TSTP Solution File: SYO356^5 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : SYO356^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 08:45:42 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.18s 0.45s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 14 ( 4 unt; 5 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 12 ( 7 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 73 ( 6 ~; 3 |; 2 &; 56 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 5 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 1 usr)
% Number of type conns : 18 ( 18 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 6 ( 4 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 18 ( 8 ^ 10 !; 0 ?; 18 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_sort1,type,
a: $tType ).
thf(decl_22,type,
v: a ).
thf(decl_23,type,
u: a ).
thf(decl_24,type,
esk1_1: ( a > a > $o ) > a ).
thf(decl_25,type,
epred1_0: a > $o ).
thf(cE1LEIBEQ2_pme,conjecture,
( ! [X1: a > a > $o] :
( ! [X2: a] : ( X1 @ X2 @ X2 )
=> ( X1 @ u @ v ) )
=> ! [X3: a > $o] :
( ( X3 @ u )
=> ( X3 @ v ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cE1LEIBEQ2_pme) ).
thf(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ! [X1: a > a > $o] :
( ! [X2: a] : ( X1 @ X2 @ X2 )
=> ( X1 @ u @ v ) )
=> ! [X3: a > $o] :
( ( X3 @ u )
=> ( X3 @ v ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cE1LEIBEQ2_pme]) ).
thf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
! [X7: a > a > $o] :
( ( ~ ( X7 @ ( esk1_1 @ X7 ) @ ( esk1_1 @ X7 ) )
| ( X7 @ u @ v ) )
& ( epred1_0 @ u )
& ~ ( epred1_0 @ v ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])]) ).
thf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: a > a > $o] :
( ( X1 @ u @ v )
| ~ ( X1 @ ( esk1_1 @ X1 ) @ ( esk1_1 @ X1 ) ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
thf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
! [X10: a > a > a,X11: a > a > a] :
( ( ( X10 @ u @ v )
= ( X11 @ u @ v ) )
| ( ( X10
@ ( esk1_1
@ ^ [Z0: a,Z1: a] :
( ( X10 @ Z0 @ Z1 )
= ( X11 @ Z0 @ Z1 ) ) )
@ ( esk1_1
@ ^ [Z0: a,Z1: a] :
( ( X10 @ Z0 @ Z1 )
= ( X11 @ Z0 @ Z1 ) ) ) )
!= ( X11
@ ( esk1_1
@ ^ [Z0: a,Z1: a] :
( ( X10 @ Z0 @ Z1 )
= ( X11 @ Z0 @ Z1 ) ) )
@ ( esk1_1
@ ^ [Z0: a,Z1: a] :
( ( X10 @ Z0 @ Z1 )
= ( X11 @ Z0 @ Z1 ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(primitive_enumeration,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[]),c_0_3]) ).
thf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ ( epred1_0 @ v ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
thf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
v = u,
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
thf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
epred1_0 @ u,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
thf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.01/0.11 % Problem : SYO356^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.01/0.12 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Mon May 20 08:49:23 EDT 2024
% 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.44 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.18/0.44 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.45 # Version: 3.1.0-ho
% 0.18/0.45 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
% 0.18/0.45 # Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.45 # Starting post_as_ho12 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.45 # Starting new_bool_9 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.45 # Starting post_as_ho1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.45 # Starting post_as_ho4 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.45 # Starting post_as_ho2 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.45 # Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.45 # Starting full_lambda_10 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.45 # Starting new_ho_8 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.45 # post_as_ho12 with pid 25146 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.45 # Result found by post_as_ho12
% 0.18/0.45 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
% 0.18/0.45 # Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.45 # Starting post_as_ho12 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.45 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.18/0.45 # Search class: HHUNF-FFSF11-SSSFFSBN
% 0.18/0.45 # partial match(1): HGUNF-FFSF11-SSSFFSBN
% 0.18/0.45 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.18/0.45 # Starting new_ho_10 with 90s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.45 # new_ho_10 with pid 25155 completed with status 9
% 0.18/0.45 # Starting post_as_ho12 with 31s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.45 # post_as_ho12 with pid 25166 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.45 # Result found by post_as_ho12
% 0.18/0.45 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
% 0.18/0.45 # Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.45 # Starting post_as_ho12 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.45 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.18/0.45 # Search class: HHUNF-FFSF11-SSSFFSBN
% 0.18/0.45 # partial match(1): HGUNF-FFSF11-SSSFFSBN
% 0.18/0.45 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.18/0.45 # Starting new_ho_10 with 90s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.45 # new_ho_10 with pid 25155 completed with status 9
% 0.18/0.45 # Starting post_as_ho12 with 31s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.45 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.18/0.45 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.18/0.45
% 0.18/0.45 # Proof found!
% 0.18/0.45 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.18/0.45 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.45 # Parsed axioms : 4
% 0.18/0.45 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.18/0.45 # Initial clauses : 6
% 0.18/0.45 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 3
% 0.18/0.45 # Initial clauses in saturation : 3
% 0.18/0.45 # Processed clauses : 8
% 0.18/0.45 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.18/0.45 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.18/0.45 # ...remaining for further processing : 8
% 0.18/0.45 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.18/0.45 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.18/0.45 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.18/0.45 # Backward-rewritten : 3
% 0.18/0.45 # Generated clauses : 8
% 0.18/0.45 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 5
% 0.18/0.45 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.18/0.45 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.18/0.45 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.18/0.45 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.18/0.45 # NegExts : 0
% 0.18/0.45 # Equation resolutions : 5
% 0.18/0.45 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.18/0.45 # Total rewrite steps : 5
% 0.18/0.45 # ...of those cached : 3
% 0.18/0.45 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.18/0.45 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.18/0.45 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.18/0.45 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.18/0.45 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.18/0.45 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.18/0.45 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.45 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.45 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.45 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.45 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.45 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.45 # Current number of processed clauses : 2
% 0.18/0.45 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 0.18/0.45 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.18/0.45 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.18/0.45 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.18/0.45 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1
% 0.18/0.45 # ...number of literals in the above : 1
% 0.18/0.45 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.18/0.45 # Current number of archived clauses : 6
% 0.18/0.45 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.18/0.45 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.18/0.45 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.18/0.45 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.18/0.45 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.18/0.45 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.18/0.45 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.18/0.45 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.18/0.45 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.18/0.45 # Termbank termtop insertions : 716
% 0.18/0.45 # Search garbage collected termcells : 87
% 0.18/0.45
% 0.18/0.45 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.45 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.18/0.45 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.18/0.45 # Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.18/0.45 # Maximum resident set size: 1756 pages
% 0.18/0.45
% 0.18/0.45 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.45 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.18/0.45 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.18/0.45 # Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.18/0.45 # Maximum resident set size: 1712 pages
% 0.18/0.45 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.18/0.45 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------