TSTP Solution File: SYO359^5 by cocATP---0.2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : cocATP---0.2.0
% Problem  : SYO359^5 : TPTP v7.5.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python CASC.py /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 0s
% DateTime : Tue Mar 29 00:51:14 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.60s 0.81s
% Output   : Proof 0.60s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem    : SYO359^5 : TPTP v7.5.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : python CASC.py /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.32  % Computer   : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32  % Model      : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPUModel   : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32  % RAMPerCPU  : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32  % OS         : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime   : Sat Mar 12 06:51:07 EST 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.12/0.33  ModuleCmd_Load.c(213):ERROR:105: Unable to locate a modulefile for 'python/python27'
% 0.12/0.34  Python 2.7.5
% 0.60/0.81  Using paths ['/home/cristobal/cocATP/CASC/TPTP/', '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/', '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/']
% 0.60/0.81  FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x2ae5a66cc560>, <kernel.Type object at 0x2ae5a66cc998>) of role type named b_type
% 0.60/0.81  Using role type
% 0.60/0.81  Declaring b:Type
% 0.60/0.81  FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x130b488>, <kernel.Type object at 0x2ae5a66cc680>) of role type named g_type
% 0.60/0.81  Using role type
% 0.60/0.81  Declaring gtype:Type
% 0.60/0.81  FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x2ae5a66cca28>, <kernel.DependentProduct object at 0x2ae5a66cccf8>) of role type named g
% 0.60/0.81  Using role type
% 0.60/0.81  Declaring g:(b->Prop)
% 0.60/0.81  FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x2ae5a66ccb90>, <kernel.DependentProduct object at 0x2ae5a66eaa70>) of role type named h
% 0.60/0.81  Using role type
% 0.60/0.81  Declaring h:((b->Prop)->gtype)
% 0.60/0.81  FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x2ae5a66cc998>, <kernel.DependentProduct object at 0x2ae5a66eaa70>) of role type named f
% 0.60/0.81  Using role type
% 0.60/0.81  Declaring f:(b->Prop)
% 0.60/0.81  FOF formula (((forall (Xx:b), ((iff (f Xx)) (g Xx)))->(forall (Xq:((b->Prop)->Prop)), ((Xq f)->(Xq g))))->((forall (Xx:b), ((iff (f Xx)) (g Xx)))->(((eq gtype) (h f)) (h g)))) of role conjecture named cEXT1
% 0.60/0.81  Conjecture to prove = (((forall (Xx:b), ((iff (f Xx)) (g Xx)))->(forall (Xq:((b->Prop)->Prop)), ((Xq f)->(Xq g))))->((forall (Xx:b), ((iff (f Xx)) (g Xx)))->(((eq gtype) (h f)) (h g)))):Prop
% 0.60/0.81  Parameter b_DUMMY:b.
% 0.60/0.81  Parameter gtype_DUMMY:gtype.
% 0.60/0.81  We need to prove ['(((forall (Xx:b), ((iff (f Xx)) (g Xx)))->(forall (Xq:((b->Prop)->Prop)), ((Xq f)->(Xq g))))->((forall (Xx:b), ((iff (f Xx)) (g Xx)))->(((eq gtype) (h f)) (h g))))']
% 0.60/0.81  Parameter b:Type.
% 0.60/0.81  Parameter gtype:Type.
% 0.60/0.81  Parameter g:(b->Prop).
% 0.60/0.81  Parameter h:((b->Prop)->gtype).
% 0.60/0.81  Parameter f:(b->Prop).
% 0.60/0.81  Trying to prove (((forall (Xx:b), ((iff (f Xx)) (g Xx)))->(forall (Xq:((b->Prop)->Prop)), ((Xq f)->(Xq g))))->((forall (Xx:b), ((iff (f Xx)) (g Xx)))->(((eq gtype) (h f)) (h g))))
% 0.60/0.81  Found x10:=(x1 (fun (x2:(b->Prop))=> (P (h x2)))):((P (h f))->(P (h g)))
% 0.60/0.81  Found (x1 (fun (x2:(b->Prop))=> (P (h x2)))) as proof of ((P (h f))->(P (h g)))
% 0.60/0.81  Found ((x x0) (fun (x2:(b->Prop))=> (P (h x2)))) as proof of ((P (h f))->(P (h g)))
% 0.60/0.81  Found (fun (P:(gtype->Prop))=> ((x x0) (fun (x2:(b->Prop))=> (P (h x2))))) as proof of ((P (h f))->(P (h g)))
% 0.60/0.81  Found (fun (x0:(forall (Xx:b), ((iff (f Xx)) (g Xx)))) (P:(gtype->Prop))=> ((x x0) (fun (x2:(b->Prop))=> (P (h x2))))) as proof of (((eq gtype) (h f)) (h g))
% 0.60/0.81  Found (fun (x:((forall (Xx:b), ((iff (f Xx)) (g Xx)))->(forall (Xq:((b->Prop)->Prop)), ((Xq f)->(Xq g))))) (x0:(forall (Xx:b), ((iff (f Xx)) (g Xx)))) (P:(gtype->Prop))=> ((x x0) (fun (x2:(b->Prop))=> (P (h x2))))) as proof of ((forall (Xx:b), ((iff (f Xx)) (g Xx)))->(((eq gtype) (h f)) (h g)))
% 0.60/0.81  Found (fun (x:((forall (Xx:b), ((iff (f Xx)) (g Xx)))->(forall (Xq:((b->Prop)->Prop)), ((Xq f)->(Xq g))))) (x0:(forall (Xx:b), ((iff (f Xx)) (g Xx)))) (P:(gtype->Prop))=> ((x x0) (fun (x2:(b->Prop))=> (P (h x2))))) as proof of (((forall (Xx:b), ((iff (f Xx)) (g Xx)))->(forall (Xq:((b->Prop)->Prop)), ((Xq f)->(Xq g))))->((forall (Xx:b), ((iff (f Xx)) (g Xx)))->(((eq gtype) (h f)) (h g))))
% 0.60/0.81  Got proof (fun (x:((forall (Xx:b), ((iff (f Xx)) (g Xx)))->(forall (Xq:((b->Prop)->Prop)), ((Xq f)->(Xq g))))) (x0:(forall (Xx:b), ((iff (f Xx)) (g Xx)))) (P:(gtype->Prop))=> ((x x0) (fun (x2:(b->Prop))=> (P (h x2)))))
% 0.60/0.81  Time elapsed = 0.183153s
% 0.60/0.81  node=24 cost=-53.000000 depth=5
% 0.60/0.81  ::::::::::::::::::::::
% 0.60/0.81  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.60/0.81  % SZS output start Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.60/0.81  (fun (x:((forall (Xx:b), ((iff (f Xx)) (g Xx)))->(forall (Xq:((b->Prop)->Prop)), ((Xq f)->(Xq g))))) (x0:(forall (Xx:b), ((iff (f Xx)) (g Xx)))) (P:(gtype->Prop))=> ((x x0) (fun (x2:(b->Prop))=> (P (h x2)))))
% 0.60/0.81  % SZS output end Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------