TSTP Solution File: SYO360^5 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : SYO360^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 09:04:08 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.13s 0.37s
% Output : Refutation 0.13s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 22 ( 8 unt; 9 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 23 ( 22 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 77 ( 9 ~; 0 |; 8 &; 58 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 1 usr)
% Number of type conns : 14 ( 14 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 9 ( 7 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 19 ( 0 ^ 18 !; 0 ?; 19 :)
% ( 1 !>; 0 ?*; 0 @-; 0 @+)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
a: $tType ).
thf(func_def_0,type,
a: $tType ).
thf(func_def_1,type,
j: a > a ).
thf(func_def_2,type,
g: ( a > a ) > a > a ).
thf(func_def_3,type,
h: a > a ).
thf(func_def_4,type,
f: ( a > a ) > a > a ).
thf(func_def_9,type,
ph1:
!>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).
thf(func_def_10,type,
sK2: a ).
thf(func_def_11,type,
sK3: a ).
thf(f14,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f13,f9]) ).
thf(f9,plain,
! [X0: a] :
( ( j @ X0 )
= ( h @ X0 ) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).
thf(f6,plain,
( ! [X0: a] :
( ( j @ X0 )
= ( h @ X0 ) )
& ! [X1: a,X2: a > a] :
( ( f @ X2 @ X1 )
= ( g @ X2 @ X1 ) )
& ( ( f @ h )
!= ( g @ j ) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f5]) ).
thf(f5,plain,
( ! [X2: a] :
( ( h @ X2 )
= ( j @ X2 ) )
& ! [X1: a,X0: a > a] :
( ( f @ X0 @ X1 )
= ( g @ X0 @ X1 ) )
& ( ( f @ h )
!= ( g @ j ) ) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f4]) ).
thf(f4,plain,
( ( ( f @ h )
!= ( g @ j ) )
& ! [X2: a] :
( ( h @ X2 )
= ( j @ X2 ) )
& ! [X1: a,X0: a > a] :
( ( f @ X0 @ X1 )
= ( g @ X0 @ X1 ) ) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).
thf(f2,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ( ! [X2: a] :
( ( h @ X2 )
= ( j @ X2 ) )
& ! [X1: a,X0: a > a] :
( ( f @ X0 @ X1 )
= ( g @ X0 @ X1 ) ) )
=> ( ( f @ h )
= ( g @ j ) ) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).
thf(f1,conjecture,
( ( ! [X2: a] :
( ( h @ X2 )
= ( j @ X2 ) )
& ! [X1: a,X0: a > a] :
( ( f @ X0 @ X1 )
= ( g @ X0 @ X1 ) ) )
=> ( ( f @ h )
= ( g @ j ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cEDEC1) ).
thf(f13,plain,
( ( j @ sK3 )
!= ( h @ sK3 ) ),
inference(negative_extensionality,[],[f12]) ).
thf(f12,plain,
h != j,
inference(equality_resolution,[],[f11]) ).
thf(f11,plain,
( ( g @ h @ sK2 )
!= ( g @ j @ sK2 ) ),
inference(superposition,[],[f10,f8]) ).
thf(f8,plain,
! [X2: a > a,X1: a] :
( ( f @ X2 @ X1 )
= ( g @ X2 @ X1 ) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).
thf(f10,plain,
( ( f @ h @ sK2 )
!= ( g @ j @ sK2 ) ),
inference(negative_extensionality,[],[f7]) ).
thf(f7,plain,
( ( f @ h )
!= ( g @ j ) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SYO360^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.13/0.14 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Mon May 20 10:12:37 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.35 This is a TH0_THM_EQU_NAR problem
% 0.13/0.35 Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.37 % (31324)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/183Mi)
% 0.13/0.37 % (31325)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/4Mi)
% 0.13/0.37 % (31326)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/27Mi)
% 0.13/0.37 % (31327)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.13/0.37 % (31329)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/275Mi)
% 0.13/0.37 % (31330)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/18Mi)
% 0.13/0.37 % (31329)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.13/0.37 % (31329)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.37 % (31329)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.13/0.37 % (31329)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 % (31325)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.13/0.37 % (31325)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.37 % (31325)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.13/0.37 % (31325)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 % (31325)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.13/0.37 % (31325)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.13/0.37 % (31325)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.13/0.37 % (31324)First to succeed.
% 0.13/0.37 % (31325)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.37 % (31325)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.37 % (31327)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.13/0.37 % (31327)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.37 % (31327)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.13/0.37 % (31327)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 % (31327)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.13/0.37 % (31327)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.13/0.37 % (31327)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.13/0.37 % (31327)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.37 % (31327)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 % (31329)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.13/0.37 % (31326)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.13/0.37 % (31326)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.37 % (31326)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.13/0.37 % (31329)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.13/0.37 % (31326)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 % (31326)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.13/0.37 % (31326)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.13/0.37 % (31326)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.13/0.37 % (31326)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.37 % (31326)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.37 % (31329)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.13/0.37 % (31329)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.37 % (31329)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.37 % (31324)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.13/0.37 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.13/0.37 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.13/0.38 % (31324)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.38 % (31324)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.13/0.38 % (31324)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.13/0.38
% 0.13/0.38 % (31324)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.13/0.38 % (31324)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.13/0.38 % (31324)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.13/0.38 % (31324)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.38 % (31324)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.38 % (31323)Success in time 0.005 s
% 0.13/0.38 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------