TSTP Solution File: SYO517^1 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : SYO517^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 09:05:37 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.14s 0.38s
% Output : Refutation 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SYO517^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.14/0.14 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Mon May 20 09:29:23 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.35 This is a TH0_THM_EQU_NAR problem
% 0.14/0.36 Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.38 % (19932)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/183Mi)
% 0.14/0.38 % (19933)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/4Mi)
% 0.14/0.38 % (19934)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/27Mi)
% 0.14/0.38 % (19935)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.14/0.38 % (19938)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/18Mi)
% 0.14/0.38 % (19939)lrs+10_1:1_bet=on:cnfonf=off:fd=off:hud=5:inj=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/3Mi)
% 0.14/0.38 % (19935)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.14/0.38 % (19935)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38 % (19935)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.38 % (19935)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.14/0.38 % (19935)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 % (19935)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.14/0.38 % (19935)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.14/0.38 % (19935)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.14/0.38 % (19935)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38 % (19935)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38 % (19937)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/275Mi)
% 0.14/0.38 % (19936)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.14/0.38 % (19936)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.14/0.38 % (19936)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38 % (19936)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.38 % (19936)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.14/0.38 % (19936)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 % (19936)Memory used [KB]: 895
% 0.14/0.38 % (19936)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.14/0.38 % (19939)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.14/0.38 % (19939)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38 % (19939)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.38 % (19936)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.14/0.38 % (19936)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38 % (19936)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38 % (19939)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.14/0.38 % (19939)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 % (19939)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.14/0.38 % (19939)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.14/0.38 % (19939)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.14/0.38 % (19939)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38 % (19939)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38 % (19934)First to succeed.
% 0.14/0.38 % (19933)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.14/0.38 % (19933)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38 % (19933)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.38 % (19933)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.14/0.38 % (19933)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 % (19933)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.14/0.38 % (19937)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.14/0.38 % (19937)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38 % (19937)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.38 % (19933)Time elapsed: 0.006 s
% 0.14/0.38 % (19933)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.14/0.38 % (19933)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38 % (19933)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38 % (19937)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 % (19937)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.14/0.38 % (19937)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.14/0.38 % (19937)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.14/0.38 % (19937)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38 % (19937)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38 % (19934)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.14/0.38 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.38 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.38 thf(func_def_1, type, vEPSILON: !>[X0: $tType]:((X0 > $o) > X0)).
% 0.14/0.38 thf(func_def_4, type, sK0: (($i > $o) > $i) > $i > $o).
% 0.14/0.38 thf(func_def_5, type, sK1: (($i > $o) > $i) > $i).
% 0.14/0.38 thf(func_def_7, type, ph3: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)).
% 0.14/0.38 thf(f29,plain,(
% 0.14/0.38 $false),
% 0.14/0.38 inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f21])).
% 0.14/0.38 thf(f21,plain,(
% 0.14/0.38 ($false = $true)),
% 0.14/0.38 inference(superposition,[],[f19,f11])).
% 0.14/0.38 thf(f11,plain,(
% 0.14/0.38 ( ! [X0 : ($i > $o) > $i] : (((sK0 @ X0 @ (sK1 @ X0)) = $true)) )),
% 0.14/0.38 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9])).
% 0.14/0.38 thf(f9,plain,(
% 0.14/0.38 ! [X0 : ($i > $o) > $i] : (((sK0 @ X0 @ (X0 @ (sK0 @ X0))) != $true) & (((sK0 @ X0 @ (sK1 @ X0)) = $true) & ! [X3] : (((sK1 @ X0) = X3) | ((sK0 @ X0 @ X3) != $true))))),
% 0.14/0.38 inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f6,f8,f7])).
% 0.14/0.38 thf(f7,plain,(
% 0.14/0.38 ! [X0 : ($i > $o) > $i] : (? [X1 : $i > $o] : (((X1 @ (X0 @ X1)) != $true) & ? [X2] : (((X1 @ X2) = $true) & ! [X3] : ((X2 = X3) | ((X1 @ X3) != $true)))) => (((sK0 @ X0 @ (X0 @ (sK0 @ X0))) != $true) & ? [X2] : (($true = (sK0 @ X0 @ X2)) & ! [X3] : ((X2 = X3) | ((sK0 @ X0 @ X3) != $true)))))),
% 0.14/0.38 introduced(choice_axiom,[])).
% 0.14/0.38 thf(f8,plain,(
% 0.14/0.38 ! [X0 : ($i > $o) > $i] : (? [X2] : (($true = (sK0 @ X0 @ X2)) & ! [X3] : ((X2 = X3) | ((sK0 @ X0 @ X3) != $true))) => (((sK0 @ X0 @ (sK1 @ X0)) = $true) & ! [X3] : (((sK1 @ X0) = X3) | ((sK0 @ X0 @ X3) != $true))))),
% 0.14/0.38 introduced(choice_axiom,[])).
% 0.14/0.38 thf(f6,plain,(
% 0.14/0.38 ! [X0 : ($i > $o) > $i] : ? [X1 : $i > $o] : (((X1 @ (X0 @ X1)) != $true) & ? [X2] : (((X1 @ X2) = $true) & ! [X3] : ((X2 = X3) | ((X1 @ X3) != $true))))),
% 0.14/0.38 inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f5])).
% 0.14/0.38 thf(f5,plain,(
% 0.14/0.38 ~? [X0 : ($i > $o) > $i] : ! [X1 : $i > $o] : (? [X2] : (((X1 @ X2) = $true) & ! [X3] : (((X1 @ X3) = $true) => (X2 = X3))) => ((X1 @ (X0 @ X1)) = $true))),
% 0.14/0.38 inference(fool_elimination,[],[f4])).
% 0.14/0.38 thf(f4,plain,(
% 0.14/0.38 ~? [X0 : ($i > $o) > $i] : ! [X1 : $i > $o] : (? [X2] : ((X1 @ X2) & ! [X3] : ((X1 @ X3) => (X2 = X3))) => (X1 @ (X0 @ X1)))),
% 0.14/0.38 inference(rectify,[],[f2])).
% 0.14/0.38 thf(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 0.14/0.38 ~? [X0 : ($i > $o) > $i] : ! [X1 : $i > $o] : (? [X2] : ((X1 @ X2) & ! [X3] : ((X1 @ X3) => (X2 = X3))) => (X1 @ (X0 @ X1)))),
% 0.14/0.38 inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1])).
% 0.14/0.38 thf(f1,conjecture,(
% 0.14/0.38 ? [X0 : ($i > $o) > $i] : ! [X1 : $i > $o] : (? [X2] : ((X1 @ X2) & ! [X3] : ((X1 @ X3) => (X2 = X3))) => (X1 @ (X0 @ X1)))),
% 0.14/0.38 file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',descri)).
% 0.14/0.38 thf(f19,plain,(
% 0.14/0.38 ( ! [X0 : $i] : (($false = (sK0 @ @@+ @ $i @ X0))) )),
% 0.14/0.38 inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f17])).
% 0.14/0.38 thf(f17,plain,(
% 0.14/0.38 ( ! [X0 : $i] : (($false = (sK0 @ @@+ @ $i @ X0)) | ($true != $true)) )),
% 0.14/0.38 inference(superposition,[],[f12,f14])).
% 0.14/0.38 thf(f14,plain,(
% 0.14/0.38 ( ! [X0 : ($i > $o) > $i,X1 : $i] : (((sK0 @ X0 @ (@@+ @ $i @ (sK0 @ X0))) = $true) | ((sK0 @ X0 @ X1) = $false)) )),
% 0.14/0.38 introduced(choice_axiom,[])).
% 0.14/0.38 thf(f12,plain,(
% 0.14/0.38 ( ! [X0 : ($i > $o) > $i] : (((sK0 @ X0 @ (X0 @ (sK0 @ X0))) != $true)) )),
% 0.14/0.38 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9])).
% 0.14/0.38 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.38 % (19934)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38 % (19934)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.38 % (19934)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 % (19934)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.14/0.38 % (19934)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.14/0.38 % (19934)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.14/0.38 % (19934)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38 % (19934)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38 % (19931)Success in time 0.016 s
% 0.14/0.38 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------