.10/0.12 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Sat Jul 9 06:33:45 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/1.40 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.22/1.40 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.22/1.40 # Preprocessing time : 0.034 s
% 0.22/1.40
% 0.22/1.40 # Proof found!
% 0.22/1.40 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.22/1.40 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/1.40 # Proof object total steps : 12
% 0.22/1.40 # Proof object clause steps : 7
% 0.22/1.40 # Proof object formula steps : 5
% 0.22/1.40 # Proof object conjectures : 7
% 0.22/1.40 # Proof object clause conjectures : 4
% 0.22/1.40 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.22/1.40 # Proof object initial clauses used : 5
% 0.22/1.40 # Proof object initial formulas used : 2
% 0.22/1.40 # Proof object generating inferences : 2
% 0.22/1.40 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 2
% 0.22/1.40 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.22/1.40 # Parsed axioms : 86
% 0.22/1.40 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 6
% 0.22/1.40 # Initial clauses : 480
% 0.22/1.40 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Initial clauses in saturation : 480
% 0.22/1.40 # Processed clauses : 483
% 0.22/1.40 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # ...subsumed : 25
% 0.22/1.40 # ...remaining for further processing : 458
% 0.22/1.40 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Backward-subsumed : 2
% 0.22/1.40 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Generated clauses : 2470
% 0.22/1.40 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 1363
% 0.22/1.40 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 7
% 0.22/1.40 # Paramodulations : 2470
% 0.22/1.40 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Current number of processed clauses : 456
% 0.22/1.40 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 22
% 0.22/1.40 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Negative unit clauses : 9
% 0.22/1.40 # Non-unit-clauses : 425
% 0.22/1.40 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1341
% 0.22/1.40 # ...number of literals in the above : 7266
% 0.22/1.40 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Current number of archived clauses : 2
% 0.22/1.40 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 37898
% 0.22/1.40 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5263
% 0.22/1.40 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 34
% 0.22/1.40 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 428
% 0.22/1.40 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Termbank termtop insertions : 50143
% 0.22/1.40
% 0.22/1.40 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/1.40 # User time : 0.103 s
% 0.22/1.40 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.22/1.40 # Total time : 0.107 s
% 0.22/1.40 # Maximum resident set size: 5540 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------