TSTP Solution File: SYO527^1 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : SYO527^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 09:06:05 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.13s 0.38s
% Output   : Refutation 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   26 (  17 unt;   8 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   53 (  13 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   82 (   9   ~;   0   |;   0   &;  64   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Number of types       :    3 (   2 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   13 (  13   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    9 (   4 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%                                         (   3  !!;   5  ??;   0 @@+;   0 @@-)
%            Number of variables   :   28 (   6   ^  13   !;   8   ?;  28   :)
%                                         (   1  !>;   0  ?*;   0  @-;   0  @+)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(type_def_6,type,
    b: $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(func_def_1,type,
    b: $tType ).

thf(func_def_2,type,
    r: a > b > $o ).

thf(func_def_11,type,
    sK0: ( a > b ) > a ).

thf(func_def_13,type,
    sK2: a > b ).

thf(func_def_14,type,
    ph3: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(f22,plain,
    $false,
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f20]) ).

thf(f20,plain,
    $true != $true,
    inference(superposition,[],[f12,f17]) ).

thf(f17,plain,
    ! [X1: a] :
      ( ( r @ X1 @ ( sK2 @ X1 ) )
      = $true ),
    inference(sigma_clausification,[],[f16]) ).

thf(f16,plain,
    ! [X1: a] :
      ( ( ?? @ b @ ( r @ X1 ) )
      = $true ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f15]) ).

thf(f15,plain,
    ! [X1: a] :
      ( $true
      = ( ^ [Y0: a] : ( ?? @ b @ ( r @ Y0 ) )
        @ X1 ) ),
    inference(pi_clausification,[],[f14]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ( ( !! @ a
      @ ^ [Y0: a] : ( ?? @ b @ ( r @ Y0 ) ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f13]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ( ( !! @ a
      @ ^ [Y0: a] :
          ( ?? @ b
          @ ^ [Y1: b] : ( r @ Y0 @ Y1 ) ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ( ( !! @ a
      @ ^ [Y0: a] :
          ( ?? @ b
          @ ^ [Y1: b] : ( r @ Y0 @ Y1 ) ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f5]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ! [X0: a] :
    ? [X1: b] : ( r @ X0 @ X1 ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0: a] :
    ? [X1: b] : ( r @ X0 @ X1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rtotal) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ! [X0: a > b] :
      ( ( r @ ( sK0 @ X0 ) @ ( X0 @ ( sK0 @ X0 ) ) )
     != $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ! [X0: a > b] :
      ( ( r @ ( sK0 @ X0 ) @ ( X0 @ ( sK0 @ X0 ) ) )
     != $true ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f9,f10]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ! [X0: a > b] :
      ( ? [X1: a] :
          ( ( r @ X1 @ ( X0 @ X1 ) )
         != $true )
     => ( ( r @ ( sK0 @ X0 ) @ ( X0 @ ( sK0 @ X0 ) ) )
       != $true ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ! [X0: a > b] :
    ? [X1: a] :
      ( ( r @ X1 @ ( X0 @ X1 ) )
     != $true ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ~ ? [X0: a > b] :
      ! [X1: a] :
        ( ( r @ X1 @ ( X0 @ X1 ) )
        = $true ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f7]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ~ ? [X0: a > b] :
      ! [X1: a] : ( r @ X1 @ ( X0 @ X1 ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f3]) ).

thf(f3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X2: a > b] :
      ! [X0: a] : ( r @ X0 @ ( X2 @ X0 ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f2]) ).

thf(f2,conjecture,
    ? [X2: a > b] :
    ! [X0: a] : ( r @ X0 @ ( X2 @ X0 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',skolem) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : SYO527^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.12/0.14  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime   : Mon May 20 10:22:52 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.13/0.35  This is a TH0_THM_NEQ_NAR problem
% 0.13/0.35  Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.37  % (8564)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/4Mi)
% 0.13/0.37  % (8564)First to succeed.
% 0.13/0.37  % (8566)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.13/0.38  % (8564)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.13/0.38  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.13/0.38  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.13/0.38  % (8564)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.38  % (8564)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.13/0.38  % (8564)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  % (8564)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.13/0.38  % (8564)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.13/0.38  % (8564)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.13/0.38  % (8564)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.38  % (8564)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.38  % (8562)Success in time 0.018 s
% 0.13/0.38  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------