TSTP Solution File: SYO470^6 by Satallax---3.5

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Satallax---3.5
% Problem  : SYO470^6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : satallax -E eprover-ho -P picomus -M modes -p tstp -t %d %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 19:32:44 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.95s 1.29s
% Output   : Proof 0.95s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11  % Problem  : SYO470^6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : satallax -E eprover-ho -P picomus -M modes -p tstp -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.32  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.32  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.32  % DateTime : Fri Jul  8 18:34:51 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.95/1.29  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.95/1.29  % Mode: mode213
% 0.95/1.29  % Inferences: 6685
% 0.95/1.29  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.95/1.29  thf(ty_p, type, p : ($i>$o)).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(ty_eigen__2, type, eigen__2 : $i).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(ty_eigen__1, type, eigen__1 : $i).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(ty_eigen__0, type, eigen__0 : $i).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(ty_eigen__3, type, eigen__3 : $i).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(ty_rel_s5, type, rel_s5 : ($i>$i>$o)).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(sP1,plain,sP1 <=> ((rel_s5 @ eigen__0) @ eigen__3),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP1])])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(sP2,plain,sP2 <=> (![X1:$i]:(![X2:$i]:((~((((rel_s5 @ eigen__2) @ X1) => (~(((rel_s5 @ X1) @ X2)))))) => ((rel_s5 @ eigen__2) @ X2)))),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP2])])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(sP3,plain,sP3 <=> (((rel_s5 @ eigen__0) @ eigen__2) => ((rel_s5 @ eigen__2) @ eigen__0)),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP3])])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(sP4,plain,sP4 <=> (![X1:$i]:(![X2:$i]:(![X3:$i]:((~((((rel_s5 @ X1) @ X2) => (~(((rel_s5 @ X2) @ X3)))))) => ((rel_s5 @ X1) @ X3))))),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP4])])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(sP5,plain,sP5 <=> ((rel_s5 @ eigen__0) @ eigen__0),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP5])])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(sP6,plain,sP6 <=> (sP5 => (![X1:$i]:(((rel_s5 @ eigen__0) @ X1) => (~((![X2:$i]:(((rel_s5 @ X1) @ X2) => (p @ X2)))))))),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP6])])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(sP7,plain,sP7 <=> (((rel_s5 @ eigen__2) @ eigen__3) => (p @ eigen__3)),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP7])])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(sP8,plain,sP8 <=> (![X1:$i]:(((rel_s5 @ eigen__0) @ X1) => (~((![X2:$i]:(((rel_s5 @ X1) @ X2) => (p @ X2))))))),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP8])])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(sP9,plain,sP9 <=> ((rel_s5 @ eigen__0) @ eigen__1),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP9])])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(sP10,plain,sP10 <=> (sP9 => (~(((rel_s5 @ eigen__1) @ eigen__2)))),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP10])])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(sP11,plain,sP11 <=> (![X1:$i]:(![X2:$i]:(((rel_s5 @ X1) @ X2) => ((rel_s5 @ X2) @ X1)))),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP11])])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(sP12,plain,sP12 <=> (((rel_s5 @ eigen__2) @ eigen__0) => (~(sP1))),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP12])])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(sP13,plain,sP13 <=> (![X1:$i]:(((rel_s5 @ eigen__0) @ X1) => (p @ X1))),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP13])])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(sP14,plain,sP14 <=> (![X1:$i]:((~((((rel_s5 @ eigen__2) @ eigen__0) => (~(((rel_s5 @ eigen__0) @ X1)))))) => ((rel_s5 @ eigen__2) @ X1))),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP14])])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(sP15,plain,sP15 <=> (sP5 => (~(sP13))),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP15])])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(sP16,plain,sP16 <=> ((rel_s5 @ eigen__2) @ eigen__3),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP16])])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(sP17,plain,sP17 <=> ((rel_s5 @ eigen__0) @ eigen__2),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP17])])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(sP18,plain,sP18 <=> (![X1:$i]:((~((sP9 => (~(((rel_s5 @ eigen__1) @ X1)))))) => ((rel_s5 @ eigen__0) @ X1))),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP18])])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(sP19,plain,sP19 <=> ((rel_s5 @ eigen__2) @ eigen__0),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP19])])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(sP20,plain,sP20 <=> (![X1:$i]:(((rel_s5 @ eigen__2) @ X1) => (p @ X1))),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP20])])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(sP21,plain,sP21 <=> ((~(sP10)) => sP17),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP21])])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(sP22,plain,sP22 <=> (p @ eigen__3),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP22])])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(sP23,plain,sP23 <=> (![X1:$i]:((rel_s5 @ X1) @ X1)),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP23])])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(sP24,plain,sP24 <=> (![X1:$i]:(((rel_s5 @ eigen__0) @ X1) => (![X2:$i]:(((rel_s5 @ X1) @ X2) => (~((![X3:$i]:(((rel_s5 @ X2) @ X3) => (p @ X3))))))))),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP24])])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(sP25,plain,sP25 <=> (![X1:$i]:(((rel_s5 @ eigen__0) @ X1) => ((rel_s5 @ X1) @ eigen__0))),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP25])])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(sP26,plain,sP26 <=> ((rel_s5 @ eigen__1) @ eigen__2),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP26])])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(sP27,plain,sP27 <=> (![X1:$i]:(![X2:$i]:((~((((rel_s5 @ eigen__0) @ X1) => (~(((rel_s5 @ X1) @ X2)))))) => ((rel_s5 @ eigen__0) @ X2)))),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP27])])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(sP28,plain,sP28 <=> ((~(sP12)) => sP16),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP28])])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(def_meq_ind,definition,(meq_ind = (^[X1:mu]:(^[X2:mu]:(^[X3:$i]:(X1 = X2)))))).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(def_meq_prop,definition,(meq_prop = (^[X1:$i>$o]:(^[X2:$i>$o]:(^[X3:$i]:((X1 @ X3) = (X2 @ X3))))))).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(def_mnot,definition,(mnot = (^[X1:$i>$o]:(^[X2:$i]:(~((X1 @ X2))))))).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(def_mor,definition,(mor = (^[X1:$i>$o]:(^[X2:$i>$o]:(^[X3:$i]:((~((X1 @ X3))) => (X2 @ X3))))))).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(def_mand,definition,(mand = (^[X1:$i>$o]:(^[X2:$i>$o]:(mnot @ ((mor @ (mnot @ X1)) @ (mnot @ X2))))))).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(def_mimplies,definition,(mimplies = (^[X1:$i>$o]:(mor @ (mnot @ X1))))).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(def_mimplied,definition,(mimplied = (^[X1:$i>$o]:(^[X2:$i>$o]:((mor @ (mnot @ X2)) @ X1))))).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(def_mequiv,definition,(mequiv = (^[X1:$i>$o]:(^[X2:$i>$o]:((mand @ ((mimplies @ X1) @ X2)) @ ((mimplies @ X2) @ X1)))))).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(def_mxor,definition,(mxor = (^[X1:$i>$o]:(^[X2:$i>$o]:(mnot @ ((mequiv @ X1) @ X2)))))).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(def_mforall_ind,definition,(mforall_ind = (^[X1:mu>$i>$o]:(^[X2:$i]:(![X3:mu]:((X1 @ X3) @ X2)))))).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(def_mforall_prop,definition,(mforall_prop = (^[X1:($i>$o)>$i>$o]:(^[X2:$i]:(![X3:$i>$o]:((X1 @ X3) @ X2)))))).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(def_mexists_ind,definition,(mexists_ind = (^[X1:mu>$i>$o]:(mnot @ (mforall_ind @ (^[X2:mu]:(mnot @ (X1 @ X2)))))))).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(def_mexists_prop,definition,(mexists_prop = (^[X1:($i>$o)>$i>$o]:(mnot @ (mforall_prop @ (^[X2:$i>$o]:(mnot @ (X1 @ X2)))))))).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(def_mtrue,definition,(mtrue = (^[X1:$i]:(~($false))))).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(def_mfalse,definition,(mfalse = (mnot @ mtrue))).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(def_mbox,definition,(mbox = (^[X1:$i>$i>$o]:(^[X2:$i>$o]:(^[X3:$i]:(![X4:$i]:(((X1 @ X3) @ X4) => (X2 @ X4)))))))).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(def_mdia,definition,(mdia = (^[X1:$i>$i>$o]:(^[X2:$i>$o]:(mnot @ ((mbox @ X1) @ (mnot @ X2))))))).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(def_mreflexive,definition,(mreflexive = (^[X1:$i>$i>$o]:(![X2:$i]:((X1 @ X2) @ X2))))).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(def_msymmetric,definition,(msymmetric = (^[X1:$i>$i>$o]:(![X2:$i]:(![X3:$i]:(((X1 @ X2) @ X3) => ((X1 @ X3) @ X2))))))).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(def_mserial,definition,(mserial = (^[X1:$i>$i>$o]:(![X2:$i]:(~((![X3:$i]:(~(((X1 @ X2) @ X3)))))))))).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(def_mtransitive,definition,(mtransitive = (^[X1:$i>$i>$o]:(![X2:$i]:(![X3:$i]:(![X4:$i]:((~((((X1 @ X2) @ X3) => (~(((X1 @ X3) @ X4)))))) => ((X1 @ X2) @ X4)))))))).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(def_meuclidean,definition,(meuclidean = (^[X1:$i>$i>$o]:(![X2:$i]:(![X3:$i]:(![X4:$i]:((~((((X1 @ X2) @ X3) => (~(((X1 @ X2) @ X4)))))) => ((X1 @ X3) @ X4)))))))).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(def_mpartially_functional,definition,(mpartially_functional = (^[X1:$i>$i>$o]:(![X2:$i]:(![X3:$i]:(![X4:$i]:((~((((X1 @ X2) @ X3) => (~(((X1 @ X2) @ X4)))))) => (X3 = X4)))))))).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(def_mfunctional,definition,(mfunctional = (^[X1:$i>$i>$o]:(![X2:$i]:(~((![X3:$i]:(((X1 @ X2) @ X3) => (~((![X4:$i]:(((X1 @ X2) @ X4) => (X3 = X4))))))))))))).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(def_mweakly_dense,definition,(mweakly_dense = (^[X1:$i>$i>$o]:(![X2:$i]:(![X3:$i]:(![X4:$i]:(((X1 @ X2) @ X3) => (~((![X5:$i]:(((X1 @ X2) @ X5) => (~(((X1 @ X5) @ X3)))))))))))))).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(def_mweakly_connected,definition,(mweakly_connected = (^[X1:$i>$i>$o]:(![X2:$i]:(![X3:$i]:(![X4:$i]:((~((((X1 @ X2) @ X3) => (~(((X1 @ X2) @ X4)))))) => ((~(((~(((X1 @ X3) @ X4))) => (X3 = X4)))) => ((X1 @ X4) @ X3))))))))).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(def_mweakly_directed,definition,(mweakly_directed = (^[X1:$i>$i>$o]:(![X2:$i]:(![X3:$i]:(![X4:$i]:((~((((X1 @ X2) @ X3) => (~(((X1 @ X2) @ X4)))))) => (~((![X5:$i]:(((X1 @ X3) @ X5) => (~(((X1 @ X4) @ X5)))))))))))))).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(def_mvalid,definition,(mvalid = (!!))).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(def_minvalid,definition,(minvalid = (^[X1:$i>$o]:(![X2:$i]:(~((X1 @ X2))))))).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(def_msatisfiable,definition,(msatisfiable = (^[X1:$i>$o]:(~((![X2:$i]:(~((X1 @ X2))))))))).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(def_mcountersatisfiable,definition,(mcountersatisfiable = (^[X1:$i>$o]:(~(((!!) @ X1)))))).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(def_mbox_s5,definition,(mbox_s5 = (^[X1:$i>$o]:(^[X2:$i]:(![X3:$i]:(((rel_s5 @ X2) @ X3) => (X1 @ X3))))))).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(def_mdia_s5,definition,(mdia_s5 = (^[X1:$i>$o]:(mnot @ (mbox_s5 @ (mnot @ X1)))))).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(prove,conjecture,(![X1:$i]:(~(((~((~(((~((~((~((![X2:$i]:(((rel_s5 @ X1) @ X2) => (~((~((![X3:$i]:(((rel_s5 @ X2) @ X3) => (~((![X4:$i]:(((rel_s5 @ X3) @ X4) => (p @ X4))))))))))))))))))) => (![X2:$i]:(((rel_s5 @ X1) @ X2) => (p @ X2)))))))) => (~(((~((~((![X2:$i]:(((rel_s5 @ X1) @ X2) => (p @ X2))))))) => (~((![X2:$i]:(((rel_s5 @ X1) @ X2) => (~((~((![X3:$i]:(((rel_s5 @ X2) @ X3) => (~((![X4:$i]:(((rel_s5 @ X3) @ X4) => (p @ X4))))))))))))))))))))))).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(h0,negated_conjecture,(~((![X1:$i]:(~((((~((![X2:$i]:(((rel_s5 @ X1) @ X2) => (![X3:$i]:(((rel_s5 @ X2) @ X3) => (~((![X4:$i]:(((rel_s5 @ X3) @ X4) => (p @ X4))))))))))) => (![X2:$i]:(((rel_s5 @ X1) @ X2) => (p @ X2)))) => (~(((![X2:$i]:(((rel_s5 @ X1) @ X2) => (p @ X2))) => (~((![X2:$i]:(((rel_s5 @ X1) @ X2) => (![X3:$i]:(((rel_s5 @ X2) @ X3) => (~((![X4:$i]:(((rel_s5 @ X3) @ X4) => (p @ X4)))))))))))))))))))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(h1,assumption,(((~(sP24)) => sP13) => (~((sP13 => (~(sP24)))))),introduced(assumption,[])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(h2,assumption,(~(((~(sP24)) => sP13))),introduced(assumption,[])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(h3,assumption,(~((sP13 => (~(sP24))))),introduced(assumption,[])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(h4,assumption,(~(sP24)),introduced(assumption,[])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(h5,assumption,(~(sP13)),introduced(assumption,[])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(h6,assumption,(~((sP9 => (![X1:$i]:(((rel_s5 @ eigen__1) @ X1) => (~((![X2:$i]:(((rel_s5 @ X1) @ X2) => (p @ X2)))))))))),introduced(assumption,[])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(h7,assumption,sP9,introduced(assumption,[])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(h8,assumption,(~((![X1:$i]:(((rel_s5 @ eigen__1) @ X1) => (~((![X2:$i]:(((rel_s5 @ X1) @ X2) => (p @ X2))))))))),introduced(assumption,[])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(h9,assumption,(~((sP26 => (~(sP20))))),introduced(assumption,[])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(h10,assumption,sP26,introduced(assumption,[])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(h11,assumption,sP20,introduced(assumption,[])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(h12,assumption,(~((sP1 => sP22))),introduced(assumption,[])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(h13,assumption,sP1,introduced(assumption,[])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(h14,assumption,(~(sP22)),introduced(assumption,[])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(1,plain,(~(sP11) | sP25),inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(2,plain,(~(sP25) | sP3),inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(3,plain,((~(sP3) | ~(sP17)) | sP19),inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(4,plain,(~(sP4) | sP27),inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(5,plain,(~(sP27) | sP18),inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(6,plain,(~(sP18) | sP21),inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(7,plain,((~(sP21) | sP10) | sP17),inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(8,plain,((~(sP10) | ~(sP9)) | ~(sP26)),inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(9,plain,(~(sP4) | sP2),inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(10,plain,(~(sP2) | sP14),inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(11,plain,(~(sP14) | sP28),inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(12,plain,((~(sP28) | sP12) | sP16),inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(13,plain,((~(sP12) | ~(sP19)) | ~(sP1)),inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(14,plain,(~(sP20) | sP7),inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(15,plain,((~(sP7) | ~(sP16)) | sP22),inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(a2,axiom,(mtransitive @ rel_s5)).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(16,plain,sP4,inference(preprocess,[status(thm)],[a2]).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(a3,axiom,(msymmetric @ rel_s5)).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(17,plain,sP11,inference(preprocess,[status(thm)],[a3]).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(18,plain,$false,inference(prop_unsat,[status(thm),assumptions([h13,h14,h12,h10,h11,h9,h7,h8,h6,h4,h5,h2,h1,h0])],[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,h7,h10,h11,h13,h14])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(19,plain,$false,inference(tab_negimp,[status(thm),assumptions([h12,h10,h11,h9,h7,h8,h6,h4,h5,h2,h1,h0]),tab_negimp(discharge,[h13,h14])],[h12,18,h13,h14])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(20,plain,$false,inference(tab_negall,[status(thm),assumptions([h10,h11,h9,h7,h8,h6,h4,h5,h2,h1,h0]),tab_negall(discharge,[h12]),tab_negall(eigenvar,eigen__3)],[h5,19,h12])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(21,plain,$false,inference(tab_negimp,[status(thm),assumptions([h9,h7,h8,h6,h4,h5,h2,h1,h0]),tab_negimp(discharge,[h10,h11])],[h9,20,h10,h11])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(22,plain,$false,inference(tab_negall,[status(thm),assumptions([h7,h8,h6,h4,h5,h2,h1,h0]),tab_negall(discharge,[h9]),tab_negall(eigenvar,eigen__2)],[h8,21,h9])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(23,plain,$false,inference(tab_negimp,[status(thm),assumptions([h6,h4,h5,h2,h1,h0]),tab_negimp(discharge,[h7,h8])],[h6,22,h7,h8])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(24,plain,$false,inference(tab_negall,[status(thm),assumptions([h4,h5,h2,h1,h0]),tab_negall(discharge,[h6]),tab_negall(eigenvar,eigen__1)],[h4,23,h6])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(25,plain,$false,inference(tab_negimp,[status(thm),assumptions([h2,h1,h0]),tab_negimp(discharge,[h4,h5])],[h2,24,h4,h5])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(h15,assumption,sP13,introduced(assumption,[])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(h16,assumption,sP24,introduced(assumption,[])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(26,plain,(~(sP8) | sP15),inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(27,plain,((~(sP15) | ~(sP5)) | ~(sP13)),inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(28,plain,(~(sP23) | sP5),inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(29,plain,(~(sP24) | sP6),inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(30,plain,((~(sP6) | ~(sP5)) | sP8),inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(a1,axiom,(mreflexive @ rel_s5)).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(31,plain,sP23,inference(preprocess,[status(thm)],[a1]).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(32,plain,$false,inference(prop_unsat,[status(thm),assumptions([h15,h16,h3,h1,h0])],[26,27,28,29,30,31,h15,h16])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(33,plain,$false,inference(tab_negimp,[status(thm),assumptions([h3,h1,h0]),tab_negimp(discharge,[h15,h16])],[h3,32,h15,h16])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(34,plain,$false,inference(tab_imp,[status(thm),assumptions([h1,h0]),tab_imp(discharge,[h2]),tab_imp(discharge,[h3])],[h1,25,33,h2,h3])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(35,plain,$false,inference(tab_negall,[status(thm),assumptions([h0]),tab_negall(discharge,[h1]),tab_negall(eigenvar,eigen__0)],[h0,34,h1])).
% 0.95/1.29  thf(0,theorem,(![X1:$i]:(~(((~((~(((~((~((~((![X2:$i]:(((rel_s5 @ X1) @ X2) => (~((~((![X3:$i]:(((rel_s5 @ X2) @ X3) => (~((![X4:$i]:(((rel_s5 @ X3) @ X4) => (p @ X4))))))))))))))))))) => (![X2:$i]:(((rel_s5 @ X1) @ X2) => (p @ X2)))))))) => (~(((~((~((![X2:$i]:(((rel_s5 @ X1) @ X2) => (p @ X2))))))) => (~((![X2:$i]:(((rel_s5 @ X1) @ X2) => (~((~((![X3:$i]:(((rel_s5 @ X2) @ X3) => (~((![X4:$i]:(((rel_s5 @ X3) @ X4) => (p @ X4)))))))))))))))))))))),inference(contra,[status(thm),contra(discharge,[h0])],[35,h0])).
% 0.95/1.29  % SZS output end Proof
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------