TSTP Solution File: SYO528^1 by cocATP---0.2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : cocATP---0.2.0
% Problem : SYO528^1 : TPTP v7.5.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : python CASC.py /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 0s
% DateTime : Tue Mar 29 00:52:02 EDT 2022
% Result : Timeout 300.05s 300.93s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SYO528^1 : TPTP v7.5.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : python CASC.py /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUModel : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % RAMPerCPU : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Mar 13 16:31:27 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.34 ModuleCmd_Load.c(213):ERROR:105: Unable to locate a modulefile for 'python/python27'
% 0.12/0.35 Python 2.7.5
% 144.34/144.63 Using paths ['/home/cristobal/cocATP/CASC/TPTP/', '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/', '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/']
% 144.34/144.63 FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x1724638>, <kernel.DependentProduct object at 0x17243f8>) of role type named eps1
% 144.34/144.63 Using role type
% 144.34/144.63 Declaring eps1:((Prop->Prop)->Prop)
% 144.34/144.63 FOF formula (forall (P:(Prop->Prop)), (((ex Prop) (fun (X:Prop)=> (P X)))->(P (eps1 P)))) of role axiom named choiceax1
% 144.34/144.63 A new axiom: (forall (P:(Prop->Prop)), (((ex Prop) (fun (X:Prop)=> (P X)))->(P (eps1 P))))
% 144.34/144.63 FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x1728098>, <kernel.DependentProduct object at 0x1724b48>) of role type named eps2
% 144.34/144.63 Using role type
% 144.34/144.63 Declaring eps2:((Prop->Prop)->Prop)
% 144.34/144.63 FOF formula (forall (P:(Prop->Prop)), (((ex Prop) (fun (X:Prop)=> (P X)))->(P (eps2 P)))) of role axiom named choiceax2
% 144.34/144.63 A new axiom: (forall (P:(Prop->Prop)), (((ex Prop) (fun (X:Prop)=> (P X)))->(P (eps2 P))))
% 144.34/144.63 FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x2afff79ba2d8>, <kernel.DependentProduct object at 0x17246c8>) of role type named eps3
% 144.34/144.63 Using role type
% 144.34/144.63 Declaring eps3:((Prop->Prop)->Prop)
% 144.34/144.63 FOF formula (forall (P:(Prop->Prop)), (((ex Prop) (fun (X:Prop)=> (P X)))->(P (eps3 P)))) of role axiom named choiceax3
% 144.34/144.63 A new axiom: (forall (P:(Prop->Prop)), (((ex Prop) (fun (X:Prop)=> (P X)))->(P (eps3 P))))
% 144.34/144.63 FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x2afff79ba2d8>, <kernel.DependentProduct object at 0x17249e0>) of role type named eps4
% 144.34/144.63 Using role type
% 144.34/144.63 Declaring eps4:((Prop->Prop)->Prop)
% 144.34/144.63 FOF formula (forall (P:(Prop->Prop)), (((ex Prop) (fun (X:Prop)=> (P X)))->(P (eps4 P)))) of role axiom named choiceax4
% 144.34/144.63 A new axiom: (forall (P:(Prop->Prop)), (((ex Prop) (fun (X:Prop)=> (P X)))->(P (eps4 P))))
% 144.34/144.63 FOF formula (not (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps1) eps2)) of role axiom named choiceax12
% 144.34/144.63 A new axiom: (not (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps1) eps2))
% 144.34/144.63 FOF formula (not (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps1) eps3)) of role axiom named choiceax13
% 144.34/144.63 A new axiom: (not (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps1) eps3))
% 144.34/144.63 FOF formula (not (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps1) eps4)) of role axiom named choiceax14
% 144.34/144.63 A new axiom: (not (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps1) eps4))
% 144.34/144.63 FOF formula (not (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps2) eps3)) of role axiom named choiceax23
% 144.34/144.63 A new axiom: (not (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps2) eps3))
% 144.34/144.63 FOF formula (not (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps2) eps4)) of role axiom named choiceax24
% 144.34/144.63 A new axiom: (not (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps2) eps4))
% 144.34/144.63 FOF formula (not (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps3) eps4)) of role axiom named choiceax34
% 144.34/144.63 A new axiom: (not (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps3) eps4))
% 144.34/144.63 We need to prove []
% 144.34/144.63 Parameter eps1:((Prop->Prop)->Prop).
% 144.34/144.63 Axiom choiceax1:(forall (P:(Prop->Prop)), (((ex Prop) (fun (X:Prop)=> (P X)))->(P (eps1 P)))).
% 144.34/144.63 Parameter eps2:((Prop->Prop)->Prop).
% 144.34/144.63 Axiom choiceax2:(forall (P:(Prop->Prop)), (((ex Prop) (fun (X:Prop)=> (P X)))->(P (eps2 P)))).
% 144.34/144.63 Parameter eps3:((Prop->Prop)->Prop).
% 144.34/144.63 Axiom choiceax3:(forall (P:(Prop->Prop)), (((ex Prop) (fun (X:Prop)=> (P X)))->(P (eps3 P)))).
% 144.34/144.63 Parameter eps4:((Prop->Prop)->Prop).
% 144.34/144.63 Axiom choiceax4:(forall (P:(Prop->Prop)), (((ex Prop) (fun (X:Prop)=> (P X)))->(P (eps4 P)))).
% 144.34/144.63 Axiom choiceax12:(not (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps1) eps2)).
% 144.34/144.63 Axiom choiceax13:(not (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps1) eps3)).
% 144.34/144.63 Axiom choiceax14:(not (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps1) eps4)).
% 144.34/144.63 Axiom choiceax23:(not (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps2) eps3)).
% 144.34/144.63 Axiom choiceax24:(not (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps2) eps4)).
% 144.34/144.63 Axiom choiceax34:(not (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps3) eps4)).
% 144.34/144.63 There are no conjectures!
% 144.34/144.63 Adding conjecture False, to look for Unsatisfiability
% 144.34/144.63 Trying to prove False
% 144.34/144.63 Found eq_ref000:=(eq_ref00 P):((P eps1)->(P eps1))
% 144.34/144.63 Found (eq_ref00 P) as proof of (P0 eps1)
% 144.34/144.63 Found ((eq_ref0 eps1) P) as proof of (P0 eps1)
% 144.34/144.63 Found (((eq_ref ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps1) P) as proof of (P0 eps1)
% 144.34/144.63 Found (((eq_ref ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps1) P) as proof of (P0 eps1)
% 144.34/144.63 Found eq_ref000:=(eq_ref00 P):((P eps1)->(P eps1))
% 144.34/144.63 Found (eq_ref00 P) as proof of (P0 eps1)
% 144.34/144.63 Found ((eq_ref0 eps1) P) as proof of (P0 eps1)
% 144.34/144.63 Found (((eq_ref ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps1) P) as proof of (P0 eps1)
% 144.34/144.63 Found (((eq_ref ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps1) P) as proof of (P0 eps1)
% 185.64/185.96 Found eq_ref000:=(eq_ref00 P):((P eps2)->(P eps2))
% 185.64/185.96 Found (eq_ref00 P) as proof of (P0 eps2)
% 185.64/185.96 Found ((eq_ref0 eps2) P) as proof of (P0 eps2)
% 185.64/185.96 Found (((eq_ref ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps2) P) as proof of (P0 eps2)
% 185.64/185.96 Found (((eq_ref ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps2) P) as proof of (P0 eps2)
% 185.64/185.96 Found eq_ref000:=(eq_ref00 P):((P eps3)->(P eps3))
% 185.64/185.96 Found (eq_ref00 P) as proof of (P0 eps3)
% 185.64/185.96 Found ((eq_ref0 eps3) P) as proof of (P0 eps3)
% 185.64/185.96 Found (((eq_ref ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps3) P) as proof of (P0 eps3)
% 185.64/185.96 Found (((eq_ref ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps3) P) as proof of (P0 eps3)
% 185.64/185.96 Found eq_ref000:=(eq_ref00 P):((P eps2)->(P eps2))
% 185.64/185.96 Found (eq_ref00 P) as proof of (P0 eps2)
% 185.64/185.96 Found ((eq_ref0 eps2) P) as proof of (P0 eps2)
% 185.64/185.96 Found (((eq_ref ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps2) P) as proof of (P0 eps2)
% 185.64/185.96 Found (((eq_ref ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps2) P) as proof of (P0 eps2)
% 185.64/185.96 Found eq_ref000:=(eq_ref00 P):((P eps1)->(P eps1))
% 185.64/185.96 Found (eq_ref00 P) as proof of (P0 eps1)
% 185.64/185.96 Found ((eq_ref0 eps1) P) as proof of (P0 eps1)
% 185.64/185.96 Found (((eq_ref ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps1) P) as proof of (P0 eps1)
% 185.64/185.96 Found (((eq_ref ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps1) P) as proof of (P0 eps1)
% 185.64/185.96 Found eq_ref000:=(eq_ref00 P):((P eps1)->(P eps1))
% 185.64/185.96 Found (eq_ref00 P) as proof of (P0 eps1)
% 185.64/185.96 Found ((eq_ref0 eps1) P) as proof of (P0 eps1)
% 185.64/185.96 Found (((eq_ref ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps1) P) as proof of (P0 eps1)
% 185.64/185.96 Found (((eq_ref ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps1) P) as proof of (P0 eps1)
% 185.64/185.96 Found eq_ref000:=(eq_ref00 P):((P eps1)->(P eps1))
% 185.64/185.96 Found (eq_ref00 P) as proof of (P0 eps1)
% 185.64/185.96 Found ((eq_ref0 eps1) P) as proof of (P0 eps1)
% 185.64/185.96 Found (((eq_ref ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps1) P) as proof of (P0 eps1)
% 185.64/185.96 Found (((eq_ref ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps1) P) as proof of (P0 eps1)
% 185.64/185.96 Found eq_ref000:=(eq_ref00 P):((P eps2)->(P eps2))
% 185.64/185.96 Found (eq_ref00 P) as proof of (P0 eps2)
% 185.64/185.96 Found ((eq_ref0 eps2) P) as proof of (P0 eps2)
% 185.64/185.96 Found (((eq_ref ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps2) P) as proof of (P0 eps2)
% 185.64/185.96 Found (((eq_ref ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps2) P) as proof of (P0 eps2)
% 185.64/185.96 Found eq_ref00:=(eq_ref0 b):(((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) b) b)
% 185.64/185.96 Found (eq_ref0 b) as proof of (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) b) eps3)
% 185.64/185.96 Found ((eq_ref ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) b) as proof of (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) b) eps3)
% 185.64/185.96 Found ((eq_ref ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) b) as proof of (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) b) eps3)
% 185.64/185.96 Found ((eq_ref ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) b) as proof of (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) b) eps3)
% 185.64/185.96 Found eta_expansion000:=(eta_expansion00 eps2):(((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps2) (fun (x:(Prop->Prop))=> (eps2 x)))
% 185.64/185.96 Found (eta_expansion00 eps2) as proof of (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps2) b)
% 185.64/185.96 Found ((eta_expansion0 Prop) eps2) as proof of (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps2) b)
% 185.64/185.96 Found (((eta_expansion (Prop->Prop)) Prop) eps2) as proof of (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps2) b)
% 185.64/185.96 Found (((eta_expansion (Prop->Prop)) Prop) eps2) as proof of (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps2) b)
% 185.64/185.96 Found (((eta_expansion (Prop->Prop)) Prop) eps2) as proof of (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps2) b)
% 185.64/185.96 Found eq_ref00:=(eq_ref0 b):(((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) b) b)
% 185.64/185.96 Found (eq_ref0 b) as proof of (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) b) eps4)
% 185.64/185.96 Found ((eq_ref ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) b) as proof of (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) b) eps4)
% 185.64/185.96 Found ((eq_ref ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) b) as proof of (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) b) eps4)
% 185.64/185.96 Found ((eq_ref ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) b) as proof of (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) b) eps4)
% 185.64/185.96 Found eta_expansion000:=(eta_expansion00 eps2):(((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps2) (fun (x:(Prop->Prop))=> (eps2 x)))
% 185.64/185.96 Found (eta_expansion00 eps2) as proof of (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps2) b)
% 185.64/185.96 Found ((eta_expansion0 Prop) eps2) as proof of (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps2) b)
% 185.64/185.96 Found (((eta_expansion (Prop->Prop)) Prop) eps2) as proof of (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps2) b)
% 185.64/185.96 Found (((eta_expansion (Prop->Prop)) Prop) eps2) as proof of (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps2) b)
% 185.64/185.96 Found (((eta_expansion (Prop->Prop)) Prop) eps2) as proof of (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps2) b)
% 185.64/185.96 Found eq_ref00:=(eq_ref0 b):(((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) b) b)
% 185.64/185.96 Found (eq_ref0 b) as proof of (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) b) eps4)
% 185.64/185.96 Found ((eq_ref ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) b) as proof of (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) b) eps4)
% 189.20/189.58 Found ((eq_ref ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) b) as proof of (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) b) eps4)
% 189.20/189.58 Found ((eq_ref ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) b) as proof of (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) b) eps4)
% 189.20/189.58 Found eta_expansion000:=(eta_expansion00 eps1):(((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps1) (fun (x:(Prop->Prop))=> (eps1 x)))
% 189.20/189.58 Found (eta_expansion00 eps1) as proof of (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps1) b)
% 189.20/189.58 Found ((eta_expansion0 Prop) eps1) as proof of (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps1) b)
% 189.20/189.58 Found (((eta_expansion (Prop->Prop)) Prop) eps1) as proof of (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps1) b)
% 189.20/189.58 Found (((eta_expansion (Prop->Prop)) Prop) eps1) as proof of (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps1) b)
% 189.20/189.58 Found (((eta_expansion (Prop->Prop)) Prop) eps1) as proof of (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps1) b)
% 189.20/189.58 Found eq_ref000:=(eq_ref00 P):((P eps1)->(P eps1))
% 189.20/189.58 Found (eq_ref00 P) as proof of (P0 eps1)
% 189.20/189.58 Found ((eq_ref0 eps1) P) as proof of (P0 eps1)
% 189.20/189.58 Found (((eq_ref ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps1) P) as proof of (P0 eps1)
% 189.20/189.58 Found (((eq_ref ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps1) P) as proof of (P0 eps1)
% 189.20/189.58 Found eq_ref000:=(eq_ref00 P):((P eps3)->(P eps3))
% 189.20/189.58 Found (eq_ref00 P) as proof of (P0 eps3)
% 189.20/189.58 Found ((eq_ref0 eps3) P) as proof of (P0 eps3)
% 189.20/189.58 Found (((eq_ref ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps3) P) as proof of (P0 eps3)
% 189.20/189.58 Found (((eq_ref ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps3) P) as proof of (P0 eps3)
% 189.20/189.58 Found eq_ref000:=(eq_ref00 P):((P eps3)->(P eps3))
% 189.20/189.58 Found (eq_ref00 P) as proof of (P0 eps3)
% 189.20/189.58 Found ((eq_ref0 eps3) P) as proof of (P0 eps3)
% 189.20/189.58 Found (((eq_ref ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps3) P) as proof of (P0 eps3)
% 189.20/189.58 Found (((eq_ref ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps3) P) as proof of (P0 eps3)
% 189.20/189.58 Found eq_ref000:=(eq_ref00 P):((P eps1)->(P eps1))
% 189.20/189.58 Found (eq_ref00 P) as proof of (P0 eps1)
% 189.20/189.58 Found ((eq_ref0 eps1) P) as proof of (P0 eps1)
% 189.20/189.58 Found (((eq_ref ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps1) P) as proof of (P0 eps1)
% 189.20/189.58 Found (((eq_ref ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps1) P) as proof of (P0 eps1)
% 189.20/189.58 Found eq_ref000:=(eq_ref00 P):((P eps1)->(P eps1))
% 189.20/189.58 Found (eq_ref00 P) as proof of (P0 eps1)
% 189.20/189.58 Found ((eq_ref0 eps1) P) as proof of (P0 eps1)
% 189.20/189.58 Found (((eq_ref ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps1) P) as proof of (P0 eps1)
% 189.20/189.58 Found (((eq_ref ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps1) P) as proof of (P0 eps1)
% 189.20/189.58 Found eq_ref000:=(eq_ref00 P):((P eps2)->(P eps2))
% 189.20/189.58 Found (eq_ref00 P) as proof of (P0 eps2)
% 189.20/189.58 Found ((eq_ref0 eps2) P) as proof of (P0 eps2)
% 189.20/189.58 Found (((eq_ref ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps2) P) as proof of (P0 eps2)
% 189.20/189.58 Found (((eq_ref ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps2) P) as proof of (P0 eps2)
% 189.20/189.58 Found eq_ref000:=(eq_ref00 P):((P eps2)->(P eps2))
% 189.20/189.58 Found (eq_ref00 P) as proof of (P0 eps2)
% 189.20/189.58 Found ((eq_ref0 eps2) P) as proof of (P0 eps2)
% 189.20/189.58 Found (((eq_ref ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps2) P) as proof of (P0 eps2)
% 189.20/189.58 Found (((eq_ref ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps2) P) as proof of (P0 eps2)
% 189.20/189.58 Found eq_ref00:=(eq_ref0 b):(((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) b) b)
% 189.20/189.58 Found (eq_ref0 b) as proof of (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) b) eps4)
% 189.20/189.58 Found ((eq_ref ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) b) as proof of (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) b) eps4)
% 189.20/189.58 Found ((eq_ref ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) b) as proof of (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) b) eps4)
% 189.20/189.58 Found ((eq_ref ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) b) as proof of (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) b) eps4)
% 189.20/189.58 Found eq_ref00:=(eq_ref0 eps3):(((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps3) eps3)
% 189.20/189.58 Found (eq_ref0 eps3) as proof of (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps3) b)
% 189.20/189.58 Found ((eq_ref ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps3) as proof of (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps3) b)
% 189.20/189.58 Found ((eq_ref ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps3) as proof of (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps3) b)
% 189.20/189.58 Found ((eq_ref ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps3) as proof of (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps3) b)
% 189.20/189.58 Found eq_ref00:=(eq_ref0 b):(((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) b) b)
% 189.20/189.58 Found (eq_ref0 b) as proof of (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) b) eps2)
% 189.20/189.58 Found ((eq_ref ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) b) as proof of (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) b) eps2)
% 189.20/189.58 Found ((eq_ref ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) b) as proof of (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) b) eps2)
% 189.20/189.58 Found ((eq_ref ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) b) as proof of (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) b) eps2)
% 189.20/189.58 Found eta_expansion000:=(eta_expansion00 eps1):(((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps1) (fun (x:(Prop->Prop))=> (eps1 x)))
% 189.20/189.58 Found (eta_expansion00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------