TSTP Solution File: SYO288^5 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : SYO288^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 09:03:49 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.15s 0.41s
% Output   : Refutation 0.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.14  % Problem    : SYO288^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.14/0.16  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.37  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.37  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.37  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.37  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.37  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.37  % DateTime   : Mon May 20 10:59:53 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.38  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.38  This is a TH0_THM_NEQ_NAR problem
% 0.15/0.38  Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.39  % (698)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/4Mi)
% 0.15/0.39  % (704)lrs+10_1:1_bet=on:cnfonf=off:fd=off:hud=5:inj=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/3Mi)
% 0.15/0.39  % (698)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.15/0.39  % (698)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39  % (698)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.39  % (698)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.15/0.39  % (698)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.15/0.39  
% 0.15/0.39  % (698)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.15/0.39  % (698)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.39  % (698)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 0.15/0.39  % (698)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39  % (698)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39  % (704)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.15/0.39  % (704)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39  % (704)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.39  % (704)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.15/0.39  % (704)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.15/0.39  
% 0.15/0.39  % (704)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.15/0.39  % (704)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.39  % (704)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.15/0.39  % (704)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39  % (704)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39  % (702)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/275Mi)
% 0.15/0.39  % (703)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/18Mi)
% 0.15/0.39  % (699)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/27Mi)
% 0.15/0.40  % (697)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/183Mi)
% 0.15/0.40  % (701)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.15/0.40  % (700)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.15/0.40  % (699)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.15/0.40  % (699)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.40  % (699)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.40  % (699)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.15/0.40  
% 0.15/0.40  
% 0.15/0.40  % (699)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.15/0.40  % (699)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.40  % (699)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.15/0.40  % (699)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.40  % (699)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.40  % (700)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.15/0.40  % (700)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.40  % (700)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.40  % (700)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.15/0.40  % (700)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.15/0.40  % (701)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.15/0.40  % (701)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.40  % (701)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.40  % (701)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.15/0.40  % (701)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.15/0.40  
% 0.15/0.40  % (701)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.15/0.40  % (701)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.40  % (701)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.15/0.40  % (701)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.40  % (701)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.40  
% 0.15/0.40  % (700)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.15/0.40  % (700)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.40  % (700)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.15/0.40  % (700)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.40  % (700)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.40  % (702)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.15/0.40  % (702)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.40  % (702)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.40  % (702)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.15/0.40  
% 0.15/0.40  
% 0.15/0.40  % (702)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.15/0.40  % (702)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.15/0.40  % (702)Instructions burned: 6 (million)
% 0.15/0.40  % (702)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.40  % (702)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.40  % (703)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.15/0.40  % (703)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.40  % (703)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.40  % (703)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.15/0.40  % (703)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.15/0.40  
% 0.15/0.40  % (703)Memory used [KB]: 5628
% 0.15/0.40  % (703)Time elapsed: 0.011 s
% 0.15/0.40  % (703)Instructions burned: 19 (million)
% 0.15/0.40  % (703)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.40  % (703)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.41  % (705)lrs+1002_1:1_cnfonf=lazy_not_be_gen:hud=14:prag=on:sp=weighted_frequency:tnu=1:i=37:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/37Mi)
% 0.15/0.41  % (706)lrs+2_16:1_acc=model:au=on:bd=off:c=on:e2e=on:nm=2:sos=all:i=15:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/15Mi)
% 0.15/0.41  % (705)First to succeed.
% 0.15/0.41  % (708)lrs+1002_1:1_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_gen:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=4203469,65536:i=1041:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/1041Mi)
% 0.15/0.41  % (707)dis+21_1:1_cbe=off:cnfonf=off:fs=off:fsr=off:hud=1:inj=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.15/0.41  % (710)lrs+10_1:1_acc=on:amm=sco:cs=on:tgt=full:i=16:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/16Mi)
% 0.15/0.41  % (705)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.15/0.41  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.15/0.41  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.15/0.41  thf(func_def_0, type, cB: $i > $i > $o).
% 0.15/0.41  thf(func_def_1, type, cA: $i > $o).
% 0.15/0.41  thf(func_def_15, type, ph1: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)).
% 0.15/0.41  thf(func_def_16, type, sK2: ($i > $i > $o) > $i).
% 0.15/0.41  thf(f20,plain,(
% 0.15/0.41    $false),
% 0.15/0.41    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f12])).
% 0.15/0.41  thf(f12,plain,(
% 0.15/0.41    ( ! [X1 : $i > $i > $o] : ((((cB @ (sK2 @ X1) @ (sK2 @ X1)) & (cA @ (sK2 @ X1))) != (X1 @ (sK2 @ X1) @ c0))) )),
% 0.15/0.41    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f11])).
% 0.15/0.41  thf(f11,plain,(
% 0.15/0.41    ( ! [X1 : $i > $i > $o] : (($false = ((X1 @ (sK2 @ X1) @ c0) = ((cB @ (sK2 @ X1) @ (sK2 @ X1)) & (cA @ (sK2 @ X1)))))) )),
% 0.15/0.41    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f10])).
% 0.15/0.41  thf(f10,plain,(
% 0.15/0.41    ( ! [X1 : $i > $i > $o] : ((((^[Y0 : $i]: ((X1 @ Y0 @ c0) = ((cB @ Y0 @ Y0) & (cA @ Y0)))) @ (sK2 @ X1)) = $false)) )),
% 0.15/0.41    inference(sigma_clausification,[],[f9])).
% 0.15/0.41  thf(f9,plain,(
% 0.15/0.41    ( ! [X1 : $i > $i > $o] : (($false = (!! @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((X1 @ Y0 @ c0) = ((cB @ Y0 @ Y0) & (cA @ Y0))))))) )),
% 0.15/0.41    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f8])).
% 0.15/0.41  thf(f8,plain,(
% 0.15/0.41    ( ! [X1 : $i > $i > $o] : (($false = ((^[Y0 : $i > $i > $o]: (!! @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: ((Y0 @ Y1 @ c0) = ((cB @ Y1 @ Y1) & (cA @ Y1)))))) @ X1))) )),
% 0.15/0.41    inference(pi_clausification,[],[f7])).
% 0.15/0.41  thf(f7,plain,(
% 0.15/0.41    ($false = (?? @ ($i > $i > $o) @ (^[Y0 : $i > $i > $o]: (!! @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: ((Y0 @ Y1 @ c0) = ((cB @ Y1 @ Y1) & (cA @ Y1))))))))),
% 0.15/0.41    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f6])).
% 0.15/0.41  thf(f6,plain,(
% 0.15/0.41    ((~ (?? @ ($i > $i > $o) @ (^[Y0 : $i > $i > $o]: (!! @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: ((Y0 @ Y1 @ c0) = ((cB @ Y1 @ Y1) & (cA @ Y1)))))))) = $true)),
% 0.15/0.41    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5])).
% 0.15/0.41  thf(f5,plain,(
% 0.15/0.41    ((~ (?? @ ($i > $i > $o) @ (^[Y0 : $i > $i > $o]: (!! @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: ((Y0 @ Y1 @ c0) = ((cB @ Y1 @ Y1) & (cA @ Y1)))))))) = $true)),
% 0.15/0.41    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f4])).
% 0.15/0.41  thf(f4,plain,(
% 0.15/0.41    ~? [X0 : $i > $i > $o] : ! [X1] : ((X0 @ X1 @ c0) <=> ((cA @ X1) & (cB @ X1 @ X1)))),
% 0.15/0.41    inference(rectify,[],[f2])).
% 0.15/0.41  thf(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 0.15/0.41    ~? [X0 : $i > $i > $o] : ! [X1] : ((X0 @ X1 @ c0) <=> ((cA @ X1) & (cB @ X1 @ X1)))),
% 0.15/0.41    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1])).
% 0.15/0.41  thf(f1,conjecture,(
% 0.15/0.41    ? [X0 : $i > $i > $o] : ! [X1] : ((X0 @ X1 @ c0) <=> ((cA @ X1) & (cB @ X1 @ X1)))),
% 0.15/0.41    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cSV10)).
% 0.15/0.41  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.15/0.41  % (705)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.41  % (705)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.41  % (705)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.15/0.41  
% 0.15/0.41  % (705)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.15/0.41  % (705)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.15/0.41  % (705)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.15/0.41  % (705)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.41  % (705)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.41  % (696)Success in time 0.039 s
% 0.15/0.42  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------