TSTP Solution File: SYO412^1 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : SYO412^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 08:45:55 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.48s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 13
% Number of leaves : 24
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 61 ( 24 unt; 15 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 232 ( 20 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 90 ( 5 avg)
% Number of connectives : 575 ( 120 ~; 133 |; 23 &; 299 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 33 ( 4 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 66 ( 66 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 17 ( 15 usr; 5 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 67 ( 45 ^ 22 !; 0 ?; 67 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_24,type,
mnot: ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_25,type,
mor: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_26,type,
mand: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_27,type,
mimplies: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_29,type,
mequiv: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_49,type,
mvalid: ( $i > $o ) > $o ).
thf(decl_53,type,
rel_k: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_54,type,
mbox_k: ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_55,type,
mdia_k: ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_56,type,
p: $i > $o ).
thf(decl_57,type,
q: $i > $o ).
thf(decl_58,type,
esk1_0: $i ).
thf(decl_59,type,
esk2_0: $i ).
thf(decl_60,type,
esk3_0: $i ).
thf(decl_61,type,
esk4_0: $i ).
thf(mand,axiom,
( mand
= ( ^ [X6: $i > $o,X7: $i > $o] : ( mnot @ ( mor @ ( mnot @ X6 ) @ ( mnot @ X7 ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL013^0.ax',mand) ).
thf(mnot,axiom,
( mnot
= ( ^ [X6: $i > $o,X3: $i] :
~ ( X6 @ X3 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL013^0.ax',mnot) ).
thf(mor,axiom,
( mor
= ( ^ [X6: $i > $o,X7: $i > $o,X3: $i] :
( ( X6 @ X3 )
| ( X7 @ X3 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL013^0.ax',mor) ).
thf(mimplies,axiom,
( mimplies
= ( ^ [X6: $i > $o,X7: $i > $o] : ( mor @ ( mnot @ X6 ) @ X7 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL013^0.ax',mimplies) ).
thf(mequiv,axiom,
( mequiv
= ( ^ [X6: $i > $o,X7: $i > $o] : ( mand @ ( mimplies @ X6 @ X7 ) @ ( mimplies @ X7 @ X6 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL013^0.ax',mequiv) ).
thf(mdia_k,axiom,
( mdia_k
= ( ^ [X6: $i > $o] : ( mnot @ ( mbox_k @ ( mnot @ X6 ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL013^1.ax',mdia_k) ).
thf(mbox_k,axiom,
( mbox_k
= ( ^ [X6: $i > $o,X3: $i] :
! [X14: $i] :
( ~ ( rel_k @ X3 @ X14 )
| ( X6 @ X14 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL013^1.ax',mbox_k) ).
thf(mvalid,axiom,
( mvalid
= ( ^ [X6: $i > $o] :
! [X3: $i] : ( X6 @ X3 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL013^0.ax',mvalid) ).
thf(prove,conjecture,
mvalid @ ( mequiv @ ( mdia_k @ ( mimplies @ p @ q ) ) @ ( mimplies @ ( mbox_k @ p ) @ ( mdia_k @ q ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove) ).
thf(c_0_9,plain,
( mand
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o,Z2: $i] :
~ ( ~ ( Z0 @ Z2 )
| ~ ( Z1 @ Z2 ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mand]) ).
thf(c_0_10,plain,
( mnot
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i] :
~ ( Z0 @ Z1 ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mnot]) ).
thf(c_0_11,plain,
( mor
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o,Z2: $i] :
( ( Z0 @ Z2 )
| ( Z1 @ Z2 ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mor]) ).
thf(c_0_12,plain,
( mimplies
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o,Z2: $i] :
( ~ ( Z0 @ Z2 )
| ( Z1 @ Z2 ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mimplies]) ).
thf(c_0_13,plain,
( mequiv
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o,Z2: $i] :
~ ( ~ ( ~ ( Z0 @ Z2 )
| ( Z1 @ Z2 ) )
| ~ ( ~ ( Z1 @ Z2 )
| ( Z0 @ Z2 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mequiv]) ).
thf(c_0_14,plain,
( mand
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o,Z2: $i] :
~ ( ~ ( Z0 @ Z2 )
| ~ ( Z1 @ Z2 ) ) ) ),
inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]) ).
thf(c_0_15,plain,
( mimplies
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o,Z2: $i] :
( ~ ( Z0 @ Z2 )
| ( Z1 @ Z2 ) ) ) ),
inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_10]),c_0_11]) ).
thf(c_0_16,plain,
( mdia_k
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i] :
~ ! [X21: $i] :
( ~ ( rel_k @ Z1 @ X21 )
| ~ ( Z0 @ X21 ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mdia_k]) ).
thf(c_0_17,plain,
( mbox_k
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i] :
! [X14: $i] :
( ~ ( rel_k @ Z1 @ X14 )
| ( Z0 @ X14 ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mbox_k]) ).
thf(c_0_18,plain,
( mequiv
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o,Z2: $i] :
~ ( ~ ( ~ ( Z0 @ Z2 )
| ( Z1 @ Z2 ) )
| ~ ( ~ ( Z1 @ Z2 )
| ( Z0 @ Z2 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15]) ).
thf(c_0_19,plain,
( mvalid
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o] :
! [X3: $i] : ( Z0 @ X3 ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mvalid]) ).
thf(c_0_20,plain,
( mdia_k
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i] :
~ ! [X21: $i] :
( ~ ( rel_k @ Z1 @ X21 )
| ~ ( Z0 @ X21 ) ) ) ),
inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_10]),c_0_17]) ).
thf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X25: $i] :
~ ( ~ ( ~ ~ ! [X22: $i] :
( ~ ( rel_k @ X25 @ X22 )
| ~ ( ~ ( p @ X22 )
| ( q @ X22 ) ) )
| ~ ! [X23: $i] :
( ~ ( rel_k @ X25 @ X23 )
| ( p @ X23 ) )
| ~ ! [X24: $i] :
( ~ ( rel_k @ X25 @ X24 )
| ~ ( q @ X24 ) ) )
| ~ ( ~ ( ~ ! [X23: $i] :
( ~ ( rel_k @ X25 @ X23 )
| ( p @ X23 ) )
| ~ ! [X24: $i] :
( ~ ( rel_k @ X25 @ X24 )
| ~ ( q @ X24 ) ) )
| ~ ! [X22: $i] :
( ~ ( rel_k @ X25 @ X22 )
| ~ ( ~ ( p @ X22 )
| ( q @ X22 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove]),c_0_15]),c_0_18]),c_0_19]),c_0_17]),c_0_20])]) ).
thf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
! [X28: $i,X29: $i,X32: $i] :
( ( ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk4_0 )
| ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk3_0 )
| ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) )
& ( ( q @ esk4_0 )
| ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk3_0 )
| ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) )
& ( ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk4_0 )
| ~ ( p @ esk3_0 )
| ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) )
& ( ( q @ esk4_0 )
| ~ ( p @ esk3_0 )
| ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) )
& ( ( p @ X32 )
| ~ ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ X32 )
| ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) )
& ( ~ ( q @ X32 )
| ~ ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ X32 )
| ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) )
& ( ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk4_0 )
| ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk3_0 )
| ~ ( p @ esk2_0 )
| ( q @ esk2_0 ) )
& ( ( q @ esk4_0 )
| ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk3_0 )
| ~ ( p @ esk2_0 )
| ( q @ esk2_0 ) )
& ( ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk4_0 )
| ~ ( p @ esk3_0 )
| ~ ( p @ esk2_0 )
| ( q @ esk2_0 ) )
& ( ( q @ esk4_0 )
| ~ ( p @ esk3_0 )
| ~ ( p @ esk2_0 )
| ( q @ esk2_0 ) )
& ( ( p @ X32 )
| ~ ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ X32 )
| ~ ( p @ esk2_0 )
| ( q @ esk2_0 ) )
& ( ~ ( q @ X32 )
| ~ ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ X32 )
| ~ ( p @ esk2_0 )
| ( q @ esk2_0 ) )
& ( ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk4_0 )
| ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk3_0 )
| ~ ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ X28 )
| ( p @ X28 ) )
& ( ( q @ esk4_0 )
| ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk3_0 )
| ~ ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ X28 )
| ( p @ X28 ) )
& ( ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk4_0 )
| ~ ( p @ esk3_0 )
| ~ ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ X28 )
| ( p @ X28 ) )
& ( ( q @ esk4_0 )
| ~ ( p @ esk3_0 )
| ~ ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ X28 )
| ( p @ X28 ) )
& ( ( p @ X32 )
| ~ ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ X32 )
| ~ ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ X28 )
| ( p @ X28 ) )
& ( ~ ( q @ X32 )
| ~ ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ X32 )
| ~ ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ X28 )
| ( p @ X28 ) )
& ( ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk4_0 )
| ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk3_0 )
| ~ ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ X29 )
| ~ ( q @ X29 ) )
& ( ( q @ esk4_0 )
| ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk3_0 )
| ~ ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ X29 )
| ~ ( q @ X29 ) )
& ( ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk4_0 )
| ~ ( p @ esk3_0 )
| ~ ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ X29 )
| ~ ( q @ X29 ) )
& ( ( q @ esk4_0 )
| ~ ( p @ esk3_0 )
| ~ ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ X29 )
| ~ ( q @ X29 ) )
& ( ( p @ X32 )
| ~ ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ X32 )
| ~ ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ X29 )
| ~ ( q @ X29 ) )
& ( ~ ( q @ X32 )
| ~ ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ X32 )
| ~ ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ X29 )
| ~ ( q @ X29 ) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_21])])])])])]) ).
thf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
! [X3: $i,X14: $i] :
( ~ ( q @ X3 )
| ~ ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ X3 )
| ~ ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ X14 )
| ~ ( q @ X14 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).
thf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
! [X3: $i,X14: $i] :
( ( p @ X3 )
| ( p @ X14 )
| ~ ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ X3 )
| ~ ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ X14 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).
thf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
! [X3: $i] :
( ~ ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ X3 )
| ~ ( q @ X3 ) ),
inference(condense,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).
thf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
( ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk4_0 )
| ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 )
| ~ ( p @ esk3_0 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).
thf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
( ( q @ esk4_0 )
| ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 )
| ~ ( p @ esk3_0 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).
thf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
( ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk4_0 )
| ( q @ esk2_0 )
| ~ ( p @ esk3_0 )
| ~ ( p @ esk2_0 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).
thf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
( ( q @ esk4_0 )
| ( q @ esk2_0 )
| ~ ( p @ esk3_0 )
| ~ ( p @ esk2_0 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).
thf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
! [X3: $i] :
( ( p @ X3 )
| ~ ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ X3 ) ),
inference(condense,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).
thf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
( ( q @ esk4_0 )
| ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk3_0 )
| ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).
thf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
( ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 )
| ~ ( p @ esk3_0 ) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),c_0_27]) ).
thf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
( ( q @ esk4_0 )
| ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk3_0 )
| ( q @ esk2_0 )
| ~ ( p @ esk2_0 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).
thf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
( ( q @ esk2_0 )
| ~ ( p @ esk2_0 )
| ~ ( p @ esk3_0 ) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_28]),c_0_29]) ).
thf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
( ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk4_0 )
| ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk3_0 )
| ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).
thf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
( ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 )
| ( q @ esk4_0 ) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),c_0_32]) ).
thf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
( ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk4_0 )
| ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk3_0 )
| ( q @ esk2_0 )
| ~ ( p @ esk2_0 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).
thf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
( ( q @ esk4_0 )
| ( q @ esk2_0 )
| ~ ( p @ esk2_0 ) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_33]),c_0_34]) ).
thf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
( ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk3_0 )
| ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_35]),c_0_36]) ).
thf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
( ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk3_0 )
| ( q @ esk2_0 )
| ~ ( p @ esk2_0 ) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_37]),c_0_38]) ).
thf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0,
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_39]),c_0_32]) ).
thf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
( ( q @ esk2_0 )
| ~ ( p @ esk2_0 ) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_40]),c_0_34]) ).
thf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
p @ esk2_0,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_41]) ).
thf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
~ ( q @ esk2_0 ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_41]) ).
thf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_43])]),c_0_44]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11 % Problem : SYO412^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Mon May 20 10:58:08 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.46 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.46 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.48 # Version: 3.1.0-ho
% 0.19/0.48 # Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLMNHSN.
% 0.19/0.48 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting almost_fo_3_lam with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting post_as_ho1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # ehoh_best2_full_lfho with pid 11706 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Result found by ehoh_best2_full_lfho
% 0.19/0.48 # Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLMNHSN.
% 0.19/0.48 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.19/0.48 # Search class: HGHNF-FFMF00-SHSSMFNN
% 0.19/0.48 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting new_ho_10 with 163s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # new_ho_10 with pid 11710 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Result found by new_ho_10
% 0.19/0.48 # Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLMNHSN.
% 0.19/0.48 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.19/0.48 # Search class: HGHNF-FFMF00-SHSSMFNN
% 0.19/0.48 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting new_ho_10 with 163s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.19/0.48 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.19/0.48
% 0.19/0.48 # Proof found!
% 0.19/0.48 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.48 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.48 # Parsed axioms : 71
% 0.19/0.48 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Initial clauses : 61
% 0.19/0.48 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 37
% 0.19/0.48 # Initial clauses in saturation : 24
% 0.19/0.48 # Processed clauses : 55
% 0.19/0.48 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # ...subsumed : 8
% 0.19/0.48 # ...remaining for further processing : 47
% 0.19/0.48 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Backward-subsumed : 25
% 0.19/0.48 # Backward-rewritten : 6
% 0.19/0.48 # Generated clauses : 30
% 0.19/0.48 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 30
% 0.19/0.48 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 9
% 0.19/0.48 # Paramodulations : 30
% 0.19/0.48 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # NegExts : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Total rewrite steps : 5
% 0.19/0.48 # ...of those cached : 2
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48 # Current number of processed clauses : 6
% 0.19/0.48 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 3
% 0.19/0.48 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.19/0.48 # Non-unit-clauses : 2
% 0.19/0.48 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 3
% 0.19/0.48 # ...number of literals in the above : 7
% 0.19/0.48 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Current number of archived clauses : 41
% 0.19/0.48 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 63
% 0.19/0.48 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 51
% 0.19/0.48 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 40
% 0.19/0.48 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5
% 0.19/0.48 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # BW rewrite match attempts : 3
% 0.19/0.48 # BW rewrite match successes : 3
% 0.19/0.48 # Condensation attempts : 55
% 0.19/0.48 # Condensation successes : 2
% 0.19/0.48 # Termbank termtop insertions : 3508
% 0.19/0.48 # Search garbage collected termcells : 627
% 0.19/0.48
% 0.19/0.48 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.48 # User time : 0.008 s
% 0.19/0.48 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.19/0.48 # Total time : 0.010 s
% 0.19/0.48 # Maximum resident set size: 1912 pages
% 0.19/0.48
% 0.19/0.48 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.48 # User time : 0.012 s
% 0.19/0.48 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.19/0.48 # Total time : 0.015 s
% 0.19/0.48 # Maximum resident set size: 1800 pages
% 0.19/0.48 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.19/0.48 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------