TSTP Solution File: SYO462^2 by Leo-III-SAT---1.7.12

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III-SAT---1.7.12
% Problem  : SYO462^2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_Leo-III %s %d

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 09:00:28 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 5.30s 2.66s
% Output   : Refutation 5.30s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   16
%            Number of leaves      :   17
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   49 (   8 unt;  12 typ;   4 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  136 (  11 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   13 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  236 (  57   ~;  55   |;   0   &; 124   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   14 (   5 avg)
%            Number of types       :    3 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   23 (  23   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   18 (  15 usr;  10 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   24 (   5   ^  19   !;   0   ?;  24   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(mu_type,type,
    mu: $tType ).

thf(mimplies_type,type,
    mimplies: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(mimplies_def,definition,
    ( mimplies
    = ( ^ [A: $i > $o] : ( mor @ ( mnot @ A ) ) ) ) ).

thf(mequiv_type,type,
    mequiv: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(mequiv_def,definition,
    ( mequiv
    = ( ^ [A: $i > $o,B: $i > $o] : ( mand @ ( mimplies @ A @ B ) @ ( mimplies @ B @ A ) ) ) ) ).

thf(mvalid_type,type,
    mvalid: ( $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(mvalid_def,definition,
    ( mvalid
    = ( '!' @ $i ) ) ).

thf(rel_d_type,type,
    rel_d: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(mbox_d_type,type,
    mbox_d: ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(mbox_d_def,definition,
    ( mbox_d
    = ( ^ [A: $i > $o,B: $i] :
        ! [C: $i] :
          ( ~ ( rel_d @ B @ C )
          | ( A @ C ) ) ) ) ).

thf(p_type,type,
    p: $i > $o ).

thf(q_type,type,
    q: $i > $o ).

thf(sk1_type,type,
    sk1: $i ).

thf(sk2_type,type,
    sk2: $o ).

thf(sk3_type,type,
    sk3: $i ).

thf(sk4_type,type,
    sk4: $i ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    mvalid @ ( mimplies @ ( mbox_d @ ( mequiv @ p @ q ) ) @ ( mequiv @ ( mbox_d @ p ) @ ( mbox_d @ q ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( mvalid @ ( mimplies @ ( mbox_d @ ( mequiv @ p @ q ) ) @ ( mequiv @ ( mbox_d @ p ) @ ( mbox_d @ q ) ) ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(4,plain,
    ~ ! [A: $i] :
        ( ~ ! [B: $i] :
              ( ~ ( rel_d @ A @ B )
              | ~ ( ~ ( ~ ( p @ B )
                      | ( q @ B ) )
                  | ~ ( ~ ( q @ B )
                      | ( p @ B ) ) ) )
        | ~ ( ~ ( ~ ! [B: $i] :
                      ( ~ ( rel_d @ A @ B )
                      | ( p @ B ) )
                | ! [B: $i] :
                    ( ~ ( rel_d @ A @ B )
                    | ( q @ B ) ) )
            | ~ ( ~ ! [B: $i] :
                      ( ~ ( rel_d @ A @ B )
                      | ( q @ B ) )
                | ! [B: $i] :
                    ( ~ ( rel_d @ A @ B )
                    | ( p @ B ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(8,plain,
    ( ( rel_d @ sk1 @ sk3 )
    | sk2 ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[4]) ).

thf(6,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( rel_d @ sk1 @ A )
      | ~ ( p @ A )
      | ( q @ A ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[4]) ).

thf(25,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( sk2
      | ~ ( p @ A )
      | ( q @ A )
      | ( ( rel_d @ sk1 @ sk3 )
       != ( rel_d @ sk1 @ A ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[8,6]) ).

thf(26,plain,
    ( sk2
    | ~ ( p @ sk3 )
    | ( q @ sk3 ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[25:[bind(A,$thf( sk3 ))]]) ).

thf(9,plain,
    ( ~ ( q @ sk3 )
    | sk2 ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[4]) ).

thf(64,plain,
    ( sk2
    | ~ ( p @ sk3 )
    | ( ( q @ sk3 )
     != ( q @ sk3 ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[26,9]) ).

thf(65,plain,
    ( sk2
    | ~ ( p @ sk3 ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[64:[]]) ).

thf(5,plain,
    ( ~ sk2
    | ( rel_d @ sk1 @ sk4 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[4]) ).

thf(12,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ sk2
      | ~ ( rel_d @ sk1 @ A )
      | ( q @ A ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[4]) ).

thf(13,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ sk2
      | ~ ( rel_d @ sk1 @ A )
      | ( q @ A ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

thf(17,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ sk2
      | ( q @ A )
      | ( ( rel_d @ sk1 @ sk4 )
       != ( rel_d @ sk1 @ A ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[5,13]) ).

thf(18,plain,
    ( ~ sk2
    | ( q @ sk4 ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[17:[bind(A,$thf( sk4 ))]]) ).

thf(7,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( rel_d @ sk1 @ A )
      | ~ ( q @ A )
      | ( p @ A ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[4]) ).

thf(31,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ sk2
      | ~ ( q @ A )
      | ( p @ A )
      | ( ( rel_d @ sk1 @ sk4 )
       != ( rel_d @ sk1 @ A ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[5,7]) ).

thf(32,plain,
    ( ~ sk2
    | ~ ( q @ sk4 )
    | ( p @ sk4 ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[31:[bind(A,$thf( sk4 ))]]) ).

thf(59,plain,
    ( ~ sk2
    | ( p @ sk4 )
    | ( ( q @ sk4 )
     != ( q @ sk4 ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[18,32]) ).

thf(60,plain,
    ( ~ sk2
    | ( p @ sk4 ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[59:[]]) ).

thf(10,plain,
    ( ~ sk2
    | ~ ( p @ sk4 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[4]) ).

thf(73,plain,
    ( ~ sk2
    | ( ( p @ sk4 )
     != ( p @ sk4 ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[60,10]) ).

thf(74,plain,
    ~ sk2,
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[73:[]]) ).

thf(82,plain,
    ( ( rel_d @ sk1 @ sk3 )
    | $false ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[8,74]) ).

thf(83,plain,
    rel_d @ sk1 @ sk3,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[82]) ).

thf(11,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( rel_d @ sk1 @ A )
      | ( p @ A )
      | sk2 ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[4]) ).

thf(14,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( rel_d @ sk1 @ A )
      | ( p @ A )
      | sk2 ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[11]) ).

thf(84,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( rel_d @ sk1 @ A )
      | ( p @ A )
      | $false ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[14,74]) ).

thf(85,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( rel_d @ sk1 @ A )
      | ( p @ A ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[84]) ).

thf(92,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( p @ A )
      | ( ( rel_d @ sk1 @ sk3 )
       != ( rel_d @ sk1 @ A ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[83,85]) ).

thf(93,plain,
    p @ sk3,
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[92:[bind(A,$thf( sk3 ))]]) ).

thf(108,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ $true ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[65,74,93]) ).

thf(109,plain,
    $false,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[108]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10  % Problem  : SYO462^2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.10/0.12  % Command  : run_Leo-III %s %d
% 0.12/0.32  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.32  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.32  % DateTime : Mon May 20 10:26:09 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.98/0.95  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.28/1.13  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (184ms). 
% 1.28/1.15  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 2.09/1.51  % [INFO] 	 nitpick registered as external prover. 
% 2.09/1.51  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.40/1.68  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 1 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.52/1.71  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 1 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.52/1.71  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 2.52/1.72  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.52/1.72  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 5.30/2.65  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 5.30/2.66  % Time passed: 2177ms (effective reasoning time: 1500ms)
% 5.30/2.66  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 5.30/2.66  % Axioms used in derivation (0): 
% 5.30/2.66  % No. of inferences in proof: 33
% 5.30/2.66  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 2177 ms resp. 1500 ms w/o parsing
% 5.30/2.71  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 5.30/2.71  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------