TSTP Solution File: SYO536^1 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : SYO536^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 08:47:59 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.22s 0.54s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 12
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 27 ( 8 unt; 7 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 22 ( 5 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 117 ( 10 ~; 5 |; 1 &; 97 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 14 ( 6 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 68 ( 68 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 9 ( 7 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 57 ( 21 ^ 16 !; 20 ?; 57 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_22,type,
eps: ( $i > $o ) > $i ).
thf(decl_23,type,
epsii: ( ( $i > $i ) > $o ) > $i > $i ).
thf(decl_24,type,
epsa: ( ( $i > $i ) > $i > $o ) > $i > $i ).
thf(decl_25,type,
epsb: ( ( $i > $i ) > $i > $o ) > $i ).
thf(decl_26,type,
epred1_0: ( $i > $i ) > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_27,type,
esk1_0: $i > $i ).
thf(decl_28,type,
esk2_0: $i ).
thf(epsbd,axiom,
( epsb
= ( ^ [X5: ( $i > $i ) > $i > $o] :
( eps
@ ^ [X7: $i] : ( X5 @ ( epsa @ X5 ) @ X7 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',epsbd) ).
thf(epsad,axiom,
( epsa
= ( ^ [X5: ( $i > $i ) > $i > $o] :
( epsii
@ ^ [X6: $i > $i] :
? [X7: $i] : ( X5 @ X6 @ X7 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',epsad) ).
thf(conj,conjecture,
! [X5: ( $i > $i ) > $i > $o] :
( ? [X8: $i > $i,X7: $i] : ( X5 @ X8 @ X7 )
=> ( X5 @ ( epsa @ X5 ) @ ( epsb @ X5 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj) ).
thf(choiceaxii,axiom,
! [X3: ( $i > $i ) > $o] :
( ? [X4: $i > $i] : ( X3 @ X4 )
=> ( X3 @ ( epsii @ X3 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',choiceaxii) ).
thf(choiceax,axiom,
! [X1: $i > $o] :
( ? [X2: $i] : ( X1 @ X2 )
=> ( X1 @ ( eps @ X1 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',choiceax) ).
thf(c_0_5,plain,
( epsb
= ( ^ [Z0: ( $i > $i ) > $i > $o] :
( eps
@ ^ [Z1: $i] :
( Z0
@ ( epsii
@ ^ [Z2: $i > $i] :
? [X16: $i] : ( Z0 @ Z2 @ X16 ) )
@ Z1 ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[epsbd]) ).
thf(c_0_6,plain,
( epsa
= ( ^ [Z0: ( $i > $i ) > $i > $o] :
( epsii
@ ^ [Z1: $i > $i] :
? [X7: $i] : ( Z0 @ Z1 @ X7 ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[epsad]) ).
thf(c_0_7,plain,
( epsb
= ( ^ [Z0: ( $i > $i ) > $i > $o] :
( eps
@ ^ [Z1: $i] :
( Z0
@ ( epsii
@ ^ [Z2: $i > $i] :
? [X16: $i] : ( Z0 @ Z2 @ X16 ) )
@ Z1 ) ) ) ),
inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
thf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X5: ( $i > $i ) > $i > $o] :
( ? [X8: $i > $i,X7: $i] : ( X5 @ X8 @ X7 )
=> ( X5
@ ( epsii
@ ^ [Z0: $i > $i] :
? [X17: $i] : ( X5 @ Z0 @ X17 ) )
@ ( eps
@ ^ [Z0: $i] :
( X5
@ ( epsii
@ ^ [Z1: $i > $i] :
? [X18: $i] : ( X5 @ Z1 @ X18 ) )
@ Z0 ) ) ) ),
inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj]),c_0_7]),c_0_6]) ).
thf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( ( epred1_0 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 )
& ~ ( epred1_0
@ ( epsii
@ ^ [Z0: $i > $i] :
? [X17: $i] : ( epred1_0 @ Z0 @ X17 ) )
@ ( eps
@ ( epred1_0
@ ( epsii
@ ^ [Z0: $i > $i] :
? [X18: $i] : ( epred1_0 @ Z0 @ X18 ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])])]) ).
thf(c_0_10,plain,
! [X24: ( $i > $i ) > $o,X25: $i > $i] :
( ~ ( X24 @ X25 )
| ( X24 @ ( epsii @ X24 ) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[choiceaxii])])])]) ).
thf(c_0_11,plain,
! [X22: $i > $o,X23: $i] :
( ~ ( X22 @ X23 )
| ( X22 @ ( eps @ X22 ) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[choiceax])])])]) ).
thf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ ( epred1_0
@ ( epsii
@ ^ [Z0: $i > $i] :
? [X32: $i] : ( epred1_0 @ Z0 @ X32 ) )
@ ( eps
@ ( epred1_0
@ ( epsii
@ ^ [Z0: $i > $i] :
? [X33: $i] : ( epred1_0 @ Z0 @ X33 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
thf(c_0_13,plain,
! [X3: ( $i > $i ) > $o,X4: $i > $i] :
( ( X3 @ ( epsii @ X3 ) )
| ~ ( X3 @ X4 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
thf(c_0_14,plain,
! [X1: $i > $o,X2: $i] :
( ( X1 @ ( eps @ X1 ) )
| ~ ( X1 @ X2 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
thf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
! [X4: $i > $i] :
( ? [X34: $i] :
( epred1_0
@ ( epsii
@ ^ [Z0: $i > $i] :
? [X35: $i] : ( epred1_0 @ Z0 @ X35 ) )
@ X34 )
| ~ ? [X36: $i] : ( epred1_0 @ X4 @ X36 ) ),
inference(choice_inst,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
thf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
! [X2: $i] :
~ ( epred1_0
@ ( epsii
@ ^ [Z0: $i > $i] :
? [X37: $i] : ( epred1_0 @ Z0 @ X37 ) )
@ X2 ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(choice_inst,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_14]),c_0_12]) ).
thf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
epred1_0 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
thf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
! [X4: $i > $i,X2: $i] :
~ ( epred1_0 @ X4 @ X2 ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]),c_0_16]) ).
thf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.13/0.14 % Problem : SYO536^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.13/0.15 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.37 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.37 % DateTime : Mon May 20 08:57:23 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.53 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.22/0.53 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/0.54 # Version: 3.1.0-ho
% 0.22/0.54 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSMCHHA.
% 0.22/0.54 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.54 # Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.54 # Starting ehoh_best_sine_rwall with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54 # new_bool_1 with pid 12207 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.22/0.54 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSMCHHA.
% 0.22/0.54 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.54 # Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.54 # Starting ehoh_best_sine_rwall with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.22/0.54 # Search class: HHUNF-FFSF21-DHHFFMBC
% 0.22/0.54 # partial match(3): HHUSS-FFSF21-MHHFFMBC
% 0.22/0.54 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.22/0.54 # Starting new_ho_10 with 181s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54 # new_ho_10 with pid 12210 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Result found by new_ho_10
% 0.22/0.54 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSMCHHA.
% 0.22/0.54 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.54 # Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.54 # Starting ehoh_best_sine_rwall with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.22/0.54 # Search class: HHUNF-FFSF21-DHHFFMBC
% 0.22/0.54 # partial match(3): HHUSS-FFSF21-MHHFFMBC
% 0.22/0.54 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.22/0.54 # Starting new_ho_10 with 181s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.22/0.54 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.22/0.54
% 0.22/0.54 # Proof found!
% 0.22/0.54 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.22/0.54 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.54 # Parsed axioms : 9
% 0.22/0.54 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 4
% 0.22/0.54 # Initial clauses : 4
% 0.22/0.54 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Initial clauses in saturation : 4
% 0.22/0.54 # Processed clauses : 12
% 0.22/0.54 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # ...remaining for further processing : 12
% 0.22/0.54 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Backward-subsumed : 2
% 0.22/0.54 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Generated clauses : 9
% 0.22/0.54 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 6
% 0.22/0.54 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Paramodulations : 2
% 0.22/0.54 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # NegExts : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.22/0.54 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.54 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.54 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.54 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.54 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.54 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.54 # Current number of processed clauses : 3
% 0.22/0.54 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.22/0.54 # Non-unit-clauses : 2
% 0.22/0.54 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2
% 0.22/0.54 # ...number of literals in the above : 4
% 0.22/0.54 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Current number of archived clauses : 9
% 0.22/0.54 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2
% 0.22/0.54 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.22/0.54 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.22/0.54 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Condensation attempts : 12
% 0.22/0.54 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1830
% 0.22/0.54 # Search garbage collected termcells : 194
% 0.22/0.54
% 0.22/0.54 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.54 # User time : 0.005 s
% 0.22/0.54 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.22/0.54 # Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.22/0.54 # Maximum resident set size: 1772 pages
% 0.22/0.54
% 0.22/0.54 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.54 # User time : 0.006 s
% 0.22/0.54 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.22/0.54 # Total time : 0.010 s
% 0.22/0.54 # Maximum resident set size: 1740 pages
% 0.22/0.54 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.22/0.55 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------