TSTP Solution File: SYO543^1 by E---3.2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.2.0
% Problem  : SYO543^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 20:34:14 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.49s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   12 (   8 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   37 (  23 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   65 (  15   ~;  12   |;  18   &;  19   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   23 (  23   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    6 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   24 (  13   ^  10   !;   1   ?;  24   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_22,type,
    epsii: ( ( $i > $i ) > $o ) > $i > $i ).

thf(decl_23,type,
    if: $o > ( $i > $i ) > ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i ).

thf(decl_24,type,
    epred1_0: $o ).

thf(decl_25,type,
    esk1_0: $i > $i ).

thf(ifd,axiom,
    ( if
    = ( ^ [X3: $o,X2: $i > $i,X4: $i > $i] :
          ( epsii
          @ ^ [X5: $i > $i] :
              ( ( X3
                & ( X5 = X2 ) )
              | ( ~ X3
                & ( X5 = X4 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Gm98GBcva3/E---3.1_31102.p',ifd) ).

thf(conj,conjecture,
    ! [X3: $o,X2: $i > $i] :
      ( ( if @ X3 @ X2 @ X2 )
      = X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Gm98GBcva3/E---3.1_31102.p',conj) ).

thf(choiceaxii,axiom,
    ! [X1: ( $i > $i ) > $o] :
      ( ? [X2: $i > $i] : ( X1 @ X2 )
     => ( X1 @ ( epsii @ X1 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Gm98GBcva3/E---3.1_31102.p',choiceaxii) ).

thf(c_0_3,plain,
    ( if
    = ( ^ [Z0: $o,Z1: $i > $i,Z2: $i > $i] :
          ( epsii
          @ ^ [Z3: $i > $i] :
              ( ( Z0
                & ( Z3 = Z1 ) )
              | ( ~ Z0
                & Z3 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ifd]) ).

thf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X3: $o,X2: $i > $i] :
        ( ( epsii
          @ ^ [Z0: $i > $i] :
              ( ( X3
                & ( Z0 = X2 ) )
              | ( ~ X3
                & ( Z0 = X2 ) ) ) )
        = X2 ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj]),c_0_3]) ).

thf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( epsii
      @ ^ [Z0: $i > $i] :
          ( ( epred1_0
            & ( Z0 = esk1_0 ) )
          | ( ~ epred1_0
            & ( Z0 = esk1_0 ) ) ) )
   != esk1_0 ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])]) ).

thf(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X12: ( $i > $i ) > $o,X13: $i > $i] :
      ( ~ ( X12 @ X13 )
      | ( X12 @ ( epsii @ X12 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[choiceaxii])])])]) ).

thf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( epsii
      @ ^ [Z0: $i > $i] :
          ( ( epred1_0
            & ( Z0 = esk1_0 ) )
          | ( ~ epred1_0
            & ( Z0 = esk1_0 ) ) ) )
   != esk1_0 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

thf(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X1: ( $i > $i ) > $o,X2: $i > $i] :
      ( ( X1 @ ( epsii @ X1 ) )
      | ~ ( X1 @ X2 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

thf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2: $i > $i] :
      ( ( epred1_0
        & ( ( epsii
            @ ^ [Z0: $i > $i] :
                ( ( epred1_0
                  & ( Z0 = esk1_0 ) )
                | ( ~ epred1_0
                  & ( Z0 = esk1_0 ) ) ) )
          = esk1_0 ) )
      | ( ~ epred1_0
        & ( ( epsii
            @ ^ [Z0: $i > $i] :
                ( ( epred1_0
                  & ( Z0 = esk1_0 ) )
                | ( ~ epred1_0
                  & ( Z0 = esk1_0 ) ) ) )
          = esk1_0 ) )
      | ~ ( ( epred1_0
            & ( X2 = esk1_0 ) )
          | ( ~ epred1_0
            & ( X2 = esk1_0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(choice_inst,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).

thf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    epred1_0,
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])]),c_0_7])]) ).

thf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])]),c_0_7])]),c_0_10])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem    : SYO543^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.11  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.32  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % DateTime   : Sun Jun 23 06:55:54 EDT 2024
% 0.11/0.32  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.19/0.47  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.47  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Gm98GBcva3/E---3.1_31102.p
% 0.19/0.49  # Version: 3.2.0-ho
% 0.19/0.49  # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSCHSA.
% 0.19/0.49  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.49  # Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.49  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49  # Starting new_bool_2 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49  # sh5l with pid 31218 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.49  # Result found by sh5l
% 0.19/0.49  # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSCHSA.
% 0.19/0.49  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.49  # Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.49  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.19/0.49  # Search class: HHUSF-FFSF22-MHSFFMBC
% 0.19/0.49  # partial match(3): HHUSS-FFSF21-MHHFFMBC
% 0.19/0.49  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.49  # Starting new_ho_10 with 181s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49  # new_ho_10 with pid 31223 completed with status 9
% 0.19/0.49  # Starting sh5l with 31s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49  # sh5l with pid 31231 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.49  # Result found by sh5l
% 0.19/0.49  # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSCHSA.
% 0.19/0.49  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.49  # Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.49  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.19/0.49  # Search class: HHUSF-FFSF22-MHSFFMBC
% 0.19/0.49  # partial match(3): HHUSS-FFSF21-MHHFFMBC
% 0.19/0.49  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.49  # Starting new_ho_10 with 181s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49  # new_ho_10 with pid 31223 completed with status 9
% 0.19/0.49  # Starting sh5l with 31s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.19/0.49  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.19/0.49  
% 0.19/0.49  # Proof found!
% 0.19/0.49  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.49  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.49  # Parsed axioms                        : 5
% 0.19/0.49  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 2
% 0.19/0.49  # Initial clauses                      : 2
% 0.19/0.49  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.19/0.49  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 2
% 0.19/0.49  # Processed clauses                    : 8
% 0.19/0.49  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.19/0.49  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.19/0.49  # ...remaining for further processing  : 7
% 0.19/0.49  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 4
% 0.19/0.49  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.19/0.49  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.19/0.49  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.19/0.49  # Generated clauses                    : 16
% 0.19/0.49  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 8
% 0.19/0.49  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.19/0.49  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.19/0.49  # Paramodulations                      : 0
% 0.19/0.49  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.19/0.49  # NegExts                              : 1
% 0.19/0.49  # Equation resolutions                 : 4
% 0.19/0.49  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.19/0.49  # Total rewrite steps                  : 1
% 0.19/0.49  # ...of those cached                   : 0
% 0.19/0.49  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.19/0.49  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.19/0.49  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.19/0.49  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.19/0.49  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.19/0.49  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.19/0.49  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49  # Current number of processed clauses  : 4
% 0.19/0.49  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 1
% 0.19/0.49  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.19/0.49  #    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 0.19/0.49  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1
% 0.19/0.49  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 4
% 0.19/0.49  # ...number of literals in the above   : 5
% 0.19/0.49  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.19/0.49  # Current number of archived clauses   : 3
% 0.19/0.49  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1
% 0.19/0.49  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.19/0.49  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.19/0.49  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.19/0.49  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.19/0.49  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.19/0.49  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.19/0.49  # Condensation attempts                : 8
% 0.19/0.49  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.19/0.49  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 2042
% 0.19/0.49  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 69
% 0.19/0.49  
% 0.19/0.49  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.49  # User time                : 0.006 s
% 0.19/0.49  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.19/0.49  # Total time               : 0.008 s
% 0.19/0.49  # Maximum resident set size: 1784 pages
% 0.19/0.49  
% 0.19/0.49  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.49  # User time                : 0.006 s
% 0.19/0.49  # System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.19/0.49  # Total time               : 0.011 s
% 0.19/0.49  # Maximum resident set size: 1728 pages
% 0.19/0.49  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.19/0.49  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------