TSTP Solution File: SYO565^7 by Nitpick---2016
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Nitpick---2016
% Problem : SYO565^7 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v5.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s
% Computer : n020.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz
% Memory : 32218.75MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jan 18 19:33:20 EST 2017
% Result : CounterSatisfiable 25.12s
% Output : FiniteModel 25.12s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SYO565^7 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v5.5.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s
% 0.02/0.23 % Computer : n020.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% 0.02/0.23 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.02/0.23 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
% 0.02/0.23 % Memory : 32218.75MB
% 0.02/0.23 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64
% 0.02/0.23 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.02/0.23 % DateTime : Mon Jan 16 05:19:19 CST 2017
% 0.02/0.23 % CPUTime:
% 25.12/10.12 Nitpicking formula...
% 25.12/10.12 Timestamp: 05:19:28
% 25.12/10.12 The type bnd_mu passed the monotonicity test; Nitpick might be able to skip
% 25.12/10.12 some scopes
% 25.12/10.12 Using SAT solver "Lingeling_JNI" The following solvers are configured:
% 25.12/10.12 "Lingeling_JNI", "CryptoMiniSat_JNI", "MiniSat_JNI", "SAT4J", "SAT4J_Light"
% 25.12/10.12 Skipping 5000 scopes. (Consider using "mono" or "merge_type_vars" to prevent
% 25.12/10.12 this.)
% 25.12/10.12 Batch 1 of 1000: Trying 5 scopes:
% 25.12/10.12 card bnd_mu = 1 and card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 1
% 25.12/10.12 card bnd_mu = 2 and card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 2
% 25.12/10.12 card bnd_mu = 3 and card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 3
% 25.12/10.12 card bnd_mu = 4 and card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 4
% 25.12/10.12 card bnd_mu = 5 and card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 5
% 25.12/10.12 % SZS status CounterSatisfiable % SZS output start FiniteModel
% 25.12/10.12 Nitpick found a counterexample for card bnd_mu = 2 and
% 25.12/10.12 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 2:
% 25.12/10.12
% 25.12/10.12 Skolem constants:
% 25.12/10.12 \<lambda>Va. ??.bnd_mbox_s4.V = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1, i2 := i2)
% 25.12/10.12 ??.bnd_mbox_s4.V = i1
% 25.12/10.12 ??.bnd_mbox_s4.V = i2
% 25.12/10.12 \<lambda>V. ??.bnd_mforall_ind.X = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := b1, i2 := b1)
% 25.12/10.12 ??.bnd_mforall_ind.X = b2
% 25.12/10.12 ??.bnd_mvalid.W = i1
% 25.12/10.12 Constants:
% 25.12/10.12 bnd_a =
% 25.12/10.12 (\<lambda>x. _)
% 25.12/10.12 (b1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True, i2 := True),
% 25.12/10.12 b2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := False))
% 25.12/10.12 bnd_exists_in_world =
% 25.12/10.12 (\<lambda>x. _)
% 25.12/10.12 (b1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True, i2 := True),
% 25.12/10.12 b2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := True))
% 25.12/10.12 bnd_rel_s4 =
% 25.12/10.12 (\<lambda>x. _)
% 25.12/10.12 (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True, i2 := True),
% 25.12/10.12 i2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := True))
% 25.12/10.12 % SZS output end FiniteModel
% 25.12/10.12 Total time: 677 ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------